The IVC is formed by three paired embryonic veins; posterior cardinal, subcardinal, and supracardinal veins, which arise in a chronological order between the 4
th and 8
th week of fetal life (
2-
4). The relationship between the location of the three veins is shown in
Figure 2. Persistence or regression with extensive anastomosis among them result in various patterns of the IVC, and the normal IVC is composed of four segments: hepatic, suprarenal, renal, and infrarenal. The frequently described anomalies are retroaortic/circumaortic left renal vein, double IVC, left IVC, interrupted IVC with azygos/hemiazygos continuation, and circumcaval ureter (
2,
3). Among them, the left IVC is formed by regression of the right supracardinal vein and persistence of the left supracardinal vein (
1). Typically, the left IVC anteriorly crosses the aorta at the renal hilar level to form a normal right-sided suprarenal IVC (
1-
4).
A few cases of unusual pattern of left IVC have been reported, such as crossing over left IVC posterior to the aorta (
4,
5) and left IVC with azygos/hemiazygos continuation. There were only four reports on the left IVC that crossed over to the right at the suprarenal level; the left IVC which drained directly into the right atrium in three cases, and interrupted left IVC with hepatic venous continuation in one case (
6). However in this case, the left IVC was noted in the infrahepatic level until it reached the retrohepatic area. Then it crossed over to the right and directly drained into the right atrium as seen in previous reports. Also, there were several anastomoses between the left IVC and the left HV. This course is not consistent with typical left IVC and its variants, and it has not been reported yet to the best of our knowledge. In this respect, we presumed the process of its development. With regression of the right supracardinal vein and persistence of the left supracardinal vein, persistent left supra-subcardinal anastomosis, left subcardinal vein, and left subcardinal-hepatic anastomosis may have contributed to the left IVC in renal and suprarenal segments.
As for this case, heterotaxy syndrome with polysplenia was also discovered. Interruption of the IVC with azygos or hemiazygos continuation is the second most common abnormality associated with polysplenia syndrome (
6,
7). However, in this case, there were normal azygos and hemiazygos veins, and hepatic IVC.
Congenital anomalies of IVC have become more frequently encountered incidentally since the development of cross-sectional imaging. However, the knowledge about IVC anomalies has clinical significance as follows: they rarely cause symptoms; possible risk factor for lower limb thrombosis, particularly in young adults (
2), intermittent celiac artery compression syndrome in IVC anterior to the aorta at the level of the celiac trunk, and compression of the left IVC coursing anterior to the abdominal aorta between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery, so-called nutcracker phenomenon (
8); it can be misinterpreted as retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy or mass on cross-sectional imaging (
4); it is crucial in planning the surgery and interventions, such as nephrectomy, renal transplantation, aortic aneurysm repair, IVC filter placement, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
In conclusion, the infrahepatic left IVC with retrohepatic crossing over and intrahepatic venocaval shunts is a unique variant not reported so far. Regardless of symptoms, the knowledge about IVC anomaly is crucial for radiologists and clinicians to avoid misdiagnosis and to plan properly for surgical and interventional procedures.