1. Background
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the terminology used for a wide spectrum of disorders ranging from simple steatosis to progressive nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis and its diagnosis in clinics is based on ultrasonography (1, 2). Although, the actual prevalence of NAFLD remains unknown (3), the prevalence of NAFLD ranges from about 20% - 35% in the Western population and about 19% - 32% in Asian population (4), with the prevalence being higher (70% - 90%) in obese individuals (5). One study reported that the prevalence of NASH in Iranian males is twice than females (6). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is characterized by elevated liver enzymes including alanine amino transferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST) and also, build-up of fat within liver cells (7). Obesity, sedentary lifestyle and insulin resistance are well-established risk factors for NAFLD; however, the pathogenesis of NAFLD is incompletely understood and factors that determine disease severity remain unclear (8). Although, the severity of fatty liver was positively related to anthropometric measurements including body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumference, subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and hypertriglyceridaemia (3, 9) Currently, there is no specific drug therapy approved for the treatment of NAFLD and management focus on treatment of the “metabolic syndrome” rather than NAFLD as an individual entity (10). Lifestyle change and Physical Activities are currently the main recommendation for people with NAFLD. Lifestyle interventions in the form of calorie restriction and increasing the physical activity level with an aim to reduce weight remain the cornerstone of treatment for patients with NAFLD (11). Exercise training (ET) is a major component of treatment for NAFLD (8) as recommended by the American Gastroenterological Association (12). However, the role of ET in the treatment of this condition has not been thoroughly investigated and only few studies have investigated the effect of ET on NAFLD, usually in combination with diet and weight loss (4, 13-18). Exercise training has been shown to reduce the risk of insulin resistance, aminotransferase levels, dyslipidemia, and impaired fasting glucose and can be beneficial for glucose-lipid metabolism (8, 19). Aerobic and resistance exercise can be therapeutic in reducing liver fat deposition by increasing energy expenditure, improvement in skeletal lipid oxidation, reduction in total and abdominal adiposity, reduction in subcutaneous fat and free fatty acid flux to liver (4, 14, 19-21). Overall, there is very limited data on the effectiveness of aerobic and resistance exercise on hepatic function in NAFLD. Mir et al. (17) demonstrated a significant reduction in aminotransferase levels and liver fat in patients with NASH who adhered to an aerobic exercise program. The results of one study demonstrated that, short-term exercise can target hepatic lipid composition, which may reduce the risk of NAFLD progression (16). de Piano et al. (15) present that the long-term exercise therapy along with aerobic and resistance therapy was significantly effective in improving noninvasive biomarkers of NAFLD. In another study, Damor et al. (4) present that moderate intensity progress resistance training is associated with significant improvement in hepatic fat, subcutaneous fat and insulin sensitivity in patients with NAFLD. Davoodi et al. (14) evaluated the effects of aerobic exercise on liver enzymes and hepatic fat in subjects with NAFLD. They reported that after eight weeks, aminotransferase levels and hepatic fat were significantly reduced in the aerobic group. So far, to the best of our knowledge, there are no data on the effect of aerobic and resistance exercise on liver aminotransferase levels and hepatic fat among the Iranian men with NAFLD; therefore, this study was undertaken.
2. Objectives
The present study was conducted to examine the effect of aerobic and resistance exercise training on liver enzymes and hepatic fat in men with NAFLD in Iran.
3. Patients and Methods
3.1. Subjects
In this randomized clinical trial study, subjects were randomly selected from the liver clinic in the department of gastroenterology/hepatology at Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran City, Iran. Sample size estimation was performed through single proportion formula with 95% confidence interval and the calculated sample size was 30. Subjects were between 32 and 54 years of age. Inclusion criteria including men with hepatic steatosis, which was confirmed by ultrasonography with acceptable sensitivity and specificity and was based on a hepatic triglyceride content greater than 5% (22). Exclusion criteria were identified as genetic, metabolic or endocrine diseases (15), alcohol consumption ≥ 30 g/day (13), heart and pulmonary disease, patients with chronic hepatitis B and C, autoimmune hepatitis, drug abuse, and patients with diabetic mellitus and fasting hyperglycemia. The study protocol was approved by the human research ethics committees of the Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (January 5, 2014 with Code No: 34). An informed consent was obtained from all patients, including agreement of the patients to participate as volunteers. The patients were then divided into three equal groups, aerobic, resistance and control groups (n = 10 in each group).
