Logo

Is Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Helpful in Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer?

Authors:
Maryam FarghadaniMaryam FarghadaniMaryam Farghadani ORCID1,*, Ali HekmatniaAli Hekmatnia2, Hoda SharifHoda Sharif2, Mehdi BaradaranMehdi Baradaran2, Maryam RiahinezhadMaryam Riahinezhad3
1Assistant Professor of MUI
2Isfahan Medical University
3Isfahan University of Medical Sciences


IJ Radiology:Vol. 14, issue Special Issue; e48039
Published online:Apr 12, 2017
Article type:Abstract
Received:Dec 20, 2016
Accepted:Feb 07, 2017
How to Cite:Maryam FarghadaniAli HekmatniaHoda SharifMehdi BaradaranMaryam RiahinezhadIs Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Helpful in Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer?.14(Special Issue):e48039.https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48039.

Abstract

Objectives:

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) corresponds to hormonally active breast fibroglandular tissue. Several studi.es have reported increased odds of breast cancer in patients with marked BPE. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate BPE in contralateral breast of biopsy proven breast cancer patients and comparison of the results with control group.

Methods:

In a case-control study, CE-MRI of the contralateral breasts of 40 biopsy-proven breast cancer patients and 40 patients with biopsy- proven benign breast lesions, were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist and degree of BPE, and pattern of enhancement were determined, finally, BPE was compared between case and control groups using chi square test. Pearson correlation test was used to determine association between FGT amount and BPE. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results:

In the case group, 4, 17, 14, and 5 patients had minimal, mild, moderate, and marked BPE, respectively. In the control group, 12, 24, .and 4 participants had minimal, mild, and moderate BPE, respectively. BPE was significantly higher in the case group in comparison with the control group (P value < 0.05). Patients with invasive carcinoma had significantly higher BPE in comparison with the patients with carcinoma in situ. (P value < 0.05) There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.4, P value < 0.05) between FGT amount and degree of BPE. In the case group, 3, 26, and 11 patients had mass-non mass, mass, and non mass pattern of enhancement, respectively. In the control group, 25, antl15 participants had mass, and non mass pattern of enhancement, respectively. Pattern of enhancement was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions:

Our study revealed that patients with the diagnosis of breast cancer have greater BPE in comparison with control group. The results may be indicative for higher probability of developing breast cancer in patients with higher BPE. Therefore, CE-MRI could be a useful tool for breast cancer risk assessment.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles