Logo
Hepat Mon

Image Credit:Hepat Mon

Prognostic Factors of Patients with Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis and Establishment of a Risk Prediction Model

Author(s):
Hua JiangHua Jiang1,*, Fei WuFei Wu2, Wenkai PengWenkai Peng1, Cong WangCong Wang1
1Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
2The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China


Hepatitis Monthly:Vol. 25, issue 1; e150630
Published online:Apr 08, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 02, 2024
Accepted:Mar 24, 2025
How to Cite:Hua JiangFei WuWenkai PengCong WangPrognostic Factors of Patients with Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis and Establishment of a Risk Prediction Model.Hepat Mon.2025;25(1):e150630.https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon-150630.

Abstract

Background:

We aimed to explore the prognostic factors in patients with decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis (HBC) and to establish a risk prediction model.

Methods:

In this prospective study, 120 subjects were selected from patients with decompensated HBC who were hospitalized between January 2022 and January 2023. All patients were followed for one year. Using death during follow-up as the prognostic endpoint, patients were categorized into a good prognosis (survival) group and a poor prognosis (death) group. Demographic data and laboratory indicators were compared between the two groups. Risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a risk prediction model was subsequently established.

Results:

There were 30 cases (25%) in the poor prognosis group and 90 cases (75%) in the good prognosis group. The incidence of hypoproteinemia, international normalized ratio (INR), and the levels of total cholesterol (TC), cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group compared to the good prognosis group (P < 0.05). Hypoproteinemia, cfDNA, GM-CSF, and INR were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC [odds ratio (OR) > 1, P < 0.05], while TC was identified as a protective factor (OR < 1, P < 0.05). A regression equation was established as follows:

Logit (P) = -12.544 + 1.376 × cfDNA + 1.051 × GM-CSF + 1.025 × INR + 0.675 × TC + 4.136 × hypoproteinemia.

The area under the curve (AUC) for this model was 0.920 [95% confidence interval: 0.855 - 0.980, P < 0.001], indicating high reliability and stability.

Conclusions:

Hypoproteinemia, INR, cfDNA, and GM-CSF are risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC.

1. Background

Hepatitis B is a common and frequently occurring disease in clinical practice. There are 900,000 to 1,000,000 new cases of hepatitis B in China every year, and both the number of new cases and the incidence rate are on the rise (1). Currently, antiviral medication is the dominant clinical treatment for hepatitis B, effectively delaying disease progression (2). Nevertheless, hepatitis B affects liver microcirculation and suppresses normal physiological function, potentially inducing decompensated cirrhosis in the presence of various internal and external factors (3, 4). Decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis (HBC) is characterized by symptoms and signs caused by hepatic insufficiency and portal hypertension, accompanied by various complications, making treatment more difficult and greatly increasing the risk of poor prognosis (5, 6). The high incidence rate of cirrhosis-related complications in patients with decompensated HBC not only brings significant economic and psychological burdens but also markedly increases the risk of death (7, 8). However, recompensation can occur in some patients with decompensated cirrhosis after actively receiving etiological and symptomatic treatment as early as possible, thus transitioning to compensated cirrhosis (9, 10). Therefore, it is of great significance to identify the influencing factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC as early as possible and to screen high-risk groups to ameliorate prognosis. Although several studies have attempted to identify prognostic factors and develop predictive models for these patients, limitations such as small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and inadequate adjustment for confounding factors exist (11, 12).

2. Objectives

In this context, the influencing factors for poor prognosis of decompensated HBC subjects were analyzed in this study, and a risk prediction model was established based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, aiming to improve the prognosis of patients through early prevention.

3. Methods

3.1. General Data

In this prospective study, 120 subjects were selected from patients with decompensated HBC who were hospitalized for treatment between January 2022 and January 2023. This study was reviewed and approved by the medical ethics committee of our hospital (approval No. 2021001204).

3.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were determined as follows: (1) Patients with a history of hepatitis B and clinically diagnosed with decompensated HBC; (2) those who signed informed consent forms; (3) those with clear consciousness, a normal mental state, and stable vital signs, allowing them to cooperate in the study; (4) those with a history of hepatitis B; (5) those with an expected survival period greater than 6 months; and (6) those with complete clinical and imaging data.

Exclusion criteria included: (1) Patients with uncontrolled infectious or communicable diseases; (2) those with severe anemia or poor general conditions; (3) those with decompensated cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease, cholestatic liver disease, or autoimmune liver disease; (4) those with a history of splenectomy or portal shunt; (5) those with a medication history of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants; or (6) those with coagulation disorders or bleeding tendencies.

