An Innovative Journal in the Field of Radiology
Authors
Adequate diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) could lead to efficacious treatment. Due to the fact that DCIS lesions can progress to invasive carcinomas and that the sensitivity of the standard examination mammography is between 70 and 80%, use of a more sensitive diagnostic tool was needed. In detection of DCIS, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) has the sensitivity up to 96%.
Morphological features and kinetic parameters were evaluated to define the most regular morphological, kinetic and morpho-kinetic patterns on MRI assessment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
We retrospectively assessed eighteen patients with 23 histologically confirmed lesions (mean age, 52.4 10.5 years). All patients were clinically and mammographically examined prior to MRI examination.
DCIS appeared most frequently as non-mass-like lesions (12 lesions, 52.17%). The differences in the frequency of lesion types were statistically significant (P<0.05). The following morphological patterns were detected: A: no specific morphologic features, B: linear/branching enhancement, C: focal mass-like enhancement, D: segmental enhancement, E: segmental enhancement in triangular shape, F: diffuse enhancement, G: regional heterogeneous enhancement in one quadrant not conforming to duct distribution and H: dotted or granular type of enhancement with patchy distribution. The difference in the frequency of the proposed patterns was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were eight lesions with mass enhancement, and six with segmental lesions: regional and triangular. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of enhancement curve types (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the frequency of morpho-kinetic patterns.
Non-mass-like lesions, lesions with focal or segmental distribution, with a plateau enhancement curve type were the most frequent findings of DCIS lesions on MRI.
© 2013, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Cho YH, Cho KR, Park EK, Seo BK, Woo OH, et al. Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast. I J Radiol. 2016;13(1):e30909. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.30909
Kim Y, Cho KR, Song SE, Seo BK, Woo OH, et al. Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma of the Breast: Radiologic and Histopathologic Features. I J Radiol. 2017;14(4):e39058. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.39058
Dogan S, Ozmen S, Oz B, Imamoglu H, Kahriman G, et al. Comparison of Different Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Descriptors and Clinical Findings Among Breast Cancer Subtypes Determined Based on Molecular Assessment. I J Radiol. 2018;15(4):e64889. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.64889
Lee EJ, Chang Y. Breast Imaging Findings of Microcalcifications in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Their Correlations with Pathological and Biological Features. I J Radiol. 2021;18(4):e116352. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.116352
Farghadani M, Hekmatnia A, Sharif H, Baradaran M, Riahinezhad M. Is Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Helpful in Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer?. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48039. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48039
More by these authors
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
Last Update: 5 days ago