Abstract
Background:
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can reduce risk factors and mortality rate and improve physical functions. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is commonly performed for patients with coronary disease.Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CR program on quality of life in patients with cardiac disease who had undergone CABG.Patients and Methods:
Twenty patients with cardiac disease who had undergone CABG participated in this study. The coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire (CROQ) was used to evaluate health outcomes and quality of life after CR. The patients filled the questionnaire before and after 20 sessions of CR.Results:
CR improved the overall quality of life in patients with cardiac disease who had undergone CABG (P < 0.05). The results also demonstrated a significant improvement in subscores of symptoms, psychosocial and cognition functions after CR. However, no significant difference was found in subscore of physical function in patients who had undergone CABG.Conclusions:
CR can improve the quality of life in patients with diabetes and cardiac disease who had undergone CABG and can be considered as a treatment intervention for patients with cardiac disease.Keywords
1. Background
Diabetes, specifically type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is one of the most challenging health problems in today’s societies. The prevalence has been increased worldwide from an estimated 30 million in 1985 to 150 million in 2000, 171 million in 2007, and expected 366 million in 2030 (1-3). The risk of developing and dying from coronary heart disease has been reported 2 to 4 times in patients with diabetes compared to nondiabetic (NDM) ones (4-6). Coronary heart disease has been attributed as the main cause of death in patients with diabetes (7).
Patients with diabetes constitute at least one-fourth of all patients referred for revascularization (8). The risk of complications from all types of revascularization procedures is higher in patients with diabetes than those without it, and their long-term prognosis is also worse (9-15).
Cardiac rehabilitation has been increasingly recognized as an integral component of the continuum of care for patients with cardiovascular disease (4). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has several beneficial effects, including modification of coronary risk factors and improvement of the prognosis, in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (16). Quality of life (QOL) is a major goal in the field of preventive and therapeutic cardiology (17).
The limited information on CR suggests that such programs might be important in subjects with diabetes (18, 19). However, review of the literature revealed that minimal evidence exists to address the effects of CR on QOL in patients with diabetes using specific outcome measurement.
The coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire (CROQ) is a specific outcome measurement, which evaluates health outcomes and quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (20).
It includes items in the following domains: symptoms, physical functioning, psychosocial functioning, cognitive functioning, satisfaction and adverse effects. It has four different types as CROQ-CABG- pre and CROQ-PTCA-pre, to be administered before the patient undergoes coronary revascularization, and the CROQ-CABG-post and CROQ-PTCA-post for three months after CABG and PTCA, respectively. The former two questionnaires are identical in item content and differ only by name, but the later two are different only regarding the content of adverse effects scale, as these problems differ for the two procedures. The postversions of this questionnaire were used in this study.
To our knowledge, no objective study has directly investigated the effect of CR on QOL in patients with diabetes using specific outcome measurement. The Persian version of this questionnaire was used for this study (21).
2. Objectives
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of CR on QOL in patients with diabetes undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) using CROQ.
3. Patients and Methods
Thirty-four patients with diabetes referred by physicians for cardiac rehabilitation, participated in this study. Participants aged 43-68 years in CABG and 41-66 years in PTCA groups. Subjects were categorized into two groups as patients undergone CABG (N = 20, the mean age = 56.45 ± 6.97 years) and those undergone PTCA (N = 14, the mean age = 53.92 ± 6.29 years). Patients with diabetes were included if they had undergone CABG and PTCA within past three months. Exclusion criteria were more than one time undergoing CABG or PTCA, undergoing these procedures collectively and presenting myocardial ischemia or severe ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were also excluded if they could not read, understand and completely fill the questionnaire. Patients completed the questionnaire, before and after 20 sessions of CR. All the participants signed an informed consent form approved by the ethics committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences before participating in the study. Physical characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1.
Respondents Characteristics
| Characteristics | CABG |
|---|---|
| Total No. | 20 |
| Gender, No. (%) | |
| Female | 8 (40%) |
| Male | 12 (60%) |
| Mean of Height, Cm | 162.90 ± 11.47 |
| Mean of Weight, Kg | 74.70 ± 8.48 |
| Mean of Age, y | 56.45 ± 6.97 |
3.1. Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
The CR was a complete program containing supervised exercise sessions, dietary counseling, risk factor management, psychosocial counseling and smoking cessation counseling (if required) over seven weeks. Exercise program was prescribed based on patients’ initial graded exercise test, with 50-80% intensity of their heart rate reserve (220-age). Exercise sessions were performed three times a week, consisting of a 15-minute warm-up, 30 minutes aerobic exercise (consisted of a cycle and arm ergometer, treadmill exercise) and 15 minutes active cool-down. Total time of a session was about one hour.
