Automatic Fetal Biometry Evaluation in Ultrasound Images Using a Deep Learning-Based Approach

Mostafa Ghelich Oghli; Shakiba Moradi; Reza Gerami; Ali Shabanzadeh

doi:10.5812/iranjradiol.99138

IJ Radiology

An Innovative Journal in the Field of Radiology

Home

Current Issue All Issues In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Instructions

Journal Information Editors and Boards Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.99138

Automatic Fetal Biometry Evaluation in Ultrasound Images Using a Deep Learning-Based Approach

Author(s):

Mostafa Ghelich Oghli^1,*,

Shakiba Moradi²,

Reza Gerami³,

Ali Shabanzadeh¹

1Intelligent Imaging Technology Research Center, Med Fanavarn Plus Co., Karaj, Iran

2Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3Army University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

IJ Radiology:Vol. 16, issue Special Issue; e99138

Published online:Dec 10, 2019

Article type:Abstract

Received:Oct 26, 2019

Accepted:Dec 10, 2019

How to Cite:Mostafa Ghelich OghliShakiba MoradiReza GeramiAli ShabanzadehAutomatic Fetal Biometry Evaluation in Ultrasound Images Using a Deep Learning-Based Approach.I J Radiol.16(Special Issue):e99138.https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.99138.

Abstract

Background:

The 2D fetal ultrasound biometrics have been extensively used to establish (or confirm) the gestational age of the fetus, estimate its size and weight, and identify growth patterns and abnormalities. Typically, an ultrasound examination is routinely performed between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy to evaluate the growth of the fetus by measuring its head, abdomen, and femur. Automatic methods for fetal biometric measurements have been investigated recently to reduce intra- and inter-observer variability and create more accurate and reproducible measurements.

Objectives:

In this paper, we proposed a deep learning-based approach to calculate fetal biometry parameters automatically.

Patients and Methods:

The fetal biometry parameters came from the fetal head, abdomen, and femur evaluation. Head circumference (HC) and biparietal diameter (BPD) were related to the fetal head, whereas abdominal circumference (AC) was related to the fetal abdomen and femur length (FL) was related to the fetal femur. Figure 1 shows these parameters in ultrasound images. Our prepared dataset included three parts, as follows: (1) 1334 2D ultrasound images of the fetal head in the standard plane. This dataset was publically available from the automated measurement of fetal head circumference challenge. (2) 158 2D ultrasound images of the fetal abdomen in the standard plane. The dataset was gathered from Alvand Medical Imaging Center, Tehran, Iran, by expert radiologists. (3) 315 2D ultrasound images of the fetal femur in the standard plane. The dataset was gathered from two distinct centers: (i) Alvand Medical Imaging Center, Tehran, Iran, and (ii) Laleh Hospital, Tehran, Iran. We trained and evaluated a novel convolutional network for the segmentation of fetal head and abdomen. The proposed network, called MFP-Unet, was a combination of Unet and feature pyramid network (FPN). The network architecture is depicted in Figure 2. For fetal femur, we had a pre-processing step. We used the superpixel algorithm to remove darker parts of the image, as the femur was typically the brightest part of the US image. Then, we applied an image saliency algorithm to represent the salient features of the image. Finally, MFP-Unet was trained on these pre-processed images to segment the femur. After the segmentation process, image analysis algorithms achieved all of the required measures. An ellipse detection algorithm on the segmented area of the fetal head was to measure the HC and BPD while an ellipse detection algorithm on the segmented area of the fetal abdomen was to measure the AC. Finally, a skeletonization algorithm achieved the femur length.

Results:

We used the mean absolute difference (MAD) and root mean square error (RMSE) for the measurement errors. The values of MAD and RMSE were 0.23 mm and 0.11 mm for BPD, 0.13 mm and 0.09 mm for HC, 0.17 mm and 0.08 mm for AC, and 0.18 mm and 0.12 mm for FL, respectively. Table 1 shows the results. The correlation between automatic and manual measurements was evaluated by correlation graphs. The R values were 0.97, 0.91, and 0.97 for HC, BPD, and FL, respectively.

Conclusion:

According to the results, we proposed a robust and useful algorithm for automatic fetal biometry evaluation that could be extended to nuchal translucency (NT) measurement based on the providing dataset.

To see figures and table, please refer to the PDF file.

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

CrossRef (1)

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Mostafa Ghelich Oghli:[PubMed][Scholar]
Shakiba Moradi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Reza Gerami:[PubMed][Scholar]
Ali Shabanzadeh:[PubMed][Scholar]