https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.97919

Iranian Medical Tourism Industry and Selected Countries in 2020: A Comparative Study

authors:

avatar Khalil Momeni 1 , avatar Ali Jannati ORCID 2 , 3 , avatar Rahim Khodayari-Zarnaq ORCID 2 , avatar Shabnam Ghasemyani ORCID 4 , 5 , * , avatar Mohamadreza Havasian 6

Department of Public Health, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Department of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Health Management and Economic Research Center,Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Student Research Committee, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
Health Scope: Vol.10, issue 1; e97919
published online: February 25, 2021
article type: Review Article
received: March 2, 2020
revised: November 28, 2020
accepted: December 7, 2020

how to cite: Momeni K, Jannati A, Khodayari-Zarnaq R, Ghasemyani S, Havasian M. Iranian Medical Tourism Industry and Selected Countries in 2020: A Comparative Study. Health Scope. 2021;10(1):e97919. https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.97919.

Abstract

Background:

Today, medical tourism is a growing phenomenon in the healthcare industry, especially among developing countries.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to compare the Iranian medical tourism industry with selected countries.

Methods:

This comparative study was conducted in 2020. Data were gathered from databases, including PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Magiran, SID, and websites of the World Tourism Association, the Ministry of Tourism, and the Ministry of Health of the selected countries from 2000 to 2020. A researcher-made checklist was used to collect data. Selected countries were compared in terms of the status of tourism and travel competitiveness, governance and policy-making status, the status of the medical tourism industry, and medical tourism infrastructure

Results:

The main difference between the selected countries and Iran lies in the organizational structure of the main stakeholders of the tourism industry. In other countries, this industry is organized and supervised by specific coordination bodies. In terms of tourism and travel competitiveness, Singapore, with a global rank of 17, was better than other countries. Based on the status of the medical tourism industry, Costa Rica ranked 7th in the world, and Singapore, the UAE (Dubai), Turkey, UAE (Abu Dhabi), Jordan, and Iran ranked 15, 22, 27, 31 35, and 41, respectively. In Iran, all indicators of medical tourism infrastructure were lower than those of other countries except for competitive prices.

Conclusions:

Considering a low rank of Iran in all the studied components, the organizational integration structure of the medical tourism industry and increasing competitiveness can help the development of this industry in Iran.

1. Background

Medical tourism is a growing phenomenon with a bright future. Nowadays, countries with tourist attractions are investing in medical tourism, so that attracting foreign tourists has become a growing competition among the organizations involved in the tourism industry (1-5). The globalization of health services has created a new kind of tourism, which is commonly known as health tourism (6). Features, such as the existence of multidisciplinary hospitals, competitive prices, and international quality of global standards, are effective in advancing the globalization of healthcare (7). Advances in medical technology and therapeutic procedures have led to the development of medical tourism during the twentieth century (8). Medical tourism, which is a search for medical services beyond national boundaries is defined as a process, in which medical tourists travel to new places seeking treatment and care (9-14). The payments for these services are usually out of pocket (15).

Medical tourism is not a new phenomenon. In the past, the wealthy patient from developing countries has traveled to developed countries in order to access medical services that were unavailable in their countries. However, today, the reverse trend in medical tourism from the developed world to the developing countries has been created to receive health services, such as cardiac, plastic, and orthopedic surgery and infertility treatments (16-26). The main reasons for medical tourism include the high cost of medical treatment, long waiting lists, lack of qualified doctors, the lack of access to necessary services, and high technology in the country of origin (6, 7, 21, 22, 27-29). Moreover, investing in this sector can increase income, improve services, bring foreign exchange earnings, and promote general tourism (6).

Despite the legal framework for medical tourism development in Iran, this industry is currently facing several challenges. These challenges are lack of specific medical tourism structure at the international, national, and regional levels, the lack of a medical tourism system, definition and formulation of laws, policies, and plans, the lack of infrastructure, and the lack of supervision system. Some other difficulties are weaknesses in the management process and designing benefit packages provided to medical tourists, such as uncertain prices, particularly in the private sector, the lack of insurance coverage, the lack of governmental support for private sector investment, and the lack of a clear marketing system (30, 31).

2. Objectives

This study aimed at comparing the medical tourism industry based on general profile, the competitiveness of tourism and travel, governance and policy, the status of medical tourism, and medical tourism infrastructure in Iran with selected countries.

