The Risk Factors of Early Biliary Infection After 125I Particles Stent Implantation in Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction

authors:

avatar Fei Song 1 , avatar Youquan Niu 2 , avatar Xuelin Li 3 , avatar Jiayin Che 1 , avatar Hao Huang 3 , avatar Yingying Xiang ORCID 3 , * , avatar Ming Huang 1 , **

Department of Minimally Invasive Intervention, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming , China
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan, China
Department of Stomatology, Yan’an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming , China
Corresponding Authors:

how to cite: Song F, Niu Y, Li X, Che J, Huang H, et al. The Risk Factors of Early Biliary Infection After 125I Particles Stent Implantation in Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction. I J Radiol. 2024;21(2):e143789. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-143789.

Abstract

Background:

Early biliary infection (EBI) is a significant and prevalent complication following percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting, especially in cases involving the use of 125I particle stents for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO).

Objectives:

This study aims to uncover potential risk factors contributing to EBI post-implantation in this patient group.

Patients and Methods:

In this retrospective study, a total of 231 patients who underwent 125I particle stent implantation between January 2014 and December 2020 were included. Screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria identified a total of 178 patients (115 males and 63 females, aged 32 - 83 years). Early biliary infection occurrence was monitored within the first 30 days following the stent implantation, when infectious complications are most prevalent. We analyzed baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters of patients, comparing those who developed EBI with those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify significant risk factors for EBI.

Results:

Out of the 178 patients, 35 (19.7%) developed EBI within 30 days post-implantation. Every EBI case was accompanied by a positive bile culture. Notably, patients with EBI more frequently had diabetes [odds ratio (OR), 3.329; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.129 - 9.819; regression coefficient (B) = 1.203; P = 0.029], gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts (OR, 3.459; 95% CI, 1.060 - 11.283; B = 1.241; P = 0.040), higher level of biliary obstruction (OR, 3.008; 95% CI, 1.243 - 7.280; B = 1.101; P = 0.015), intraoperative biliary bleeding (OR, 5.416; 95% CI, 1.569 - 18.696; B = 1.689; P = 0.008), and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia (OR, 2.655; 95% CI, 1.108 - 6.362; B = 0.976; P = 0.029) compared to those without EBI. These factors were positively correlated with EBI development post-implantation. Conversely, the duration from percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to 125I stent implantation was longer in patients without EBI (OR, 0.966; 95% CI, 0.940 - 0.992; B = - 0.035; P = 0.012), suggesting a negative association with EBI occurrence.

Conclusion:

This study identifies diabetes, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts, high-level obstruction, intraoperative biliary bleeding, and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia as significant risk factors for EBI. Additionally, a longer interval from PTBD to 125I stent implantation emerges as a protective factor against EBI in patients with MBO undergoing 125I particle stent implantation. These risk factors can offer guidance to minimize post-125I particle stent implantation biliary infection, thereby shortening hospitalization for affected patients.

1. Background

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is a pathological blockage caused by malignancies in the bile duct, gallbladder, pancreas, ampulla of Vater, liver, etc. (1). Cholestasis in the bile duct can lead to the penetration of bile into the bloodstream. To avoid the adverse effects of hyperbilirubinemia, biliary drainage is necessary (2). A meta-analysis based on 26 articles revealed that preoperative biliary drainage improves the outcomes of malignant obstructive jaundice after surgery (3). For patients unable to undergo surgery, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic biliary drainage are commonly used strategies (4).

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) is a supplement to PTBD, which can dredge the biliary tract, normalize plasma levels of bilirubin, and relieve MBO-associated symptoms (5). In PTBS, metal stents are superior to plastic stents due to longer patency and lower re-intervention rates (6). However, the growth of tumor cells and mucosal hyperplasia significantly limit the cumulative patency rate of metal stents, leading to the recurrence of biliary restenosis or obstruction (7). Encouragingly, the development of 125I particle stents opens new horizons. The implantation of 125I particle stents can not only dredge obstruction but also inhibit the growth of tumor cells in the bile duct (8). Pang et al. found that PTBS combined with 125I particles is more effective in inhibiting biliary re-obstruction and prolonging survival time than PTBS alone (9). Hasimu et al. also demonstrated that PTBS with 125I particles improves stent patency and extends survival time in patients with MBO (10). With the ability to prevent restenosis, 125I particle stent implantation shows great potential in the treatment of MBO.

