Abstract
Background:
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes have been shown to have virological, clinical, and therapeutic implications. Knowledge about HBV genotype distribution in Slovenia is scarce. This study was the first to determine various characteristics of patients with chronic HBV infection with regard to HBV genotypes at the national level.Methods:
HBV genotype determination was performed on randomly selected patients out of 1,729 patients from all Slovenian regions who tested positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) at the national reference laboratory for viral hepatitis between January 1997 and December 2010. Demographic, epidemiological, virological, and clinical data were extracted from the medical records and statistically analyzed with regard to HBV genotypes.Results:
A total of 186 HBsAg positive patients with the mean age of 40.1 years were identified from whom, 65.1% were male. 157 (84.4%) cases presented with genotype D, 23 (12.4%) with genotype A, and 6 (3.2%) with other HBV genotypes. Sexual transmission was more significantly associated with lower odds for HBV genotype D infection compared to blood-related risk factors (P = 0.023). Genotype A was significantly more common in men who had sex with men (P = 0.043). Compared to females with genotype D, genotype A positive women presented unknown risk factors more significantly (P = 0.002).Conclusions:
HBV genotype D is the most prevalent genotype in Slovenia. However, future changes might be expected due to recent massive immigrations to Europe. Routine HBV genotyping is recommended in patients with certain risk factors prior to initiation of hepatitis B treatment.Keywords
Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes Risk Factors Clinical Characteristics
1. Background
With an estimated 250 million of infected persons worldwide, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection presents a global public health problem. Despite the existence of effective vaccine and treatment, chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains the leading cause of chronic liver disease and associated mortality (1, 2). HBV prevalence varies with region, between 0.01% in Northern Europe and 22.4% in some African areas (3). In some European countries, the HBV prevalence is higher, with up to 10.4% reported from Kyrgyzstan (3).
HBV genotypes are effective on clinical outcome, seroconversion rates of HBV e antigen (HBeAg), mutations in the (pre)core promoter regions, and response to therapy (4). The prevalence of the HBV genotypes varies geographically: genotype A prevails in Northern Europe, North America, India, and Africa, while genotypes B and C are more frequent in Southeast Asia, and genotype D in Southern Europe, the Middle East, and India (4).
In Slovenia, a central European country with 2 million people, the HBV prevalence has been estimated at below 1% (5). However, it is believed that the prevalence is underestimated due to under-reporting (6).
2. Objectives
The aim of this national study was to determine epidemiological, virological, and clinical characteristics of individuals with chronic HBV infection in Slovenia with regard to HBV genotypes in order to optimize the national diagnostic and treatment guidelines following European association for the study of the liver (EASL) recommendations (7).
3. Methods
3.1. Patients
The database of 1,729 HBsAg-positive patients from all regions of Slovenia who tested positive for HBsAg at the reference laboratory for molecular microbiology and diagnostics of hepatitis and HIV/AIDS, Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana between January 1997 and December 2010 was reviewed. HBV genotyping had already been performed on 127 cases. From the remaining, 450 presented with available medical data. From these, every fifth patient was selected for further genotyping following a systematic random sampling approach, yielding another 90 patients. Genotyping was successfully performed on 59 cases; in the remaining 31 cases, genotyping failed: in 24 due to undetectable HBV DNA or viral load < 100 IU/mL and in 7 due to inadequate quantity of sample.
Available epidemiological and clinical characteristics were reviewed from the medical documentation.
3.2. Serological and Molecular Methods
In all samples, HBsAg and HBeAg were determined using the ARCHITECT immunoassay analyzer (Abbott, Weisbaden, Germany) and HBV DNA viral load using the real-time PCR based test Abbott RealTime HBV Test (Abbott). Viral load was categorized according to the clinical implications into three ranges: ≤ 2,000 IU/mL, 2,000 - 20,000 IU/mL, and ≥ 20,000 IU/mL (7).
