FVPs are rare benign tumors that usually occur in the proximal third of the esophagus (
2). The mass is typically pedunculated and attached with a stalk to the esophagus. Dysphagia is the most common symptom of esophageal FVP. Other symptoms include regurgitation of the mass, foreign-body sensation, respiratory symptoms, and sometimes, bleeding from ulceration at the tip of the mass (
2,
4). However, in the present case, the main symptom of the mass was melena, which was similar to a previously reported gastric FVP (
1). Melena in both of these cases of gastric FVP may have been due to focal ulcerative changes of the mass.
The imaging findings of FVPs are dependent on the proportions of fat and fibrovascular components in these lesions (
2). On CT, FVPs may manifest as heterogeneous masses with areas of fat attenuation mixed with areas of soft-tissue attenuation from fibrovascular components. Similar to CT findings, the sonographic findings of FVPs may include hyperechoic areas of fat tissue mixed with hypoechoic areas of fibrovascular components. Sometimes, one of the two components may predominate (
5). The present case was predominantly composed of fat; thus, it was hyperechoic on sonography and demonstrated fat attenuation on CT.
The present case is the second case report of FVP arising from the stomach. The CT findings for the previously reported gastric FVP showed a polypoid mass located in the anterior wall of the lesser curvature of the gastric antrum, with central heterogeneous low density, suggesting only a minor component of fat tissue and marginal enhancement. In comparison with the previous report, the FVP of the present case contained more fat and was more pedunculated, similar to the predominant imaging features of esophageal FVPs.
Fatty masses in the stomach are rare, and gastric FVP should be included in their differential diagnoses. Other lipomatous masses involving the stomach include lipomas, angiolipomas, and liposarcomas (
6). Lipomas are the most common gastric lipomatous tumors and are mostly located in the antrum. CT images will show a well-defined mass with homogeneous or slightly heterogeneous fatty attenuation, occasionally with a fibrous capsule (
6). The present case of FVP was slightly more heterogeneous than a typical lipoma. In addition, fatty masses that are covered with thick mucosa may suggest FVPs, rather than lipomas. Angiolipomas are composed of mature adipose tissue with interspersed capillaries, which may be similar to the pathologic features of FVPs. The CT findings for angiolipoma suggest a fatty mass with strong contrast enhancement of vascular structures (
6). A liposarcoma is usually described as a large exophytic mass connected to the gastric wall. Histologically, there are four types of liposarcoma: well-differentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic. Among these, well-differentiated liposarcoma shows heterogeneous fat attenuation with less-aggressive features than other types of liposarcoma, which may make it difficult to differentiate FVP (
6,
7).
Any intraluminal movable masses that originate from the stomach should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of FVP. Pedunculated polyps, inflammatory fibroid polyps, or any mass with a stalk can be movable and may occasionally be found prolapsed into the duodenal bulb (
8). Therefore, when the fat component of FVP is scarce, differentiating it from other movable intragastric lesions may be difficult.
There has not yet been a report on the sonographic findings of gastric FVPs; only the endoscopic sonographic findings for esophageal FVPs have been reported (
9). In the present case, the main sonographic finding was a hyperechoic mass, suggesting a fat-containing lesion, which is somewhat similar to the sonographic findings in gastric lipoma (
10). In addition, another sonographic finding in the present case was the mobile nature of the mass when the patient’s position changed during the sonographic examination. Such a finding suggests the presence of a stalk, which may be more clearly presented on sonography than on CT.
In conclusion, although its incidence is very low, gastric FVP may present as a fat-containing, pedunculated mass on both sonography and CT. The imaging findings for gastric FVP clearly correlate to its pathology. Thus, when a fat-containing, intraluminal mass with a mobile nature is encountered in the stomach on sonography or CT, FVP should be considered in the differential diagnosis.