With the widespread application of PTBS, increasing attention has been paid to complications. Early biliary infection (EBI) is a common early postoperative complication after PTBS, manifesting as shivering, fever, and even septic shock, posing a serious threat to patients' health and life (11). A previous study reported that 125I particle stent implantation is superior to conventional stents in reducing the risk of EBI, possibly due to the antimicrobial properties of integrated 125I and variations in stent composition, design, or material (12). Therefore, the prevention of EBI following 125I particle stent implantation is urgently needed.

Controlling risk factors is an effective strategy for preventing potential complications. Liu et al. revealed that diabetes, previous surgical or endoscopic treatment, procedure time > 60 min, and intraprocedural biliary hemorrhage are risk factors for EBI after PTBS (13). However, the risk factors of EBI following 125I particle stent implantation are not fully revealed. In this study, a total of 178 patients with MBO who underwent 125I particle stent implantation were enrolled. The baseline characteristics and perioperative parameters of these patients with or without EBI were retrospectively analyzed.

2. Objectives

This study aims to reveal potential risk factors of EBI after 125I particle stent implantation, providing guidance for the clinical treatment of MBO.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. Subjects

This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of our hospital (ethical approval code: 2020-13). Informed consent was obtained from all cases.

As a retrospective study, a total of 231 patients who underwent 125I particle stent implantation were collected from our hospital between January 2014 and December 2020. All patients were diagnosed with MBO based on pathological and imaging examinations. The inclusion criteria included: (1) > 18 years old; (2) unable or unwilling to undergo surgical operation; (3) first-time stent implantation. The exclusion criteria included: (1) benign biliary obstruction; (2) presence of biliary infection before PTBD (n = 11); (3) history of PTBS and biliary surgery (n = 6); (4) onset of severe organ dysfunction within 30 days after implantation (n = 5); (5) postoperative infection in other sites (n = 3); (6) missing clinical data and follow-up information (n = 28). Finally, a total of 178 patients (115 males and 63 females, aged 32 - 83 years) were included and analyzed in this study, comprising 35 patients with EBI and 143 patients without EBI (Figure 1). Patients included in the study underwent routine preoperative comprehensive assessments, including blood cell analysis, coagulation function tests, electrocardiography, liver and kidney function assessments, electrolyte analysis, abdominal computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The baseline data, including sex, age, liver function [total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and albumin (ALB)], blood routine [white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and platelets (PLT)], coagulation function [prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)], comorbidity [diabetes mellitus (DM) and gallstones], obstruction location, and tumor types were collected.

Flow chart describing the study design (MBO, malignant biliary obstruction; PTBD, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; EBI, early biliary infection).
Flow chart describing the study design (MBO, malignant biliary obstruction; PTBD, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; EBI, early biliary infection).