3.2. Aerobic Exercise Intervention
During the 8 week intervention period, an aerobic training (AT) program including a 45 minute session three times a week (135 min/week) under the supervision of an exercise physiologist and sport medicine. Aerobic exercise consists of three phases: warm-up, training and cool down. At the beginning of exercise session, subjects had a ten minute warm-up. The warm-up protocol was consisted of stretching movements and slowly running on treadmill. Then, the warm-up phase was followed by the training phase. At baseline, the training phase commenced with two 15 minute running on treadmill at 60% of their maximal heart rate (MHR) in the first week and increased to two 15 minute running on treadmill at 75% MHR per week by the final week of training (23). To assure that the desired heart rate (exercise intensity) was achieved and maintained for 30 minute, during the aerobic sessions, each participant underwent heart-rate monitoring with polar (model: FT1) heart rate monitor (24). Maximum heart rate was calculated using the formula (25):
3.3. Resistance Exercise Intervention
Resistance training was performed during 8-weeks with thrice weekly sessions on nonconsecutive days. The program consisted of seven exercises: triceps press, biceps curl, calf raise, leg press, leg extension, lat pull down and sit-ups (21). Each session lasted approximately 45 minute and consisted of a 5 minute warm-up with stretching followed by resistance exercise done as a circuit, ending with 5 minute cool down. The 1 repetition maximum (1RM) was measured at baseline and following the intervention (26). Initially, participants did two circuits using 50% of their 1RM and repeated them 10 times for the first and second weeks, progressing to two circuits, using 60% of their 1RM and repeated 10 times for the third and fourth weeks. In fifth and sixth weeks, participants did three circuits using 60% of their 1RM and repeated 10 times. In the last two weeks, patients did three circuits using 70% of their 1RM and repeated 10 times (27). A 90-second rest was allowed between sets of exercises.
3.4. Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition
At three preliminary sessions, subjects came to the laboratory to familiarize with the training equipment and procedure. Then, anthropometric components and body composition elements of any patient were determined in the start and the end of the study. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm using a wall-mounted stadiometer. Waist circumference and hip circumference were measured to the nearest 0.5 cm with a nonelastic tape measure. To calculate the subcutaneous fat, the pectoral, abdominal and thigh skin fold were measured using the slim guide skin fold caliper (Model: AC-6575) on the dominant side of the body (28). Also, fat mass of whole body, BMI and weight of any patient were determined using the body composition analyzer (Model: Tanita, BC-418).
3.5. Testing and Outcome Variables
Subjects did not perform any exercise 48 hour before testing and were on 12 hours fasting prior to testing. Blood samples were taken from the antecubital vein and collected in heparinized tubes and analyzed for liver enzymes (ALT and AST) or frozen and stored at -70˚C for subsequent analysis of plasma glucose and insulin. The ALT and AST enzymes’ levels were measured by Biosystem kits (Biosystem S.A., Barcelona, Spain) and through the spectrophotometry method (29). Sonography was used to measure liver fat and performed by one radiologist in all subjects with the same equipment at Baqiyatallah Hospital. Fatty liver was diagnosed via abdominal ultrasonography (US) using standardized criteria (30). Liver steatosis that detected by liver sonography was graded from 0 to 3. Grade 0 (no steatosis), grade one (mild) slightly increased echogenicity, grade two (moderate) moderately increased echogenicity and grade three (severe) markedly increased echogenicity (31). Following the 8-week exercise training intervention, subjects repeated the same tests in the same manner and order. To prevent the acute effects of exercise training altering posttraining test results, post-testing was performed 72 hours after stopping exercise (32).