For determination of HBV genotypes, a two-stage procedure was followed. In the first step, real-time PCR was employed (8). The assay differentiates reliably between genotypes A and D in a single reaction, since probes are labeled with different fluorescein dyes (FAM for genotype A and YAK for genotype D). To determine HBV genotype in non-A-non-D positive samples, a portion of the HBV polymerase gene was sequenced using primers reported previously (9), and HBV genotypes determined using NCBI genotyping tool. The dual infection sequences were determined using real-time PCR method and confirmed by sequencing. The obtained sequences were analyzed using an on-line tool geno2pheno (10). The sequences determined in this study were deposited in the GenBank (accession numbers KY613598-KY613603).
3.3. Statistical Methods
Association between patients’ characteristics and HBV genotype was tested using univariate and multiple logistic regressions, likelihood ratio, or the Mann-Whitney U test. No correction for multiple comparisons was made. Significance tests were two-sided. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using R program 3.1.1 and SPSS 23.0.
The study was approved by the national medical ethics committee of the Republic of Slovenia on May 4th 2015 (consent number: 6/04/15).
4. Results
186 patients met the inclusion criteria. The baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients are presented in Table 1.
Baseline Demographic, Epidemiological, Virological, and Clinical Characteristics of the Included Patients (N = 186)
| Patients (N = 186) | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 121 (65.1) |
| Age, y | 40.1 ±14.4 |
| Risk factors-general (n = 155) | |
| Unknown | 78 (50.3) |
| Blood-related | 65 (41.9) |
| Blood- and sexual- behavior related | 5 (3.2) |
| Sexual-behavior related | 7 (4.5) |
| Risk factors-specified (n = 155) | |
| Unknown | 78 (50.3) |
| HBV in family | 50 (32.5) |
| Blood transfusion | 10 (6.4) |
| Sexual behavior | 10 (6.4) |
| Healthcare worker | 5 (3.2) |
| Hemodialysis | 4 (2.6) |
| Tattooing | 3 (1.9) |
| Incident | 2 (1.3) |
| Intravenous drug use | 1 (0.6) |
| Man having sex with man | 1 (0.6) |
| Bisexual male | 1 (0.6) |
| HBV-positive cohabitant | 1 (0.6) |
| Surgical procedure in the past | 1 (0.6) |
| HBeAg (n = 144) Negative | 101 (70.1) |
| Genotype (n = 186) D | 157 (84.4) |
| Other | 28 (15.1) |
| A | 23 (12.4) |
| B | 2 (1.1) |
| C | 2 (1.1) |
| F | 1 (0.5) |
| AD | 1 (0.5) |
| Viral load, IU/mL (n = 126) | |
| < 2,000 | 44 (34.6) |
| 2,000 - 20,000 | 13 (10.2) |
| > 20,000 | 70 (55.1) |
| AST, IU/L (n = 137) | |
| > 0.52, UNL | 79 (57.7) |
| ALT, IU/L (n = 137) | |
| > 0.56, UNL | 94 (68.6) |
Half of the studied patients reported no known risk factors for acquiring infection. Among the remaining, blood-related factors were the most common causes (41.9%). Patients with unknown risk factors were significantly older than patients with blood-related and sexual behavior-related risk factors (P = 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively).
The majority (70.1%) of patients were HBeAg-negative (Table 1).
Genotype D was present in 157/186 (84.4%) and non-D in 28/186 (15.1%); one patient (0.5%) had mixed AD genotype (Table 1). 146/173 (84.4 %) Slovenians presented with genotype D, of the remaining (7 Bosnians, 2 Romanians, 2 Albanians, 1 Bulgarian, and 1 Chinese), 11 presented with genotype D, one (Chinese) with genotype B, and one (Bosnian) with mixed genotype AD.
The association between HBV genotypes and epidemiological, virological, and clinical characteristics of the included patients is presented in Table 2. Compared to the patients with blood-related risk factors, patients with risky sexual behavior had lower odds for HBV genotype D (OR = 0.14 [95 % CI, 0.02; 0.75]; P = 0.023). Genotype A had a statistically significant association with men who had sex with men (MSM) and bisexual men (P = 0.043).