3.2. 125I Particles Stent Implantation

The biliary 125I particle stent was purchased from Nanjing Micro-Tech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China), with a diameter of 10 mm (Appendix 1). Before stent implantation, PTBD was performed to determine the location and length of the obstruction in the bile duct under the digital subtraction angiography suite (Appendix 2). A guide wire was introduced through the PTBD tube, and the outer sheath was replaced. Using a single-curved catheter alongside the guide wire, the catheter traversed the narrowed bile duct segment. After removing the guide wire, cholangiography through the catheter precisely located and determined the length of the obstructed segment (Appendix 2). A 260 cm super-stiff, extra-long guide wire was then exchanged before withdrawing the catheter (Appendix 2). The number of 125I particles (diameter = 0. 8mm, length = 4.5 mm, effective radiation radius = 17 mm, half-life = 59.43 days; Beike Biotechnology, Beijing, China) was calculated by the radiotherapy treatment planning system (HGGR-2000; Hokai Medical Instruments, Zhuhai, China) according to the tumor status. The 125I particles are disinfected using 75% alcohol or high-temperature/high-pressure methods. They are then secured onto the particle stent delivery device using forceps. While loading 125I particles, avoid withdrawing the central metal support rod of the delivery device assembly. The biliary 125I particle stent is guided to the lesion site along a super-stiff guidewire and released upon confirming precise positioning using the proximal method (Appendix 2). After withdrawing the 125I particle stent delivery system, a standard biliary stent is advanced along the super-stiff guidewire to the site of bile duct obstruction (Appendix 2). The regular biliary stent is positioned to overlap with the radioactive particle stent, ensuring approximately a 10 mm extension beyond the lesion's upper and lower margins. Contrast imaging is then performed to confirm the release position and deployment status of the stent. Finally, the PTBD external drainage catheter (Cook Medical, USA) is to be retained in place and secured with appropriate dressing (Appendix 2).

Both PTBD and 125I particle stent implantation were performed by professional senior physicians. After the implantation for 2 - 3 weeks, unobstructed bile drainage was identified by cholangiography. Within 30 days after implantation, EBI was identified by the characteristics of fever (≥ 37.3ºC), persistent increase in white blood cells and neutrophils, positive bile culture, pain around the liver region, and/or continuous progression of jaundice. EBI within the initial 30 days post-stent implantation is consistent with clinical norms, emphasizing the critical early period when infectious complications are most prevalent.

For patients who develop EBI after 125I particle stent placement, if the PTBD drainage tube is not removed, biliary drainage can be performed through the PTBD drainage tube to control EBI. In cases of EBI, early administration of antibiotics is recommended. In our hospital, broad-spectrum antibiotics such as cefmetazole, cefoperazone-sulbactam, cefotiam, and piperacillin-tazobactam are used based on clinical experience until the results of drug sensitivity tests are available. Following the availability of sensitivity results, antibiotic therapy is adjusted accordingly. In cases where infection control is inadequate, and there is a tendency for worsening EBI, potent antibiotics like meropenem are employed. In this study, among 35 patients with EBI, appropriate anti-inflammatory treatment effectively controlled biliary infections.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Continuous data underwent normality assessment, and for normally distributed metric data, the independent t-test was applied, with results presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were presented as number (percentage), and those between two groups were compared by χ2 test. This study classifies risk factors associated with EBI into two categories: Patient-related and surgical-related factors. Patient-related factors encompass sex, age, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts, types of malignant tumor, obstruction location (low- or high-level), comorbidities (such as diabetes), preoperative liver function, blood routine, PT, APTT, and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia. Surgical factors include 125I particle numbers, intraoperative biliary bleeding, PTBD, time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation (days), time from jaundice to 125I stent implantation (days), and drainage tube removal. Observations are independent of each other. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors influencing postoperative EBI, with those having P < 0.05 subsequently subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for EBI after 125I particle stent placement. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Distribution of Bacterial Species in Early Biliary Infection

Within 30 days after implantation, EBI was observed in 35 patients (19.7%). The bacterial species in these patients were identified by bile culture, with positive results in all 35 cases. Escherichia coli (N = 17) was the dominant gram-negative bacterium in bile samples, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 5), Pseudomonas putida (N = 3), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N = 1). Gram-positive bacteria included Enterococcus faecalis (N = 4) and Staphylococcus (N = 1). Additionally, mixed bacterial infections and Candida were identified in 3 and 1 cases, respectively.

