Abstract
Introduction:
Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that arise from chromaffin cells. Often termed extra-adrenal pheochromocytomas, these tumors vary with regards to their functionality, location, and malignant potential. Mutations in the RET proto-oncogene are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN-2) and paragangliomas. The phenotypes of the individual mutations are documented to help determine prognosis.Case Presentation:
We report a case of a 64-year-old man with a history of parathyroid adenoma who developed a pancreatic retroperitoneal paraganglioma. Despite having laboratory evidence of excess circulating catecholamines, the patient’s only presenting symptom was hip pain. The patient underwent resection, and histologic findings were consistent with paraganglioma with lymph node metastasis. Genetic testing revealed a variant of uncertain significance within the RET gene [c.731C>T (p.T244I)].Conclusions:
Paragangliomas are rare extra-adrenal neuroendocrine tumors that can be associated with germline mutations. Our patient was diagnosed with a pancreatic paraganglioma associated with a RET T244I mutation. Identifying patients with germline mutations is important for documenting phenotypic presentations of RET gene variants of uncertain significance, which will allow physicians to provide proper management and surveillance of paragangliomas and other associated tumors.Keywords
Pancreatic Paraganglioma Retroperitoneal Paraganglioma RET Mutation
1. Introduction
Paragangliomas (PGL) are rare extra-adrenal neuroendocrine tumors that can form within sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia throughout the body (1). Although PGLs arise from neural crest-derived chromaffin cells, individual tumors differ with regards to location and malignant potential. PGL are genetically heterogeneous tumors that have the highest degree of heritability of any endocrine tumor type (2). Germline mutations in a variety of genes, including succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB), von Hippel Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and RET have been associated to give rise to the tumors (3).
RET is a 21-exon proto-oncogene located on chromosome 10 that has been associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN-2) syndrome. Individuals with RET mutations leading to MEN-2 are at risk for developing hyperparathyroidism, medullary thyroid cancer, and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (4). The University of Utah MEN-2 and RET genetic database has documented approximately 200 different mutations, most of which have not been well characterized (5). Here, we describe a patient with a history of parathyroid adenoma who developed a pancreatic retroperitoneal paraganglioma and was found to have a RET mutation variant of unknown significance. This particular variant has not been previously documented in the University of Utah MEN-2 and RET genetic database, making its clinical significance unknown.
2. Case Presentation
A 64-year-old Caucasian male originally presented to his primary care physician due to gradually increasing right hip pain for more than two months. He denied any significant weight loss, night sweats, heart palpitations, or other systemic symptoms. His past medical history was significant for a parathyroidectomy with resection of a single parathyroid adenoma and well-controlled arterial hypertension. Family history included prostate cancer in his father. On exam, the patient had reproducible right hip pain with passive and active motion. Due to concerns for musculoskeletal pathology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine was obtained and had demonstrated mild degenerative changes in the spine and an 11.2 cm mid-abdominal retroperitoneal mass. Contrasted enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis was obtained to characterize the mass; this showed an 11 cm ovoid, solid, enhancing mass in the right mid-abdominal mesentery with no associated lymphadenopathy (Figure 1). Given a low suspicion for a catecholamine-producing tumor (which would have necessitated further workup), the decision was made to proceed directly to an image-guided biopsy to establish a diagnosis and guide treatment. The biopsy demonstrated an atypical epithelioid and spindle cell neoplasm. The patient underwent an elective exploratory laparotomy for removal of the mass. Intraoperatively, the tumor was found to be adherent to the head of the pancreas and to the confluence of the superior mesenteric and portal veins. The tumor was resected en-bloc with a margin of pancreatic tissue and the portal vein defect was repaired primarily.
CT of the abdomen showing a large peri-pancreatic mass abutting the mesenteric vessels.
Histologic evaluation of the tumor showed evidence of neoplastic cells arranged in nests and trabeculae within the tumor’s vasculature. Round to oval cells with moderate to abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm were found within the tumor bulk. Tumor was metastatic to one of the lymph nodes. The tumor immunohistochemistry demonstrated a Ki-67 index < 1%, positive succinate dehydrogenase subunit A (SDHA), SDHB, chromogranin A, and S-100 stains, (Figure 2) and negative cytokeratin CAM 5.2 and human melanoma black-45 (HMB45) stains. These findings were consistent with a PGL with metastasis to the lymph node.
Immunohistochemical staining showing positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and S-100 consistent with paraganglioma. Ki-67 is low at < 1%.