3.6. Determination of the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance
Fasting glucose level was measured using the GOD-PAP method (Biosystems S.A. Barcelona, Spain), which is an enzyme colorometric test without deproteinization. Moreover, the fasting insulin level was measured using a chemiluminescent immunoassay (LIAISON® Insulin assay, DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy), and samples were analyzed on the LIAISON® Analyzer (DiaSorin). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), a measure of insulin resistance, was determined according to the following equation (33):
3.7. Control Group
The control group had no exercise training program during the 8-week period of the study. However, the daily physical activity was performed. In this group, studied parameters were evaluated, as well as other groups.
3.8. Statistical Analysis
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to identify between-group differences. When significance occurred, a Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test was used to determine the source of the difference. The changes within each group were undertaken using paired t-tests. Statistical significance was accepted when P < 0.05. Moreover, SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for data analysis.
4. Results
An informed consent was obtained from 30 patients and they were enrolled in the study. Table 1 shows anthropometric and body composition data of subjects with NAFLD before and after interventions. It was observed that aerobic and resistance groups presented significant improvement for anthropometric parameters. However, weight (kg) and BMI (kg/m2) were improved significantly only in the resistance exercise group. Repeated measure ANOVA analyses showed a significant difference regarding mean ALT, AST changes between the groups (Table 2). Post-hoc analyses showed significant differences in ALT, AST and hepatic fat between the control and aerobic groups, and the control and resistance groups (Table 3). Basal fatty liver that was diagnosed by sonography, after intervention, was significantly decreased in the aerobic and resistance exercise groups. However, in the control group, the liver fat content was slightly increased after 8weeks (Figure 1). Moreover, after training intervention, the aerobic group only presented significantly lower values of HOMA-IR compared to the control group (Figure 2).
| Variables | Control | Aerobic | Resistance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Posttest | P Value | Baseline | Posttest | P Value | Baseline | Posttest | P Value | |
| Age, y | 45.8 ± 7.3 | - | - | 39.7 ± 6.3 | - | - | 45.9 ± 7.3 | - | - |
| Anthropometry | |||||||||
| Height, cm | 172 ± 4.4 | - | - | 174.8 ± 2.8 | - | - | 174.9 ± 7.8 | - | - |
| Weight, kg | 82.2 ± 10.8 | 81.5 ± 11.1 | 0.05 | 85.7 ± 10.1 | 83.9 ± 11.7 | 0.15 | 94.3 ± 16.3 | 92.2 ± 16.1 | 0.01 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28.2 ± 3.7 | 27.5 ± 3.9 | 0.16 | 28.1 ± 3.1 | 27.5 ± 3.5 | 0.14 | 30.6 ± 2.6 | 29.9 ± 2.6 | 0.03 |
| Body fat, % | 23.3 ± 6 | 23.2 ± 5.8 | 0.49 | 21.3 ± 4.6 | 20 ± 5.2 | 0.009 | 25.6 ± 4.4 | 24.6 ± 4.2 | 0.002 |
| Fat mass, kg | 19.6 ± 6.6 | 19.5 ± 6.1 | 0.70 | 18.4 ± 5.6 | 17.1 ± 5.7 | 0.01 | 20.6 ± 6.6 | 19.9 ± 6.5 | 0.002 |
| Circumference, cm | |||||||||
| Waist | 97.6 ± 8.1 | 95.5 ± 7.9 | 0.02 | 98.5 ± 7.8 | 94.6 ± 7.7 | 0.000 | 108.6 ± 7.8 | 103.2 ± 6.3 | 0.001 |
| Hip | 102.4 ± 5.9 | 102.1 ± 6.2 | 0.74 | 105.8 ± 5.4 | 100.7 ± 4.6 | 0.000 | 107.9 ± 7 | 105.8 ± 6.1 | 0.03 |
| Subcutaneous body fat, mm | |||||||||
| Abdominal | 38.1 ± 8.3 | 37 ± 7.6 | 0.47 | 42.2 ± 12.3 | 37.6 ± 9.7 | 0.07 | 45.2 ± 13.2 | 39.1 ± 9.1 | 0.03 |
| Pectoral | 23.2 ± 8.4 | 23.3 ± 8.6 | 0.78 | 25.1 ± 9.7 | 22.6 ± 7 | 0.20 | 25 ± 8.4 | 25 ± 8.5 | 1.0 |
| Thigh | 29.7 ± 9.8 | 29 ± 7.1 | 0.65 | 27.4 ± 8.8 | 26.8 ± 7.3 | 0.56 | 29.4 ± 7.5 | 31.2 ± 8.60 | 0.21 |
| Variable | Control | Aerobic | Resistance | P Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | Posttest | Δ | baseline | Posttest | Δ | baseline | Posttest | Δ | ||