3. Methods

This was a comparative study conducted in 2020. The data collection was conducted by searching valid sources, including PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Magiran, SID, Google search engine, and Google Scholar, and also the websites of the World Tourism Association, Ministry of Tourism, and the Ministry of Health of the selected countries. The search was performed using the keywords of medical tourism, health tourism, health travel, and medical travel combined with countries’ names. An example of the search strategy using PubMed is as follows: ("medical tourism"[title/abstract]) or ("health tourism"[title / abstract])) or ("medical travel"[title/abstract])) or (health travel [title/abstract]) and (Singapore [title / abstract]) or (Turkey [title / abstract]) or (Costa Rica [title / abstract]) or (Jordan [title / abstract]) or ("United Arab Emirates" [title / abstract]) or (Iran [title / abstract])

The needed data published from 2000 to 2020 were collected. Inclusion criteria for studies were 1- All articles and reports related to medical tourism in selected countries, 2- articles published between 2000 and 2020, and 3- articles published in English and Persian language. Reports and articles that were inconsistent with the objectives of the study were excluded. The search strategy to obtain studies is summarized in Figure 1.

Flow diagram of our review process (PRISMA)
Flow diagram of our review process (PRISMA)
Figure 1.

Flow diagram of our review process (PRISMA)

The inclusion criteria for countries were the development status of countries, developing countries located in the different continent, and being a top destination for medical tourism. Furthermore, Iran's neighboring countries that are Muslim have similarities to Iran (Turkey, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)) and have organized activities in the field of medical tourism and also Singapore ((Asia-Pacific) since it is the world's oldest country in the field of medical tourism) were selected for comparison. Upon reviewing the literature, on the basis of inclusion criteria, six countries were selected purposefully, including Singapore, Turkey, Costa Rica, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, and Iran.

After the literature review, the variables related to the medical tourism industry were identified, and data gathered using a researcher-made checklist. The extracted data were classified according to the analysis components and then were organized as comparative tables. The comparative table was completed for the six selected countries. Comparative tables included components, such as general profile, tourism and travel competitiveness, governance and policy, the status of the medical tourism industry, and medical tourism infrastructure in selected countries. The framework analysis based on the identified components was used to analyze the data.

4. Results

The comparative findings are presented in five sections: general profiles, tourism competitiveness, policy-making and governance of medical tourism, the status of the medical tourism industry, and the medical tourism infrastructure of the selected countries.

4.1. General Profile of the Selected Countries

As shown in Table 1, Turkey, with a population of about 84.33 million, and Costa Rica, with a population of 5.09 million, had the highest and lowest populations, respectively.

Table 1.

General Profile of the Selected Countries

CountryContinentPopulation (Million People)(2019) (32)CurrencyFormal Language
SingaporeAsia5.85Singapore dollar (SGD)Language: Chinese, Malay, and English. But the official business language in Singapore is English
TurkeyEurope84.33Lira (TRY)Turkish
Costa RicaAmerica5.09Colon (CRC)Spanish
JordanAsia10.203DinarArabic
United Arab EmiratesAsia9.89DirhamArabic
IranAsia83.992RialPersian

4.2. The Competitiveness of Tourism and Travel of Selected Countries

As is shown in Table 2, the Singapore (rank 7th) and Turkey (rank 125th), respectively, had the best and worst safety and security among the selected countries. Singapore was ranked third regarding international openness, and Iran was ranked 118. Regarding price competitiveness, Iran was ranked first in the world, and Singapore was ranked 102. Regarding health and hygiene, there was no significant difference between the five countries (Costa Rica, Singapore, Jordan, the UAE, and Turkey), but Iran ranks 89th in health and hygiene and is the last among the selected countries. Iran was ranked 79th in terms of information and communication technology (ICT) readiness, which is much weaker than other countries. Regarding environmental sustainability, Costa Rica was ranked 17th in the world, while Turkey was ranked 126th among the countries with the highest and lowest rank in this index. In terms of tourism service infrastructure, Iran was ranked 108th, and UAE was ranked 22, which are the lowest and highest among the six countries.

Table 2.

The Tourism and Travel Competitiveness in Selected Countries (The World Economic Forum Annual Report) (33)

CountryFactor
Safety and SecurityInternational OpennessCompetitive PricePrioritizing Travel and TourismHealth and HygieneHuman Resources and Labor MarketICT ReadinessCultural and Business ResourcesEnvironment SustainabilityTourism Services InfrastructureAir Transport InfrastructureGround and Port InfrastructureBusiness EnvironmentNatural ResourceChange in Global Rank (From 2017 to 2019)
Singapore63102660515386136722120From 13th to 17th
Turkey125524839659771171263720567177From 44th to 43 th
Costa Rica752093168645377217296386618From 38th to 41st
Jordan4868833267111661016081708956119From 75th to 84th
United Arab Emirates7836471512644541224319103From 29th to 34th
Iran741181115891007933107108887912199From 93rd to 89th

The UAE was ranked 4th regarding air transport infrastructure, and Singapore is ranked second regarding ground and ports infrastructure, while Iran is ranked 88th and 79th in both of these two indicators, respectively. In terms of competitiveness in travel and tourism, the six studied countries are ranked as follows: Singapore, the UAE, Costa Rica, Turkey, Jordan, and Iran, respectively.