Association Between Hepatitis B Virus Genotypes and Demographic, Epidemiological, Virological, and Clinical Characteristics of the Included Patients (N = 185)a
| Genotype Non-D (N = 28) | Genotype D (N = 157) | OR (95 % CI) | P Value | Genotype A (N = 23) | P Valueb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female gender | 11 (39.3) | 54 (34.4) | 0.81 (0.35; 1.85) | 0.617 | 8 (34.8) | 0.971c |
| < 30 years of age | 20 (71.4) | 118 (75.2) | 1. 12 (0.49; 2.97) | 0.676 | 18 (78.3) | 0.744c |
| Risk factors | 0.022c | |||||
| BR | 6 (25) | 59 (45.4) | 1 | 3 (15) | ||
| SR | 3 (12.5) | 4 (3.1) | 0.14 (0.02; 0.75) | 0.023 | 3 (15) | |
| BR & SR | 1 (4.2) | 4 (3.1) | 0.41 (0.04; 4.25) | 0.453 | 1 (5) | |
| Unknown | 14 (58.3) | 63 (48.5) | 0.46 (0.16; 1.27) | 0.133 | 13 (65) | |
| HBeAg-positive | 9 (40.9) | 34 (28.1) | 0.56 (0.22; 1.44) | 0.228 | 6 (31.6) | 0.757c |
| Males (N = 120) | ||||||
| N = 17 (14.1%) | N = 103 (85.8%) | N = 15 (12.5%) | ||||
| Risk factors | n = 15 | n = 84 | n = 13 | 0.041c | ||
| BR | 4 (26.7) | 38 (45.2) | 1 | 3 (15.4) | ||
| SR | 3 (20) | 2 (2.3) | 0.07 (0.01; 0.55) | 0.012 | 3 (15.4) | |
| BR & SR | 1 (6.6) | 2 (2.3) | 0.21 (0.02; 2.87) | 0.242 | 1 (7.7) | |
| Unknown | 7 (46.7) | 42 (50) | 0.63 (0.17; 2.33) | 0.49 | 6 (46.2) | |
| MSM | 1 (6.7) | 0 | 0.05c | 1 (7.7) | 0.043c | |
| Bisexual men | 1 (6.7) | 0 | 0.05c | 1 (7.7) | 0.043c | |
| HBeAg-positive | 7/13 (53.8) | 23/81 (28.4) | 0.077c | 6/12 (50) | 0.144c | |
| Viral load, IU/mL | n = 15 | n = 67 | 0.980c | n = 13 | 0.856c | |
| < 2,000 | 4 (26.7) | 17 (25.4) | 4 (30.8) | |||
| 2,000 - 20,000 | 2 (13.3) | 8 (11.9) | 1 (7.7) | |||
| > 20,000 | 9 (60.0) | 42 (62.7) | 8 (61.5) | |||
| Females (N = 65) | ||||||
| N = 11 (16.9%) | N = 54 (83.1%) | N = 8 (12.3%) | ||||
| Risk factors | n = 9 | n = 46 | n = 7 | 0.020c | ||
| BR | 2 (22.2) | 21 (45.7) | 1 | 0 | ||
| SR or BR & SR | 0 | 4 (8.6) | - | - | 0 | |
| Unknown | 7 (77.8) | 21 (45.7) | 0.29 (0.05; 1.54) | 0.145 | 7 (100) | |
| Unknown risk f. | 7 (77.8) | 21 (45.7) | 0.07c | 7 (100) | 0.002c | |
| HBV in family | 2 (22.2) | 11 (23.9) | 0.913c | 0 | 0.06 c | |
| HBeAg positive | 2/9 (22.2) | 11/40 (27.5) | 0/7 (0) | 0.043c | ||
| Viral load, IU/mL | n = 8 | n = 36 | 0.492c | n = 6 | 0.237c | |
| < 2,000 | 5 (62.5) | 18 (50) | 5 (83.3) | |||
| 2,000 - 20,000 | 0 | 3 (8.3) | 0 | |||
| > 20,000 | 3 (37.5) | 15 (41.7) | 1 (16.7) | |||
Statistical analysis performed separately for males and females showed a significant association between HBV genotypes and risk factors; but no association between genotypes and age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, and viral load was observed. The risk factor was unknown for more genotype A infected females compared to genotype D infection cases (P = 0.002).