Once the diagnosis was obtained, urine catecholamines were immediately measured. The patient had elevated urine metanephrines 382 mcg/24 h (normal range 44 - 261 mcg/24 h) and urine normetanephrines 650 mcg/24 h (normal 138 - 521 mcg/24 h) demonstrating a functional PGL. Gallium-68 DOTATE scan showed no evidence of distant metastatic disease. Genetic analysis was performed on a peripheral blood sample using a hybridization-based protocol to enrich for regions of interest. Amplicons from the coding exons of 34 genes of interest were created using real time polymerase chain reaction, and subsequently sequenced using Illumina® technology. When compared to a reference sequence, a RET gene variant of unknown significance [c.731C>T (p.T244I)] was identified. Screening thyroid ultrasound did not demonstrate any suspicious thyroid nodules. At his three month follow up, our patient reported full recovery from the surgery with no further symptomatology and his metanephrines had normalized. At his one-year follow-up, he reported he was doing well. However, a suspicious left renal mass, concerning for renal cell carcinoma, was seen on his screening CT abdomen and pelvis. There was no evidence of recurrent disease from his metastatic PGL on imaging. At this time, patient is undergoing further work-up with urology.
3. Discussion
Germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene are associated with MEN-2 syndrome and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). The penetrance of MEN-2 varies according to the specific causative mutation (6). RET gene mutations have also been associated with lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the colon, and melanoma (7). In patients with diseases associated with the RET gene mutation, amplicons of genomic DNA can be sequenced and compared to reference data to identify specific mutations. Exons 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are specifically screened for the presence of RET mutations (8).
Our case describes a patient with no familial history of genetic syndromes and previous parathyroid adenoma who presented with a pancreatic paraganglioma associated with a RET T244I germline mutation. Since mutations in the RET gene can result in a wide range of presentations, attempts have recently been made to catalog the phenotype of individual mutations for prognostic purposes. This mutation, as of yet, is not listed under the University of Utah MEN-2 and RET genetic database. The mutation has, however, been reported once in ClinVAR database as a RET variant of uncertain significance (9).
Mutations in exons 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of the RET gene are clinically relevant as they are associated with MEN syndromes (10, 11). The development of MEN-2A has largely been linked to mutations in exons 10 and 11, coding for the cystine-rich extracellular domain of the tyrosine kinase (codon 634 in exon 11 is the most commonly altered) (12). Conversely, in MEN-2B, a point mutation in exon 16 (Met918Thyr, M918T) that results in a conformational change in the intracellular binding pocket is responsible for 95% of hereditary cases (10). In our patient, the point mutation was found in exon 4, which codes for a portion of the extracellular domain of the RET gene. A review of the University of Utah MEN-2 database has not demonstrated any mutations responsible for MEN syndrome occurring in this codon (5). Recently, Zhang et al identified two separate mutations in exon 4 that were thought to be linked to familial medullary thyroid carcinoma in an eastern Chinese population (13).
It is unclear if our patient has MEN-2A syndrome. Given his history of parathyroid adenoma and paraganglioma, our patient may have a pathogenic variant. MEN syndromes are mainly inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, however the probability of de novo pathogenic variants to cause MEN-2A is approximately 5% (14). The new finding of the renal mass concerning for renal cell carcinoma may suggest that the patient have some variant of MEN syndrome. RET gene is altered in 1.25% in renal cell carcinoma patients (7). Further urological work-up may assist in determining the genetic syndrome our patient harbor. Given our patient’s unique presentation, his case highlights the importance of documenting phenotypic presentations of newly described mutations as it not only helps in determining prognosis factors, but also guide in clinical surveillance.
The clinical course of a patient with PGL is variable, with survival most notably depending on the malignant potential of tumor. Like other neoplasms, PGLs can be considered malignant if distant metastases are present. One study found that, on average, malignant PGLs reoccurred at a distant site roughly 5.5 years after the time of initial diagnosis. Such patients with distant metastases had a median overall survival of 24.6 years (15). Determining the malignant potential of a solitary tumor, however, remains difficult. The Grading System for Adrenal Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (GAPP) was developed to predict potential aggressive behavior of PGL (16). This grading system showed that a histologic pattern of large, irregular sized nest or pseudo-rosette forming cells, high cellularity, the presence of coagulation necrosis and vascular invasion, Ki-67 immunoreactivity > 3%, and norepinephrine producing PGL were associated with malignant potential. Patients with malignant PGL were also found to have rapid disease progression if associated with male sex, older age at diagnosis, synchronous metastasis, large tumor size, elevated dopamine, and not undergoing resection of the primary tumor (15).
Using the GAPP score, our patient would have a low to intermediate risk with a metastatic rate of 3.6 to 60% and five-year survival of 66.8 to 100%. Considering the likelihood the patient has renal cell carcinoma, we would expect his five-year survival to be less than expected according to the GAPP score.
