The expression of PSMA has been demonstrated in the neovasculature of various malignancies other than prostate cancer, including breast adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme, pancreatic ductal and gastric adenocarcinomas, and a variety of renal tumors, including ccRCC, papillary RCC, oncocytomas, and angiomyolipomas (
2). However, breast, lung, colorectal, and renal cell carcinomas are the most common primary tumors with PSMA expression (
3,
4).
Siva et al. published a case series, including eight patients with RCC, undergoing both
18F-FDG and
68Ga-PSMA PET imaging. The PSMA uptake was typically more intense than FDG in RCC. Both PET radiotracers demonstrated treatment response before the emergence of morphological changes on either CT or MRI. They concluded that PSMA PET scan is suitable for diagnostic and response assessments in metastatic RCC patients after local treatments (
5).
Mads et al. reported an interesting case of primary lung adenocarcinoma in a 70-year-old man with prostate cancer on
68Ga-PSMA PET scan for the first time in 2018 (
6). On the other hand, Pyka et al. reported that
68Ga-PSMA PET scan cannot differentiate between pulmonary metastasis and primary lung tumors in patients with prostate cancer. They found no clear reason for the high PSMA uptake in non-prostate cancer lesions. However, they hypothesized that PSMA protein expression in the neovasculature can be related to other factors, such as tracer binding to proteins other than PSMA (
7). Nadebaum et al. also described the “flip-flop” phenomenon using
68Ga-PSMA and
18F-FDG PET/CT scans in a patient with sarcomatoid RCC. Areas with a slow recurrence and a low grade of sarcomatoid differentiation demonstrated intense
68Ga-PSMA expression with a low
18F-FDG uptake (
8).
Overall,
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan is potentially useful for patients with RCC recurrence to detect metastasis; it may be also used for the assessment of treatment response to novel therapeutic agents (
9,
10). The expression of PSMA may be considered as an indicator of lutetium-177 (
177Lu)-PSMA therapy efficacy and an alternative treatment for patients with RCC recurrence. However, further studies with a larger sample size (
9,
11) and prospective trials are needed to evaluate PSMA-targeted agents for imaging and treatment of non-prostate neoplasms. Also, the role of
68Ga-PSMA PET scan in the evaluation of lung cancer lesions is less understood, and further research is necessary.
In conclusion, we found the expression of PSMA in a patient with concurrent renal and pulmonary cancers. Based on the findings, 68Ga-PSMA PET scan is a potentially useful tool for the evaluation and treatment of tumors other than prostate cancer with PSMA expression. Nonetheless, further investigation is needed on a larger sample size to confirm its potential role.