4.3. Governance and Policy of Medical Tourism of Selected Countries

Table 3 presents the governance structure, key stakeholders, and main strategies for the medical tourism industry of the selected countries. As shown in Table 4, the main difference between the selected countries and Iran is in the medical tourism industry. In all countries, this industry is under the supervision of the Ministry of Tourism or Ministry of Health, but in Iran, this industry is under the supervision of several ministries. The other similarities observed among the selected countries were the key stakeholders.

Table 3.

Governance and Policy of the Medical Tourism Industry of the Selected Countries

CountryFactor
Governance StructureMain StockholdersStrategies
SingaporeMinistry of healthSingapore Tourism Board, Infrastructure Development Board, Marketing Companies, Hospitals, Immigration Bureau, Hospitality Department (34).Improving the quality of health care; being trusted in all respects; international accreditation of hospitals; signing contracts with Central Asian countries in the field of medical tourism; facilitating visa issuance; practical support of the private sector by the government (tax incentives, interest-free loans, etc.) (34).
TurkeyMinistry of Culture and Tourism of TurkeyGovernorate, Municipality, Chamber of Commerce, travel agencies, private and public hospitals, hotels, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Association of Travel Agents of Turkey (TÜRSAB), the Turkish Tourism Investors Association (TYD), the Association of Turkish Investors and Hotels (TÜROB), the Federation of Turkish Hotels (TUROFED) and the Tourism Guides Association (TUREB) (35).Tenth Development Plan of Turkey: Developing and strengthening the medical tourism marketing system; attracting two million foreign patients in 2023 and earning $ 20 billion dollars as important goals in the 2013 - 2017 strategic plan; Considering treatment visa for medical tourists; signing a contract with developed countries in the field of medical tourism; Practical support from the private sector by the government (tax incentives, interest-free loans, etc.) (36).
Costa RicaMinistry of CompetitionMinistry of Health, hospitals, marketing companies, universities, tourism agencies, international insurance agencies, hotels (37).Non-visa medical tourists entrance with very few restrictions; Focus on medical tourists from neighboring countries; Practical support of the private sector by the government (tax incentives, interest-free loans, etc.) (37).
JordanMinistry of TourismMinistry of Health, Jordanian Ministry of International Planning and Cooperation, Medical Tourism Board, Jordanian Health Accreditation Council, Jordanian Private Hospitals Association, Hotels, Marketing Companies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (38).Developing a marketing strategy and assessing demand for the Jordanian medical tourism market in cooperation with the United States Agency for International Development; National Tourism Strategy with the aim of doubling the medical tourism industry; exchanging medical tourists with developed countries; using private sector in the prosperity of medical tourism (38).
United Arab EmiratesMinistry of Health and PreventionCommercial Tourism and Marketing Bureau, Immigration, Aerospace, Hospitality, Hospitals and Private and Governmental Healthcare Centers, Marketing Companies, Active Tourism Companies, Private Investment Contract with developed countries in the field of medical tourism; Applying specialist doctors from developed countries; Facilitating the issuance of visas in November 2012 for medical tourists and increasing its duration; Development of the private sector to enter this market; Practical support from the private sector by the government (tax incentives, interest-free loans, etc.)(Dubai Health Strategies 2016-2021) (39).
IranThe organization for Cultural Heritage of Handicrafts and TourismCultural Heritage of Handicrafts and Tourism, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Health and Medical Education Iran intends to host 20 million foreign tourists and earn 15 billion dollars from this industry by 2025 (20-Year Vision Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Perspective 2025)) (40).
Table 4.

The Status of Medical Tourism of Selected Countries

CountryFactor
Number of Tourist Arrival; (Million) World Bank (2018) (41).Number of Medical Tourist ArrivalMain CustomersGlobal Rank Regarding the Quality of Health Care Facilities and Services (World Medical Tourism Forum, 2020-20201) (42).Global Rank Regarding the Medical Tourism Industry; (World Medical Tourism Forum, 2020 - 20201) (42).
Singapore14.673 million touristsAnnually about 1,200,000 China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan, and the United States6th15th
Turkey45.76 million tourists Annually about 700,000 on averageEuropean countries (Germany, Bulgaria, Greece) and Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, Iraq, Azerbaijan, and Iran32nd27th
Costa Rica3.017million tourists Annually about 500,000 people80% from the US20th7th
Jordan4.15million tourists Annually about 300,000 peopleOf the 84 countries, mainly from the Arab region, the United States, Britain, and Canada30th35th
United ArabAbu Dhabi: 16th31th
Emirates21.286 million tourists An average of 800,000 annuallyFrom most countries, especially developed countries such as Britain, the United States and European countriesDubai: 10th22th
Irana7.295 million tourists An average of 200,000 people annually Azerbaijan, Iraq, the Persian Gulf States