4.2. Comparisons of Baseline Characteristics in Patients with and Without Early Biliary Infection

The baseline characteristics of patients with and without EBI were compared. As listed in Table 1, there were no significant differences in sex, age, liver function (TBIL, DBIL, AST, ALT, and ALB), blood routine (WBC, HGB, and PLT), coagulation function (PT and APTT), and tumor types between the non-EBI and EBI groups. Notably, diabetes and gallstones (in the gallbladder or bile ducts) were more frequent in EBI cases compared to non-EBI cases (P < 0.01). Patients with high-level obstruction were also more likely to suffer from EBI (P = 0.013).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients with and Without Early Biliary Infection

ParametersNon-EBI (n = 143)EBI (n = 35)P-value
Sex0.809
Male93 (65.0)22 (62.9)
Female50 (35.0)13 (37.1)
Age (y)60.87 ± 10.7561.51 ± 9.920.749
Liver function
TBIL (μmol/L)342.82 ± 151.80328.94 ± 140.950.624
DBIL (μmol/L)274.36 ± 106.43274.78 ± 116.250.984
AST (IU/L)126.28 ± 118.43172.20 ± 170.000.063
ALT (IU/L)158.07 ± 148.84178.86 ± 174.920.476
ALB (g/L)37.03 ± 4.9636.06 ± 6.560.330
Blood routine
WBC (× 109/L)7.14 ± 1.867.26 ± 2.180.744
HGB (g/L)127.28 ± 16.73123.17 ± 17.190.197
PLT (× 109/L)297.92 ± 97.87298.60 ± 84.330.970
Coagulation function
PT (s)12.82 ± 1.5613.12 ± 1.370.290
APTT (s)36.83 ± 4.5937.13 ± 3.810.726
Comorbidity
Diabetes12 (8.4)10 (28.6)< 0.001 a
Gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts9 (6.3)8 (22.9)0.003 a
Obstruction location0.013 a
High-level obstruction35 (24.5)16 (45.7)
Low-level obstruction108 (75.5)19 (54.3)
Types of malignant tumor0.998
Bile duct74 (51.7)18 (51.4)
Pancreas34 (23.8)9 (25.8)
Secondary 16 (11.2)4 (11.4)
Gallbladder9 (6.3)2 (5.7)
Others 10 (7.0)2 (5.7)

4.3. Comparisons of Perioperative Parameters in Patients with and Without Early Biliary Infection

The perioperative parameters were subsequently compared. The time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation was significantly longer in non-EBI cases than in EBI cases (P = 0.009). However, the time from jaundice to 125I stent implantation and the number of particles were not significantly different between cases with and without EBI. Additionally, the removal of the drainage tube was not associated with the onset of EBI. Notably, intraoperative biliary bleeding and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia were more likely to be found in EBI cases compared to non-EBI cases (P < 0.01) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Perioperative Parameters in Patients with and Without Early Biliary Infection a

ParametersNon-EBI (n = 143)EBI (n = 35)P-value
Time from jaundice to 125I sent implantation (days)50.73 ± 31.0345.49 ± 17.640.339
Time from PTBD to 125I sent implantation (days)22.55 ± 25.1314.80 ± 16.890.009 b
Particle numbers15.15 ± 4.6215.26 ± 5.020.907
Intraoperative biliary bleeding9 (6.3)8 (22.9)0.003 b
Drainage tube removal97 (67.8)22 (62.9)0.575
Postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia53 (37.1)22 (62.9)0.006 b

4.4. Identification of Risk Factors for Early Biliary Infection

Based on the parameters with significant differences, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the potential risk factors for EBI. As shown in Table 3, diabetes, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts, high-level obstruction, intraoperative biliary bleeding, and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia were all identified as risk factors for EBI in patients who underwent 125I particle stent implantation (P < 0.05). Conversely, the time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation was identified as a protective factor against EBI (P = 0.012).

Table 3.

Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for Early Biliary Infection After I Particle Stent Implantation

ParametersB-valueP-value aOR95% CI
Diabetes1.2030.0293.3291.129 - 9.819
Gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts1.2410.0403.4591.060 - 11.283
High obstruction1.1010.0153.0081.243 - 7.280
Intraoperative biliary bleeding1.6890.0085.4161.569 - 18.696
Postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia0.9760.0292.6551.108 - 6.362
Time from PTBD to 125I sent implantation-0.0350.0120.9660.940 - 0.992

5. Discussion

Malignant biliary obstruction is an ominous disorder of biliary obstruction and cholestasis caused by the invasion of malignant tumors (14). Malignant biliary obstruction is accompanied by high mortality mainly due to tumor progression, liver failure, and sepsis (15). Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stenting, characterized by minimal invasion and high efficiency, is a common therapeutic strategy for MBO. The development of 125I particle stents brings great advantages in prolonging biliary patency and survival time (13). However, the onset of complications, including EBI, seriously affects the quality of life. In this study, EBI was observed in 35 patients (19.7%) after 125I stent implantation. Bile culture determined that the pathogens of EBI were mainly gut-derived bacteria, such as E.coli, K.pneumoniae, and E.faecalis. Additionally, several risk factors for EBI were identified, including diabetes, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts, high-level obstruction, short time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation, intraoperative biliary bleeding, and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia.

Diabetes is a common metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia (16). Many previous studies have identified diabetes as a risk factor for EBI after PTBS (11, 13). In this study, diabetes was more frequent in the EBI group than in the non-EBI group and was subsequently determined to be a risk factor for EBI after 125I particle stent implantation. Our findings are consistent with previous studies, illustrating that diabetes is a risk for the onset of EBI following 125I particle stent implantation. The possible mechanisms include: (1) the reduction of insulin with anti-inflammatory effects (17); (2) weakened immune defense, leading to microbial invasion and infection (18); (3) diabetes-associated vascular disorders affecting blood flow around the bile duct, benefiting the growth of anaerobic bacteria under a hypoxic environment (19); and (4) hyperglycemia benefiting the growth of many bacteria in the bile duct (20). Therefore, preoperative control of blood glucose is urgently needed for patients requiring 125I particle stent implantation.

Gallstones grow inside the gallbladder or biliary tract, causing intermittent obstruction of the cystic duct (21). Gallstones can lead to a series of disorders, such as pain, jaundice, infection, and acute pancreatitis (22). A previous study reported that gallstones are a risk factor for cholecystitis within 30 days after PTBS (23). In this study, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts were determined to be a risk factor for EBI after 125I particle stent implantation. This result demonstrates the adverse role of gallstones in the outcomes of 125I stent implantation. The underlying mechanisms may be that gallstones can block the stent with the contraction of the gallbladder and the flow of bile, and the obstruction-induced cholestasis benefits bacterial growth, contributing to EBI. To avoid the adverse effects of gallstones, premature removal of PTBD drainage tubes is not recommended after stent implantation. When gallstones block the stent, they can be removed through the drainage tubes.

The location of obstruction is closely associated with the risk of biliary infection after drainage. Zhou et al. reported that the location of obstruction is a risk factor for EBI following PTBS (24). Consistent with previous studies, this study also revealed that high-level obstruction is a risk factor for EBI after 125I particle stent implantation. High-level biliary obstruction is characterized by an insidious onset and special anatomical location, which may lead to an increased risk of stent implantation and predispose to a variety of complications, such as EBI (25). For patients with high-level obstruction, accurate location of the obstruction based on preoperative cholangiography is necessary, and an appropriate stent should be customized to achieve sufficient drainage and reduce the risk of EBI.

Intraoperative biliary bleeding may occur due to mechanical damage caused by punctures, wire guides, and stents (26). Biliary bleeding can increase the risk of biliary infection by bringing contaminated bile into the bloodstream. Liu et al. reported that intraoperative biliary bleeding is an independent risk factor for EBI after PTBS (13). Consistently, this study also revealed that intraoperative biliary bleeding is a risk factor for EBI after 125I particle stent implantation. Therefore, avoiding vascular damage during interventional therapy is particularly important for reducing the risk of EBI.

