Our anti-HBSP antibodies semi-quantitative ELISA showed significant discrimination between chronic hepatitis B patients and the control sera (P < 0.001). However, a relatively low incidence rate (9%) of anti-HBSP antibodies among Syrian CHB patients enrolled in our study compared to previous studies (
12) might be attributed to different technical conditions adopted including synthetic peptide variants and ELISA procedure. Furthermore, inability to detect the antibodies due to low antibody levels, antigen-antibody complex formation (
21), or HBSP production down-regulation (
20) might be speculated. Thus, anti-HBSP antibodies incidence rate might have increased if follow-up and retesting were accomplished for CHB patients showing negative or grey-zone results.
In the present study, no association was seen between anti-HBSP antibody detection and viral replication manifested by the viral loads and HBeAg status. HBSP hypothesized mechanism of action does not seem to impact viral replication (
12). HBeAg production might be disabled by precore and basal core promoter mutations. Hence, predominant HBeAg-negative status in Syria does not necessarily indicate better prognosis or less replication (
2). Conversely, Anti-HBSP antibodies status correlated moderately with fibrosis severity indicated by the liver biopsy staging ranks. This finding might be due to HBSP-induced apoptosis in the liver hepatocellular cells (
22,
23), which might diminish the immune neutralization due to the viral particles spread (
24). Accordingly, lack of/weak correlation of anti-HBSP antibodies status with necroinflammation grades/aminotransferase levels, respectively, is rationally explained. Furthermore, hepatic steatosis was found in three CHB patients' liver biopsies with fibrosis staging S1 (one patient) or S2 (two patients). However, this was overlooked since the association of liver steatosis with fibrosis severity in CHB infection is controversial (
25-
27). Our ELISA results using the three synthetic peptide variants were partially consistent. In particular, the peptide variant two could not detect all anti-HBSP positive sera. Moreover, the results of the peptide variant three showed the highest correlation coefficient with fibrosis severity. This might suggest variant three (LLLKEPLCIPPVAVQNLRTE) to be efficient for detecting anti-HBSP antibodies.
Albeit semi-quantitative, our assay paved the way to a tentative fibrosis assessment. Hence, developing the anti-HBSP ELISA described herein into a quantitative assay and evaluating its sensitivity and specificity empirically might be advisable to determine anti-HBSP antibodies levels discriminating different liver biopsy staging ranks. In conclusion, we introduced an anti-HBSP antibody ELISA, purposely designed based on genomic sequences obtained from HBV strains circulating in the Syrian population. Although anti-HBSP test did not show any significant association with parameters of viral replication and liver inflammation, it delivered partial indication on liver fibrosis associated with chronic hepatitis B.