Cover image of the article: Assessment the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis Incidence in the Interventionist’s Leg

Image Credit:I J Radiol

Assessment the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis Incidence in the Interventionist’s Leg

Authors

Fariba zareifari@yahoo.com1,*, Alireza Rasekhi1, Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani2, Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam1, Amin Abolhasani Foroughi1
1Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran
2Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Fariba Zarei, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran, E-mail: zareifari@yahoo.com Email: zareifari@yahoo.com

Iranian Journal of Radiology:Vol. 14, issue Special Issue; e93689
Published online:Apr 13, 2017
Article type:Abstract
Received:May 14, 2019
Accepted:Feb 08, 2017
How to Cite:zareifari@yahoo.com F, Rasekhi A, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Abolhasani Foroughi A. Assessment the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis Incidence in the Interventionist’s Leg. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e93689. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48203

Abstract

Background: Fluoroscopy guided imaging, which is going to be more routine these days require a long time of fluoroscopic observing, which can increase the radiation dose of the physician and other staff who have to stay near the patient during the procedure. In our department, one of the senior interventionists had observed the hair loss in his lower limb. Thus the objective of this study was measuring the radiation dose of the physician’s leg during common procedures in order to find out that whether the radiation dose exceeds the threshold of deterministic effects of radiation or not?.

Methods: Thermo luminescent-dosimeters (TLD-100) set on the leg part of the anthropomorphic whole body phantom PBU-50, was used in order to measure the radiation dose in 2 centers where our interventionist work. Meanwhile, the duration of exposure in important procedures was observed and recorded in center 1 for 2 months. During this period some data such as age, height, and weight of the patients and radiation exposure time, dose (mGy) and dose area product (dap) (Gy.cm2) was recorded

Results: The result of TLD dosimetry shown that the mean effective dose in center 1 and 2 was 0.20 and 0.86 mSv, and also the mean-dose (mSv)/min in these centers was 0.02 ± 0.00 and 0.20 ± 0.015 mSv/min respectively.

Conclusions: The effective annual dose of interventionists who work in center 1 and 2 was 143.08 and 1226.78 mSv respectively. The high radiation dose which delivers to the leg of physicians in center 2 can be an important cause of radiation dermatitis occurred on the leg of our interventionist. Patient dose during most of the procedures was less than the threshold dose for occurring erythema but unfortunately in TIPS procedure which is a time-consuming procedure the patient radiation dose exceeds the threshold. It would be useful if a plan design to reduce the dose of patients and even physicians.

Highlights

Copyright

© 2017, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

22
Jul
2017
Assessment of the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis in the Legs of Interventional Radiologists

Assessment of the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis in the Legs of Interventional Radiologists

Fariba Zarei,
Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani,
Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam,
Alireza Rasekhi,
Amin Abolhasani Foroughi

Zarei F, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Rasekhi A, Abolhasani Foroughi A. Assessment of the Possibility of Radiation Dermatitis in the Legs of Interventional Radiologists. I J Radiol. 2017;14(3):e22030. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.22030

11
Jun
2017
Evaluation of Occupational and Patient Dose in Challenging Hemodialysis Catheter Placement

Evaluation of Occupational and Patient Dose in Challenging Hemodialysis Catheter Placement

Alireza Rasekhi,
Amin Abolhasani Foroughi,
Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani,
Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam,
Fariba Zarei,
Masoume Nazeri

Rasekhi A, Abolhasani Foroughi A, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Zarei F, et al. Evaluation of Occupational and Patient Dose in Challenging Hemodialysis Catheter Placement. I J Radiol. 2017;14(3):e14314. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.14314

12
Jun
2018
Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Safoora Nikzad,
Maryam Pourkaveh,
Naghi Jabbari Vesal,
Farideh Gharekhanloo

Nikzad S, Pourkaveh M, Jabbari Vesal N, Gharekhanloo F. Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures. I J Radiol. 2018;15(3):e60955. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.60955

15
Feb
2001
Staff radiation doses associated with nuclear procedures and efficacy of syringe shield for reduction dose

Staff radiation doses associated with nuclear procedures and efficacy of syringe shield for reduction dose

Peyman Hejazi,
Mehdi Sohrabi

Hejazi P, Sohrabi M. Staff radiation doses associated with nuclear procedures and efficacy of syringe shield for reduction dose. koomesh. 2001;2(2):e151927. doi:

30
Dec
2003
Reduction of Unwarranted Patient Exposure in X-ray Examinations

Reduction of Unwarranted Patient Exposure in X-ray Examinations  

F. Bouzarjomehri

Bouzarjomehri F. Reduction of Unwarranted Patient Exposure in X-ray Examinations  . I J Radiol. 2003;1(3&4):e79266. doi:

More by these authors

Fariba zareifari@yahoo.comPubMedScholar
Alireza RasekhiPubMedScholar
Banafsheh Zeinali-RafsanjaniPubMedScholar
Mahdi Saeedi-MoghadamPubMedScholar
Amin Abolhasani ForoughiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics