Commonly, AMs are treated via CT-guided radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation (
1,
2,
13). More recently, cryoablation approaches have been applied to treat AM and other malignant tumors, since they cause less pain, allow for visualization of the treatment zone, and are beneficial for better healing (
3,
12). Our findings suggested that CT-guided cryoablation can be a safe and effective treatment to control AM secondary to NSCLC. The success rates of primary and secondary ablations in the present cohort were 91.1% and 100%, respectively. These high success rates might be attributed to the mean AM size in this study (3 cm).
In previous studies regarding CT-guided radiofrequency, microwave ablation, and cryoablation for AM patients, the mean AM size ranged from 3 to 3.7 cm (
1-
3). The success rates of primary and secondary ablations in this study are comparable to those reported in other studies of CT-guided radiofrequency, microwave ablation, and cryoablation for AM patients (
1-
3). Besides, there was no significant difference in the primary ablation rates between patients with SCC and adenocarcinoma (P = 1.000). This finding indicated that the success rate of cryoablation was not influenced by the pathological type of primary NSCLC.
The local recurrence rate was reported in 7/34 (20.5%) patients in the present cohort, which is comparable to the rate reported in a previous study of microwave/radiofrequency ablation for AM secondary to NSCLC (22%) (
13). Similarly, other studies reported a 20% local recurrence rate for AM secondary to liver cancer (
15). Moreover, we found that the median time until local progression was 18 months, which is within the range reported in studies using microwave ablation for 24 months and radiofrequency ablation for 8.6 months (
1,
16). Besides, the local recurrence rate (P = 0.551) and local RFS (P = 0.931) were not significantly different between patients with primary SCC and adenocarcinoma in this study. Overall, these results demonstrated that the local recurrence rate and time were not influenced by the ablation method or primary cancer type. The local control rate reached 79.5% in the present study, which is very close to that reported in patients undergoing adrenalectomy (77 - 83%) (
3,
4).
Regarding regional recurrence, 5/34 (14.7%) patients experienced extra-adrenal recurrence. The five-year systematic RFS rates were very low in both groups of patients with primary SCC and adenocarcinoma (11.9% and 0%, respectively). Since cryoablation is a local treatment, it has limited effects on distant recurrence. Radiological examination is critical for identifying extra-adrenal recurrence and ensuring that proper treatment is administered on time.
A previous study on CT-guided AM ablation showed that the OS of patients with AM secondary to NSCLC was significantly lower than that of patients with AM secondary to other cancer types (
1). In this study, we found that the median OS was 34 months in all patients, which is longer than 18.9 months reported in a previous study (
1). This discrepancy might be attributed to different patient inclusion criteria, as all of our patients had undergone surgical resection of primary NSCLC.
We also found that the median OS was significantly longer in the SCC group as compared to the adenocarcinoma group (56 vs. 22 months) (P = 0.009). The Cox regression analysis also revealed that primary SCC was a predictor of longer OS. It was also shown that the NSCLC subtype is an important determinant of metastasis and patient survival. Many studies have reported that lung adenocarcinoma is more prone to lymph node metastasis than SCC (
17,
18). This may explain why patients with primary SCC in our study had a longer OS as compared to patients with adenocarcinoma. Age and stage III primary NSCLCs were both independent predictors of OS in our cohort. Age was likely to be an adverse prognostic factor, partly because older patients were often immunocompromised; therefore, tumors in older patients progress faster than younger patients (
1).
Chemotherapy is a common procedure to treat NSCLC. However, in our multivariate Cox regression analysis, no significant association was found between chemotherapy and patient survival (P = 0.090). This may be attributed to the limited sample size of this study. Further studies on a larger cohort of patients are warranted to determine whether chemotherapy exerts beneficial effects on patient survival. The ablation of adrenal tumors has been found to be associated with the incidence of a hypertensive crisis (
2,
11). It is known that a thermal ablation causes significant temperature increases in the target tissues and is associated with higher hypertensive crisis rates as compared to other forms of ablation (
3). Several moderate hypertension cases were identified and provided with timely blood pressure control medications. However, no case of a hypertensive crisis was found in the present cohort; therefore, timely blood pressure control after cryoablation may decrease the incidence of a hypertensive crisis (
3).
There are several limitations to this study. Firstly, this was a retrospective analysis and is therefore, subjected to selection bias. Secondly, this was a single-center study with a small sample size; therefore, caution must be taken when generalizing the results to a larger patient population or over longer follow-up periods. Thirdly, this study did not include a comparison group of patients with some other forms of ablation; therefore, further multi-center randomized controlled trials are crucial to validate and expand these findings. Fourthly, only some of our patients received postoperative chemotherapy, based on their clinical status. Some of the patients did not receive chemotherapy because of their poor economic status, while some patients refused to receive chemotherapy after cryoablation; this definitely increased the risk of bias.
In conclusion, CT-guided cryoablation can be a safe and effective treatment for AM secondary to NSCLC; patients with AM secondary to SCC may benefit the most from this treatment.