3.2. Main Outcome Measures
The CROQ was collected at baseline and at the end of protocol to investigate the efficacy of CR program on QOL of patients with diabetes who had undergone CABG or PTCA.
CROQ is a validated self-administered scale for measuring revascularization outcome. All four versions (CROQ-CABG-Pre, CROQ-PTCA-Pre, CROQ-CABG-Post, CROQ-PTCA-Post) contain 32 evaluative items and one descriptive item. The post-revascularization versions of the CROQ used in this study (CROQ-CABG-Post 52 items, CROQ-PTCA-Post 47 items) contain these 33 core items plus additional evaluative items about adverse effects and satisfaction with outcome and two descriptive items. The questionnaire was filled out by the subjects. The CROQ has six subscales: symptoms (seven items), physical functioning (eight items), psychosocial functioning (14 items), cognitive functioning (three items), satisfaction (six items), and adverse effects (eleven or six items). Items in each scale were summed and then numbered to a 0–100 scale; 100 representing the best feasible outcome (20). The Persian versions of the CROQ are reliable questionnaires to measure outcome in Persian-speaking patients who had undergone CABG and PTCA (21).
3.3. Statistical Analysis
Wilcoxon-Rank test was used to determine any significant changes in each subgroup scores, at the end of CR sessions, compared with primary scores in both the CABG and PTCA groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
4. Results
Demographic data (Mean ± SD) of the patients in each group are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 depict CROQ scores at baseline and at the end of CR protocol in diabetic patients with CABG. Detailed descriptive statistics is presented in Table 2. The comparison of subgroup scores, before and after CR, in patients undergone CABG, showed a significant improvement in this subgroup scores: symptoms (mean score from 22.5 to 35.90), psychosocial functioning (mean score from 52.45 to 54.40), cognition (mean score from 17.35 to 17.40) total scores of subgroups (mean score from 181.55 to 207.55). There was no statistically significant difference in these subgroup scores; physical functioning (mean score from 17.10 to 17.60), satisfaction (mean score from 21.30 to 21.65) adverse effects (mean score from50.85 to 50.85) (Figure 1).
Descriptive Statistics Regarding the Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on CROQ Subscores in the Both CABG and PTCA Groups
| Sub Group | CABG | PTCA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-CR Mean (SD) | Post-CR Mean (SD) | P Value | Pre-CR Mean (SD) | Post-CR Mean (SD) | P Value | |
| Symptom | 22.5 (4.65) | 35.90 (0.30) | ≤ 0.05 | 25.85 (3.54) | 34.92 (1.26) | ≤ 0.05 |
| Physical Function | 17.10 (3.24) | 17.60 (2.83) | ≥ 0.05 | 21.46 (2.86) | 23.00 (1.24) | ≤ 0.05 |
| Psychosocial Function | 52.45 (10.38) | 54.40 (7.91) | ≤ 0.05 | 53.00 (9.47) | 60.28 (5.71) | ≤ 0.05 |
| Cognition | 17.35 (1.26) | 17.40 (0.68) | ≤ 0.05 | 16.42 (2.37) | 17.64 (0.49) | ≤ 0.05 |
| Satisfaction | 21.30 (2.27) | 21.65 (4.66) | ≥ 0.05 | 21.14 (2.14) | 21.07 (1.81) | ≥ 0.05 |
| Adverse Effect | 50.85 (3.09) | 50.85 (3.09) | ≥ 0.05 | 29.42 (1.22) | 29.50 (0.85) | ≥ 0.05 |
| Total Score | 181.55 (16.47) | 207.55 (11.93) | ≤ 0.05 | 165.57 (13.70) | 195.64 (8.34) | ≤ 0.05 |
CROQ Subscores at Baseline and the End of CR Protocol in Patients With Diabetes Who Had Undergone CABG
5. Discussion
The result of this study showed a significant increase in overall CROQ scores after CR compared with before CR in the both groups. These findings revealed a significant improvement in QOL of patients with diabetes who had undergone CABG and PTCA, after about 20 sessions of CR.
The change in overall quality of life after CR found in our study is in line with the results of previous studies, which indicated improvement of QOL following CR in cardiac patients (diabetic or nondiabetic ones). More in depth review of the literature shows that most previous studies mainly investigated the effects of CR on the risk factors of cardiac disease such as lipid profile (16, 18, 22, 23). Some others assessed physical well-being (fitness and symptoms), psychological well-being (anxiety and depression), social well-being (family life and relationships), or functional status (return to work and previous life style) using generic health related questionnaire (mainly SF-36). (24-27). To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly investigate the effects of CR on QOL of patients with diabetes undergone CABG and PTCA using specific instrument. CROQ is a specific outcome measurement, which evaluates health outcomes and quality of life before and after CABG and PTCA (20).