aIn this ranking, which is related to the year 2020 - 2021, the rank of Iran is not mentioned, and according to the latest statements from the Ministry of Health of Iran was ranked 41th (43).

Pertaining to strategies, Turkey has precisely described the “Tourism Strategy of Turkey - 2023”, which includes the main strategies for the tourism industry, specific objectives, and operational plans required to achieve these strategies. In the UAE, medical tourism strategies have been described in the framework of Dubai Health Strategy 2016 - 2021. In Iran, the strategies of the tourism industry are described in the 20-Year Vision Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Perspective 2025), which indicates how many tourists entered, how many jobs will be generated, and how much investment will be needed. However, there is no specific strategy for medical tourism. Only regarding health tourism, the number of health tourist's arrival up to 2025 is mentioned. One of the main strategies indicated an interaction between developed countries in the field of medical tourism in selected countries other than Iran.

4.4. The Status of Medical Tourism of Selected Countries

As presented in Table 3, Turkey had the highest tourist arrival, while Costa Rica had the lowest arrival. The average cost per tourist (dollar) is different in each country, with Singapore as the most expensive destination (Mean = 1390 $) and Iran as the cheapest one at the rate of 665 $.

Our findings showed that in contrast to Singapore, with the highest average number of medical tourist arrivals (1.200.000 per year), Iran had the lowest average of 200,000 health tourists per year.

The main customers (medical tourists) were different among the selected countries. Therefore, the main customers of the UAE and Jordan are from all over the world, especially the developed countries, such as the United States and Britain. About 80% of the medical tourists in Costa Rica come from the United States, and the main customers of Turkey are from Europe, the Arab countries, and even Iran. Meanwhile, most of Iran’s medical tourists come from neighboring countries (Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, Azerbaijan, and Iraq).

The average annual income of medical tourists among selected countries depends on their arrival. Singapore is ranked first, and Iran is ranked the last with an average annual income of about 600 million US $ (cultural heritage, handicrafts, and tourism organization, 2014).

According to the ranking by the Medical Tourism Association, Singapore ranked first (six in the world) regarding the quality of health care facilities and services, whilst Iran is not ranked among the 41 countries. Considering the medical tourism industry, Costa Rica was ranked 7th, followed by Singapore, the UAE (Dubai), Turkey, UAE (Abu Dhabi), and Jordan, respectively, with the world rank of 15th, 22nd, 27th, 31st, and 35th.

4.5. Medical Tourism Infrastructure of Selected Countries

As depicted in Table 5, Turkey was ranked first among the selected countries with 42 hospitals accredited by joint commission international accreditation standards (JCI (, whereas Iran was ranked last without having a JCI accredited hospital.

Table 5.

Medical Tourism Infrastructure of the Selected Countries

CountryFactor
Licensed Hospital and Clinic (International Accreditation Organization)The Percentage of Medical Care Provided to Medical Tourists.; 1. Public Hospital; 2. Private HospitalMain Competitive Advantages in Medical TourismMain ChallengeTherapeutic BrandNumber of Beds (Per 10,000 Population) (44)1. Per Capita Physician; 2. Per Capita Nurse (Per 10,000 Population) (44)
Singapore (35, 45).2130; 70High-Quality Health services (Complicated Surgery), Advanced Medical Infrastructure, and Acceptance of international insuranceThe high cost of healthcare and heavy dependence on foreign human resourcesUse of stem cells in the treatment of transplant disease24 (2015)19.5; 28
Turkey (46)4810; 90Reasonable health care costs, Medical staff fluent in English, 5 star hotels nearby hospitals, and Acceptance of international insuranceLow security in the tourist cities of Turkey in recent yearsoncology, cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, orthopedic therapy, traumatology, plastic surgery, test-tube baby (fertility tourism), hemodialysis, oral treatments and dental services27 (2013)17; 18
Costa Rica (37)3No specific statistics availableAdvanced Private Facility for Health Services, easy access, Healthcare and tourism costs are far lower than in North America, and Acceptance of international insuranceDental services and oral and dental surgery12 (2015)11.1; 19
Jordan (47)1040; 60Low medical expenses, skilled physicians, and acceptance of international insuranceStomach surgery, cosmetic surgery, eye exams, heart surgeries and routine checkups14 (2015)25.6; 40.5
United Arab Emirates (48)38No specific statistics availableHigh quality health care, High physician-to-patient ratio, high security, and Acceptance of international insuranceHeavy dependence on foreign specialist human resourcesCosmetics surgery11.5 (2013)19.3; 40.9
Iran (49)0Low medical expenses and skilled physiciansLack of coordination between the stakeholder organizations, lack of provision of some of the necessary infrastructure (air transportation, visa issuance, etc.) for accepting medical touristsLiver Transplant; Cardiovascular Surgery15 (2014)8.9; 14.1