3.3. Prognostic Evaluation

The patients were followed up for one year through telephone or in-person visits at regular intervals. With death during follow-up as the prognostic endpoint, the patients were assigned to a good prognosis (survival) group (n = 90) and a poor prognosis (death) group (n = 30).

3.4. Collection of Baseline Data

A questionnaire was designed to collect demographic data from patients, including age, sex, smoking history, underlying disease, drinking history, family history, international normalized ratio (INR) (prothrombin time/international sensitivity index), and hypoproteinemia (defined as plasma total protein < 60 g/L and albumin < 30 g/L).

Relevant laboratory indicators were measured at the time of enrollment. Specifically, 3 mL of fasting venous blood was drawn in the morning on the first day after admission and centrifuged to obtain the upper serum. Liver function indicators—including alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin—and kidney function indicators—including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, and glomerular filtration rate—were measured using the 7060 automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi, Japan).

The inflammatory marker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was examined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a kit purchased from Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (China). Routine blood indicators—including hemoglobin count, platelet count, and white blood cell count—were measured using the Countstar cell analyzer (Beijing Taize Jiaye Technology Development Co., Ltd., China).

Blood lipid indicators, including triglycerides and total cholesterol (TC), were detected using the AU5821 automatic biochemical analyzer (Beckman Coulter, USA). Cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively (kits: Genzyme, USA).

3.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 23.0 software was utilized for statistical analysis. Measurement data were described as mean ± standard deviation (x-±s) and analyzed using the t-test. Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages [n (%)] and assessed using the chi-square test. Risk factors were identified through logistic regression analysis, based on which a risk prediction model was developed. The predictive power of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Prognosis

There were 30 cases (25%) in the poor prognosis group and 90 cases (75%) in the good prognosis group.

4.2. Baseline Data of Two Groups

No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of sex, age, underlying diseases, smoking history, drinking history, family history, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin count, platelet count, white blood cell count, and triglyceride levels (P > 0.05). However, the proportion of patients with hypoproteinemia, as well as the serum levels of INR, TC, cfDNA, and GM-CSF, were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group compared to the good prognosis group (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.Baseline Data of Two Groups a
FactorsPoor Prognosis Group (n = 30)Good Prognosis Group (n = 90)χ2/t ValueP-Value
Gender0.0110.916
Male (n = 65)16 (53.33)49 (54.44)
Female (n = 55)14 (46.67)41 (45.55)
Underlying disease0.0190.890
Yes (n = 21)5 (16.67)16 (17.78)
No (n = 99)25 (83.33)74 (82.22)
Family history0.6260.429
Yes (n = 5)0 (0.00)5 (5.56)
No (n = 115)30 (100.00)85 (94.44)
Smoking history0.0290.865
Yes (n = 13)3 (10.00)10 (11.11)
No (n = 107)27 (90.00)80 (88.89)
Drinking history0.0210.885
Yes (n = 19)5 (16.67)14 (15.56)
No (n = 101)25 (83.33)76 (84.44)
Hyperproteinemia6.6980.010
Yes (n = 81)26 (86.67)55 (61.11)
No (n = 39)4 (13.33)35 (38.89)
Age (y)55.86 ± 5.2555.65 ± 5.340.1870.852
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)55.55 ± 10.2553.24 ± 10.051.0850.280
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)43.52 ± 6.2545.24 ± 6.521.2640.209
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L)130.24 ± 15.65133.54 ± 16.240.9720.333
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (U/L)72.54 ± 7.5871.24 ± 8.400.7510.454
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)50.24 ± 6.2448.54 ± 7.251.1500.253
Serum creatinine (μg/L)75.21 ± 8.2172.25 ± 7.261.8710.064
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)7.50 ± 0.527.36 ± 0.321.7520.082
Cystatin C (mg/L)1.49 ± 0.231.47 ± 0.210.4410.660
Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min)155.72 ± 18.85153.45 ± 18.320.5840.561
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L)10.33 ± 0.9910.24 ± 0.880.4700.639
Hemoglobin count (g/L)110.52 ± 15.25112.24 ± 16.240.4510.653
Platelet count (× 109 L)55.35 ± 5.2454.24 ± 5.021.0380.302
White blood cell count (× 109 L)6.02 ± 0.155.99 ± 0.160.9030.368
Triglyceride (mmol/L)1.15 ± 0.301.20 ± 0.250.9010.369
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)2.19 ± 0.223.26 ± 0.3316.552< 0.001
Cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (μg/L)3571.25 ± 416.273016.52 ± 342.257.272< 0.001
Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (ng/mL)35.15 ± 3.0225.12 ± 2.9216.156< 0.001
International normalized ratio1.81 ± 0.401.50 ± 0.324.307< 0.001

