https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.118640

Relationship Between Platelet to White Blood Cell Ratio and 30-Day Prognosis of Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

authors:

avatar Xiang Xu # 1 , avatar Chen Li # 1 , avatar Jing Chen 1 , avatar Xiaoyan Liu 1 , avatar Haibin Su 1 , avatar Jingjing Tong 1 , avatar Jinhua Hu 1 , *

Department of Hepatology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
# These authors are contributed equally as the first author.
Hepatitis Monthly: Vol.21, issue 9; e118640
published online: December 14, 2021
article type: Research Article
received: August 21, 2021
revised: November 19, 2021
accepted: December 4, 2021

how to cite: Xu X, Li C, Chen J, Liu X, Su H, et al. Relationship Between Platelet to White Blood Cell Ratio and 30-Day Prognosis of Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. Hepat Mon. 2021;21(9):e118640. https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.118640.

Abstract

Background:

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is always associated with thrombocytopenia or leukocytosis. Therefor the platelet to white blood cell ratio (PWR) in ACLF patients is always reduced.

Objectives:

Here, we assessed the relationship between PWR and prognosis in ACLF patients.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort of 415 patients, including 100 patients that were diagnosed of chronic hepatitis B, 104 patients suffered of HBV-related liver cirrhosis and 211 patients suffered of HBV-related ACLF, was investigated. Univariate and multivariate COX models were used to investigate the relationship between PWR and 30-day survival in patients with ACLF. Factors affecting PWR in ACLF patients were also analysed using logistic regression analysis.

Results:

At baseline, the platelet count in patients with HBV-related ACLF was significantly lower than that in patients with CHB and patients suffered of HBV-related cirrhosis. The PWR value was much higher in the survivors of ACLF than in ACLF patients who died. PWR, age, total bilirubine, prothrombin activity, and aspartate transaminase were independent predictors of the 30-day survival rate of ACLF patients. We also found that ascites and infection were independent factors related to the decrease of PWR in ACLF patients.

Conclusions:

The PWR value was significant declined in ACLF patients. And it was independent risk factors for the survival rate of those patients.

1. Background

ACLF is a unique clinical entity with high morbidity and mortality rate. It is characterized by acute onset on the chronic liver disease (CLD). The severe liver damage caused by hepatocellular insult such as hepatitis virus infection, alcohol abuse, autoimmune disease, some genetic diseases, among other causes (1). There is acute deterioration of liver function, leading to the dysfunction of one or more organs. ALCF usually involves an acute strike (2, 3), first resulting in damage to liver function, which is followed by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome, and finally immune paralysis (4). In cases of confirmed and unproven bacterial infections, exacerbated SIRS is very important to ACLF progression and prognosis (5). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is the most common cause of ACLF in Asian countries (6, 7).

The inflammatory response crucial to the pathogenesis and prognosis of patients with ACLF. The pathogenic mechanism of ACLF is related to innate immunity and systemic inflammatory responses. Therefore, inhibiting innate immune activation may be a new strategy for ACLF treatment (3, 8). Usually, clinical evaluation of the inflammatory state relies on various indicators of routine peripheral blood tests, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count. In liver disease, platelet count often decreases. Increasing evidence shows that hematological parameters, such as platelet distribution width/platelet count ratio and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, are predictors of endocrine disease and COVID-19 (9-11).

More than 76% of patients with liver disease suffered from thrombocytopenia (12), which may be related to liver cirrhosis, hypersplenism, and portal hypertension (13). Platelet count decrease may be the first indication of, and is often directly proportional to the severity of liver failure (14). Thrombocytopenia has multifaceted causes, such as decreased production of hormone thrombopoietin (TPO), or increased destruction of platelets in an enlarged spleen (15). TPO is mainly synthesized in hepatocytes, so it decreases when the liver cell mass is damaged or destroyed. Also, at all stages of megakaryocyte production and thrombopoiesis differentiation, only TPO can play a role in the whole process (16).

PWR has been reported to be a marker of systemic inflammatory response. Previous studies have shown that it can be used as a prognostic predictor of acute ischemic stroke and cancer (17-20). This indicates that ischemic stroke patients with a lower platelet count and a higher number of WBCs will have worse prognosis.

2. Objectives

However, there are few reports on the PWR in liver failure. In this study, we verified the relationship between PWR and prognosis, and explored the factors related to the decrease in PWR, in ACLF patients.

3. Methods

3.1. Patient Enrollment and Study Design

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), HBV-related liver cirrhosis (LC) and HBV-related ACLF, consecutively hospitalized at the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital of China from January 2014 to December 2017, were selected for retrospective analysis. As shown in Figure 1, in this retrospective study, we reviewed 100 patients with CHB, 104 patients with HBV-related LC, and 211 HBV-related ACLF patients.

The flow chart (CHB, chronic hepatitis B; LC, HBV-related liver cirrhosis; ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure).
The flow chart (CHB, chronic hepatitis B; LC, HBV-related liver cirrhosis; ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure).
Figure 1.

The flow chart (CHB, chronic hepatitis B; LC, HBV-related liver cirrhosis; ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure).

3.2. Data Collection

Laboratory data were recored at the time of enrollment, and included WBC count, platelet, international normalized ratio (INR), alanine transaminase (ALT), albumin (ALB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alpha fetoprotein (AFP), total bilirubin (TBil), and plasma thromboplastin antecedent (PTA). In the ACLF patients, we also recorded the spleen size as measured by ultrasound, infectious complications, the complication of infection, SIRS and ascites.

3.3. Definition

CHB was defined as HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positivity of at least 6 months’duration (21). Cirrhosis was clinically based on the patient history or ultrasonic imaging characteristics, including a small-sized liver, nodular liver surface, and splenomegaly, with or without the portal hypertension. ACLF patients met the Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver criteria (22). We excluded patients with any other serious co-existing systemic diseases and hematological diseases; with other systemic malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma, who were pregnant, or who lacked complete medical records. Infection status was diagnosed based on the following criteria. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) was diagnosed based on diagnostic paracentesis, when the neutrophil count of the ascites reached a cutoff of 250/mm3. Pneumonia diagnosis was based on symptoms and signs of an acute lower respiratory tract infection, and was confirmed by a chest radiograph showing new shadowing unrelated to any other cause. Bloodstream infection was diagnosed based on the growth of a non-common skin contaminant from ≥ 1 blood culture (BC) and of a common skin contaminant from BC of ≥ 2 samples drawn on separate sites with signs of infection. Spontaneous bacterial empyema was diagnosed based on the polymorphonuclear cell count in pleural fluid ≥ 250/mm3. Urinary tract infection was diagnosed based on the number of bacteria in the urine. For symptomatic women, a culture definition for cystitis was ≥ 102 CFU/mL of an uropathogen, and for pyelonephritis ≥ 104 CFU/mL. In non-catheter-related cystitis, counts of ≥ 102 CFU/mL are significant in urine samples obtained by catheterization. In males with cystitis, a culture of ≥ 103 CFU/mL was considered to be significant. Cellulitis was diagnosed based on the clinical signs of skin infection associated with discomfort, erythema, swelling, and warmth of the affected area. SIRS was assessed according to the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference. The diagnosis of ascites was based on ultrasound (23). The size of the spleen was measured using ultrasound imaging (iu22, Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA).

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (2019089D).

Due to the study was retrospective nature of the study and the anonymous data used, we waived the informed consent .The patient identification was anonymous.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and MedCalc software (version 15.2.2, Ostend, Belgium). Descriptive statistics were expressed as median (interquartile range, Q1 - Q3) or mean with standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney test or t-test was used to compare two continuous variables, as appropriate. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative survival rate. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine whether specific variables were related to the cumulative survival rate. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as well as the corresponding P values are shown. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the two models was compared using the Delong test.

4. Results

4.1. Baseline Demographic, Laboratory Characteristics of the Patients

The examination indices of patients are shown in Table 1. The WBC in patients of ACLF was significantly higher than patients with CHB and LC (P < 0.0001).The platelet count differed among the three groups,being the lowest in those with ACLF, followed by those with LC patients and those with CHB (P < 0.0001).