The participation of the private sector in healthcare delivery is 90% in Turkey, 70% in Singapore, and 60% in Jordan. No information was available for other countries (UAE, Turkey, and Iran).

According to Table 5, reasonable pricing of healthcare services was proposed as a competitive advantage for the medical tourism industry among Turkey, Iran, and Jordan. Insurance coverage in selected countries except Iran was mentioned as an advantage.

The main challenges in the medical tourism industry of the selected countries are listed in Table 5. Therefore, the most important challenges heavily depend on external human resources in the UAE and low level of security in tourism cities of Turkey and management issues, such as lack of coordination between stakeholder organizations in Iran.

Also, Jordan had the highest (25.6) physician per capita index (per 10,000 populations), while Iran had the lowest (8.9). Regarding the nurses per capita, the UAE is attributed to the highest (40.9 nurses per 10,000) and Iran to the lowest.

5. Discussion

One of the growing businesses in the health industry is health tourism (5, 12). Infrastructure and intermediaries play an important role in the development of the medical tourism industry (50). As it is known, the most important prerequisites for the development of medical tourism are basic infrastructure in the tourism sector, accessibility, competitive prices, and political stability. Comparing the mentioned countries in this study, derived the conclusion that countries with more facilities gained a higher ranking in medical tourism (33). These facilities include proper tourism development infrastructure (security, international openness, competitive prices, health and hygiene, human resources and labor market, ICT readiness, cultural and business resources, environment sustainability, infrastructure of tourism services, air transportation infrastructure, ground and port infrastructure, business environment, and natural resources). Many studies in Turkey have identified wide transportation infrastructure, affordable price, and the high number of accredited hospitals as strengths for the industry (51, 52). The international accreditation of medical centers can play an important role in the development of infrastructure, and the advertising and using effective tourism marketing tools can drive more demand.

All of the indicators in tourism and travel competitiveness are low in Iran except pricing, which is ranked as the first cheapest country in the world (33). The growing medical tourism industry requires the optimal provision of all tourism infrastructures and not only the promotion of different indicators.

One of the important factors that highlights Thailand and Singapore as medical tourism destinations is the high quality of care (45, 52). Singapore also has a positive reputation in high-quality medical services and has established itself as a core brand of “medical excellence” in the international arena (12). Based on the report of the Medical Tourism Organization, the UAE, Turkey, and Jordan are the three most important destinations for medical tourism in the Middle East. Some Asian tourism destinations have been successful in attracting tourists because of high-quality medical facilities and trust in the destination brand (53). Focusing on a few areas first and mastering them would be more commercially practical in establishing a position among other countries.

Despite the fact that Iran has good conditions in terms of competitive price, presence of skilled physicians, and low waiting time among the studied countries, but other medical tourism infrastructures are not enough invested. These findings are consistent with the results obtained by Delgoshaei et al. (30, 40, 49). In addition, Hadian et al. reported that necessary technology and technical infrastructure for the development of medical tourism in Iran are not provided. For example, until 2017, Iran has not been able to obtain a JCI license even for one hospital, and the average per capita physician/nurse index is much lower than the global one. In order to promote medical tourism, it is necessary to recognize the strategic medical tourism status of each province in the country, supply a specialized workforce, provide high-quality services, improve infrastructure, and promote a positive attitude of authorities to support the medical tourism industry (54). Factors that can play a positive role in the development of medical tourism in Iran are advanced services for infertility treatment, cosmetic and dental surgery, organ transplantation and cell therapy, cultural similarity and familiarity with neighboring countries, and competitive prices (55-57). Measures, such as improving human resource communication skills and developing private hospitals in accordance with international standards, can also be effective in developing medical tourism.

