Abstract
The authors are deeply sorry about the inadvertent error made in the published article titled Evaluation of the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading among Iranian Individuals”. The conclusion section was mistakenly added from another article in that issue of the International Cardiovascular Research Journal (Sep. 2020, 14 (3); e104728).
The correct conclusion is as follows: Conclusions: The results showed that non-invasive BP measurement methods could be used efficiently for HTN status assessment with no significant difference with its simultaneous intra-arterial reading. Yet, several other studies are needed to clarify these outcomes and evaluate the efficacy of each tool for accurate BP measurement within different BP spectra.
The correct conclusion is as follows: Conclusions: The results showed that non-invasive BP measurement methods could be used efficiently for HTN status assessment with no significant difference with its simultaneous intra-arterial reading. Yet, several other studies are needed to clarify these outcomes and evaluate the efficacy of each tool for accurate BP measurement within different BP spectra.
Keywords
Fulltext
The full-text is available in pdf.
References
-
1.
The references are available in pdf.
Copyright
© 2021, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.