Abstract
The authors are deeply sorry about the inadvertent
error made in the published article titled “Evaluation of
the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement
Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading
among Iranian Individuals”. The conclusion section was
mistakenly added from another article in that issue of the
International Cardiovascular Research Journal (Sep. 2020,
14 (3); e104728).
The correct conclusion is as follows:
Conclusions: The results showed that non-invasive BP
measurement methods could be used efficiently for HTN
status assessment with no significant difference with its
simultaneous intra-arterial reading. Yet, several other
studies are needed to clarify these outcomes and evaluate
the efficacy of each tool for accurate BP measurement
within different BP spectra.
error made in the published article titled “Evaluation of
the Efficiency of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement
Methods in Comparison to Intra-Arterial Reading
among Iranian Individuals”. The conclusion section was
mistakenly added from another article in that issue of the
International Cardiovascular Research Journal (Sep. 2020,
14 (3); e104728).
The correct conclusion is as follows:
Conclusions: The results showed that non-invasive BP
measurement methods could be used efficiently for HTN
status assessment with no significant difference with its
simultaneous intra-arterial reading. Yet, several other
studies are needed to clarify these outcomes and evaluate
the efficacy of each tool for accurate BP measurement
within different BP spectra.
Keywords
Fulltext
The full-text is available in pdf.
References
-
1.
The references are available in pdf.
Copyright
© 2030, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.