With the development of imaging technology and clinical diagnosis ability in recent years, PE has gradually become one of the most common emergency and critical diseases in clinic. PE is more likely to occur in elderly patients, patients with a postoperative fracture, patients lying in bed for a long period, patients with a malignant tumor, and patients with abnormal coagulation function. The clinic untypicalities and fatalness of PE are closely related to its own anatomical and pathological characteristic. When the embolus exists in the pulmonary artery trunk and lobar arteries, it makes pulmonary circulation pressure and the right ventricular load increase, leading to right heart failure. The clinical symptoms tend to be more obvious and sudden death is likely to happen. When the embolus involves the pulmonary segmental and sub-segmental pulmonary arteries, the clinical symptoms are usually not obvious and the duration of the disease is often subacute or chronic because the region influenced by the embolus is smaller and there is collateral circulation around the region. However, the embolus existing in peripheral pulmonary arteries makes the blood flow become slow, the vortex increase, mean transit time become prolonged, and the blood platelet more easily stay in the pulmonary artery wall. Further, it induces a large area of central PE. It is necessary to diagnose pulmonary embolism in peripheral pulmonary arteries in a timely and accurate manner. However, it is relatively difficult to conduct a definitive diagnosis with conventional CTPA. Tang et al. (
11) used canine models and found that dual-energy CT could significantly increase the detection rate of peripheral PE compared with traditional CTPA. Lee et al. (
14) demonstrated that the combined application of multiple reconstruction methods on dual-source CT could increase the detection rate of peripheral PE.
We found that the diagnostic consistency between the two radiologists for PED images was higher than for CTPA images. These may be due to the characteristics of different reconstruction methods. Precise assessment of CTPA images is a boring process because it needs evaluation of large number of pulmonary arteries one by one. In addition, observation ability and diagnostic criteria are slightly different between different people so the diagnostic consistency between the two radiologists for CTPA images is lower. However, assessment of PED images is more convenient as these images are screened and reconstructed by computer, which could reduce the workload and artificial interference so the diagnostic consistency between the two radiologists for PED images is higher.
We also found that the detection rate using PED images for segmental and subsegmental pulmonary embolism was significantly higher than that of CTPA, which is consistent with the literature. This may be due to the radiologist’s need to observe each artery in turn on CTPA images, which contain a huge number of segmental and sub-segmental pulmonary arteries, and their courses are usually unnatural or varied. Therefore, the radiologist may misdiagnose due to boring course of assessment or problems of image reconstruction. However, with PED images, each artery is analyzed by computer and the presence of pulmonary emboli is determined according to an internal model, subverting the possibility of misdiagnosis. Yet, due to its high sensitivity, false positives are possible because PED images are vulnerable to the influence of factors such as blood perfusion status, vascular filling, and microcirculation. PED images must be combined with CTPA images to decrease the false positives cases. The radiologist must be the final arbiter, meticulously observing the images determined by the software to have an embolus, and making the final determination combining with CTPA images.
Some scholars found that dual-source dual-energy CT perfusion imaging could better display perfusion defects caused by PE (
12,
17-
19), which is similar to our findings. The sensitivity and specificity of DEPI images on the diagnosis of PE were 91.7% and 97.5%, respectively. The sensitivity was slightly lower. We analyzed the data and found that, for complete PE, DEPI could better show the perfusion changes of the corresponding region, while the diagnostic accuracy of DEPI for incomplete PE was less in this study. This may be because the embolus did not completely block the blood vessels and enough blood could flow through so that a decline in perfusion was not significant. There were 14 false positive cases in this study. Lung perfusions were abnormal in DEPI images, but pulmonary artery emboli were not found in the CTPA and PED images. The reason may be that the perfusion of blood in the lung was heterogeneous, susceptible to gravity, cardiac output, or disturbances in microcirculation. In addition, lung lesions themselves, such as pneumonia, pleural effusion, and pulmonary interstitial lesions, can obscure perfusion images. They may cause interference in DEPI figures. Finally, the diagnostic accuracy of DEPI images may be detrimentally influenced by contrast agents within the heart cavity and veins, which can produce artifacts.
It has been reported that the consistency of diagnosis for PE between pulmonary artery angiography and pulmonary perfusion imaging is good (
20,
21), which is consistent with our results. We found that there was good consistency (kappa = 0.85) between PED and CTPA images and DEPI figures for diagnosing peripheral PE. PED images and CTPA images are able to provide information regarding pulmonary emboli, but they cannot show changes in pulmonary perfusion or pulmonary function. DEPI can indicate changes in pulmonary perfusion, but is vulnerable to a variety of factors. Therefore, the definitive diagnosis of peripheral PE requires the combined observation of both PED and CTPA images and DEPI images.
Of course, as a computer aided diagnosis software, the reliability and accuracy of PED have yet to be further verified in daily clinical work. As a semiquantitative lung perfusion image, DEPI images were easily influenced by gravity, cardiac output, and microcirculation and were also influenced by observation ability and diagnostic criteria of the observer. As a result, it was necessary to do the combined observation of PED, CTPA, and DEPI images.
There are several limitations in our study. First, the number of patients in this study sample is relatively small, and we need to collect more cases with peripheral pulmonary embolism and make a systematic summary in the future. Second, the observation of pulmonary arteries and diagnosis of PE are difficult as the segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries are relatively small and have more variation.
In conclusion, using PED software of dual-source CT combined with energy perfusion imaging significantly improves the detection rate of peripheral PE and enables diagnosis at an early stage. This combination provides valuable information for clinical treatment and has great clinical value.