Table 1.

Basic Demographic, Laboratory Characteristics in the Three Groups a

VariablesChronic Hepatitis BLiver CirrhosisACLFP ValueCHB vs LCCHB vs ACLFLC vs ACLF
Gender (male)66 (66.0)70 (67.3)176 (83.4)0.00010.8430.0010.001
Age (y)43.55 ± 10.3347.45 ± 10.1244.14 ± 11.270.0130.0060.6570.01
WBC (× 109/L)5.58 ± 1.444.99 ± 1.657.45 ± 3.870.00010.0260.00010.0001
PLT (× 109/L)187 (149, 217)128 (103, 171)86 (55, 120)0.00010.00010.00010.0001
ALT (U/L)27 (18, 40)24 (19, 30)154 (72, 466)0.00010.10.00010.0001
AST (U/L)24 (20, 35)25 (21, 31)173 (104, 366)0.00010.5850.00010.0001
TBil (µmol/L)10.7 (8.32, 14.08)10.9 (7.83, 14.27)287.2 (200.35, 393.55)0.00010.9880.00010.0001
ALB (g/L)41.14 ± 3.8941.07 ± 5.0429.11 ± 4.770.00010.9720.00010.0001
INR0.90 ± 0.0490.94 ± 0.0432.05 ± 0.620.00010.00010.00010.0001
PTA (%)153.8 ± 10.69106.2 ± 8.9233.54 ± 8.860.00010.00010.00010.0001
AFP2.14 (1.51, 3.34)2.22 (1.58, 3.61)65.00 (17.55, 239.95)0.00010.6420.00010.0001
PWR32.65 (25.68, 43,05)27.82 (20.72, 34.94)13.33 (9.01, 18.50)0.00010.00010.00010.0001

Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell; PLT, platelet; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate amino transferase; TBil, total bilirubin; ALB, albumin; PTA, Prothrombin activity; AFP, alpha fetal protein; PWR, platelet to white blood cell.

a P value estimated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-test, or the Kruskal-Wallis H test for continuous data, and chi-square test for categorical data.

The median PWR of patients with ACLF was 13.33, which was significantly lower than that of other patients (P < 0.0001). Other laboratory parameters such as ALB, ALT, AST, TBiL, INR and PTA levels in patients with ACLF were significantly difference compared with others (P < 0.05). The ALB, PTA values were significantly reduced in ACLF patients. The remaining indicators were significantly higher in ACLF patients.

By radiography, 127 patients has splenomegaly, and 150 ACLF patients had ascites. Of all the ACLF patients, 65 patients had complications related to infection at intake, and 14 patients had SIRS.

4.2. Association of PWR with 1-Month Mortality in HBV-Related ACLF

The median follow-up period was 30 days. Fifty-nine ACLF patients died within 1 month, the non-liver transplant 1-month survival rate of ACLF was 71.8% (Figure 2). Upon dividing patients into survival and decesed groups, the PWR in survivors was markedly higher than that in deceased patients (P = 0.0027) (Figure 3). The Cut-off value of the continuous variables, such as age, WBC, creatinine (Cr), PWR, TBil, monocyte count, sodium (Na), prothrombin activity (PA), INR, ALT, AST, and ALB were calculated using ROC curve. By univariate analysis, 12 factors reached statistical significance with patient survival: age, Cr, PWR, TBiL, monocyte, cholesterol, triglycerides, Na, PTA, INR, SBP (Table 2).

Accumulated survival probabilities in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients
Accumulated survival probabilities in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients
Figure 2.

Accumulated survival probabilities in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients

The platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio in survivors and nonsurvivors in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients (P < 0.0001)
The platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio in survivors and nonsurvivors in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients (P < 0.0001)
Figure 3.

The platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio in survivors and nonsurvivors in acute-on-chronic liver failure patients (P < 0.0001)

Table 2.

