Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis

Ali Mohammadzadeh; Sara Tavasoli; Madjid Shakiba; Ali Borhani; Maryam Mohammadzadeh

International Cardiovascular Research Journal

The Official Annually Journal of Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue All Issues In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Boards & Committees Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

Diagnostic Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis

Author(s):

Ali Mohammadzadeh

¹,

Sara Tavasoli¹,

Madjid Shakiba²,

Ali Borhani²,

Maryam Mohammadzadeh

^3,*

1Department of Radiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular and Medical Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

2Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

3Department of Radiology, Amiralalm Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

International Cardiovascular Research Journal:Vol. 13, issue 4; e87529

Published online:Dec 01, 2019

Article type:Research Article

Received:Dec 14, 2018

Accepted:Sep 17, 2019

How to Cite:Ali MohammadzadehSara TavasoliMadjid ShakibaAli BorhaniMaryam MohammadzadehDiagnostic Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography in Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis.Int Cardiovasc Res J.13(4):e87529.

Abstract

Background:

Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis (CP) is a clinical challenge. Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are the most commonly used modalities for evaluating pericardial diseases, such as CP.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and echocardiography in diagnosis of CP.

Methods:

This cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted on 45 patients suspicious for CP [n = 36] or non-constrictive pericarditis [n = 9]. Among the 36 patients suspicious for CP, 20 underwent pericardiectomy. Accordingly, 19 patients were proved to have CP based on histopathological assessments and were considered as the CP-positive group. In addition, the nine patients who were suspicious for pericarditis without the clinical findings of pericardial constriction were included in the CP-negative group [adding to one patient who was negative for CP after surgery, there were a total of 10 CP-negative patients]. MRI, echocardiographic, and clinical findings were obtained from the hospital digital archive and were compared with each other. Diagnostic accuracy indices of echocardiography and MRI in diagnosis of CP were also calculated.

Results:

The mean age of the patients with proved CP and without CP was 48.1 ± 20.7 (12-77) and 50.6 ± 15.3 years (25 - 72), respectively. Additionally, 15 patients were male (78.9%), while six individuals were male (60%) in the CP-negative group. Among MRI and echocardiography variables, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI septal bounce was found to be the same as the gold standard. MRI pericardial thickening > 4 mm had the sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 80%, Positive Predictive value (PPV) of 90%, and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 100%. Echocardiographic parameters, including pericardial thickness, septal bounce, hepatic venous reversal flow, and respiratory variation in mitral flow, also showed high specificity (100%). Additionally, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of MRI and echocardiography was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.85 - 1) and 0.89 (95% CI = 0.80 - 0.99), respectively (P = 0.43). Moreover, the sensitivity of MRI and echocardiography in diagnosis of CP was 100% and 78.9%, respectively (P = 0.045).

Conclusion:

MRI was found to be more sensitive than echocardiography in diagnosis of CP. Indeed, MRI septal bounce had the best diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of CP.

Keywords

Constrictive Pericarditis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Echocardiography

Fulltext

The full-text is available in PDF.

References

1.
The references are available in PDF.

comments