| ALT (U/L) | 48.3 ± 17.6 | 49.6 ± 17.6 | 1.3 ± 4 | 36.9 ± 16.4 | 24.4 ± 7,2 | -12.5 ± 11.1 | 56 ± 23.7 | 41.3 ± 19.5 | -14.7 ± 12.2 | 0.002 |
| AST (U/L) | 32 ± 7.1 | 31.6 ± 7.6 | -0.4 ± 5.1 | 29.7 ± 9 | 20.9 ± 4.4 | -8.8 ± 7.3 | 39.8 ± 21.19 | 34.7 ± 18.1 | -5.1 ± 6.8 | 0.02 |
| ALP (U/L) | 189.4 ± 42.3 | 184.3 ± 34 | -5.1 ± 14.2 | 165.5 ± 48.1 | 139.1 ± 35.7 | -26.4 ± 30.1 | 186.3 ± 41.1 | 161.3 ± 39.4 | -25 ± 31.2 | 0.15 |
| Group | ALT | AST | Hepatic Fat | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Differences | P Value | Mean Differences | P Value | Mean Differences | P Value | |
| Control group comparisons with aerobic | 13.8 | 0.01 | 8.4 | 0.02 | 1.1 | 0.004 |
| Control group comparisons with resistance | 16 | 0.003 | 5.9 | 0.04 | 0.8 | 0.03 |
| Resistance group comparisons with aerobic | 3.2 | 0.87 | 3.7 | 0.42 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
The Results of Post-Hoc Test of Alanine Amino Transferase, Aspartate Amino Transferase and Hepatic Fata
Data are presented as Mean ± SD; #, indicats P < 0.05 is significant.
Data are presented as Mean ± SD; #, indicats P < 0.05 is significant.
5. Discussion
For some time we have been interested in how much exercise training, what types (modes) of exercise and what exercise intensity are most beneficial for peoples with NAFLD. Although, it is a fact that not any one amount or type of exercise is likely to be best for patients with NAFLD (34). In this study, we compare the effects of aerobic and resistance exercise on hepatic fat and liver enzymes in peoples with NAFLD. Because, it is important for the clinician to understand whether resistance or aerobic training is superior in inducing changes in hepatic fat liver enzymes and body composition in individuals with NAFLD. An 8-week aerobic and resistance exercise program brought about a significantly reduction in liver fat and improving in fasting insulin resistance (HOMA). This was accompanied by a significantly increase in insulin sensitivity, and decreased ALT and AST levels after aerobic exercise in the absence of any change in body weight. Although in the resistance group, these changes were associated with a significant reduction in body weight and BMI. Our findings are consistent with previous studies that observed a decrease in hepatic fat following aerobic exercise in people with NAFLD. Davoodi et al. (14) demonstrated that hepatic fat and the serum AST and ALT levels were reduced after 8 weeks aerobic exercise. van der Heijden et al. (35) demonstrated that a 12-week aerobic exercise program without weight loss or change in BMI, results in reduced visceral and hepatic fat content, and decreased insulin resistance in obese adolescents. Chen et al. (36) in their study showed that insulin resistance and hepatic fat were significantly decreased after a 10-week aerobic exercise. Haus et al. (16) reported aerobic exercise can target hepatic fat, which may reduce the risk of NAFLD progression. They have suggested that the improvement in hepatic lipid composition may be driven by adiponectin, fat oxidation and increase on insulin sensitivity. Hallsworth et al. (21) expressed that the mechanisms underlying the change in hepatic fat following exercise training are likely to reflect changes in insulin sensitivity, circulatory lipids and energy balance. Insulin sensitivity plays a significant role in internal hepatic lipid homeostasis. Our findings would support other reports that exercise training increases body glucose disposal at least partly due to increases expression of GLUT4 in skeletal muscles, insulin receptor and glycogen storage (37). Also, moderate to vigorous exercise training increases fatty acid oxidation from adipose, intramyocellular, and possibly hepatic sources (38). Contrary to our results about the resistance group, Hallsworth et al. (21) reported that an 8-week resistance exercise program improves NAFLD (reduction in liver lipid and HOMA-IR) independent of any change in body weight. In this study, we found significant reductions in ALT and AST levels, independent of weight loss, after 8weeks of aerobic exercise in men with NAFLD. Although in resistance training, reduction in ALT and AST were dependent to weight loss and decrease in BMI. Similar findings have been reported previously about the relation between aerobic exercise training with ALT and AST (17) and also physical activity and ALT in NAFLD (32). Although limited number of studies have explored the role of aerobic and resistance exercises on ALT and AST levels in patients with NAFLD. de Piano et al. (15) compared the effectiveness of resistance and aerobic (AT + RT) with aerobic exercise in obese adolescents with NAFLD. In those who underwent resistance and aerobic exercise, presented lower ALT after intervention compared with aerobic training. Sreenivasa Baba et al. (19) also, reported that moderate intensity aerobic exercise helps in normalizing ALT levels in patients with NAFLD. Comparisons between aerobic and resistance training groups in the current study suggest that resistance training decreases both body weight and BMI significantly more than aerobic training. The lack of body mass loss observed with aerobic training in this study supports the findings of others and is likely driven by an increase in lean body mass (39-41). Finally, this study demonstrated that 8 weeks of exercise training favorably decreases abdominal obesity (as measured by waist circumference), body fat and fat mass and greatly improves hip circumference and abdominal subcutaneous fat in aerobic and resistance groups. Surprisingly, however, other markers of adiposity, such as pectoral and thigh subcutaneous fat were unaltered at the end of the study. In one study, Bell et al. reported that an 8-week combined aerobic and resistance exercise program without weight loss resulted in decreased insulin resistance and reduced waist circumference in sedentary obese individuals (42). Also, with regard to body composition, Gutin and Owens observed that a 12-week aerobic exercise program attenuated growth-related increase in abdominal subcutaneous fat and visceral fat accumulation compared to the control group (43). In another study, Gutin et al. (44) demonstrated that an 8-month program of physical activity combined with lifestyle education decreased abdominal subcutaneous fat and visceral fat content. Both study results are in line with our findings. Our results indicate that aerobic exercise without weight loss results in decreased abdominal subcutaneous fat and visceral fat content but not pectoral and thigh subcutaneous fat. We postulate that this is due to the fact that abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat is more metabolically active (35, 45).
Our study has three limitations. First, the small size of patients can be considered as a limitation of study. Undoubtedly, study of broader spectrum of NAFLD patients is necessary to increase the external validity of our findings. Second, in the present study, NAFLD was not diagnosed based on histology; so, the fat content was not measured bybiopsy. Third, an important limitation of this study is that hepatic fat measures obtained from US, similar to other reports (46, 47), while highly correlated to liver fat measures from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and liver biopsy studies (48, 49) are not direct measures of liver fat. However, the changes in hepatic fat are very similar to the patterns of change across the two exercise groups in ALT, AST, waist and hip circumference, abdominal subcutaneous fat and HOMA-IR. In conclusion, the results of this randomized controlled trial demonstrate that 8 weeks of aerobic training and resistance training are equally effective in reducing hepatic fat content and liver enzymes levels (ALT and AST) in patients with NAFLD. Interestingly, in the aerobic group, these changes are independent of weight loss and decrease of BMI. Our data indicate that exercise training (aerobic and resistance) can provide benefit for the management of NAFLD.