The main difference between the selected countries and Iran lies down in the organizational structure of the main stakeholders of the tourism industry. Hadian et al. showed that one of the challenges for growing medical tourism in Iran is the presence of different organs of political and decision-making, as well as the cultural and political conditions (58). In all other countries, this industry is organized and supervised by specific coordination bodies. Coordinating policies and strategies between ministries and organizations involved and reviewing some laws can help facilitate cross-sectoral coordination in this area. One of the important factors in the development of the medical tourism industry is the focus on attracting tourists from neighboring countries (59). Generally, certain populations are attracted more to certain locations. This might be due to a similar ethnic and cultural background.

In order to increase Iran’s ability to compete with countries in the region, such as Turkey, in attracting medical tourists, long-term plans should be developed to strengthen the infrastructure and cultural reforms, increase private sector participation and plan for the efficient use of mass media and local press for raising awareness (60). This requires a national effort and redefining the role of health tourism in the economy, as well as a strong trustee to follow up these measures.

The strengths points of this study are the comprehensiveness of the selected countries and obtaining systematic information according to the appropriate strategy search. One of the limitations of the study is that in many items, the existing indicators are not updated, and some of the documents were in languages other than English and Persian.

5.1. Conclusions

Despite the evidence of growing reverse trends of medical tourism by the arrival of medical tourists from developed countries to developing countries, as well as the strategic location of Iran in attracting tourists, establishing infrastructures for attracting foreign revenues is essential for the growth of this industry. Iran should undertake major reforms in the tourism infrastructure, especially the air transportation infrastructure, tourism infrastructure, and international openness, in order to become a leading player in medical tourism. These actions are necessary for Iran in the Middle East to compete with those successful countries, especially the neighboring countries (Turkey, Jordan, and the UAE).

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Zamani-Farahani H, Musa G. Residents’ attitudes and perception towards tourism development: A case study of Masooleh, Iran. Tourism Management. 2008;29(6):1233-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.008.

  • 2.

    Abd Manaf NH, Maulan S, Hussin H, Jahn Kassim PN, Alavi R. Service quality, value, satisfaction and future intention in medical tourism. JTHCA. 2017;9(3):1-12.

  • 3.

    Nilashi M, Samad S, Manaf AA, Ahmadi H, Rashid TA, Munshi A, et al. Factors influencing medical tourism adoption in Malaysia: A dematel-fuzzy topsis approach. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;137:106005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005.

  • 4.

    Samadbeik M, Asadi H, Mohseni M, Takbiri A, Moosavi A, Garavand A. Designing a medical tourism website: A qualitative study. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46(2):249.

  • 5.

    Ahani A, Nilashi M, Ibrahim O, Sanzogni L, Weaven S. Market segmentation and travel choice prediction in spa hotels through tripadvisor’s online reviews. Int J Hosp Manage. 2019;80:52-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.01.003.

  • 6.

    Heung VC, Kucukusta D, Song H. Medical tourism development in Hong Kong: an assessment of the barriers. Tourism Management. 2011;32(5):995-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.012.

  • 7.

    Heydari M, Yousefi M, Derakhshani N, Khodayari-Zarnaq R. Factors affecting the satisfaction of medical tourists: A systematic review. Health Scope. 2019;8(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.80359.

  • 8.

    Köstepen A, Öter Z. Medical tourism potential in Turkey: the case of Izmir city. 8th Silk Road International Conference “Development of Tourism in Black and Caspian Seas Regions". Tbilisi, Georgia. 2013.

  • 9.

    Cannon Hunter W. Medical tourism: A new global niche. Int J Tour Sci. 2007;7(1):129-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15980634.2007.11434599.

  • 10.

    B Beland D, Zarzeczny A. Medical tourism and national health care systems: an institutionalist research agenda. Global Health. 2018;14(1):68. [PubMed ID: 30012218]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6048823]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0387-0.

  • 11.

    Junio MMV, Kim JH, Lee TJ. Competitiveness attributes of a medical tourism destination: The case of South Korea with importance-performance analysis. J Travel & Tour Market. 2017;34(4):444-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2016.1182454.

  • 12.

    Sandberg DS. Medical tourism: An emerging global healthcare industry. Int J Healthc Manag. 2017;10(4):281-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2017.1296213.

  • 13.

    Aziz A, Yusof RM, Ayob M, Bakar NTA. Measuring tourist behavioural intention through quality in Malaysian medical tourism industry. Procedia Econ Financ. 2015;31:280-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01179-X.

  • 14.

    Lunt NT, Mannion R, Exworthy M. A framework for exploring the policy implications of UK medical tourism and international patient flowsspol_833. Soc Policy Adm. 2011;47(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00833.x.

  • 15.

    Crooks VA, Turner L, Snyder J, Johnston R, Kingsbury P. Promoting medical tourism to India: Messages, images, and the marketing of international patient travel. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(5):726-32. [PubMed ID: 21310519]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.022.