The Factors Affecting the Prognosis from Single-Factor Analysis

VariablesCasesOne-Month Survival Rate (%)χ2 ValueP-Value
Age (y)3.570.044
≤ 387079.5
> 3814167.9
Cr9.140.002
≤ 118 18174.9
> 1183052.8
PWR25.190.0001
≤ 10.767652.3
> 10.7613582.8
TBiL12.150.0001
≤ 38415178.0
> 3846055.7
Monocyte8.720.003
≤ 1.2718975.2
> 1.272249.0
Cholesterol18.860.0001
≤ 0.965349.9
> 0.9615879.0
Triglycerides6.690.01
≤ 0.939061.9
> 0.9312179.1
Na10.690.001
≤ 135.59961.2
> 135.511281.1
PTA30.000.0001
≤ 25.43839.1
> 25.417379
INR13.950.0001
≤ 2.1214279.6
> 2.126955.1
Infection4.470.035
No6181.7
Yes15067.8

Abbreviations: Cr, creatinine; TBil, total bilirubin; PTA, Prothrombin activity; AST, aspartate amino transferase.

Then, multivariable Cox regression analysis (with outcome as the dependent variable) was used to determine the independent variables associated with the outcome. Using backward Cox regression analysis, the independent factors associated with mortality were PWR, age, TBIL, PA, and AST (Table 3). To evaluate the predictive value of PWR in the one-month survival rate of patients with ACLF, we used ROC curve analysis. As shown in Figure 4, the area under the ROC curve for PWR between survival and deceased patients was 0.728 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.655 - 0.801; P < 0.0001). Based on the Youden index, the optimal cut-off value was 10.76 (sensitivity: 73.7%; specificity: 61.0%; Youden’s index: 0.347). However, the area under the ROC curve for the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was 0.672 (95% CI, 0.593 - 0.750; P = 0.0001). The optimal cut-off value was 29.64 (sensitivity: 67.8%; specificity: 61.8%). While the p value of the AUC area between PWR and MELD was 0.036. Using this cut-off value, mortality rates were higher in the high than in the low PWR group (Figure 5) (P < 0.0001).

Receiver operating characteristic curve of platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) and model for evaluating liver disease (MELD) for predicting the mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Receiver operating characteristic curve of platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) and model for evaluating liver disease (MELD) for predicting the mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Figure 4.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) and model for evaluating liver disease (MELD) for predicting the mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Table 3

. Independent Predictors of Mortality by Cox Proportional Hazard Regression

PredictorHR95% CIP
PWR0.9000.853 - 0.949< 0.0001
Age (y)1.0351.010 - 1.0620.007
TBIL (umol/L)1.0021.001 - 1.0040.013
PTA (%)0.9420.915 - 0.9690.013
AST1.0011.000 - 1.0010.017

Abbreviations: TBil, total bilirubin; PTA, prothrombin activity; AST, aspartate amino transferase; PWR, platelet to white blood cell.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the patients classified by the platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) value (P < 0.0001) (Low: PWR value less than 10.76; High: PWR value > 10.76).
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the patients classified by the platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) value (P < 0.0001) (Low: PWR value less than 10.76; High: PWR value > 10.76).
Figure 5.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the patients classified by the platelet-to-white-blood-cell ratio (PWR) value (P < 0.0001) (Low: PWR value less than 10.76; High: PWR value > 10.76).

4.3. Factors Affecting the PWR Value in Patients of ACLF

The PWR value was identified as an independent risk factor for survival in ACLF patients. There was a significant difference in PWR between ACLF and other patients. We then attempted to identify factors affecting PWR value. We included plausible factors, i.e., cirrhosis, splenic vein diameters, spleen size and the diameter, ascites, SIRS and infection. Logistic regression analysis revealed ascites (P = 0.003) and infection (P = 0.003) were independent factors associated with the reduction of PWR, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4

