1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
3.1. Study Population
3.2. Imaging Techniques
3.3. Image Analysis
3.4. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Imaging Findings
A 53-year-old man presented with dizziness and unstable gait for five hours. Sequence images of the same patient whose right anterior superior cerebellar hemisphere was infarcted (A-E). A, Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the right anterior superior cerebellar hemisphere area showed a clearly high signal (red arrow). B, Measurements of the infarcted area and the contralateral apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. C, Measurements of the infarction area and the contralateral regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) value; the red arrow indicates the ischemic penumbra. D, Phase values of the infarction area and the contralateral venous drainage Δφ measurement. E-F, Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) minimum intensity projection (MinIP) figure; the red arrow indicates that the drainage veins were significantly more numerous and thicker in the infarcted area than on the contralateral region. F, An image of another patient with a left posterior upper cerebellar hemisphere infarction. The patient was 50 years old and she had balance disorder and ataxia for two days.
A 57-year-old man who presented with dizziness and unstable gait for one day. A, A slightly longer T2 signal is visible in the right inferior cerebellar hemisphere on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). B, Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (b = 1000 s/mm2); a few slight higher signals were present in the right inferior cerebellar hemisphere. C-D, Axial imaging at venous stage in dynamic enhancement of MRI. C, A patchy of enhanced high-signal were observed in infarct area (red arrow). D, Multiple enhanced venous vessels connected to the venous sinus were observed (red arrow). E, Coronary imaging at venous stage in dynamic enhancement of MRI, a patchy of enhanced high-signal were observed in infarct area (red arrow). F, A focal-like liquefied area was observed in the infarction area on T2WI of the same patient after six months of treatment (red arrow).
4.2. Comparison of Mean Phase Values of Drainage Veins in the Cerebellar Hemispheres of 30 Healthy Volunteers
| Items | Numbers | Left | Right | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCV | 30 | 213.23 ± 93.24 | 212.93 ± 82.98 | -0.020 | 0.984 |
| PSCV | 30 | 204.83 ± 73.22 | 232.33 ± 95.24 | 2.195 | 0.036 |
| AICV | 30 | 268.03 ± 124.66 | 251.07 ± 110.35 | -0.817 | 0.421 |
| PICV | 30 | 233.33 ± 84.22 | 246.70 ± 110.48 | 1.030 | 0.312 |
Abbreviations: AICV, anterior inferior cerebellar vein; ASCV, anterior superior cerebellar vein; PICV, posterior inferior cerebellar vein; PSCV, posterior superior cerebellar vein; SD, standard deviation
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
The van chart of mean phase values of the venous drainage in both cerebellar hemispheres (Abbreviations: RASCV, LASCV: the right and left anterior superior cerebellar vein; RPSCV, LPSCV: the right and left posterior superior cerebellar vein; RAICV, LAICV: the right and left anterior inferior cerebellar vein; RPICV, LPICV: the right and left posterior inferior cerebellar vein).
4.3. Comparison of Mean Phase Values of Drainage Veins on the Healthy Side and Infarction Area of Cerebellar Infarction Patients with Normal Healthy Group (Mean ± SD)
| Items | Numbers | Phase values | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal volunteers | 240 | 232.81 ± 98.81 | -1.535 | 0.13 |
| Contralateral (healthy side) of infarct area | 30 | 251.20 ± 55.56 | ||
| Normal volunteers | 240 | 232.81 ± 98.81 | -4.207 | < 0.0001 |
| The infarct areas | 26 | 317.08 ± 77.88 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
4.4. Phase Value Δφ of Drainage Veins, rADC Values, and rCBF Values of the Infarction Area in the Cerebellar Hemisphere Compared with the Contralateral Region
| Items | Numbers | The infarct area | The contralateral region | t | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δφ | 26 | 317.08 ± 77.88 | 253.10 ± 57.55 | 3.525 | 0.001 |
| rADC | 26 | 0.50 ± 0.07 | 0.72 ± 0.06 | -12.329 | < 0.0001 |
| rCBF | 26 | 23.14 ± 5.75 | 50.31 ± 3.53 | -20.533 | < 0.0001 |
Abbreviations: rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; rCBF, regional cerebral blood flow; SD, standard deviation
aΔφ units: spin; ADC units: 10-3 mm2/s; CBF units: ml/(min·100 g)
bValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
4.5. Infarction Area of the Cerebellar Hemisphere Drainage Venous Phase Value Δφ, rADC Value, and rCBF Value Correlation Analyses
4.6. The Phase Value of Drainage Veins and rCBF Value of Critical Infarctions in the Ischemic Penumbra of Cerebellar Infarction (ROC Curve)
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the phase value of drainage veins and regional cerebral blood flow value of critical infarction in the ischemic penumbra of cerebellar infarction. A, ROC analysis of Δφ for differentiating salvageable cerebellar tissue from infarction. Area under the curve (AUC) is 0.773 and cut off point is 301 spin, in which the sensitivity is 62.5%, specificity is 66.7%, and accuracy is 64.5%. B, ROC analysis of cerebral blood flow (CBF) for differentiating salvageable cerebellar tissue from infarction. AUC is 0.908 and cut off point is 22.25 ml/(min·100g), in which the sensitivity is 93.8%, specificity is 66.7%, and accuracy is 80.6%.





