Aortic dissection is the most common cause of aortic emergency and has a high mortality rate (
7). Therefore, rapid diagnosis and management are necessary. Fortunately, recent advancement in imaging techniques, such as ECG-gated CT aortography and MRI, contributes to diagnosing acute aortic dissection more rapidly and easily. CT is the preferred modality over MRI in emergency situations due to shorter scanning time. This imaging modality not only differentiates aortic dissection types but is also capable of evaluting fatal complications of aortic dissection such as hemopericardium, hemothorax, and organ ischemia (
7).
Among those complications, hemorrhage extending along the pulmonary artery is an uncommon complication of Stanford type A aortic dissection. This complication reduces pulmonary circulation, which eventually decreases left ventricle preload resulting in a devastating outcome. Only a few reports were published previously (
2-
6). Sueyoshi et al. found 21 cases (9%) of 232 patients with Stanford A aortic dissection (
2), but the true prevalence of this complication is still unclear because this complication is probably under-recognized. Anatomically, pulmonary trunk and ascending aorta have a single common adventitia at the roots of the great vessels, and the ascending aorta is anterior to the pulmonary artery at the roots of the great vessels. Therefore, hemorrhage resulting from the rupture of the posterior wall of the aorta can extend into the space between the media of the pulmonary artery and common adventitia. This can compress and narrow the pulmonary arterial lumen as the aortic pressure is higher than the pulmonary artery pressure (
1,
2).
Diagnosis of this complication is mainly dependent on imaging studies. According to previous reports, chest radiographic findings are variable from normal to mimicking pulmonary edema. Transthoracic echocardiography can detect aortic dissections and some complications such as hemopericardium (
8), however, it has limitations when it comes to evaluating the pulmonary artery. As a result, CT is the most sensitive method to evaluate the complication of aortic dissection. On nonenhanced CT, hemorrhage is visible as high attenuation along the wall of the pulmonary artery. On enhanced CT, it is usually interpreted as pulmonary arterial wall thickening with narrowed lumen (
2-
4). Accurate diagnosis is guaranteed only when both pre and post contrast enhanced scans are obtained. For example, our first case showed wall thickening and luminal narrowing of the pulmonary artery on enhanced CT, and the wall thickening was confirmed as hemorrhage by high attenuation in the corresponding region on non-enhanced CT. However, not all cases reveal both findings. In our second case, pre-contrast CT was performed just after lower extremity CT angiography, so highly attenuated hemorrhage was concealed by previously injected contrast-media. On the other hand, sometimes contrast media from a previous study remains in the aortopulmonary adventitia and is seen as a high density lesion. This should be differentitated from hemorrhage (
6). Therefore, if any contrast-enhanced CT was performed before CT aortography, physicians should consider the effect of previously injected contrast media. Furthermore, like in our third case, non-enhanced CT images are not always routinely included in CT scans. Therefore, in these situations, enhanced images should be more carefully evaluated.
Sueyoshi et al. (
2) classified this complication into three catergories based on the extent of hemorrhage shown by the CT image. The first category includes abnormal density limited only to the pulmonary artery, indicating hemorrhage is localized around the pulmonary artery. The second category includes the presence of interlobular septal thickening on CT, which indicates hemorrhage extension into the interlobular septa. The third category is defined as hemorrhage extension into the alveoli, and the CT image shows ground-glass opacity in the affected lung field. Higher category is associated with worse prognosis (
2). Therefore, we also have to carefully assess lung images. All three of our cases can be classified into the third category.
Stanford type A aortic dissection itself has a poor prognosis, but when it is combined with complications, the prognosis is even worse. Hemorrhage extending to the pulmonary artery is one of the most fatal complications of Stanford type A aortic dissection and emergent surgical management needs to be considered (
9). Therefore, a quick and accurate imaging evaluation can help the patient receive appropriate management. Typical imaging findings of a hemorrhage extending to the pulmonary arteries are noted by high attenuation along the wall of the pulmonary artery on nonenhanced CT, while enhanced CT images show wall thickening and luminal narrowing of the artery. However, not all cases reveal both findings and different CT findings can make diagnosis difficult. Therefore, we should keep this complication in mind when aortic dissection is considered.