It has been recognized that exercise tolerance is a good prognostic factor in patients with cardiovascular diseases (18, 28). Muscular strength has been also related to all-cause mortality (29). The present study demonstrated a significant improvement in symptoms after CR in both CABG and PTCA groups. Our data also revealed a significant enhancement in physical functioning after CR in the PTCA group. However, no significant difference was found in physical functioning after CR program compared to before treatment scores in the CABG group. Belardinelli et al. (30) reported that patients undergone PTCA had significantly better scores in physical functioning and less pain after exercise training compared with control group (17% of the intervention group had diabetes). Seki et al. (24) showed that Phase III CR was improved in general health and bodily pain in patients who had undergone CABG or PTCA compared to the control group(Cardiac patients that were not treated by cardiac rehabilitation). In contrast, Briffa et al. (31) and Dalal et al. (32) found no significant changes in physical functioning of post-MI patients after CR (10.5% and 18% of the patients had diabetes, respectively).
Psychological status is considered as an important factor correlated with physical activity and social functioning (24). Anxiety and depression cause unhealthy behaviors and worse outcome (33, 34). Our data demonstrated significant improvement in psychosocial functioning scores after CR. These findings are similar to Lie et al. (35) results indicating positive effects of home based interventions on psychological and social wellbeing in patients after CABG (12% of patients had diabetes). Seki et al. (24) observed significant improvement in psychological subscale, but no difference in social subscale scores after CR in patients after CABG and PTCA. Similar findings were reported elsewhere. Belardinelli et al. (30) findings were the same as Seki et al. (24), but in post PTCA patients. In contrast, Briffa et al. (31) and Dalal et al. (32) found no significant difference in psychological and social subscales scores in post-MI patients.
Our data showed a relative improvement in overall quality of life in the both groups, which is probably due to CR program.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Israili ZH. Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Ther. 2011;18(2):117-52. [PubMed ID: 19834322]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181afbf51.
-
2.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047-53. [PubMed ID: 15111519].
-
3.
Horton ES. Can newer therapies delay the progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus? Endocr Pract. 2008;14(5):625-38. [PubMed ID: 18753109]. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP.14.5.625.
-
4.
Mourot L, Boussuges A, Maunier S, Chopra S, Riviere F, Debussche X, et al. Cardiovascular rehabilitation in patients with diabetes. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30(3):157-64. [PubMed ID: 20040882]. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181c565fe.
-
5.
Garcia MJ, McNamara PM, Gordon T, Kannel WB. Morbidity and mortality in diabetics in the Framingham population. Sixteen year follow-up study. Diabetes. 1974;23(2):105-11. [PubMed ID: 4359625].
-
6.
Rytter L, Troelsen S, Beck-Nielsen H. Prevalence and mortality of acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1985;8(3):230-4. [PubMed ID: 4006657].
-
7.
Kannel WB. Lipids, diabetes, and coronary heart disease: insights from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1985;110(5):1100-7. [PubMed ID: 4061265].
-
8.
Kapur A, Hall RJ, Malik IS, Qureshi AC, Butts J, de Belder M, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(5):432-40. [PubMed ID: 20117456]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.014.
-
9.
Stein B, Weintraub WS, Gebhart SP, Cohen-Bernstein CL, Grosswald R, Liberman HA, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91(4):979-89. [PubMed ID: 7850985].
-
10.
Kip KE, Faxon DP, Detre KM, Yeh W, Kelsey SF, Currier JW. Coronary Angioplasty in Diabetic Patients: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation. 1996;94(8):1818-25. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1818.
-
11.
Alderman EL, Corley SD, Fisher LD, Chaitman BR, Faxon DP, Foster ED, et al. Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). JAMA. 1993;22(4):1141-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90429-5.
-
12.
Thourani VH, Weintraub WS, Stein B, Gebhart SS, Craver JM, Jones EL, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(4):1045-52. [PubMed ID: 10320249].
-
13.
Abizaid A, Costa MA, Centemero M, Abizaid AS, Legrand VM, Limet RV, et al. Clinical and economic impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous and surgical treatment of multivessel coronary disease patients: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial. Circulation. 2001;104(5):533-8. [PubMed ID: 11479249].
-
14.
Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ. Diabetes and coronary revascularization. JAMA. 2005;293(12):1501-8. [PubMed ID: 15784875]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.12.1501.
-
15.
Marcheix B, Vanden Eynden F, Demers P, