IJ Radiology
Ali Babaei Jandaghi1,*, 
Mohsen Mardani Kivi2, Ali Fakheri3, Ehsan Kazem nejad Leyli3, Khashayar Saheb Ekhtiari3, Keyvan Hashemi Motlagh3, Ramin Pourghorban4The impingement of flexor tendon sheath in A1 pulley, named as trigger finger, leads to pain and difficulty during flexion and extension. Local corticosteroid injection into the affected tendon sheath is the treatment of choice. To the best of the authors knowledge, no study has been conducted so far to compare intra-sheath and extra- sheath corticosteroid injection in patients with trigger finger.
The aim of this study was to determine if injection directly into the tendon sheath will make any difference in the long term outcome of the patients.
One hundred-sixty-six patients with the diagnosis of trigger finger were enrolled based on the following clinical criteria: 1, Tenderness in A1 pulley; 2, Pain and discomfort during flexion and extension; 3, Presence of nodule. The Quinnell scale was used to evaluate the severity of the disease before the launch of the treatment. Thereafter, with a random block method, patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n=83), with ultrasound-guided extra-sheath corticosteroid injection and Group B (n=83), with ultrasound-guided intra-sheath corticosteroid injection directly into the sheath. All patients have been followed up to one year according to the following timeline: 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after the treatment. The Quinnell scale was obtained again during each follow-up session. If patients score did not change until the third visit, either reinjection or surgery would had been considered as the next proper treatment option, if any.
The ethic committee of our center had approved of this survey, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The mean age of the enrolled patient was 49.9 years. Right hand was more commonly involved in our patients. No tendon rupture, infection, fat necrosis, finger necrosis, hematoma, nerve rapture, or A1 pulley injury was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups A and B in the frequency of required injections at the follow up sessions, based on their lack of improvement in the Quinnell scale. The follow-up sessions, the patients group, and the corresponding number of patients in whom reinjection was required were as follows: First follow-up session, 2 cases in group A, 1 case in group B; Second follow-up session, 10 cases in group A, 7 cases in group B; Third follow-up session, no case in group A, 1 case in group B; Fourth follow-up session, 1 case in group A, 1 case in group B. Surgery was required to be done in none of our patients. Overall, the frequency of high Quinnell scales (scales 3 and 4) were reduced in all patients at the end of our study.
Full text is available in PDF
© 2014, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Leave a comment here
Purchasing Reprints
Author(s):
