This PHPT case was effectively treated by the combination therapy of EA and subsequent RFA. By EA, the cystic component of parathyroid adenoma was effectively removed; however, the solid component considerably remained. By subsequent RFA, the remaining parathyroid adenoma was removed entirely, resulting in the clinical success during follow-up; however, complete biochemical remission was not sustained. Procedure-related complications, such as hematoma and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, were not noticed. The combination therapy of EA and subsequent RFA is safe and effective and can be considered an alternative therapeutic method for PHPT treatment, especially for patients with high morbidity and mortality of parathyroidectomy.
For several decades, percutaneous EA has been used to treat symptomatic thyroid cysts or cystic nodules in the head and neck areas. The mechanism of ethanol has the following two effects: (1) the coagulative necrosis of target tissue due to cell dehydration and protein denaturation; and (2) ischemic necrosis caused by small blood vessel thrombosis and the inhibition of enzymatic activity in surrounding tissues (
8). EA has been established as the first treatment modality alternative to treat cystic thyroid disease since EA has some benefits, including cost-effectiveness, easy accessibility, and repeatability based on outpatient departments. EA has also been introduced in the literature as an alternative therapeutic approach to treat parathyroid adenoma with a relatively high response rate (
Table 1) (
5,
9,
10). Yazdani et al. used EA for treating 39 cases with parathyroid adenomas and demonstrated a 46% therapeutic response rate for a one-month follow-up and 84.5% for a 12-month period to decrease serum PTH and calcium. However, no major complication was reported by these researchers (
5). Ha et al. reported the acceptable outcome of 98.5% mean volume reduction rate for EA in treating eight cases with nonfunctioning parathyroid cysts on a six-month follow-up. In their study, one case had transient voice change after EA, which was recovered spontaneously within two months (
7).
Percutaneous RFA has been mainly applied to treat benign thyroid nodules in the head and neck area for a decade. The RFA mechanism has the following two effects: (1) friction heat damage by tissue agitation, which results promptly in protein denaturation and irreversible cell death around an electrode; and (2) conduction heat damage, which slowly destroys the remote tissue around the ablation zone (
12). RFA has been demonstrated to be more efficient than EA in treating solid thyroid nodules (
13). RFA has been recently introduced as an alternative treatment modality for PHPT (
Table 1). The effectiveness of RFA in treating PHPT has been reported from 50% to 89.9% for short-term or intermediate-term follow-ups (
3,
7,
11). Wei et al. reported that the cure rate of RFA for treating 23 parathyroid adenoma cases was 87% (20 out of 23) on a six-month follow-up to normalize serum PTH and calcium, and that the complication rate was 4.3% (1 out of 23) (
3). Ha et al. documented that the clinical outcome of RFA in treating 11 cases with PHPT was 63.6% (7 out of 11), and that complete biochemical remission was 63.6% (7 out of 11) and complication rate was 9% (1 out of 11) with transient hypocalcemia, which was spontaneously recovered within a few days (
7). Korkusuz et al. found that the clinical outcomes of RFA in treating nine parathyroid adenoma cases were 100% (9 out of 9) technical success, 55.6% (5 of 9) biochemical remission, and that no complication was appeared (
2). Khandelwal et al. showed that the clinical outcome of RFA in treating 10 parathyroid adenoma cases was 100% (10 of 10) technical success and 100% (10 of 10) biochemical remission for a short-term follow-up, and that the complication rate was 10% (1 of 10) with voice change. The complication was spontaneously resolved within three weeks (
11). Previous studies, however, had some limitations, including small sample sizes (< 30 cases) and short-term follow-up periods (< 1 year). To validate the clinical outcome of RFA in treating PHPT, multicenter studies with larger population and more extended follow-up period are recommended.
In conclusion, the combination therapy of EA and subsequent RFA can be an alternative to treat PHPT for patients ineligible for parathyroidectomy, if EA is not sufficiently effective to achieve clinical success.