Given the morbidities associated with PGL’s and other RET-derived tumors, it is recommended that an affected patient’s family members also obtain genetic testing to determine if they have any somatic RET mutations. Patients and family members with RET mutations will benefit from annual biochemical screening, including serum calcium, carcinoembryonic antigen, calcitonin, 24-hour urine metanephrines, and vanillyl mandelic acid (VMA) levels. Patients should also undergo screening ultrasound for thyroid cancer.6
We recommend that patients be followed every four months in the first year after surgery. Afterwards, patients should be seen semi-annually to annually for the following two years, and then annually thereafter. Our recommendation is similar to that of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), which recommends patients have semi-annual follow up for three years after surgery, and then annual follow up for up to ten years. After ten years, NCCN recommends that physicians consider surveillance as clinically indicated (17). We recommend that patients (regardless of mutational status) should undergo life-long surveillance since recurrence and metastatic disease can present years after from the primary diagnosis (15).
References
-
1.
Ginesu GC, Barmina M, Paliogiannis P, Trombetta M, Cossu ML, Feo CF, et al. Nonfunctional paraganglioma of the head of the pancreas: A rare case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;28:81-4. [PubMed ID: 27689525]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5043404]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.09.012.
-
2.
Crona J, Taieb D, Pacak K. New Perspectives on Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Toward a Molecular Classification. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(6):489-515. [PubMed ID: 28938417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5716829]. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2017-00062.
-
3.
Lenders JWM, Kerstens MN, Amar L, Prejbisz A, Robledo M, Taieb D, et al. Genetics, diagnosis, management and future directions of research of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2020;38(8):1443-56. [PubMed ID: 32412940]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7486815]. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002438.
-
4.
Norton JA, Krampitz G, Jensen RT. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia: Genetics and Clinical Management. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24(4):795-832. [PubMed ID: 26363542]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4571281]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soc.2015.06.008.
-
5.
MEN2 Database. ARUP Scientific Resource for Research and Education. Utah, USA: ARUP; 2021, [cited 2 Sep 2021]. Available from: https://arup.utah.edu/database/MEN2/MEN2_display.php.
-
6.
Yi JW, Kang HI, Kim SJ, Seong CY, Chai YJ, Choi JY, et al. A Novel RET D898Y Germline Mutation in a Patient with Pheochromocytoma. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2018;2018:8657914. [PubMed ID: 29850289]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5924991]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8657914.
-
7.
My Cancer Genome. RET. Tennessee, USA: My Cancer Genome; 2021. Available from: https://www.mycancergenome.org/content/gene/ret/.
-
8.
Elisei R, Tacito A, Ramone T, Ciampi R, Bottici V, Cappagli V, et al. Twenty-Five Years Experience on RET Genetic Screening on Hereditary MTC: An Update on The Prevalence of Germline RET Mutations. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(9). [PubMed ID: 31510104]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6771015]. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090698.
-
9.
MGeND. RET p.Thr244Ile. Kyoto, Japan: MGeND; [cited 2 Sep 2021]. Available from: https://mgend.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/annotation/info/CLINVAR_RCV000557609.
-
10.
Martucciello G, Lerone M, Bricco L, Tonini GP, Lombardi L, Del Rossi CG, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasias type 2B and RET proto-oncogene. Ital J Pediatr. 2012;38:9. [PubMed ID: 22429913]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3368781]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-38-9.
-
11.
Martins R, Bugalho MJ. Paragangliomas/Pheochromocytomas: clinically oriented genetic testing. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:794187. [PubMed ID: 24899893]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4037125]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/794187.
-
12.
Hedayati M, Zarif Yeganeh M, Sheikhol Eslami S, Rezghi Barez S, Hoghooghi Rad L, Azizi F. Predominant RET Germline Mutations in Exons 10, 11, and 16 in Iranian Patients with Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. J Thyroid Res. 2011;2011:264248. [PubMed ID: 21765987]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3134203]. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/264248.
-
13.
Zhang L, Li X, Li Q, Ge S, Chen M, Huang S, et al. Rare RET Variant p.D707E in a Chinese Pedigree with Hereditary Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Pathobiology. 2017;84(3):152-60. [PubMed ID: 27798940]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448845.
-
14.
Eng C. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2. In: Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW, et al., editors. GeneReviews®. Washington, USA: University of Washington; 2019. p. 1993-2022.
-
15.
Hamidi O, Young WJ, Iniguez-Ariza NM, Kittah NE, Gruber L, Bancos C, et al. Malignant Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: 272 Patients Over 55 Years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(9):3296-305. [PubMed ID: 28605453]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5587061]. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00992.
-
16.
Wachtel H, Hutchens T, Baraban E, Schwartz LE, Montone K, Baloch Z, et al. Predicting Metastatic Potential in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: A Comparison of PASS and GAPP Scoring Systems. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(12). [PubMed ID: 32877928]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7553245]. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa608.
-
17.
Shah MH, Goldner WS, Benson AB, Bergsland E, Blaszkowsky LS, Brock P, et al. Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(7):839-68. [PubMed ID: 34340212]. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0032.