1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Population
3.2. Blood Collection, DNA Extraction and Genotyping
3.3. Anthropometric Measurements and Tanner Stages
3.4. Biochemical Parameters
3.5. Bone Mineral Density Measurements
3.6. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Basic Characteristics
| Data | Girls, N = 123 | Boys, N = 127 | P Valueb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 13.5 ± 2.9 | 13.75 ± 2.7 | 0.632 |
| Weight, kg | 39.4 ± 11.7 | 44.7 ± 14.9 | 0.001b |
| Height, cm | 148.8 ± 12.1 | 157.4 ± 16.2 | 0.001b |
| BMI, kg/cm2 | 17.4 ± 3.2 | 17.5 ± 3.1 | 0.797 |
| BMD Z-score | -0.77 ± 0.2 | -0.68 ± 0.3 | 0.60 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 68.1 ± 10.3 | 67.7 ± 10.7 | 0.775 |
| 25OH vit D, ng/mL | 14.1 ± 5.2 | 16.1 ± 5.9 | 0.004b |
| Calcium, mg/dL | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 0.027b |
| Phosphorus, mg/dL | 4.1 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 0.816 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BMD, bone mineral density.
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
b Significant at %5.
4.2. Genotype Frequencies and Distribution of VDR Polymorphisms
| Sex | FokI (rs2228570), N = 243b | BsmI (rs1544410), N = 218c | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | Ff | ff | Total | BB | Bb | b | Total | |
| Genotype | ||||||||
| Boys | 83 (67.5) | 38 (30.9) | 2 (1.6) | 123 | 20 (18.5) | 55 (50.9) | 33 (30.6) | 108 |
| Girls | 73 (60.8) | 37 (30.9) | 10 (8.3) | 120 | 24 (21.8) | 49 (44.5) | 37 (3.6) | 110 |
| All Subjects | 156 (64.2) | 75 (30.9) | 12 (4.9) | 243 | 44 (20.2) | 104 (47.7) | 70 (32.1) | 218 |
| F | f | Total | B | b | Total | |||
| Allele | ||||||||
| Boys | 204 (82.9) | 42 (17.1) | 246 | 95 (44) | 121 (56) | 216 | ||
| Girls | 183 (76.2) | 57 (23.3) | 240 | 97 (44) | 123 (56) | 220 | ||
| All Subjects | 387 (79.6) | 99 (10.4) | 486 | 192 (44) | 244 (56) | 436 | ||
a Values are expressed as No. (%).
b Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for FokI (P = 0.44)
c Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for BsmI (P = 0.63)
4.3. Effect of VDR Polymorphisms on General and Biochemical Parameters
| Data | Genotype | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FokI (rs2228570), N = 243 | BsmI (rs1544410), N = 218 | |||||||
| FF | Ff | ff | P Value | BB | Bb | bb | P Value | |
| Height, cm | 152.95 ± 15.11 | 155.89 ± 14.59 | 144.25 ± 13.30 | 0.15 | 152.88 ± 15.75 | 151.43 ± 14.48 | 153.56 ± 15 | 0.17 |
| Weight, Kg | 42.75 ± 14.34 | 43.33 ± 12.88 | 36 ± 10.72 | 0.12 | 41.30 ± 12.83 | 40.41 ± 11.93 | 42.79 ± 15.58 | 0.26 |
| BMI, kg/cm2 | 17.76 ± 3.43 | 17.41 ± 2.82 | 16.93 ± 2.43 | 0.09 | 17.21 ± 2.56 | 17.25 ± 2.92 | 17.56 ± 3.68 | 0.87 |
| 25OH vit D, ng/mL | 14.95 ± 5.93 | 15.84 ± 5.49 | 12.22 ± 4.12 | 0.15 | 14.58 ± 4.60 | 15.15 ± 6.15 | 15.31 ± 5.19 | 0.76 |
| Calcium, mg/dL | 9.84 ± 0.47 | 9.90 ± 0.57 | 9.78 ± 0.36 | 0.62 | 9.77 ± 0.42 | 9.88 ± 0.49 | 9.79 ± 0.52 | 0.40 |
| Phosphorus, mg/dL | 4.04 ± 0.53 | 4.11 ± 1.36 | 4.19 ± 0.47 | 0.53 | 4.14 ± 0.47 | 4.18 ± 1.18 | 4.00 ± 0.53 | 0.46 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
a Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
4.4. Effect of VDR Polymorphisms on Body Composition and DXA Bone Densitometry
4.5. Effect of VDR Polymorphisms on Bone Mineral Density Z-Score
| Data | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P Value | Model 1 OR (95% CI) | P Value | Model 2 OR (95% CI) | P Value | Model 3 OR (95% CI) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FokI, N = 243 | ||||||||
| Lumbar spine | ||||||||
| Additive | ||||||||