  • 16.

    Abubakar AM, Ilkan M. Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. J Dest Mark Manag. 2016;5(3):192-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2015.12.005.

  • 17.

    Ehrbeck T, Guevara C, Mango PD, Cordina R, Singhal S. Health care and the consumer. McKinsey Quarterly. 2008;4(2):80-91.

  • 18.

    Hall CM. Health and medical tourism: A kill or cure for global public health? Tourism review. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/16605371111127198.

  • 19.

    Horowitz MD, Rosensweig JA, Jones CA. Medical tourism: globalization of the healthcare marketplace. Med Gen Med. 2007;9(4):33.

  • 20.

    Johnson TJ, Youngquist JS, Garman AN, Hohmann S, Cieslak PR. Factors influencing medical travel into the United States. Int J Pharm Healthc Mark. 2015;9(2):118-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-02-2013-0004.

  • 21.

    Johnston R, Crooks VA, Adams K, Snyder J, Kingsbury P. An industry perspective on Canadian patients' involvement in medical tourism: implications for public health. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):416. [PubMed ID: 21627830]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3117713]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-416.

  • 22.

    Johnston R, Crooks VA, Snyder J, Kingsbury P. What is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries? A scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9(1):24. [PubMed ID: 21047433]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2987953]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-24.

  • 23.

    Lee M, Han H, Lockyer T. Medical tourism-attracting Japanese tourists for medical tourism experience. J Travel & Tour Mark. 2011;29(1):69-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2012.638564.

  • 24.

    Snyder J, Crooks VA, Johnston R. Perceptions of the ethics of medical tourism: comparing patient and academic perspectives. Public Health Ethics. 2012;5(1):38-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phr034.

  • 25.

    Moghavvemi S, Ormond M, Musa G, Isa CRM, Thirumoorthi T, Mustapha MZB, et al. Connecting with prospective medical tourists online: A cross-sectional analysis of private hospital websites promoting medical tourism in India, Malaysia and Thailand. Tourism Management. 2017;58:154-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.10.010.

  • 26.

    Noree T, Hanefeld J, Smith R. Medical tourism in Thailand: A cross-sectional study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016;94(1):30. [PubMed ID: 26769994]. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.152165.

  • 27.

    Crooks VA, Kingsbury P, Snyder J, Johnston R. What is known about the patient's experience of medical tourism? A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):266. [PubMed ID: 20825667]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2944273]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-266.

  • 28.

    Crozier GK, Baylis F. The ethical physician encounters international medical travel. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(5):297-301. [PubMed ID: 20439336]. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.032789.

  • 29.

    Leahy AL. Medical tourism: The impact of travel to foreign countries for healthcare. SURG-J R COLL SURG E. 2008;6(5):260-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80047-9.

  • 30.

    Delgoshaei B, Ravaghi H, Abolhassani N. Importance-performance analysis of medical tourism in Iran from medical tourists and medical services provider's perspective: 2011. Middle-East J Sci Res. 2012;12(11):1541-7.

  • 31.

    Momeni K, Janati A, Imani A, Khodayari-Zarnaq R. Barriers to the development of medical tourism in East Azerbaijan province, Iran: A qualitative study. Tourism Management. 2018;69:307-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.05.007.

  • 32.

    United Nations. World population ageing 2019-highlights. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2019. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2019-Highlights.pdf.

  • 33.

    World Economic Forum. The travel & tourism competitiveness report 2019. Geneva: World Economic Forum; 2019. Available from: https://reports.weforum.org/travel-and-tourism-competitiveness-report-2019/.

  • 34.

    Chee Heng L. Medical tourism and the state in Malaysia and Singapore. Glob Soc Pol. 2010;10(3):336-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018110379978.

  • 35.

    Paksoy P. The environmental focus in tourism strategy of turkey-2023 within the outlook of tourism planning. SGEM. 2009;2:875.

  • 36.

    Aliu A, Cilginoglu H, Özkan Ö, Aliu D. Medical tourism market and inter-stakeholders’ relations in turkey: A comparative investigation from reverse innovation and destination governance viewpoint. SSRN. 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2779704.

  • 37.

    Bristow RS, Yang W, Lu M. Sustainable medical tourism in Costa Rica. Tourism Review. 2011;66(1-2):107-17.

  • 38.

    Council HH. The national strategy for health sector in Jordan 2016-2020. Jordan: Government of Jordan Amman; 2016. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/countryplanningcycles/sites/default/files/planning_cycle_repository/jordan/national_strategy_for_health_sector_2016-2020_jordan.pdf.

  • 39.