. Logistic Regression Analysis for Factors Significantly Affected PWR

PredictorUnivariate Analysis HR (95% CI)PMultivariate Analysis; HR (95% CI)P
Ascites
No1
Yes0.25 (0.118 - 0.529)< 0.0010.31 (0.142 - 0.677)0.003
Infection
No1
Yes0.25 (0.135 - 0.463)< 0.0010.363 (0.187 - 0.703)0.003

5. Discussion

In this study, we verified the relationship between PWR and prognosis, and explored the factors related to the PWR decrease in ACLF patients. At baseline, the platelet count in patients with HBV-related ACLF was significantly lower than that in CHB and LC patients. The PWR was markedly higher in ACLF survivors than in ACLF patients who died. PWR, age, total bilirubin, prothrombin activity, and aspartate transaminase were independent predictors of the 30-day survival rate of ACLF patients. We also found that ascites and infection were independent factors related to PWR decrease in ACLF patients.

ACLF patients have severe disease, rapid progression, a high incidence of complications, and a high short-term mortality rate (24). Because of this high mortality, predicting the prognosis of liver failure is important for patient management. Recently, numerous studies have evaluated models to predict the prognosis of patients with ACLF, using Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores, including ALB, TBil, prothrombin (PT), ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy, MELD scores, including TBil, PT-INR, serum Cr, etiology, and MELD-Na scores. However, the score calculation of these scores is more complicated; thus, a simpler score is needed to predict the prognosis of ACLF patients.

In many diseases, platelet count is markedly reduced (25, 26). Thrombocytopenia is regarded as a poor prognostic sign in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with various diseases (27) and is common in patients with CLD. It increases the bleeding risk, prolonging hospital stay and increasing hospitalization costs. We found that platelet counts in ACLF patients was significantly lower than that in patients with CHB. Thrombocytopenia in liver diseases may be due to splenomegaly, decreased activity of platelet-promoting hormone, and bone marrow suppression caused by chronic viral infection (28-30). Additionally, decreased platelet production, antiplatelet antibodies, diffuse intravascular coagulation, translocation toxins, and intestinal-derived substances may cause low platelet counts (31). Recently, there is an additional mechanism for increased platelet destruction in CLD patients, which is the effect of abnormal rheological conditions caused by elevated portal pressure (32). Platelets are not only essential for hemostasis, but also promote liver regeneration and prevent the progression of liver fibrosis by secreting a variety of growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor (33). As a feedback response, thrombocytopenia can further aggravate liver damage and promote the progression of CLD and liver cirrhosis. In addition, in CLD patients, platelet transfusion and splenectomy are used as platelet augmentation therapy to improve liver function (34). Vinholt et al. found that the lower the platelet count, the more severe the liver cirrhosis and platelet function impairment (35). Therefore, the platelet index is of great significance in CLD.

When studying the relationship between platelets and the outcome of patients with severe disease, a previous study found that the platelet count was increased in survivors but not in non-survivors after ICU admission for various diseases (36). A dynamic change in platelets indicates a change in liver disease severity. Our univariate analysis showed that a dynamic process of platelet change is closely related to patient prognosis. In previous studies, the PWR ratio was associated with the prognosis of patients with acute stroke and acute coronary syndrome (20, 37). ACLF patients are prone to infection, resulting in elevated WBCs (38); therefore, due to an increase in WBCs and a decrease in platelets, the PWR will eventually decrease. We also found that the PWR was markedly higher in survivors than in those who died. Since routine blood examination is a simple detection method, the PWR can provide clinicians with a quick reference, within 30 min. Accurately predicting short-term survival time of ACLF patients is helpful to make appropriate medical decisions to improve the survival rate. Furthermore, we found that the combination of PWR, age, TBil, PA, and AST could predict the 1-month survival rate.

Kamath et al. (39) first reported the MELD score, in 2001, as a means to assess the prognosis of patients after transjugular portosystemic shunts. It was later confirmed to be suitable for evaluating severity of various CLDs, predicting the survival rate of patients after liver transplantation, and is widely used as a scoring system for organ allocation in liver transplantation. However, the MELD score does not consider inflammation, which significantly influences prognosis. We found that PWR was strongly correlated with ACLF prognosis. The PWR calculation requires the assessment of two simple factors, making it simpler to determine than the MELD score.

