Evaluating the Predictive Value of a Cardiac Perfusion Scan for Cardiac Events in Chronic Kidney Disease

authors:

avatar Samaneh Hoseinzadeh 1 , avatar Mehrdad Jafari Fesharaki ORCID 2 , avatar Shiva Samavat 3 , avatar Hossein Amini ORCID 4 , avatar Vahid Eslami 2 , avatar Masoumeh Hakiminejad 5 , avatar Asghar Rahmani 6 , avatar Nooshin Dalili ORCID 3 , *

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shahid Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Chronic Kidney Disease Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
General Physician, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

how to cite: Hoseinzadeh S, Jafari Fesharaki M, Samavat S, Amini H, Eslami V, et al. Evaluating the Predictive Value of a Cardiac Perfusion Scan for Cardiac Events in Chronic Kidney Disease. Int J Cardiovasc Pract. 2024;9(1):e143902. https://doi.org/10.5812/intjcardiovascpract-143902.

Abstract

Background:

Cardiovascular diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Therefore, predicting cardiac events in CKD patients is essential.

Objectives:

The present study aims to evaluate the predictive value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in patients with different stages of CKD.

Methods:

Consecutive CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m²) referred to the department of nuclear medicine for SPECT-MPI due to suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD) based on risk factors were included if they were eligible. According to available protocols, rest and stress 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT-MPI was performed for all patients. All patients were contacted one year later. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of any cardiac event, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and any cardiac intervention (CI).

Results:

Sixty-eight patients (32 males and 36 females) were studied. During one year, 50 patients (73.5%) had no cardiac events, and 18 (26.5%) were assigned to the CI group. All patients in the CI group had abnormal MPI results, and compared to the CI-free group, they had significantly higher summed stress scores (SSS). According to multivariate logistic analysis, SSS was a significant predictor of CI (Wald = 5.99, OR = 12.56, SE = 1.03, P-value = 0.014).

Conclusions:

The findings from this study imply the predictive value of SPECT-MPI in CKD patients. Patients with abnormal MPI scans and higher SSS are at greater risk of cardiac events and should be followed up regularly at short intervals.

1. Background

Cardiovascular diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. The majority of patients in stages 3 to 4 of CKD (15 ≤ GFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m²) die because of cardiovascular disease rather than progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (1). The exact etiology of cardiovascular disease in CKD patients is unknown. Hypertension (HTN), dyslipidemia, and diabetes, known companions of CKD, are also risk factors for endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease (2). Identifying CKD patients at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events is a crucial step toward lowering the mortality rate. Previous studies have shown that SPECT-MPI is an excellent tool to diagnose or predict adverse cardiovascular events in suspected patients with or without a known history of ischemic heart disease (3, 4). The incremental prognostic value of MPI in CKD patients was reported in some previous studies (5, 6).

2. Objectives

The majority of these studies were small retrospective series. The present prospective study aims to evaluate the predictive value of SPECT-MPI in patients with different stages of CKD.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Population

This single-center prospective study was conducted in the nuclear medicine department of Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center (Iran) between September 2016 and January 2018. Consecutive CKD patients referred to the department of nuclear medicine for SPECT-MPI due to suspected IHD based on risk factors were included if they were eligible. The inclusion criteria were an established diagnosis of CKD according to the National Kidney Foundation guidelines (7) and age ≥20 years. Patients with a prior history of MI, severe heart disease, or revascularization were excluded. A physician recorded the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients at the time of the imaging study. The protocol of this study was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. All participants signed informed consent.

3.2. SPECT-MPI Protocol

Stress and rest 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT-MPI were performed for all patients according to standard protocols (8). The pharmacological stress test was performed on the first day with Dipyridamole at a dose of 0.14 mg/kg/min over 4 minutes. After 3 minutes, 740 MBq of 99mTc-MIBI was injected intravenously, and 30 minutes later, a heart scan was performed. The rest phase of the imaging was completed on the second day. For this purpose, all patients received 555 MBq of 99mTc-MIBI, and 45 minutes later, imaging was obtained. The images were acquired on a Siemens single-head SPECT camera, and a Butterworth filter (Cutoff 0.3, Order 2.5) was applied for image reconstruction. QGS software calculated SSS, summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS). MPI studies were further classified as normal (SSS 0 - 3), mildly abnormal (SSS 4 - 8), moderately abnormal (SSS 9 - 13), and severely abnormal (SSS ≥ 14). Similarly, based on SDS, the ischemic burden was categorized into no ischemia (SDS 0 - 1), mild ischemia (SDS 2 - 4), and moderate to severe ischemia (SDS ≥ 5) (9).

Two independent nuclear medicine specialists interpreted all imaging data.

3.3. Follow-up and Outcomes

All patients were contacted one year after the baseline evaluation. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, MI, heart failure, and any cardiac intervention (CI).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

We used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 to perform all statistical analyses in this study. The chi-square test compared categorical variables. An independent samples test was used to evaluate the differences between the study groups regarding the continuous variables. Logistic regression with the stepwise forward method was performed to identify independent predictors of cardiac events. Patients' demographic, clinical, and MPI data were included as covariates. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results

4.1. Patient Characteristics

A total of 68 patients were included (Figure 1). The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Abnormal MPI was detected in 53 (77.3%) patients. The severity of perfusion defects in patients is demonstrated in Figure 2.

