The local ethics committee approved this cross-sectional study (Decision No.: E.31554 HRU, date: 19.07.05). The study was performed on 28 female outpatients with complaints of widespread pain, who were diagnosed with FMS. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Age range of 18 - 55 years; meeting the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria for FMS; and voluntary participation in the study. On the other hand, patients were excluded from the study if they had a history of systemic disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular or renal disease) or malignancy, an active infection, a history of neuromuscular, autoimmune, or psychiatric disorders, and pregnancy or breastfeeding.
In the first examination of FMS patients, the severity of pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), and their functional status was determined using the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Generally, VAS is an easily applicable scale with global acceptance, which is used to measure the severity of pain. This scale, by converting values that cannot be measured numerically to numbers, facilitates an evaluation of subjective pain sensation and represents the pain severity. Pain is measured based on a 10-cm horizontal line, marked in equal sections of 1 cm, and the respondents are instructed to mark their level of pain on this line (0, no pain; 10, intolerable pain) (
4,
5). The pain severity in the current study was classified as follows: 0 – 3, mild; 4 - 6, moderate; and 7 - 10, severe (
7).
Moreover, the FIQ was used in this study to determine the quality of life and functional status of FMS patients. This scale, which is widely used for the evaluation of FMS patients, was developed by Burckhardt et al. (
8). Also, the validity and reliability studies of the Turkish version of this questionnaire were conducted by Sarmer et al. (
9). The FIQ generally consists of 10 items. The first item examines 11 activities of daily living (shopping, cooking, washing, vacuuming, making the bed, walking a few hundred meters, visiting friends/family, gardening, driving, and ascending/descending stairs), each scored from zero to three (0, always; 1, usually; 2, sometimes; and 3, never). The rest of the items examine well-being in the past week, inability to work, pain level, fatigue, morning stiffness, morning tiredness, anxiety, and depression.
The total score was determined for the first item of FIQ (11 activities, rated on a 0 - 3 scale); to normalize it, it was divided by 11 and then multiplied by 3.33. For the second item of the questionnaire, as the number of days the patient felt well was negatively proportional to the disease severity, the number of days stated by the patient was subtracted from seven and then multiplied by 1.43 to obtain a normalized value. The third item, which represented the number of days the patient was unable to work over the last week because of FMS symptoms, was normalized by multiplying by 1.43. The total score of the questionnaire was determined as the sum of the scores of items 4 - 10 plus the normalized scores of the first three items. The maximum total score was 100, with higher scores indicating a lower quality of life and functional status.
The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRS, and DT imaging examinations were performed for the participants before treatment. The MRS and DT examinations of all the patients were performed on a 3 Tesla MRI unit (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Germany) with a standard head coil. All MR examinations were first evaluated regarding pathologies, and patients with conventional MR examinations within normal limits were included in the study. After non-contrast brain MRI, single-voxel MRS of the thalamus was performed bilaterally at both a short echo (repetition time [TR], 2000 ms; echo time [TE], 30 ms) and a long echo (TR, 2000 ms; TE, 135 ms). Additionally, sagittal T1-weighted images and axial and coronal T2-weighted images were acquired for guiding volume selection. The right hand, as the dominant hand, was used for all the patients. The spectra were determined based on the point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) method. Following water signal suppression with the chemical shift selective technique, spectroscopic data were obtained.
For the DT examination, T1-weighted 3D magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) imaging was performed for all the patients. The imaging parameters were as follows: TE, 92.0 ms; TR, 3700 ms; flip angle (FA), 7; and inversion time (TI), 1250 ms. On the ADC and FA maps, measurements were performed from the bilateral posterior limbs of internal capsule, thalami, corpus callosum genu, and splenium. The data were analyzed on a Leonardo workstation (Siemens, Forcheim, Germany), equipped with the manufacturer’s supplied software package.
Moreover, in the present study, the metabolite signals included N-acetylaspartate (NAA; 2.04 ppm), choline (Cho; 3.24 ppm), creatine (Cr; 3.05 ppm), glutamate-glutamine (Glx; 3.80 ppm), myo-inositol (MI; 3.58 ppm), and lactate (1.33 ppm). The ratio of these metabolites to Cr (Cho/Cr, NAA/Cr, Glx/Cr, and MI/Cr) was calculated in this study. Additionally, the metabolite concentrations of NAA, MI, Cho, and Cr were measured (
Figure 1A -
C).
A, Long-echo-time spectroscopy of a 26-year-old control woman; B, Short-echo-time spectroscopy of a 29-year-old patient (the N-acetylaspartate/Creatine (NAA/Cr) ratio was estimated at 1.84 with an increasing trend); C, Diffusion tensor (DT) color fractional anisotropy (FA) map of a 31-year-old female patient.
The collected data were statistically analyzed in IBM SPSS Version 20.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median, minimum and maximum, or number (n) and percentage (%). The normal distribution of continuous variables was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk test when the sample size was < 50 and using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test when the sample size was ≥ 50. For comparison of two independent groups of data, independent samples t-test was performed when the data had a normal distribution, while Mann-Whitney U test was performed when the data did not have a normal distribution. On the other hand, for comparison of two dependent groups of data, paired samples t-test was used when the normal distribution conditions were met, while Wilcoxon test was applied when the data did not show a normal distribution. Moreover, for comparison of two groups of quantitative data, Pearson’s correlation test was performed when the data had a normal distribution; otherwise, Spearman’s correlation test was applied. Only statistically significant results of these tests are presented in this article. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.