We also found that ascites and infection were related to the PWR. Infection increases the WBC, which reduces the PWR value. Immune function is severely damaged in ACLF patients, resulting in infection (40, 41). The presence of various pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory factors can be detected in ACLF patients, such as sTNF-aR2,TNF-a, sTNF-aR1,IL-2R, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 (42-44). High levels of serum IL-6 increase the mortality of HBV-associated ACLF. ACLF is characterized by severe systemic inflammation, which is associated with its poor prognosis (45). Ascites was related to the severity of portal hypertension and hypoproteinemia, further demonstrating the extent of cirrhosis. Thus, ascites and infection lowered the PWR value in ACLF patients, and the lower the PWR value, the lower was the survival rate.

One important limitation of our study is that it was a retrospective analysis with a potential selection bias. The cases were from a single center, which is another limitation. Another limitation is that these patients have only been followed up to 2017. Regardless of the above limitations, PWR is an easy-to-calculate indicator when compared to MELD or MELD-Na. In other words, when a patient is admitted to the hospital, PWR can quickly identify the severity of the patients.

5.1. Conclusions

In conclusion, we here demonstrated the clinical significance of PWR in patients with ACLF. The PWR value, which is easy and convenient to calculate, may be an important predictor of the prognosis of ACLF patients.

References

  • 1.

    Arroyo V, Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P; Easl-Clif Consortium CANONIC Study. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: A new syndrome that will re-classify cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S131-43. [PubMed ID: 25920082]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.045.

  • 2.

    Sarin SK, Choudhury A, Sharma MK, Maiwall R, Al Mahtab M, Rahman S, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): An update. Hepatol Int. 2019;13(4):353-90. [PubMed ID: 31172417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6728300]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-019-09946-3.

  • 3.

    Sarin SK, Choudhury A. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Terminology, mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(3):131-49. [PubMed ID: 26837712]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.219.

  • 4.

    Choudhury A, Kumar M, Sharma BC, Maiwall R, Pamecha V, Moreau R, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in acute-on-chronic liver failure: Relevance of 'golden window': A prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(12):1989-97. [PubMed ID: 28374414]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13799.

  • 5.

    Laleman W, Claria J, Van der Merwe S, Moreau R, Trebicka J. Systemic Inflammation and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Too Much, Not Enough. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:1027152. [PubMed ID: 30155448]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6093057]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1027152.

  • 6.

    Marsden PA, Ning Q, Fung LS, Luo X, Chen Y, Mendicino M, et al. The Fgl2/fibroleukin prothrombinase contributes to immunologically mediated thrombosis in experimental and human viral hepatitis. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(1):58-66. [PubMed ID: 12840059]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC162293]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18114.

  • 7.

    Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: New estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine. 2012;30(12):2212-9. [PubMed ID: 22273662]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.116.

  • 8.

    Li J, Liang X, Jiang J, Yang L, Xin J, Shi D, et al. PBMC transcriptomics identifies immune-metabolism disorder during the development of HBV-ACLF. Gut. 2022;71(1):163-75. [PubMed ID: 33431576]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323395.

  • 9.

    Demir AD. Relationship of the platelet distribution width/platelet count ratio with thyroid antibody levels in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(9):3000605211043240. [PubMed ID: 34586923]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8485304]. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211043241.

  • 10.

    Kalyon S, Gultop F, Simsek F, Adas M. Relationships of the neutrophil-lymphocyte and CRP-albumin ratios with the duration of hospitalization and fatality in geriatric patients with COVID-19. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(9):3000605211046110. [PubMed ID: 34581218]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8485297]. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211046112.

  • 11.

    Wu M, Zhang X, Chen J, Zha M, Yuan K, Huang K, et al. A Score of Low-Grade Inflammation for Predicting Stroke Recurrence in Patients with Ischemic Stroke. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:4605-14. [PubMed ID: 34548807]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8449639]. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S328383.

  • 12.

