The prevalence of CAC on panoramic radiographs is detected in different studies and the prevalence has been reported as %5, %6.2, %9.4, %13, and % 38.8 (
1-
5). A considerable rate of mortalities in the United States refers to strokes that occur in women after the age of 50 (
14). Atheromas often have been detected on the panoramic radiographs of neurologically asymptomatic male veterans; however, similar studies have not been conducted among female veterans (
14). Hoke et al. reported that there is no statistically significant association between the presence of CAC on panoramic radiographs and the presence of a significant carotid stenosis or the degree of carotid stenosis (
4). In a study conducted by Masood et al., hypertension did not show a statistically significant association with CAC (
6). A study carried out by Uthman et al. mentioned that people suffering stroke, had a greater prevalence of CAC on panoramic radiographs (
8). Cohen et al. demonstrated that 86% of the patients who had CAC on dental panoramic images had at least one vascular risk factor (
13). Friedlander introduced hypertension as the most important risk factor for atherosclerosis in menopausal women, and a significant relationship has been reported between hypertension and the occurrence of carotid artery calcification (
15). But Ohba from Japan in a study on 80-year-old Japanese patients found no relation between systolic or diastolic hypertension and the existence or non-existence of CAC (
11). In our study, this association was completely significant. Also, we obtained such a strong association between MI history and CAC on panoramic images. Cohen et al. in a study on 73 patients with CAC in panoramic radiography observed that 11% had a history of MI, 7% had a history of CVA, and 15% died because of vascular accidents. So they concluded that the existence of carotid artery calcification on dental panoramic radiographs could be a strong marker to predict CVA (
13). Thus, the existence of CAC on panoramic radiographs along with CVA risk factors such as hypertension and a previous MI can be considered as important symptoms for predicting stroke. It should be mentioned that in our studied patients, only four patients had a history of MI, but it was interesting that most of them showed CAC on the panoramic radiographs. So nevertheless, we found association between MI and CAC on panoramic images, but it is not enough and further studies with more patients reporting a history of MI is recommended. The difference in results among the mentioned studies and also our study can be related to the differences in age, gender and ethnicity of the sample groups. Since panoramic radiographs are routinely indicated for dental patients, dentists can evaluate panoramic images to find carotid artery calcification and refer these patients to specialists to prevent all morbidity and mortalities due to strokes and other adverse vascular events that could force high costs for the healthcare system. Therefore, training general dentists in order to diagnose this calcification on panoramic radiographs is important. Besides dental problems, dentists should generally consider the existing CAC as well. The identification of CAC on dental panoramic radiographs must be performed by an experienced evaluator. So training, experience and the specialty of the dentistare also important. Almog demonstrated that the probability of wrong diagnosis was high when the dentists didnot have enough experience and specialty to detect CAC on panoramic radiographs (17). Wrong diagnosis can result in enforcing unnecessary considerable costs (for example angiography) to the patient and the society. An atherosclerotic lesion is not always calcified, Almog et al. demonstrated that 50% of the patients who had CAC on their panoramic radiographs had a higher than 50% carotid artery stenosis. When panoramic radiographs do not show calcification, the percentage of vessel stenosis will be only 21 % (
14).
Panoramic radiographs are not as useful as Doppler ultrasonography and CT in detecting atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries and especially stenosis of the vessels, but it is a very cheap and non-invasive method in comparison to other imaging methods and they are commonly used in dental patients. Panoramic radiographs may help us to detect CACs in patients with or without other associated risk factors (
10).
There were imitations to our study. First, identification of MI based on history is not as certain as ECG findings, but it was not possible in our study to detect MI with other methods such as ECG. Second, unfortunately, the number of patients with a history of MI in our study was small; therefore, more investigations in greater sample sizes are necessary. Third, some cases of carotid plaques are not calcified so they cannot be detected on radiographs. However, the diagnosis of calcified ones can have an important role in preventing CVA. In our study, the prevalence of CAC was 11% and it shows the importance of panoramic radiograph evaluation in detecting CAC.
There is a significant relationship between the presence of CAC on panoramic radiographs and the two other CVA risk factors including hypertension and MI history, so a detailed evaluation of panoramic radiographs is very important. Taking panoramic radiographs just to detect CAC is not recommended, but patients should be referred for further evaluation when CAC is detected on dental panoramic radiographs. Dental panoramic radiographs should be carefully examined in the area of the carotid artery in not only patients with systemic disease, but also asymptomatic patients.