Multiple logistic regression with age, HBeAg status, viral load, risk factors for HBV infection, and ALT level as predictors and HBV genotype as the dependent variable showed that HBeAg-positive patients and those with sexual behavior-related risk factors have lower odds for HBV genotype D infection than for HBV non-D genotype (Table 3). The regression analysis was performed although Agresti’s rule of thumb concerning ten events for independent variable had been violated (11).
Association Between Hepatitis B Virus Genotype D and Epidemiological, Virological, and Clinical Characteristics of the Included Patients (Results of Multiple Logistic Regression; Reference Category: Non-D Genotypes) (N = 109)
| OR (95 % CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 0.99 (0.95; 1.03) | 0.543 |
| Risk factors | ||
| BR | ||
| SR | 0.11 (0.02; 0.87) | 0.036 |
| BR & SR | 0.54 (0.05; 6.18) | 0.623 |
| Unknown | 0.46 (0.13; 1.69) | 0.244 |
| HBeAg-positive | 0.23 (0.05; 0.98) | 0.047 |
| Viral load, IU/mL | ||
| < 2,000 | ||
| 2,000 - 20,000 | 1.4 (0.14; 13.87) | 0.773 |
| > 20,000 | 1.4 (0.33; 5.86) | 0.649 |
| ALT > 0.56 IU/L | 2.14 (0.57; 7.97) | 0.258 |
5. Discussion
Only scarce data are available on the characteristics of HBV infected patients in Slovenia. A 2.5% prevalence for HBsAg positive persons injecting drugs on substitution treatment was reported (12), which ranks Slovenia as a country with the lowest rate among European countries (13). In HIV-positive Slovenian patients, HBsAg was determined in 3.5% and 3.9% (14, 15), which are lower compared to other European countries (16).
So far, no study on HBV genotype distribution has been performed in Slovenia. According to our results, genotype D is the most prevalent one, followed by genotype A. The genotype D prevalence of 84.4% positions Slovenia alongside other countries of the Balkan region, such as Serbia (82%; 85%), Montenegro (80.2%), and Croatia (80%) (17-20).
The results highlighted out the association of HBV genotypes with the risk factors for acquiring the infection; patients with risky sexual behavior, especially MSM and bisexual men, were significantly more often infected with genotype A. VanHoudt et al. also reported genotype A as the most prevalent genotype in MSM population in Europe (21). Similar reports came from Japan (22).
In a patient originating from Bosnia-Herzegovina, a dual infection with genotypes A and D was determined. The prevalence of co-infections with two HBV genotypes in Europe has been poorly documented. Sporadic reports showed up to 27% prevalence of mixed genotype infections, predominantly AD (20, 23). Sequencing is less sensitive than other methods detecting mixed genotypes, as it detects mainly the predominant genotype in mixtures, leading to potential underestimation (24). In highly prevalent genotype D regions, a single-step PCR method can be used to distinguish HBV genotypes D from non-D (25).
HBeAg-positive patients were less likely to be infected with genotype D, and genotype D was more frequently present in patients with HBeAg-negative status. Our finding reflects the natural course of HBV infection characteristic in the Mediterranean region, where genotype D and pre-core mutations prevail and consequently, HBeAg-negative prevalence is higher (26). A 70.1% prevalence of HBeAg-negative infection in Slovenia is in accordance with other reports from Europe, where it varies from 70% - 100% (27).
Females infected with genotype D were significantly younger and had a higher viral load regardless the risk factor for infection compared to other genotypes. Similarly, Tran et al. reported very high viral loads in HBV genotype D infected women with ≤ 44 years compared to those infected with HBV of the non-D genotype (28).
Interestingly, no significant differences regarding the viral load between genotypes D and A were seen when the whole population was examined. Lindh et al. reported that HBeAg-positive patients with genotype D had higher viral load than those infected with other genotypes (29). Oommen et al. indicated viral load was higher in children infected with genotype D in comparison with genotype A (30).
