Most of the published reports on BAE have focused on patients with inflammatory causes of hemoptysis or tumor-related bleeding (
1-
3). However, a few reports have included various hematologic condition and none of those were large series. This study was designed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of BAE in the management of hemoptysis in patients with hematologic diseases, who had complex underlying medical issues that may influence the overall survival and limit the response to invasive procedures. In our study, although the clinical success rate was as high as 80%, eight patients (32%) died within 6 months and the 30-day mortality rate was 24%. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that BAE may be an effective palliative tool in patients with hematologic diseases because most of the patients had no recurrent hemoptysis until the time of death after the successful BAE procedure. The causes of death included bleeding in another site, hepatic failure, and pneumonia or sepsis, not persistent hemoptysis. In four patients, hemoptysis could not be controlled with BAE and all of the four patients died within 20 days due to persistent hemoptysis, along with decreased lung function. This may reflect the clinical implication that any additional stress including uncontrolled hemoptysis can herald a terminal event in hematologic patients. Thus, we suppose that patients with hematologic diseases should be aggressively managed even when they have mild hemoptysis.
Selective catheterization of the bronchial arteries should be attempted even in cases with an apparently normal aortogram because bleeding may occur from normal-diameter vessels (
10). Moreover, a moderate degree of hemoptysis and even a mild degree of hemoptysis are considered indications for transcatheter embolization (
11). Urgent aggressive treatment is necessary in patients with hematologic diseases because they have complex underlying diseases and because any additional stress can influence clinical course. In our study, complete clinical response was observed in all nine patients with non-hypertrophied bronchial arteries who underwent BAE. We believe that prophylactic embolization should be undertaken in patients with non-hypertrophied bronchial arteries because it can improve clinical course and survival, although prognosis also depends on the hematologic conditions of patients in addition to success in hemostasis.
Aina et al. (
12) reported that patients with coagulopathies after transcatheter arterial embolization experience recurrent hemorrhage more frequently than those without. However, the recurrence rate of hemoptysis in our series was 4% (only one patient). In addition, clinical success rate of BAE was high regardless of the presence of coagulopathy. These results imply that BAE may be efficient in ceasing arterial bleeding and can be the first treatment option for hemoptysis in hematology patients, even in the presence of coagulopathy.
Diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage has been reported in immunocompromised patients, such as those with hematologic malignancy (
13-
17). In general, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage is a hemorrhagic syndrome, but it is not associated with hemoptysis because the alveolar epithelium is not just leaking fluid but is perforated sufficiently to leak red cells (
18). Thus, aggressive correction of thrombocytopenia and coagulation disturbances may be the first and sufficient treatment option (
18). Massive pulmonary hemorrhage that can induce hemoptysis is an uncommon complication of leukemia and is generally attributed to thrombocytopenia. However, a platelet deficiency cannot be the only explanation since most patients with thrombocytopenia do not experience this complication (
19). Smith et al. (
19) showed that the combination of severe thrombocytopenia and diffuse alveolar damage is required for the development of massive intra-alveolar hemorrhage in patients with leukemia. Many chemotherapeutic agents, sepsis, or transplantation can cause diffuse alveolar damage. Our study includes eight patients who had hemoptysis along with diffuse pulmonary hemorrhagic patterns on CT and blood in the lavage specimens. Despite the uncorrected coagulopathy,75% of the eight patients with diffuse pulmonary hemorrhagic pattern showed complete clinical response. These results imply that BAE may be an effective treatment option for patients with diffuse pulmonary hemorrhagic patterns. Therefore, BAE may be helpful in correcting the bleeding defect and preventing further lung damage.
In general, emergent medical therapy is the first treatment option in hematologic patients with coagulopathy and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (18). However, in our results, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical success rate and survival rate between patients with coagulopathy or diffuse alveolar hemorrhagic pattern and other hematologic patients. (
Table 4). Regardless of the presence of coagulopathy or diffuse alveolar hemorrhage pattern, a high clinical success rate and low recurrence rate were achieved in patients who were treated with BAE.
This study had limitations. First, this study was of retrospective nature and had a small sample size without randomization. Second, this study was limited to patients who underwent BAE. There were no comparisons between patients undergoing BAE and those who were treated with conservative treatment alone. Despite the effectiveness of BAE, its superiority over conservative therapy in stopping hemoptysis and reducing morbidity remains unproven. Only prospective randomized trials can resolve this issue. However, the results of this study demonstrated that the frequency of complete clinical response became higher after BAE regardless of the correction of coagulopathy. In addition, BAE is a minimally invasive and relatively safe procedure. Therefore, we suppose that BAE may be the first treatment option in hematology patients with hemoptysis.
Transcatheter arterial embolization for hemoptysis in patients with hematologic disease was efficient for ceasing hemoptysis. Presence of coagulopathy or differentiation of radiographic patterns were not significant factors affecting clinical outcomes. Our study demonstrates an immediate decrease or resolution in bleeding in 80% of the patients and a low recurrence rate of 4% (only one patient). These results suggest that BAE may be an excellent treatment option for hemoptysis in patients with hematologic diseases.