Flow diagram of patients in this study
Flow diagram of patients in this study
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Patients a

CharacteristicsAll PatientsCI-Free GroupCI GroupP-Value
685018
Age57.3 ± 11.156.6 ± 10.259.4 ± 13.30.364
Male32 (47.1)24 (48)8 (44.4)1.00
Smoking14 (20.6)12 (24)2 (11.1)0.323
Hemodialysis29 (42.6)24 (48)5 (27.8)0.171
Diabetes mellitus36 (52.9)22 (44)14 (77.8)0.026
Hypertension37 (54.4)33 (66)4 (22.2)0.002
Dyslipidemia18 (26.5)17 (34)1 (5.6)0.027
EF53.3 ± 6.854.9 ± 5.748.6 ± 7.60.004
Serum Cr4.6 ± 2.74.6 ± 2.84.7 ± 2.30.952
eGFR22.4 ± 13.923.2 ± 14.919.7 ± 10.20.367
MPI data
Abnormal MPI53 (77.9)35 (70)18 (100)0.007
SSS-4.96 ± 1.211.1 ± 2.2< 0.001
Severity of perfusion defect in patients
Severity of perfusion defect in patients

4.2. Follow-up Results

Within one year, 20 (29.4%) patients underwent coronary angiography, and cardiac intervention was performed for 18. The baseline clinical characteristics of the CI-free and CI groups are compared in Table 1. The two groups were comparable regarding age, gender, smoking rate, hemodialysis rate, serum Cr, and eGFR. The frequency of diabetic patients was significantly higher in the CI group. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was statistically lower in these patients. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were more frequent among the CI-free group. All patients in the CI group had abnormal MPI results, and compared to the CI-free group, they had significantly higher SSS.

4.3. Predictors of CI

According to multivariate logistic analysis, SSS was a significant predictor of CI (Wald = 5.99, OR = 12.56, SE = 1.03, P-value = 0.014). None of the other included variables were significant.

5. Discussion

Here we assessed the predictive value of MPI-SPECT for predicting cardiac events in patients with CKD. MPI was abnormal in 77.9% of the patients. During the one year of this study, 26.5% of the patients became candidates for CI due to abnormal coronary angiography. All patients within the CI group had abnormal MPI. The results of this study confirm previous studies that concluded abnormal MPI is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis in patients with impaired renal function (10). The predictive value of MPI was evaluated in a cohort study with 303 ESRD patients. The authors demonstrated a cumulative risk of abnormal MPI on adverse cardiac events (11). Several previous studies have shown the cardiac diagnostic and prognostic value of SSS in patients with CKD (12, 13). In line with these studies, we demonstrated that patients in the CI group had significantly higher SSS. SSS was the only significant predictor of CI. A single increase in SSS was associated with a 12.56 times greater risk of CI. Likewise, in another study, higher SSS was observed among patients who developed cardiac death within one year of the study (14). In a study by Nakajima et al., similar to our survey, factors like LVEF and eGFR were investigated and found to be significantly lower in the group that experienced a cardiovascular event, such as sudden death, cardiac death, or death due to heart failure, compared to the group that did not experience a cardiovascular event. Additionally, parameters like SRS and SSS were significantly higher in the cardiovascular event group, but SDS was not (15).

Nakamura et al. have shown that the incidence of cardiac events was 2.6 times more common among CKD patients with SSS > 8. They also reported a 9% higher risk of cardiac events following an increase in SSS (16). In a study by Kasama et al., SSS was shown to be a significant predictor of cardiac death in 299 patients with different stages of CKD 14. Bhatti et al. have shown that the annualized rate of cardiac death was several times higher among patients with SSS ≥ 4 and GFR < 60 (17). Here we showed that patients in the CI group had significantly lower EF. Diabetes was also more prevalent among the CI group. Surprisingly, dyslipidemia and HTN were more common in the CI-free group. However, none of these variables were significant predictors of CI in the final model.

In contrast to our findings, GFR, diabetes, HTN, dyslipidemia, and EF were reported to have significant predictive value for cardiac events in patients with abnormal MPI, which seems to be due to the larger sample size of these studies compared to ours (12, 17, 18). In a retrospective cohort study in Japan, 529 CKD patients without a diagnosis of coronary artery disease were included. After one year of follow-up, 33 patients died due to cardiovascular events. Hypertension, unlike dyslipidemia, was more common in non-survivors, and similar to our results, SSS was significantly higher in the cardiac events group in univariate and multivariate analysis (19).