Our study has several limitations. First, selection bias cannot be excluded. Due to financial limitations, only 90 additional randomly chosen patients could be genotyped. Besides, some statistical analyses were performed in smaller subpopulations due to lack of data. The strength of the study lies in its nationwide analysis of HBV genotypes in Slovenian patients.
In conclusion, the results suggest that genotype D is the most prevalent genotype in Slovenia that indicates the need to change the national guidelines for the management of CHB in males with history of high risk sexual behavior, especially in MSM. As CHB treatment response differs per HBV genotype (7), this risk group should be routinely genotyped before the treatment initiation.
References
-
1.
Locarnini S, Hatzakis A, Chen DS, Lok A. Strategies to control hepatitis B: Public policy, epidemiology, vaccine and drugs. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1 Suppl):S76-86. [PubMed ID: 25920093]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.01.018.
-
2.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095-128. [PubMed ID: 23245604]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
-
3.
Schweitzer A, Horn J, Mikolajczyk RT, Krause G, Ott JJ. Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013. Lancet. 2015;386(10003):1546-55. [PubMed ID: 26231459]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61412-X.
-
4.
Sunbul M. Hepatitis B virus genotypes: global distribution and clinical importance. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(18):5427-34. [PubMed ID: 24833873]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5427.
-
5.
Hatzakis A, Van Damme P, Alcorn K, Gore C, Benazzouz M, Berkane S, et al. The state of hepatitis B and C in the Mediterranean and Balkan countries: report from a summit conference. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20 Suppl 2:1-20. [PubMed ID: 23827008]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.12120.
-
6.
Kraigher A, Socan, M, Klavs, I, Frelih, T, Grilc, E, Grgic Vitek, M. Epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases in Slovenia in 2013. 2014. Available from: http://www.nijz.si/sites/www.nijz.si/files/publikacije-datoteke/epidemilosko_spremljanje_nalezljivih_bolezni_2013.pdf.
-
7.
Friedman SL. Focus. Metchnikoff, macrophages and the metabolic syndrome. J Hepatol. 2012;57(1):1-2. [PubMed ID: 22522383]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.006.
-
8.
Malmstrom S, Berglin-Enquist I, Lindh M. Novel method for genotyping hepatitis B virus on the basis of TaqMan real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1105-11. [PubMed ID: 20107090]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01442-09.
-
9.
Osiowy C, Villeneuve JP, Heathcote EJ, Giles E, Borlang J. Detection of rtN236T and rtA181V/T mutations associated with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in samples from patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection by the INNO-LiPA HBV DR line probe assay (version 2). J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(6):1994-7. [PubMed ID: 16757589]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02477-05.
-
10.
Beggel B, Neumann-Fraune M, Doring M, Lawyer G, Kaiser R, Verheyen J, et al. Genotyping hepatitis B virus dual infections using population-based sequence data. J Gen Virol. 2012;93(Pt 9):1899-907. [PubMed ID: 22694900]. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.043042-0.
-
11.
Agresti A. Building and applying logistic regression models. In: Agresti A, editor. An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007. p. 137-62.
-
12.
Baklan Z, Gorisek JR, Poljak M, Pisec A. Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, C and G virus infections among injecting drug users on methadone maintenance treatment in Maribor. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116 Suppl 2:5-7. [PubMed ID: 15506302].
-
13.
Prevalence of current hepatitis B infection (percentage with HBsAg) among injecting drug users (%), 1991 to 2007. 2009. Available from: http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/stats09/inftab114.
-
14.
Seme K, Lunar MM, Tomazic J, Vidmar L, Karner P, Maticic M, et al. Low prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections among HIV-infected individuals in Slovenia: a nation-wide study, 1986-2008. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2009;18(4):153-6. [PubMed ID: 20043052].
-
15.
Skamperle M, Seme K, Lunar MM, Maver PJ, Tomazic J, Vovko TD, et al. Prevalence, genotype distribution, and risk factors for hepatitis C infection among HIV-infected individuals in Slovenia: a 1986-2013 update. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2014;23(2):25-6. [PubMed ID: 24964945].