| FF | 0.34 (0.86 - 1.4) | 0.10 | 0.35 (0.86 - 1.4) | 0.15 | 0.25 (0.05 - 1.1) | 0.07 | 0.37 (0.07 - 2) | 0.25 |
| Ff | 0.32 (0.86 - 1.2) | 0.133 | 0.32 (0.83 - 1.2) | 0.10 | 0.30 (0.07 - 1.2) | 0.10 | 0.43 (0.09 - 2.1) | 0.30 |
| ff | Ref. | |||||||
| Dominant (FF+Ff) vs. ff | 0.33 (0.09 - 1.2) | 0.10 | 0.33 (0.09 - 1.2) | 0.10 | 0.29 (0.071.2) | 0.08 | 0.41(0.08 - 2) | 0.28 |
| Recessive FF vs. (Ff+ff) | 1.2 (0.6 - 2.4) | 0.52 | 1.3 (0.6 - 2.5) | 0.48 | 1 (0.5 - 2.1) | 0.97 | 1(0.5 - 2.1) | 0.10 |
| Femoral Neck | ||||||||
| Additive | ||||||||
| FF | 1.5 (0.4 - 5.9) | 0.6 | 1.1 (0.3 - 4.7) | 0.86 | 0.9 (0.2 - 4) | 0.94 | 1 (0.2 - 4.6) | 0.9 |
| Ff | 0.8 (0.4 - 1.7) | 0.6 | 0.8 (0.4 - 1.7) | 0.63 | 0.6 (0.2 - 1.2) | 0.17 | 0.6 (0.3 - 1.5) | 0.3 |
| ff | Ref. | |||||||
| Dominant (FF+Ff) vs. ff | 0.6 (0.2 - 2.5) | 0.53 | 0.8 (0.2 - 3.3) | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.2 - 3.6) | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.2 - 3.9) | 0.9 |
| Recessive FF vs. (Ff+ff) | 1 (0.5 - 2.1) | 0.8 | 1.1 (0.6 - 2.2) | 0.7 | 1.6 (0.8 - 3.3) | 0.2 | 1.4 (0.7 - 3.1) | 0.4 |
| BsmI, N = 218 | ||||||||
| Lumbar spine | ||||||||
| Additive | ||||||||
| BB | 0.9 (0.3 - 2.5) | 0.8 | 0.9 (0.4 - 2.4) | 0.8 | 1 (0.3 - 3) | 0.9 | 0.9 (0.3 - 2.9) | 0.9 |
| Bb | 1.5 (0.7 - 3.3) | 0.3 | 1.4 (0.8 - 3.2) | 0.3 | 1.6 (0.7 - 3.7) | 0.3 | 1.3 (0.6 - 3.2) | 0.5 |
| bb | Ref. | |||||||
| Dominant (BB+Bb) vs. bb | 1.3 (0.6 - 2.8) | 0.5 | 1.3 (0.6 - 2.8) | 0.5 | 1.4 (0.6 - 3.2) | 0.4 | 1.2 (0.5 - 2.7) | 0.6 |
| Recessive BB vs. (B+bb) | 0.7 (0.2 - 1.7) | 0.4 | 0.7 (0.2 - 1.7) | 0.4 | 0.7 (0.3 - 1.9) | 0.5 | 0.8 (0.3 - 2.1) | 0.6 |
| Femoral Neck | ||||||||
| Additive | ||||||||
| BB | 2.3 (0.8 - 6.4) | 0.1 | 2.3 (0.8 - 6.6) | 0.1 | 2.9 (1 - 9) | 0.056 | 3.2 (1 - 10) | 0.049 |
| Bb | 2.5 (1 - 6) | 0.035 | 2.8 (1.1 - 6.8) | 0.021 | 3.3 (1.3 - 8.6) | 0.013 | 3.7 (1.3 - 10) | 0.011 |
| bb | Ref. | |||||||
| Dominant (BB+Bb) vs. bb | 2.5 (1 - 5.6) | 0.033 | 2.7 (1.1 - 6.2) | 0.023 | 3.2 (1.2 - 8) | 0.012 | 3.5 (1.3 - 9.3) | 0.012 |
| Recessive BB vs. (BB+bb) | 1.2 (0.5 - 2.7) | 0.6 | 1.2 (0.5 - 2.7) | 0.7 | 1.3 (0.5 - 3.1) | 0.5 | 1.3 (0.5 - 3.2) | 0.5 |
| Over dominant Bb vs. (BB + bb) | 0.57 (0.29 - 1.1) | 0.1 | 0.52 (0.25 - 1) | 0.066 | 0.49 (0.23 - 1) | 0.059 | 0.46 (0.21 - 1) | 0.053 |
Abbreviations: VDR, vitamin D receptor; BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio.
a According to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) guideline in additive, dominant and recessive models with adjustment for confounding factors. Adjustment was done in 3 models. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex, model 2 for age, sex and BMI, and model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI and the tanner stage of puberty.
b P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Linear Regression Model | P Valueb | |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar Spine BMD | Femoral Neck BMD | |
| FokI | ||
| Unadjusted | 0.24 | 0.54 |
| Model 1 | 0.74 | 0.39 |
| Model 2 | 0.26 | 0.79 |
| Model 3 | 0.08 | 0.90 |
| BsmI | ||
| Unadjusted | 0.21 | 0.50 |
| Model 1 | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| Model 2 | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Model 3 | 0.34 | 0.22 |
Abbreviations: VDR, vitamin D receptor; BMD, bone mineral density.
a Adjustments was done in 3 models. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex, model 2 for age, sex and body mass index (BMI), and model 3 was adjusted for age, sex, BMI and the tanner stage of puberty.
b P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.