A total of 3713 male workers (age range, 35 – 63 years) of a Japanese company were recruited for this study. All the subjects had responded to a questionnaire containing questions on the current medical and treatment history and some lifestyle factors. They underwent two consecutive annual health examinations, which included measurements of the waist circumference (WC) and systolic/diastolic blood pressure (measured in the sitting position after the subjects had rested for 3 minutes), and collection of fasting blood samples. Subjects with a current history of treatment for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, coronary and/or cerebrovascular disease, and liver disease were excluded (n = 475). Subjects with CRP values of 10 mg/L or higher were excluded by considering acute occult inflammation or chronic infectious disorder (n = 48), and subjects with MetS or high plasma glucose levels (>= 140 mg/dL) at the baseline study were also excluded to maintain the validity of the results on the insulin-related biomarkers (n = 38). Namely, as a simple surrogate index for insulin sensitivity/resistance, I adopted the upper limitation value of plasma fasting glucose for HOMA-IR and QUICKI at 140 mg/dL in this study (
13 ). As the number of subjects with Mets in 2011 was 510, the final target subject became 2642 (
Figure 1).
A Flow-Chart for the Study Population
Informed consent was obtained from the study participants, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the university.
Data on lifestyle-related variables was gathered from the self-administered questionnaire. Smoking habit was categorized as current smoking (0) or no smoking, including ex-smoking (1). Drinking habit was categorized as everyday drinking (0) or occasional drinking, including no drinking (1). Physical activity was categorized as everyday exercise, including walking for ≥ 1 hour (1) or no daily exercise habit (0). Especially, I used the following questionnaire to evaluate habitual exercise; “Do you take exercise every day, including walking for at least one hour?”
The author used the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III), in which MetS is defined based on the presence of three or more of the following criteria: central obesity (waist circumference ≥ 85 cm) (
14); hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dL); reduced serum level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (serum HDL < 40 mg/dL); high-blood pressure (systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP ≥ 85 mm Hg); high fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (≥ 100 mg/dL) (
15).
Serum ALT, GGT, and uric acid were measured with an automatic analyzer (7700 series, Hitachi, Tokyo). Serum high-sensitivity CRP measurement was based on a Latex turbidity assay (Mitsubishi Kagaku Iatron, Tokyo, Japan) using the Hitachi 7700 auto-analyzer. The detection limit of this assay is 0.1 mg/L. The intraassay CVs for repeated measurements ranged from 0.84% to 2.54%. Insulin was measured using CLEIA (Fujirebio Inc, Tokyo, Japan) and Lumipulse Presto II. The detection limit of this assay is 0.3 mIU/L. The intraassay CV for repeated measurements was 3.06%. Serum HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and glucose levels were determined enzymatically with a Hitachi 7700 auto-analyzer.
As the insulin-related biomarkers, HOMA-IR and QUICKI were calculated as follows:
HOMA-R = (FPG × insulin)/405; QUICKI = 1/ (common logarithms (FPG × insulin))
The units of glucose and insulin for the HOMA-R calculation were mg/dL and mIU/L, respectively.
Mathematically, the association between these two indicators becomes a monotone decreasing function. The distribution of HOMA-IR is logarithmic-normal; whereas, that of QUICKI is normal. Although FPG was used for the calculation, the serum insulin and HOMA-IR were closely related (
16).
All the statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Japan, Tokyo). Spearman's rho was calculated for the univariate analysis. Then, a multiple logistic regression analysis was performed for predicting the risk of MetS development as the dependent variable. Three lifestyle factors were originally classified in a binary manner. Other independent variables were also converted to binary format, namely, age (≥ 45 and <45 years old), uric acid (≥ 7 and <7 mg/dL), ALT (≥ 45 and < 45 IU/L), GGT (≥ 50 and < 50 IU/L), CRP (≥ 1 and <1 mg/L), HOMA-IR (≥ 2.5 and < 2.5), and QUICKI (≤ 0.33 and >0.33), which were assigned the values of 1 and 0. A cut-off value of the highest tertile of age became 45 years, and cut-off value of CRP was adopted as "mildly elevated" (
17,
18). P-values of less than 0.05 according to a two-tailed test were considered to denote statistical significance.