    Afdhal N, McHutchison J, Brown R, Jacobson I, Manns M, Poordad F, et al. Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008;48(6):1000-7. [PubMed ID: 18433919]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.009.

  • 13.

    Pradella P, Bonetto S, Turchetto S, Uxa L, Comar C, Zorat F, et al. Platelet production and destruction in liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2011;54(5):894-900. [PubMed ID: 21145808]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.08.018.

  • 14.

    Scharf RE. Thrombocytopenia and Hemostatic Changes in Acute and Chronic Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical and Laboratory Features, and Management. J Clin Med. 2021;10(7). [PubMed ID: 33917431]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8038677]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071530.

  • 15.

    Kurokawa T, Ohkohchi N. Platelets in liver disease, cancer and regeneration. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(18):3228-39. [PubMed ID: 28566882]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5434428]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3228.

  • 16.

    Saab S, Brown RJ. Management of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(10):2757-68. [PubMed ID: 31011942]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05615-5.

  • 17.

    Amalia L, Dalimonthe NZ. Clinical significance of Platelet-to-White Blood Cell Ratio (PWR) and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in acute ischemic stroke. Heliyon. 2020;6(10). e05033. [PubMed ID: 33083587]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7553977]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05033.

  • 18.

    Garbens A, Wallis CJD, Bjarnason G, Kulkarni GS, Nathens AB, Nam RK, et al. Platelet to white blood cell ratio predicts 30-day postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal malignancy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(11):E414-20. [PubMed ID: 29072562]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5698019]. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4478.

  • 19.

    Tang C, Cheng X, Yu S, Wang Y, Hou J, Li Q, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with the oxaliplatin and capecitabine regimen. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:7061-75. [PubMed ID: 30410363]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6200072]. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S176768.

  • 20.

    Chen Z, Huang Y, Li S, Lin J, Liu W, Ding Z, et al. Platelet-to-White Blood Cell Ratio: A Prognostic Predictor for 90-Day Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Intravenous Thrombolysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25(10):2430-8. [PubMed ID: 27372596]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.06.015.

  • 21.

    Lee J, Yoo SH, Sohn W, Kim HW, Choi YS, Won JH, et al. Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients receiving entecavir for chronic hepatitis B. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2016;22(3):339-49. [PubMed ID: 27729627]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5066372]. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2016.0021.

  • 22.

    Sarin SK, Kedarisetty CK, Abbas Z, Amarapurkar D, Bihari C, Chan AC, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) 2014. Hepatol Int. 2014;8(4):453-71. [PubMed ID: 26202751]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-014-9580-2.

  • 23.

    European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010;53(3):397-417. [PubMed ID: 20633946]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004.

  • 24.

    Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A, Simpson K, Wendon J, Burroughs A. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet. 2015;386(10003):1576-87. [PubMed ID: 26423181]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00309-8.

  • 25.

    Berardi A, Baroni L, Bacchi Reggiani ML, Ambretti S, Biasucci G, Bolognesi S, et al. The burden of early-onset sepsis in Emilia-Romagna (Italy): A 4-year, population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(19):3126-31. [PubMed ID: 26515917]. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1114093.

  • 26.

    Zhang X, Liu ZQ, Zhang W, Xu Q. A retrospective analysis of plasma D-dimer dynamic variation in terminal stage cancer patients: Implications for disease progression. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(8):2395-401. [PubMed ID: 25232445]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4161605].

  • 27.

    Vanderschueren S, De Weerdt A, Malbrain M, Vankersschaever D, Frans E, Wilmer A, et al. Thrombocytopenia and prognosis in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(6):1871-6. [PubMed ID: 10890635]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200006000-00031.

  • 28.

    Gangireddy VG, Kanneganti PC, Sridhar S, Talla S, Coleman T. Management of thrombocytopenia in advanced liver disease. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;28(10):558-64. [PubMed ID: 25222481]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4234356]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/532191.

  • 29.

    Hitchcock IS, Kaushansky K. Thrombopoietin from beginning to end. Br J Haematol. 2014;165(2):259-68. [PubMed ID: 24499199]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12772.

  • 30.

