The Effectiveness of a Radiation Safety Training Program in Increasing the Radiation Safety Knowledge of Physicians: A Pilot Study

authors:

avatar Azam Janati Esfahani ORCID 1 , * , avatar Reihaneh Mehrabi 2 , avatar Nematollah Gheibi ORCID 1 , avatar reza paydar 3 , avatar Masoome Aliakbari 4 , avatar Fateme Sadat Bagheri 4 , avatar Samane Heshmati 4 , avatar Elmira Mohammadi 4 , avatar Zahra Sadat Seyedi Gilavan 4 , avatar Mahla Gangi 4

Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Department of Pure Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Biology Research Centre, School of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Student Research Committee, School of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

how to cite: Janati Esfahani A, Mehrabi R, Gheibi N, paydar R, Aliakbari M, et al. The Effectiveness of a Radiation Safety Training Program in Increasing the Radiation Safety Knowledge of Physicians: A Pilot Study. J Inflamm Dis. 2020;24(1):e156199. 

Abstract

Background: Ionizing and non-ionizing radiation are widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Considering the potential risks of radiation, radiation safety training courses are important for medical staff. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of one-day radiation safety training program in increasing the radiation safety knowledge of physicians. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, subjects were 12 physicians (6 general practitioners and 6 non-radiologist specialists) participated in the training program organized by Qazvin University of Medical Sciences in 2018. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for surveying physicians before and after the training. The mean and standard deviation of the scores were first calculated. Then, the pre- and post-test scores were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the correlation of these scores with their age, gender, expertise area, and work experience was examined by Spearman's correlation test. Findings: The mean total scores of the physicians before and after training were 7.00±2.56 (ranged 3-11) and 11.92± 2.31 (ranged 8-15) out of 18, respectively. The radiation safety knowledge of physicians significantly increased after training (P<0.001). No significant relationship was found between their scores and their age, gender, expertise area and work experience. Conclusion: The radiation safety training program was effective in increasing the radiation safety knowledge of physicians and it can be used for a larger community of physicians.

References

  • 1.

    Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. https://books.google. com/books?id=6HhjwRyqBzgC&dq.

  • 2.

    No Authors Listed. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37(2-4):1-332. [PMID].

  • 3.

    Polk C, Postow E. Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Cleveland: CRC Press; 1995. https://books.google.com/books?id=PZd_2UJrwdwC&dq.

  • 4.

    Fedorowski A, Steciwko A. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Med Pr. 1998; 49(1):93-105. [In Polish][PMID].

  • 5.

    Mortazavi SMJ, Mortazavi SA, Paknahad M. Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran. Int J Reprod BioMed. 2017; 15(2):115-6. [DOI:10.29252/ijrm.15.2.115].

  • 6.

    Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjear SK. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and risk for spontaneous preterm delivery in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(3):511-5. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b1377b] [PMID].

  • 7.

    Izadifar Z, Babyn P, Chapman D. Mechanical and biological effects of ultrasound: A review of present knowledge. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017; 43(6):1085-104. [DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2017.01.023] [PMID].

  • 8.

    Schauer DA, Linton OW. NCRP report No. 160, ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States, medical exposure-are we doing less with more, and is there a role for health physicists? Health Phys. 2009; 97(1):1-5. [DOI:10.1097/01.HP.0000356672.44380.b7] [PMID].

  • 9.

    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP report no. 93, Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States [Internet]. 2015 [Updated 2015 June 1]. Available from: https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report 93/.

  • 10.

    Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(22):2277 84. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra072149] [PMID].

  • 11.

    de Gonzlez AB, Mahesh M, Kim KP, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22):2071-7. [DOI:10.1001/archinternmed. 2009.440] [PMID] [PMCID].

  • 12.

    International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Principles for non-ionizing radiation protection. Health Phys. 2020; 118(5):477-82. [DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000001252] [PMID].

  • 13.

    Borgen L, Stranden E. Radiation knowledge and perception of referral practice among radiologists and radiographers compared with referring clinicians. Insights Imaging. 2014; 5(5):635- 40. [DOI:10.1007/s13244-014-0348-y] [PMID] [PMCID].

  • 14.

    Gnalp M, Glnay B, Polat O, Demirkan A, Grler S, Akka M, et al. Ionising radiation awareness among resident doctors, interns, and radiographers in a university hospital emergency department. Radiol Med. 2014; 119(6):440-7. [DOI:10.1007/s11547-013-0374-8] [PMID].

  • 15.

    Geofery L, Basirat M, Eze CU, Chigozie NI, Auwal A, Kalu O, et al. Evaluation of the knowledge and awareness of non ionizing radiation among final year students of College of Medical Science University of Maiduguri. Int Res J Pure Appl Phys. 2015; 3(3):8-14. https://bit.ly/2D3avQe.

  • 16.

    Madrigano RR, Abro KC, Puchnick A, Regacini R. Evaluation of non-radiologist physicians knowledge on aspects related to ionizing radiation in imaging. Radiol Bras. 2014; 47(4):210-6. [DOI:10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1840] [PMID] [PMCID].

  • 17.

    Faggioni L, Paolicchi F, Bastiani L, Guido D, Caramella D. Awareness of radiation protection and dose levels of imaging procedures among medical students, radiography students, and radiology residents at an academic hospital: Results of a comprehensive survey. Eur J Radiol. 2017; 86:135-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.033] [PMID].

  • 18.

    Wong CS, Huang B, Sin HK, Wong WL, Yiu KL, Ching TCY. A questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(3):e264-e8.[DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.022] [PMID].

  • 19.

    Thaker A, Navadeh S, Gonzales H, Malekinejad M. Effectiveness of policies on reducing exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging: A systematic review. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12(12 Pt B):1434-45. [DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.033] [PMID].

  • 20.

    Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S, Moineddin R, Charkot G, BenDavid G, et al. Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36(8):823-32. [DOI:10.1007/s00247-006-0170-x] [PMID].

  • 21.

    Yunus N, Abdullah MHRO, Said ZA, Chng PE. Assessment of radiation safety awareness among nuclear medicine nurses: A pilot study. J Phys Conference Series. 2014; 546(1):012015. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/546/1/012015].

  • 22.

    Dauer LT, Kelvin JF, Horan CL, St Germain J. Evaluating the effectiveness of a radiation safety training intervention for oncology nurses: A pretest-intervention-posttest study. BMC Med Educ. 2006; 6:32. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-6-32] [PMID][PMCID].

  • 23.

    Georges JL, Livarek B, Gibault-Genty G, Aziza, JP, Hautecoeur JL, Soleille H, et al. Reduction of radiation delivered to patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures. Effect of a programme for dose reduction based on radiation-protection training. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009; 102(12):821-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2009.09.007] [PMID]##.