Under normal circumstances, no gas is present in the bile duct. In this study, postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia was observed in 75 cases after 125I particle stent implantation, which was more frequent in the EBI group than in the non-EBI group. The subsequent analysis determined a positive correlation between postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia and EBI. The respiration of some bacteria contributing to EBI may lead to the onset of intrahepatic pneumobilia. After identifying bacterial gas in patients with postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia, the drainage tube should be temporarily retained for flushing bile ducts.

The time from PTBD to 125I implantation was further determined to be a protective factor for EBI. Patients with MBO usually have impaired immune function (27). Hyperbilirubinemia can further weaken cellular defense responses by stimulating cytotoxic reactions (28). Given that the normal protective barrier of the bile duct is easily damaged, interventional therapies, including PTBD, have a high risk of inducing biliary infection. Therefore, it is better to wait for the improvement of bilirubin, liver and coagulation function, and remission of edema in the bile duct wall before 125I particle stent implantation. Our findings indicate that an appropriate extension of the time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation is beneficial to reducing the risk of EBI.

In conclusion, patients with MBO have a relatively high incidence of EBI (19.7%) after 125I particle stent implantation. Diabetes, gallstones in the gallbladder or bile ducts, high-level obstruction, intraoperative biliary bleeding, and postoperative intrahepatic pneumobilia are risk factors for EBI. The time from PTBD to 125I stent implantation is a protective factor for EBI. However, this study is based on data from a single center with a limited sample size, potentially leading to biased results. The risk factors of EBI are not only limited to those elucidated in this study. Further research with a larger sample size and consideration of additional factors, such as the time of onset of malignancy, patient weight loss and malnutrition, and immunosuppression, is warranted.

References

  • 1.

    Okamoto T. Malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(10):985-1008. [PubMed ID: 35431494]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8968522]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.985.

  • 2.

    Oran NT, Oran I, Memis A. Management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. Nursing perspective from the interventional radiology room. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23(2):128-33. [PubMed ID: 10763284]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200004000-00009.

  • 3.

    Moole H, Bechtold M, Puli SR. Efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):182. [PubMed ID: 27400651]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4940848]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0933-2.

  • 4.

    Duan F, Cui L, Bai Y, Li X, Yan J, Liu X. Comparison of efficacy and complications of endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Imaging. 2017;17(1):27. [PubMed ID: 29037223]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5644169]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-017-0129-1.

  • 5.

    Sarkodie BD, Botwe BO, Brakohiapa EKK. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement in the palliative management of malignant obstructive jaundice: initial experience in a tertiary center in Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37:96. [PubMed ID: 33425129]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7757328]. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.37.96.20050.

  • 6.

    Pinol V, Castells A, Bordas JM, Real MI, Llach J, Montana X, et al. Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial. Radiol. 2002;225(1):27-34. [PubMed ID: 12354980]. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2243011517.

  • 7.

    Jang SI, Lee DK. Stents with specialized functions: drug-eluting stents and stents with antireflux devices. Gastrointestinal Intervention. 2015;4(1):50-4.

  • 8.

    Gao F, Huang X, Wang Y. The efficacy and safety of (125)I seeds combined with biliary stent placement versus stent placement alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(7):4589-602. [PubMed ID: 37456287]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10347337]. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-824.

  • 9.

    Pang Q, Zhou L, Hu XS, Wang Y, Man ZR, Yang S, et al. Biliary stenting alone versus biliary stenting combined with (125)I particles intracavitary irradiation for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11348. [PubMed ID: 31383886]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6683155]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47791-4.

  • 10.

    Hasimu A, Gu JP, Ji WZ, Zhang HX, Zhu DW, Ren WX. Comparative Study of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Placement with or without Iodine-125 Seeds for Treating Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(4):583-93. [PubMed ID: 28162906]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.038.

  • 11.