    Sakai K, Iwao T, Oho K, Toyonaga A, Sata M. Propranolol ameliorates thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol. 2002;37(2):112-8. [PubMed ID: 11871761]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350200005.

  • 31.

    Peck-Radosavljevic M. Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease. Liver Int. 2017;37(6):778-93. [PubMed ID: 27860293]. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13317.

  • 32.

    Mitchell O, Feldman DM, Diakow M, Sigal SH. The pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease. Hepat Med. 2016;8:39-50. [PubMed ID: 27186144]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4847598]. https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S74612.

  • 33.

    Matsuo R, Ohkohchi N, Murata S, Ikeda O, Nakano Y, Watanabe M, et al. Platelets Strongly Induce Hepatocyte Proliferation with IGF-1 and HGF In Vitro. J Surg Res. 2008;145(2):279-86. [PubMed ID: 17688880]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.035.

  • 34.

    Maruyama T, Murata S, Takahashi K, Tamura T, Nozaki R, Ikeda N, et al. Platelet transfusion improves liver function in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2013;229(3):213-20. [PubMed ID: 23459612]. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.229.213.

  • 35.

    Vinholt PJ, Hvas AM, Nielsen C, Soderstrom AC, Sprogoe U, Fialla AD, et al. Reduced platelet activation and platelet aggregation in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Platelets. 2018;29(5):520-7. [PubMed ID: 28895774]. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2017.1349308.

  • 36.

    Akca S, Haji-Michael P, de Mendonca A, Suter P, Levi M, Vincent JL. Time course of platelet counts in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):753-6. [PubMed ID: 11940740]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200204000-00005.

  • 37.

    Szabo S, Etzel D, Ehlers R, Walter T, Kazmaier S, Helber U, et al. Combined thrombolysis with abciximab favourably influences platelet-leukocyte interactions and platelet activation in acute myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005;20(3):155-61. [PubMed ID: 16261288]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-005-3546-0.

  • 38.

    Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P, Pavesi M, Angeli P, Cordoba J, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1426-37. [PubMed ID: 23474284]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.042.

  • 39.

    Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, Kremers W, Therneau TM, Kosberg CL, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464-70. [PubMed ID: 11172350]. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.22172.

  • 40.

    Wasmuth HE, Kunz D, Yagmur E, Timmer-Stranghoner A, Vidacek D, Siewert E, et al. Patients with acute on chronic liver failure display "sepsis-like" immune paralysis. J Hepatol. 2005;42(2):195-201. [PubMed ID: 15664244]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2004.10.019.

  • 41.

    Martin-Mateos R, Alvarez-Mon M, Albillos A. Dysfunctional Immune Response in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: It Takes Two to Tango. Front Immunol. 2019;10:973. [PubMed ID: 31118937]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6504833]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00973.

  • 42.

    Du B, Teng J, Yin R, Tian Y, Jiang T, Du Y, et al. Increased Circulating T Follicular Helper Cells Induced via IL-12/21 in Patients With Acute on Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure. Front Immunol. 2021;12:641362. [PubMed ID: 33868273]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8044369]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.641362.

  • 43.

    Rueschenbaum S, Cai C, Schmidt M, Schwarzkopf K, Dittmer U, Zeuzem S, et al. Translation of IRF-1 Restricts Hepatic Interleukin-7 Production to Types I and II Interferons: Implications for Hepatic Immunity. Front Immunol. 2020;11:581352. [PubMed ID: 33584648]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7874116]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.581352.

  • 44.

    Zhou C, Zhang N, He TT, Wang Y, Wang LF, Sun YQ, et al. High levels of serum interleukin-6 increase mortality of hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(30):4479-88. [PubMed ID: 32874059]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7438191]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i30.4479.

  • 45.

    Claria J, Stauber RE, Coenraad MJ, Moreau R, Jalan R, Pavesi M, et al. Systemic inflammation in decompensated cirrhosis: Characterization and role in acute-on-chronic liver failure. Hepatology. 2016;64(4):1249-64. [PubMed ID: 27483394]. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28740.