    Dubai Health Authority. Dubai health strategy 2016-2021. UAE: Dubai Health Authority; 2016. Available from: https://www.dha.gov.ae/en/Aboutus/pages/dubai_health_strategy.aspx.

  • 40.

    Zarchi MKR, Jabbari A, Hatam N, Bastani P, Shafaghat T, Fazelzadeh O. Strategic analysis of Shiraz medical tourism industry: A mixed method study. Galen Medical J. 2018;7:1021.

  • 41.

    The world bank. International tourism, number of arrivals America:. The world bank; 2018, [updated 2020]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ST.INT.ARVL.

  • 42.

    Medical Tourism Association. Find a destination for your medical needs: medical tourism association;. USA: Medical Tourism Association; 2020. Available from: https://www.medicaltourism.com/healthcare-destinations.

  • 43.

    Young Journalist Club. Rank 41th Iran in health tourism Iran. Iran: Young Journalist Club; 2019, [updated 2020]. Available from: https://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/.

  • 44.

    The World Bank Group. Hospital beds (per 1,000 people) - Iran, Islamic Rep., Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Costa Rica:. The World Bank Group,; 2019. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.PHYS.ZS?end=2017&locations=IR-JO-AE-CR&start=2012&year_high_desc=true.

  • 45.

    Othuman Mydin MA, Wong KM, Velasamy P, Tengku Arshad TN, Marzuki A. Medical tourism destination SWOT Analysis: A case study of Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and India. SHS Web of Conferences. 2014;12. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20141201037.

  • 46.

    Erdoğan S, Yilmaz E. Medical tourism: An assessment on Turkey. 10th International Conference on Knowledge, Economy and Management. Istanbul, Turkey. 2012.

  • 47.

    Al-Azzam AFM. A study of the impact of marketing mix for attracting medical tourism in Jordan. Int J Mark Res. 2016;8(1):139-49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v8n1p139.

  • 48.

    Ahmed G, Al Amiri N, Khan W. Outward medical tourism: A case of UAE. Theoretical Economics Letters. 2018;8(7):1368-90. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2018.87088.

  • 49.

    Jabbari A, Delgoshaei B, Mardani R, Tabibi SJ. Medical tourism in Iran: Issues and challenges. J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:39. [PubMed ID: 23555142]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3577393]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.104809.

  • 50.

    Yu JY, Ko TG. A cross-cultural study of perceptions of medical tourism among Chinese, Japanese and Korean tourists in Korea. Tourism management. 2012;33(1):80-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.02.002.

  • 51.

    Çavmak D, Çavmak Ş. Using AHP to Prioritize Barriers in Developing Medical Tourism: Case of Turkey. Int J Med Glob. 2020;8(2):73-9. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijtmgh.2020.12.

  • 52.

    Yağar F, dökme S. Investigation of the factors that shape medical tourism: The case of Turkey. Uluslararası Sağlık Yönetimi ve Stratejileri Araştırma Dergisi. 2017;3(2):62-72.

  • 53.

    Ganguli S, Ebrahim AH. A qualitative analysis of Singapore's medical tourism competitiveness. our Manag Perspect. 2017;21:74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.12.002.

  • 54.

    Momeni K, Janati A, Imani A, Khodayari-Zarnaq R, Arab-Zozani M. Conservative or aggressive: which strategy is better for medical tourism development in East Azerbaijan, Iran. Indo Am J of Pharm Sci. 2017;4(6):1641-50. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i2.529.

  • 55.

    Naghipour M, Langarizadeh M, Razzazi M. Identification of the requirements for designing medical tourism information system of Iran. J educ health promot. 2019;8.

  • 56.

    Rezaee R, Mohammadzadeh M. Effective factors in expansion of medical tourism in Iran. Med J IR. 2016;30:409.

  • 57.

    Rokni L, Sam-Hun P. Medical tourism in Iran, reevaluation on the new trends: A narrative review. Iran J Public Health. 2019;48(7):1191. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v48i7.2941.

  • 58.

    Hadian M, Jabbari A, Mousavi SH, Sheikhbardsiri H. Medical tourism development: A systematic review of economic aspects. Int. J. Healthc. Manag. 2019:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2019.1677977.

  • 59.

    Zarei A, Maleki F. Asian medical marketing, a review of factors affecting Asian medical tourism development. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour. 2019;20(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2018.1438959.

  • 60.

    Varzi AM, Saki K, Momeni K, Rajabi Vasokolaei G, Khodakaramifard Z, Arab Zouzani M, et al. The health tourists' satisfaction level of services provided: A cross-sectional study in Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(9):54768. [PubMed ID: 27157181]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5064070]. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p294.