    Chen Q, Lu X, Wang ZK, Feng C, Yao XJ, Guo JH. Sarcopenia increases the risk of early biliary infection after percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1039987. [PubMed ID: 36568195]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9780493]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1039987.

  • 12.

    Han LQ, Xiao NJ, Liu F, Wang XD, Wang ZK, Li W. Factors related to stent patency and early elimination of jaundice using bile duct stent combined with iodine-125 seed implantation in malignant obstructive jaundice. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2022;14(6):542-50. [PubMed ID: 36819469]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9924152]. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123974.

  • 13.

    Liu Y, Zhang C, Song M, Han X, Jiao D. Predicting early biliary infection after stenting of malignant biliary obstruction: model development and internal validation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023;48(7):2456-65. [PubMed ID: 37160766]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03936-8.

  • 14.

    Lee TH, Moon JH, Stuart S. Role of ERCP in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022;32(3):427-53. [PubMed ID: 35691690]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2022.01.003.

  • 15.

    Mosconi S, Beretta GD, Labianca R, Zampino MG, Gatta G, Heinemann V. Cholangiocarcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;69(3):259-70. [PubMed ID: 18977670]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.09.008.

  • 16.

    Demir S, Nawroth PP, Herzig S, Ekim Ustunel B. Emerging Targets in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetic Complications. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(18). e2100275. [PubMed ID: 34319011]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8456215]. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100275.

  • 17.

    Dandona P, Chaudhuri A, Mohanty P, Ghanim H. Anti-inflammatory effects of insulin. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007;10(4):511-7. [PubMed ID: 17563472]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e3281e38774.

  • 18.

    Akash MSH, Rehman K, Fiayyaz F, Sabir S, Khurshid M. Diabetes-associated infections: development of antimicrobial resistance and possible treatment strategies. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202(5):953-65. [PubMed ID: 32016521]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7223138]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01818-x.

  • 19.

    Catrina SB, Zheng X. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in diabetes and its complications. Diabetologia. 2021;64(4):709-16. [PubMed ID: 33496820]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7940280]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-021-05380-z.

  • 20.

    Gurung M, Li Z, You H, Rodrigues R, Jump DB, Morgun A, et al. Role of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. EBio Med. 2020;51:102590. [PubMed ID: 31901868]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6948163]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.051.

  • 21.

    Abraham S, Rivero HG, Erlikh IV, Griffith LF, Kondamudi VK. Surgical and nonsurgical management of gallstones. Am Fam Physician. 2014;89(10):795-802. [PubMed ID: 24866215].

  • 22.

    Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, Gurusamy K, Sturgess R, Webster G, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. 2017;66(5):765-82. [PubMed ID: 28122906]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312317.

  • 23.

    Takinami M, Murohisa G, Yoshizawa Y, Shimizu E, Nagasawa M. Risk factors for cholecystitis after stent placement in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020;27(8):470-6. [PubMed ID: 32462813]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.767.

  • 24.

    Zhou HF, Huang M, Ji JS, Zhu HD, Lu J, Guo JH, et al. Risk Prediction for Early Biliary Infection after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stent Placement in Malignant Biliary Obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(8):1233-1241 e1. [PubMed ID: 31208946]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.001.

  • 25.

    Lee JG. Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(9):533-41. [PubMed ID: 19652653]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2009.126.

  • 26.

    Pulappadi VP, Srivastava DN, Madhusudhan KS. Diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: a primer for residents. Br J Radiol. 2021;94(1120):20200879. [PubMed ID: 33529044]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8010549]. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200879.

  • 27.

    Pavlidis ET, Pavlidis TE. Pathophysiological consequences of obstructive jaundice and perioperative management. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018;17(1):17-21. [PubMed ID: 29428098]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.008.

  • 28.

    Fujiwara R, Haag M, Schaeffeler E, Nies AT, Zanger UM, Schwab M. Systemic regulation of bilirubin homeostasis: Potential benefits of hyperbilirubinemia. Hepatol. 2018;67(4):1609-19. [PubMed ID: 29059457]. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29599.