This is a qualitative descriptive phenomenological study. The study setting included the Internal Departments of Neuroscience at Al-Zahra and Kashani hospitals, as well as Al-Zahra Rehabilitation Center and Neurologists’ offices in Isfahan, Iran. The researchers referred to the settings for the initial selection of participants and selected a place for interviewing with the participants’ consent. Participants in this study were the caregivers of stroke patients. The requirements for participating in the study included a confirmed diagnosis of a family member with stroke by a neurologist, willingness to participate in research, being a family member of the stroke patient, being able to participate in interviews and transfer information and experiences. The caregivers also should have had a major role in caring for the stroke patient. A purposive sampling method was followed to recruit a sample with maximum variation (any stroke, any age, any level of literacy, any occupation, both genders, etc.). To maximize the diversity of participants and gain first-stage and long-term caregiver experiences, the researchers selected the participants from the Internal Neuroscience Departments among those whose patients had been diagnosed with stroke for the first time or referred to the hospital for rehabilitation or follow-up visits. The researchers continued the sampling until data saturation, which reached with the selection of seven participants in this study.
In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to gather information. The researcher referred to Al-Zahra Hospital, Rehabilitation Clinic for stroke patients, and the Physiotherapy Unit at Kashani Hospital after obtaining necessary permissions and receiving a letter from the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. In accordance with the criteria for participating in the study, the researcher selected the participants. After obtaining the initial agreement and written consent of the participant, the researcher selected a place and time for the interview with the participant’s agreement and then held the interviews. Kashani Hospital was the place for the interviews. Before the interviews, the researcher, while introducing himself and expressing the purpose of research, stated that their conversations would be recorded, their recordings and personal details would remain confidential to the researcher, and they may withdraw from the interviews at any time they wished. Subsequently, they were allowed to conduct further interviews to clarify the information. Therefore, each of the seven participants was interviewed 3 - 5 times before receiving comprehensive information. Sample interview questions included: (1) What are your experiences of taking care of your family member? and (2) How do you care for your patient? By answering these questions, they described their experiences in this area and explained how they acted after they had accepted the care of their family members. When there was a need to clarify the information in a particular context, other questions were used to get a deeper understanding. The average duration of the interviews was 50 minutes in the range of 20 minutes to 90 minutes.
After completing an interview, the tape was carefully listened by the researchers and transcribed verbatim. After conducting the analysis steps on each interview, to ensure the correctness of the researchers’ interpretation, the researchers contacted the participants again and the correctness of the interpretations was examined with their opinion and, if necessary, the needed changes were made. After the completion of the analysis, the interviews and extracted concepts were given to some colleagues to strengthen the findings.
Data analysis was performed on the basis of Colaizzi’s seven-stage method, as follows:
1. Reading all the descriptions and stories of the participants and sympathy with them.
2. Researchers extracted the words and sentences associated with the phenomenon under study.
3. Conceptualizing the extracted important sentences.
4. Specific categorization of concepts based on related subjects:
- Essential descriptions for the reliability of the content.
- Disregarding materials that were irrelevant to the goals of the study.
5. Combining all the extracted beliefs as a comprehensive description, including all the details of the phenomenon under study.
6. Summarizing the comprehensive description of the phenomenon as a real and concrete description.
7. In the final stage, the researchers referred to the participants in order to clarify the opinions based on the research findings and validate the findings.
The researchers used a long-term involvement to perform validation. In this way, the researchers conducted a telephone interview with a number of participants, in order to provide a deep understanding of each participant. In order to receive feedback from participants, the comments received from each interview were returned to each participant for review. For investigating the peers, the interviews were studied by researchers’ colleagues (5 faculty members (assistant professors) with more than 10 years of experience in neurology and specialist departments). For conformability, the researchers provided the data to their colleagues for verifying the authenticity of the data encoding process. For transfer, the researchers described precisely and purposefully the research process and the activities carried out in the course of research. The dependence of the data was determined in such a way that the data obtained from the interview were also obtained in patients’ observations and narratives. In total, 7 participants were interviewed, each taking an average of 1 - 2 hours.