1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
3.1. HER2 Affibody Recombinant Expression and Purification
3.2. Preparation of 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody
3.3. Quality Control of 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody
3.4. In Vitro Characterization of 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody
3.5. In Vivo Characterization of 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody in Breast Cancer Models
3.6. Patient Enrollment
3.7. 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients
3.8. HER2 Immunohistochemical Staining
3.9. Data Analysis
3.10. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. In Vitro Characterization of the 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody
4.2. In Vivo Characterization of the 99mTc-labeled HER2 Affibody
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT imaging of 99mTc-labeled human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) affibody in human HER2-positive breast carcinoma in xenografted mice (left: coronal plane; right: transverse plane). A and B, Images of 99mTc-ABH2 at 1h (A) and 4.5h (B), white arrows point radioactivity accumulated MDA-MB-361 breast carcinoma. C and D, Blocking images of 99mTc-ABH2 at 1h (C) and 4.5h (D), radioactivity was not accumulated in MDA-MB-361 breast carcinoma.
4.3. Evaluation of Patients with Suspected Breast Cancer
| Demographic information and diagnosis | Values (n = 30) |
|---|---|
| Age, y | |
| Range | 29 - 76 |
| Mean ± SD | 48.2 ± 11.1 |
| Diagnosis, % | |
| Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) | 83.33 |
| Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) | 6.67 |
| Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) | 3.33 |
| Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) | 3.33 |
| DCIS + IDC | 3.33 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) images obtained from patient No. 1 (i.e., at 60 years of age, and body weight (BW) of 70 kg) at 1.5 h (A), and 4.5 h (B) following administration of 370 MBq (50 μg) of 99mTc-labeled affibody. The breast cancer lesion (C), axillary lymph node (D) and supraclavicular lymph node (E) were clearly visible by transverse plane sectioning. Uptake of non-specific radioactivity by the liver and intestine were noted by coronal plane image analysis (F). The breast cancer lesion displaying human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression was prominent in the sagittal plane (G). All lesions were surgically removed and histologically diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma (H). Analysis of HER2 immuno-histochemical staining of the primary tumor (I) and lymph node (J) of patient No. 1, showing (3+) staining intensity.
Negative image (A) in SPECT with 99mTc-labeled affibody in breast cancer lesion of an invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (white arrow) patient (No. 22) showed negative pattern of staining in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (B); A patient (No. 8) diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) also displayed negative uptake with 99mTc-labeled affibody (white arrow) (C) and matched negative HER2 expression (D).
| PN | CL | LN | H | Pathology (IHC, FISH) | SPECT | SPECT vs. IHC | Size (mm) | T/B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R | M | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 41 | 23.8 |
| 2 | L | M | DCIS | +(3+) | - | FN | 10 | 1.8 |
| 3 | L | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 26 | 5.7 | |
| 4 | R | IDC | -(1+) | + | FP | 30 | 4.4 | |
| 5 | L, R | IDC | +(3+) | - | FN | 10 | 1.2 | |
| 6 | R | IDC | -(2+,-) | - | TN | 19 | 2.1 | |
| 7 | R | M | DCIS | +(2+,+) | + | TP | 31 | 4.3 |
| 8 | R | ILC | -(-) | - | TN | 11 | 0.3 | |
| 9 | R | IDC | -(-) | - | TN | 33 | 2.1 | |
| 10 | R | IDC | -(2+,-) | + | FP | 16 | 12.9 | |
| 11 | L | MBC | -(-) | + | FP | 38 | 5.8 | |
| 12 | R | M | IDC | +(2+,+) | + | TP | 27 | 4.2 |
| 13 | R | IDC | -(2+,-) | + | FP | 14 | 4.3 | |
| 14 | R | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 27 | 3.6 | |
| 15 | L | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 13 | 3.9 | |
| 16 | R | M | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 31 | 3.5 |
| 17 | L | IDC | -(-) | - | TN | 22 | 2.2 | |
| 18 | R | M | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 20 | 4.2 |
| 19 | L, R | IDC | -(-) | + | FP | 15 | 4.3 | |
| 20 | L, R | IDC | -(-) | - | TN | 16 | 2.0 | |
| 21 | L | M | DCIS (30% IDC) | -(1+) | + | FP | 40 | 8.6 |
| 22 | L | IDC | -(-) | - | TN | 13 | 0.8 | |
| 23 | L | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 50 | 4.8 | |
| 24 | L | M | IDC | -(1+) | - | TN | 27 | 2.3 |
| 25 | L, R | IDC | -(-) | - | TN | 17 | 2.1 | |
| 26 | L, R | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 32 | 4.9 | |
| 27 | R | IDC | +(3+) | + | TP | 24 | 4.4 | |
| 28 | L, R | IDC | +(2+,+) | + | TP | 21 | 4.7 | |
| 29 | L | IDC | +(2+,+) | - | FN | 11 | 1.9 | |
| 30 | L | IDC | -(2+,-) | - | TN | 11 | 1.4 |
Abbreviations: CL, cancer location; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; FN, false-negative; FP, false-positive; H, histology; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; L, left breast; LN, lymph node; M, lymph node metastasis; MBC, metaplastic breast cancer; NA, not applicable; ND, not done; PN, patient number; R, right breast; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography; T/B, tumor to background ratio; TN, true negative; TP, true-positive.
4.4. The Correlation Between HER2 Imaging and HER2 IHC
| Gold standard | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| IHC positive | IHC negative | ||
| Test standard | |||
| SPECT positive | 12 | 6 | 18 |
| SPECT negative | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Total | 15 | 15 | n = 30 |
Abbreviations: HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; SPECT, single-photon emission computed tomography.
aSensitivity = 80.0%; Specificity = 60%; Accuracy = 70.0%.



![Patient No. 26 (invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC]) showed bilateral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) affibody uptake (white arrow) (A, B) and only faint <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) uptake was shown on the right (C) by bilateral HER2 positive breast cancer lesions. Patient No. 26 (invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC]) showed bilateral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) affibody uptake (white arrow) (A, B) and only faint <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) uptake was shown on the right (C) by bilateral HER2 positive breast cancer lesions.](https://brieflands.com/journals/ijradiology/articles/96419/figures/iranjradiol-96419-g004-F4-preview.webp)