Baseline Data of Two Groups a

4.3. Results of Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Using the indicators associated with poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC (TC, cfDNA, GM-CSF, INR, and hypoproteinemia) as independent variables (with assigned values shown in Table 2), and patient prognosis as the dependent variable (1 = Poor prognosis, 0 = Good prognosis), multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. The results indicated that hypoproteinemia, cfDNA, GM-CSF, and INR were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC [odds ratio (OR) > 1, P < 0.05], while TC was identified as a protective factor (OR < 1, P < 0.05) (Table 3 and Figure 1).

Table 2.Assignment of Major Independent Variables
VariablesVariable CategoryDescriptionAssignment
Total cholesterolContinuous variableX1-
Cell free deoxyribonucleic acidContinuous variableX2-
Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factorContinuous variableX3-
International normalized ratioContinuous variableX4-
HypoproteinemiaCategorical variableX51 = Yes, 0 = No
PrognosisCategorical variableY1 = Poor prognosis, 0 = Good prognosis

Assignment of Major Independent Variables

Table 3.Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Results of Poor Prognosis of Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis Patients
IndicatorβStandard ErrorWaldPOdds Ratio95% Confidence Interval
cfDNA0.3190.06623.075< 0.0011.3761.208 - 1.567
Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor0.0500.01412.867< 0.0011.0511.023 - 1.080
International normalized ratio0.0240.00615.893< 0.0011.0251.013 - 1.037
Total cholesterol-0.3970.10925.214< 0.0010.6750.610 - 0.820
Hypoproteinemia1.4200.5796.0140.0144.1361.330 - 12.866
Constant-12.5443.20115.3520.0000.000 -

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis Results of Poor Prognosis of Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis Patients

Forest plot of clinical characteristics based on multivariate logistic regression analysis
Figure 1.

Forest plot of clinical characteristics based on multivariate logistic regression analysis

4.4. Establishment and Evaluation of Prediction Model

A regression equation was established as follows:

Logit (P) = -12.544 + 1.376 × cfDNA + 1.051 × GM-CSF + 1.025 × INR + 0.675 × TC + 4.136 × hypoproteinemia.

The area under the ROC curve for the prediction model was 0.920 [95% confidence interval: 0.855 - 0.980, P < 0.001], indicating that the model was both reliable and stable (Figure 2).

Receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model
Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic curve of the prediction model

5. Discussion

In this study, we intended to explore the prognostic factors in patients with decompensated HBC and to establish a risk prediction model. The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that hypoproteinemia, cfDNA, GM-CSF, and INR were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC, while TC served as a protective factor. The reasons are as follows:

First, liver damage caused by decompensated HBC weakens the liver’s capacity for protein and plasma protein synthesis. With the continuous decline in plasma albumin, the effective osmotic pressure also decreases, leading to excessive water retention in tissues. This results in complications such as pleural effusion and ascites, significantly increasing the difficulty of treatment and the risk of poor prognosis. Additionally, these patients often experience impaired blood circulation and reduced oxygen-carrying capacity, contributing to insufficient tissue oxygen supply and further elevating the risk of unfavorable outcomes (13, 14). Therefore, it is essential to assess hypoproteinemia and implement appropriate corrective interventions to improve nutritional status and thereby ameliorate prognosis.

Second, cfDNA is typically released by lymphocytes, other nucleated cells, damaged tissue cells, and inflammatory cells. It is an effective biomarker for apoptosis and/or tissue injury, and its concentration in circulation reliably reflects the severity of tissue damage (15, 16). Elevated cfDNA levels are indicative of more extensive hepatic tissue damage in patients with decompensated HBC, leading to an inevitably poor prognosis despite active treatment.

Third, GM-CSF promotes the proliferation and activation of macrophages and stimulates the release of T-cell activation-related cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Elevated TNF-α levels exacerbate the hepatic inflammatory response and enhance the expression of human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) and intercellular adhesion molecules. HLA-I is associated with the recognition of target antigens by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, while intercellular adhesion molecules facilitate the adhesion of these lymphocytes to hepatocytes. This process, driven by NF-κB activation, promotes hepatocyte fibrosis and liver injury, thus increasing the likelihood of a poor prognosis (17, 18)

Interleukin-6, through activation of the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway, contributes to the proliferation and activation of hepatocytes and astrocytes, thereby worsening liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. Additionally, IL-6 regulates T-cell polarization by promoting the differentiation and activation of T helper 17 (Th17) cells, which compromises the liver’s immune defense mechanisms. Consequently, disease progression continues, resulting in a poor prognosis (19, 20).

Fourth, an increased INR reflects a more pronounced decline in liver synthetic and reserve capacity, more significant hypersplenism, and a more severe overall condition, thereby greatly increasing the risk of poor prognosis (21).

Fifth, TC levels remain in dynamic balance in individuals with normal liver function. However, in patients with decompensated HBC, whose liver function is notably impaired, serum TC levels decline due to a reduction in active hepatocytes and inhibited synthesis of phospholipid-cholesterol acyltransferase and apolipoprotein A (22, 23). Thus, a lower serum TC level indicates more substantial liver damage, subsequently elevating the risk of a poor prognosis.

Taken together, it is essential to closely monitor cfDNA, GM-CSF, INR, and TC levels in patients and implement effective interventions to maintain these indicators within the normal range, thereby reducing the risk of poor outcomes.

Finally, a regression equation was constructed as follows:

Logit (P) = -12.544 + 1.376 × cfDNA + 1.051 × GM-CSF + 1.025 × INR + 0.675 × TC + 4.136 × hypoproteinemia.

This comprehensive prediction model, developed using five independent risk factors, effectively compensates for the low sensitivity and specificity of univariate prediction. It aids in the rapid identification of high-risk patients with poor prognoses due to decompensated HBC, thereby supporting clinical decision-making and improving outcomes.

However, this study has several limitations. The patient population was derived from a limited geographic and clinical range, which may introduce selection bias. In addition, some patients presented with other complications, making it challenging to isolate the effects of individual variables. Moreover, the follow-up duration was relatively short. Therefore, future validation of this risk prediction model will require multicenter, prospective studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods.

In conclusion, cfDNA, GM-CSF, INR, and hypoproteinemia are independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with decompensated HBC. The prediction model developed in this study demonstrates strong predictive performance and offers a valuable reference for future clinical assessment and intervention strategies.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Xu C, Wang Y, Cheng K, Yang X, Wang X, Guo S, et al. A Mathematical Model to Study the Potential Hepatitis B Virus Infections and Effects of Vaccination Strategies in China. Vaccines (Basel). 2023;11(10). [PubMed ID: 37896934]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10610674]. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11101530.
  • 2.
    Ma H, Yan QZ, Ma JR, Li DF, Yang JL. Overview of the immunological mechanisms in hepatitis B virus reactivation: Implications for disease progression and management strategies. World J Gastroenterol. 2024;30(10):1295-312. [PubMed ID: 38596493]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11000084]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1295.
  • 3.
    Mnatzaganian G, MacLachlan JH, Allard N, Brown C, Rowe S, Cowie BC. Missed opportunities for diagnosis of hepatitis B and C in individuals diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38(6):976-83. [PubMed ID: 36866537]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16162.
  • 4.
    Zhang T, Deng Y, Kang HY, Xiang HL, Nan YM, Hu JH, et al. [Recompensation of complications in patients with hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis treated with entecavir antiviral therapy]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2023;31(7):692-7. ZH. [PubMed ID: 37580250]. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230324-00126.
  • 5.
    Zhou J, Li X, Wang M, Gu C, Liu J. Platelet-to-Monocyte Ratio as a Novel Promising Agent for the Prognosis of Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Decompensated Cirrhosis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;2023:6646156. [PubMed ID: 37485072]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10361825]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6646156.
  • 6.
    Kim DS, Kim BK, Lee JS, Lee HW, Park JY, Kim DY, et al. Noninvasive risk assessment of hepatic decompensation in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;38(8):1372-80. [PubMed ID: 37188655]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16210.
  • 7.
    Hui VW, Wong GL, Wong VW, Chan HL, Lai JC, Tse YK, et al. Baveno VII criteria for recompensation predict transplant-free survival in patients with hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhosis. JHEP Rep. 2023;5(9):100814. [PubMed ID: 37546279]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10400846]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100814.
  • 8.
    Al Kaabi H, Al Alawi AM, Al Falahi Z, Al-Naamani Z, Al Busafi SA. Clinical Characteristics, Etiology, and Prognostic Scores in Patients with Acute Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(17). [PubMed ID: 37685822]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10488876]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175756.
  • 9.
    Ke Q, Yu X, Wang X, Huang J, Lin B, He J, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of spontaneous portosystemic shunt in patients with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: A multicenter study from China. Dig Liver Dis. 2023;55(10):1382-90. [PubMed ID: 37164894]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2023.04.012.
  • 10.
    Su D, Zeng X, Tang Y, Wang W. Construction and Application of Patient-Participated Health Care Guidance Plan for Patients with Decompensated Hepatitis B Cirrhosis. Hepat Med. 2024;16:45-54. [PubMed ID: 38859813]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11162963]. https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S455557.
  • 11.
    Deng Y, Kang H, Xiang H, Nan Y, Hu J, Meng Q, et al. Durability and on-treatment predictors of recompensation in entecavir-treated patients with hepatitis B and decompensated cirrhosis. JHEP Rep. 2024;6(7):101091. [PubMed ID: 39022388]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11252528]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101091.
  • 12.
    Mao HD, Zheng SQ, Yang SH, Huang ZY, Xue Y, Zhou M. A new model predicts hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HBV-related decompensated liver cirrhosis and long-term antiviral therapy: a prospective study. PeerJ. 2023;11. e15014. [PubMed ID: 36992940]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10042153]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15014.
  • 13.
    Duran-Guell M, Garrabou G, Flores-Costa R, Casulleras M, Lopez-Vicario C, Zhang IW, et al. Essential role for albumin in preserving liver cells from TNFalpha-induced mitochondrial injury. FASEB J. 2023;37(3). e22817. [PubMed ID: 36809676]. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202201526R.
  • 14.
    Wiedermann CJ. Hypoalbuminemia as Surrogate and Culprit of Infections. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9). [PubMed ID: 33925831]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8123513]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094496.
  • 15.
    Foda ZH, Annapragada AV, Boyapati K, Bruhm DC, Vulpescu NA, Medina JE, et al. Detecting Liver Cancer Using Cell-Free DNA Fragmentomes. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(3):616-31. [PubMed ID: 36399356]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9975663]. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0659.
  • 16.
    Zhang X, Wang Z, Tang W, Wang X, Liu R, Bao H, et al. Ultrasensitive and affordable assay for early detection of primary liver cancer using plasma cell-free DNA fragmentomics. Hepatology. 2022;76(2):317-29. [PubMed ID: 34954829]. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.32308.
  • 17.
    Sehgal R, Maiwall R, Rajan V, Islam M, Baweja S, Kaur N, et al. Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Modulates Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Treg Activity in Decompensated Cirrhotic Patients With Sepsis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:828949. [PubMed ID: 35720398]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9205181]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.828949.
  • 18.
    Qian D, Zhang Y. Influence of Xuebijing injection combined with cefoperazone sodium and sulbactam sodium in treating hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: TNF-alpha, IL-18, IL-6, and hepatic function. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(4):2907-14. [PubMed ID: 34017455]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8129332].
  • 19.
    Abdel-Razik A, Abdelsalam M, Gad DF, Abdelwahab A, Tawfik M, Elzehery R, et al. Recurrence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: novel predictors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32(6):718-26. [PubMed ID: 31651658]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001578.
  • 20.
    Mayr U, Lukas M, Elnegouly M, Vogt C, Bauer U, Ulrich J, et al. Ascitic Interleukin 6 Is Associated with Poor Outcome and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Validation in Critically Ill Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9). [PubMed ID: 32899730]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7564827]. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092865.
  • 21.
    Matei D, Groza I, Furnea B, Puie L, Levi C, Chiru A, et al. Predictors of variceal or nonvariceal source of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. An etiology predictive score established and validated in a tertiary referral center. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013;22(4):379-84. [PubMed ID: 24369318].
  • 22.
    Del Bo C, Perna S, Allehdan S, Rafique A, Saad S, AlGhareeb F, et al. Does the Mediterranean Diet Have Any Effect on Lipid Profile, Central Obesity and Liver Enzymes in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Subjects? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Nutrients. 2023;15(10). [PubMed ID: 37242133]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10222807]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15102250.
  • 23.
    Shi K, Zhang Y, Li Y, Wang X, Feng Y, Wang X. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol as a prognostic marker for 90-day transplant-free mortality in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1458818. [PubMed ID: 39911493]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11794805]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1458818.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.