PPH remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide (
7). However, delayed PPH has received somewhat less attention compared to early PPH because the incidence rate of delayed PPH is relatively lower than that of early PPH, and delayed PPH is usually associated with maternal morbidity rather than mortality. Moreover, clinicians often miss potential bleeding because delayed PPH usually occurs during the 8 - 14 days after delivery. Patients are usually discharged from the hospital by that time (
6,
9,
13). However, continuous and severe delayed PPH is dangerous and life-threatening because of hypovolemic shock. Usually, general causes of delayed PPH are infection, retained products of conception, and sub-involution of the placental implantation site (
1,
11). Other causes are vascular abnormalities affecting the myometrial circulation (arterial injuries, such as pseudoaneurysm and AVM).
Some authors have examined the clinical effectiveness and safety of embolization for delayed PPH and have documented clinical TAE success rates of > 90% for delayed PPH (
6,
7). Park et al. evaluated 52 women with delayed PPH, and showed a high clinical success rate (90.9%) and no procedure-related significant complications (
10). Our retrospective analysis showed that selective TAE in patients with delayed PPH is a useful treatment with high technical and clinical success. The technical success rate was 100% (37/37) and the total clinical success rate for all sessions of TAE, both primary and additional sessions, was 97.3% (36 of 37 patients). Generally identified causes of repeat bleedings after TAE include arterial spasm, collateral vessels, and placental abnormality (
17). However, compared with early PPH, published data on TAE for delayed PPH are still limited (
8-
10). Previous studies of TAE for early PPH with 40 or more patients reported clinical success rates ranging from 71.5% - 89.1%. Lee et al. (
5) reported results for a larger sample size in which the overall clinical success rate, with both initial and repeat TAE, was 90.4% (227 of 251) and overall bleeding control was achieved in 98% (246/251) in early or primary PPH patients. More studies are needed on management of delayed PPH because the incidence rate of delayed PPH is relatively low as compared with early PPH.
In our study, only 1 clinical failure case presented with continued vaginal bleeding and pelvic pain, even after secondary TAE. Choriocarcinoma was diagnosed on pelvic MRI and LAVH was performed in this patient. Full-term pregnancy with choriocarcinoma is a rare disease (
18) that may present as intrauterine fetal death, hydrops fetalis, fetomaternal hemorrhage, or PPH. However, diagnosis of gestational choriocarcinoma after a full-term pregnancy is not easy without a histopathological study of the uterus or placenta. The low incidence rate of gestational choriocarcinoma after term pregnancy does not result in a routine histopathological study of the uterus and placenta after birth in all hospitals (
2,
19). The prognosis of women diagnosed with choriocarcinoma is not bad if an appropriate chemotherapeutic drug is started early. However, delayed diagnosis and treatment affect the result by increasing the risk of distal metastasis and increased resistance to chemotherapy treatment. It is essential to be aware of delayed PPH, and postpartum choriocarcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of uncontrolled delayed PPH. In our patient, six cycles of chemotherapy with methotrexate were performed. With monitoring for 6 years, there has been no cancer recurrence or significant symptoms.
Ultrasound is a quick and noninvasive diagnostic tool for PPH. Some authors have advocated ultrasound study of the uterine cavity to find retained placental tissue while others have found that ultrasound for retained placental tissue was not particularly accurate (
13,
20,
21). A pseudoaneurysm of uterine or genital tract arteries has been reported as an outcome of procedures such as dilatation and curettage, hysterectomy, cesarean section, myomectomy, oocyte retrieval for in-vitro fertilization, and even routine vaginal delivery (
22). Uterine arterial active extravasation and rupture of a pseudoaneurysm are life-threatening events in delayed PPH, requiring early diagnosis and treatment. In an emergency setting, color-Doppler ultrasound may demonstrate a pseudoaneurysm. Computed tomography or MRI can also make the diagnosis and rule out other causes of delayed PPH. However, conventional angiography remains the standard for definitive diagnosis and can provide adequate treatment (
1,
5,
9,
10).
In the past, appropriate management of delayed PPH remained unclear. Traditional methods included administration of ergometrine with or without oxytocin. Prostaglandins have been advocated (
13), but there is not yet enough evidence to indicate clear effectiveness. Although curettage is useful in the majority of women with retained placental tissue, some patients continue to have bleeding. More curettage may be helpful, but the chances of uterine damage increase (
13). While uterine cavity tamponade with uterine balloons (
23) or other aggressive surgical treatment including total hysterectomy or internal iliac vessel ligation may be necessary, a more recent option, TAE of uterine or other arteries, might now be considered (
9,
10). TAE has clear advantages in that it is less invasive and does not need general anesthesia in a probably unstable patient. Moreover, it is easy to determine the origin of hemorrhage, leading to prompt control of bleeding, a low incidence rate of rebleeding, and a high success rate (> 90% for delayed PPH). Although TAE has many advantages, some complications can arise, such as postembolization syndrome, groin hematoma or pseudoaneurysm formation, ischemic tissue changes or abscess formation, and contrast-induced nephrotoxicity (
24). Fortunately, there were no procedure-related or other major complications in our study.
Park et al. (
10) reported that clinical success of TAE for delayed PPH was not related to any of the analyzed factors. Similarly, in our study, there was no statistical association between the clinical success of TAE for delayed PPH and any of the analyzed factors (P > 0.05), such as maternal characteristics, type of delivery, bleeding onset after delivery, causes of delayed PPH, and angiographic findings. However, we think that more studies are needed to identify the risk factors for clinical failure after TAE because the sample size of our study and Park’s study is small and a nonsignificant p-value may be due to low sample size in subgroups.
All women with available follow-up (clinical success cases) in our study resumed regular menstrual cycles, and 3 became pregnant and gave birth without complications during the follow-up period. No patients complained of infertility during the follow-up period in our records. However, the impact of TAE on menstrual cycles or fertility has not been studied sufficiently, and there are no explicit methods that can determine whether future fertility or pregnancies would be affected by TAE. Some researchers reported a higher incidence and risk of placental abnormalities and fetal growth restriction (
25). However, Hardeman et al. (
26) reported no statistically significant differences in pregnancy or fertility between women who underwent uterine artery embolization for PPH and those who did not.
Our study had some limitations, one of which was the possibility of recall bias caused by the retrospective examination of medical charts or records. Moreover, TAE procedures are controversial and necessarily subjective because there are no evidence-based standard guidelines for TAE in delayed PPH. Another limitation of this study was irregular follow-up by patients, as some women did not visit the hospital as recommended. Further studies on the most effective treatment procedures and standard guidelines for TAE techniques are needed. In addition, long-term follow-up study of ovarian function and fertility is needed.
In conclusion, selective TAE for delayed PPH is an effective and safe treatment with high technical and clinical success rates. Above all, TAE can preserve fertility. We recommend selective TAE as the initial treatment of choice for delayed PPH.