Journal of Inflammatory Diseases
The Official Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Comparison of genotypic method of mexX gene expression and phenotypic method of minimum inhibitory concentration in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Authors
Abstract
Background: The MexXY-OprM efflux pump contributes to the intrinsic resistance to various antimicrobial agents in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients. Detection of the expression of genes encoding components of the MexXY-OprM efflux pump such as mexX using real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be helpful in selecting suitable antibiotic treatment. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the genotypic method of mexX gene expression and the phenotypic method of minimum inhibitory concentration in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: This descriptive-laboratory study was conducted in University of Catholique de Louvain in 2012. After RNA extraction from 16 clinical isolates and cDNA synthesis, expression of mexX was detected by real time PCR using P. aeruginosa mex Q-TesT. According to the mex Q-TesT guideline, which is based on student T-test with 95% confidence interval and P<0.05, values equal or greater than 5 were considered as overexpression. Findings: Only 7 out of 11 clinical isolates with increased minimum inhibitory concentration for aminoglycosides showed overexpression of mexX. There was not any relationship between the pump expression and the increase in minimum inhibitory concentration values for various antibiotics. Conclusion: Since the results of the gene expression and the antimicrobial resistance data are not consistent in all cases, simultaneous use of both genotypic and phenotypic methods is recommended.
Highlights
Copyright
© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Efflux MexAB-Mediated Resistance in Multidrug and Pan-Drug Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated From Patients With Burn and Wound Infections
Khosravi AD, Mohammadian A. Efflux MexAB-Mediated Resistance in Multidrug and Pan-Drug Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated From Patients With Burn and Wound Infections. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2016;11(1):e25352. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-25352
Prevalence of Oxacillinase Groups I, II and III in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by Polymerase Chain Reaction and Genotyping by ERIC-PCR Methods
Aghazadeh M, Samadi Kafil H, Ghotaslou R, Asgharzadeh M, Moghadami M, et al. Prevalence of Oxacillinase Groups I, II and III in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by Polymerase Chain Reaction and Genotyping by ERIC-PCR Methods. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(12):e38129. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.38129
Molecular Detection and Identification of oprl and lasb Genes Isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Ghazaei C. Molecular Detection and Identification of oprl and lasb Genes Isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2023;12(2):e137394. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps-137394
VIM, NDM, IMP, GES, SPM, GIM, SIM Metallobetalactamases in Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Turkish University Hospital
Tanriverdi Cayci Y, Biyik İ, Birinci A. VIM, NDM, IMP, GES, SPM, GIM, SIM Metallobetalactamases in Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Turkish University Hospital. J Arch Mil Med. 2022;10(1):e118712. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm-118712
Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan and PAβN on MexAB Expression in Clinical Isolates of Ciprofloxacin Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Faridi F, Abbasi S, Shoja S, Bahador N. Antibacterial Activity of Chitosan and PAβN on MexAB Expression in Clinical Isolates of Ciprofloxacin Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2021;14(5):e115652. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.115652
More by these authors
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 2 days ago