Yoda et al. retrospectively reviewed data obtained from 2243 CKD patients who underwent stress MPI (18). Compared to the event-free group, male gender, chest pain, history of prior MI, and diabetes were more common among patients within the cardiac event group. Moreover, SSS was higher, and EF and eGFR were lower in this group. The authors identified diabetes, eGFR, SDS, and SSS as independent predictors of cardiac events in these patients. Kasama et al. found that SDS and eGFR are negatively associated with significant adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal events. Similar to our results, they did not report any significant predictive value of diabetes, EF, HTN, and dyslipidemia for cardiac events (14).

The majority of previous studies were retrospective, and they evaluated the significance of abnormal MPI in both CKD and non-CKD patients. Thus, the prospective design and focused study population are notable advantages of this study. The small sample size and short follow-up period are major limitations of the present study. We did not detect any cardiac death, MI, or heart failure during the study period.

5.1. Conclusions

Therefore, it was not possible to evaluate the prognostic value of MPI for predicting major cardiac events in our CKD patients. Due to the small sample size, this study's statistical analyses are underpowered. To better understand the prognostic value of MPI in CKD patients, future prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations are needed.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF. Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. J Circulation. 2007;116(1):85-97. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678342.

  • 2.

    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu C. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. J New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(13):1296-305. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041031.

  • 3.

    Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. J Circulation. 2003;107(23):2900-7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072790.23090.41.

  • 4.

    Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. J Circulation. 1998;97(6):535-43. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.97.6.535.

  • 5.

    Hase H, Joki N, Ishikawa H, Fukuda H, Imamura Y, Saijyo T, et al. Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate at the beginning of haemodialysis treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2004;19(5):1161-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh037.

  • 6.

    Dussol B, Bonnet J, Sampol J, Savin B, De La Forte C, Mundler O, et al. Prognostic value of inducible myocardial ischemia in predicting cardiovascular events after renal transplantation. J Kidney international. 2004;66(4):1633-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00929.x.

  • 7.

    Levey AS, Coresh J, Bolton K, Culleton B, Harvey KS, Ikizler TA, et al. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. J American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2002;39(2 SUPPL. 1):i-ii+ S1-S266.

  • 8.

    Tiwari SC, Bhowmik DM. Staging of CKD: Is a new stage needed? J American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2008;51(2):346. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.016.

  • 9.

    Doukky R, Hayes K, Frogge N, Balakrishnan G, Dontaraju VS, Rangel MO, et al. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Circulation. 2013;128(15):1634-43. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002744.

  • 10.

    Vij A, Golzar Y, Doukky R%. Regadenoson use in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: A focused review. J Nuclear Cardiolog. 2018;25(1):137-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0960-6.

  • 11.

    Doukky R, Fughhi I, Campagnoli T, Wassouf M, Ali A. The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nuclear Cardiolog. 2017;24(1):112-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0303-4.

  • 12.

    Momose M, Babazono T, Kondo C, Kobayashi H, Nakajima T, Kusakabe K%. Prognostic significance of stress myocardial ECG-gated perfusion imaging in asymptomatic patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease on initiation of haemodialysis. J European Nuclear Medicine Molecular Imaging. 2009;36:1315-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1110-4.

  • 13.

    Dahan M, Viron BM, Faraggi M, Himbert DL, Legallicier BJ, Kolta AM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of combined dipyridamole-exercise thallium imaging in hemodialysis patients. J Kidney international. 1998;54(1):255-62. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00988.x.

  • 14.

    Kasama S, Toyama T, Sato M, Sano H, Ueda T, Sasaki T, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular and renal events in patients with chronic kidney disease: results from first year of follow-up of the Gunma-CKD SPECT multicenter study. J European Nuclear Medicine Molecular Imaging. 2016;43:302-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3197-0.

  • 15.

    Nakajima K, Nakamura S, Hase H, Takeishi Y, Nishimura S, Kawano Y, et al. Risk stratification based on J-ACCESS risk models with myocardial perfusion imaging: Risk versus outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease. J Nuclear Cardiolog. 2020;27:41-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1330-8.

  • 16.

    Nakamura S, Kawano Y, Nakajima K, Hase H, Joki N, Hatta T, et al. Prognostic study of cardiac events in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease using ECG-gated myocardial Perfusion imaging: Final 3-year report of the J-ACCESS 3 study. J Nuclear Cardiology. 2019;26(2):431-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0880-5.

  • 17.

    Bhatti S, Hakeem A, Dhanalakota S, Palani G, Husain Z, Jacobsen G, et al. Prognostic value of regadenoson myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with different degrees of renal dysfunction. J European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;15(8):933-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu036.

  • 18.

    Yoda S, Nakanishi K, Tano A, Kasamaki Y, Kunimoto S, Matsumoto N, et al. Risk stratification of cardiovascular events in patients at all stages of chronic kidney disease using myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Cardiolog. 2012;60(5):377-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.06.011.

  • 19.

    Joki N, Hase H, Kawano Y, Nakamura S, Nakajima K, Hatta T, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting cardiac events in Japanese patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: 1-year interim report of the J-ACCESS 3 investigation. J European Nuclear Medicine Molecular Imaging. 2014;41:1701-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2781-z.