-
16.
Mocroft A, Ledergerber B, Katlama C, Kirk O, Reiss P, d'Arminio Monforte A, et al. Decline in the AIDS and death rates in the EuroSIDA study: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362(9377):22-9. [PubMed ID: 12853195].
-
17.
Lazarevic I, Cupic M, Delic D, Svirtlih NS, Simonovic J, Jovanovic T. Distribution of HBV genotypes, subgenotypes and HBsAg subtypes among chronically infected patients in Serbia. Arch Virol. 2007;152(11):2017-25. [PubMed ID: 17680327]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-007-1031-0.
-
18.
Milosevic I, Delic D, Lazarevic I, Pavlovic IP, Korac M, Bojovic K, et al. The significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes for the disease and treatment outcome among patients with chronic hepatitis B in Serbia. J Clin Virol. 2013;58(1):54-8. [PubMed ID: 23838671]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.017.
-
19.
Vratnica Z, Zehender G, Ebranati E, Sorrentino C, Lai A, Vujosevic D, et al. Hepatitis B virus genotype and subgenotype prevalence and distribution in Montenegro. J Med Virol. 2015;87(5):807-13. [PubMed ID: 25712706]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.24083.
-
20.
Deterding K, Constantinescu I, Nedelcu FD, Gervain J, Nemecek V, Srtunecky O, et al. Prevalence of HBV genotypes in Central and Eastern Europe. J Med Virol. 2008;80(10):1707-11. [PubMed ID: 18712830]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21294.
-
21.
van Houdt R, Bruisten SM, Geskus RB, Bakker M, Wolthers KC, Prins M, et al. Ongoing transmission of a single hepatitis B virus strain among men having sex with men in Amsterdam. J Viral Hepat. 2010;17(2):108-14. [PubMed ID: 19811610]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01158.x.
-
22.
Koibuchi T, Hitani A, Nakamura T, Nojiri N, Nakajima K, Jyuji T, et al. Predominance of genotype A HBV in an HBV-HIV-1 dually positive population compared with an HIV-1-negative counterpart in Japan. J Med Virol. 2001;64(4):435-40. [PubMed ID: 11468727].
-
23.
Schaefer S. Hepatitis B virus genotypes in Europe. Hepatol Res. 2007;37(s1):S20-6. [PubMed ID: 17627630]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00099.x.
-
24.
Pourkarim MR, Van Ranst M. Guidelines for the detection of a common source of hepatitis B virus infections. Hepat Mon. 2011;11(10):783-5. [PubMed ID: 22224075]. https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.773.
-
25.
Amini-Bavil-Olyaee S, Pourkarim MR, Schaefer S, Mahboudi F, Van Ranst M, Adeli A, et al. Single-step real-time PCR to quantify hepatitis B virus and distinguish genotype D from non-D genotypes. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18(4):300-4. [PubMed ID: 20367802]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01308.x.
-
26.
Wu JF, Chang MH. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection from infancy to adult life - the mechanism of inflammation triggering and long-term impacts. J Biomed Sci. 2015;22:92. [PubMed ID: 26487087]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-015-0199-y.
-
27.
Hadziyannis SJ, Vassilopoulos D. Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2001;34(4 Pt 1):617-24. [PubMed ID: 11584355]. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.27834.
-
28.
Tran TT, Gordon SC, Fung S, Dinh P, Yee L, Martins EB, et al. Hepatitis B e antigen status and hepatitis B DNA levels in women of childbearing age with chronic hepatitis B infection screening for clinical trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0121632. [PubMed ID: 25789483]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121632.
-
29.
Lindh M, Horal P, Dhillon AP, Norkrans G. Hepatitis B virus DNA levels, precore mutations, genotypes and histological activity in chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2000;7(4):258-67. [PubMed ID: 10886534].
-
30.
Oommen PT, Wirth S, Wintermeyer P, Gerner P. Relationship between viral load and genotypes of hepatitis B virus in children with chronic hepatitis B. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43(3):342-7. [PubMed ID: 16954957]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mpg.0000233191.95447.1e.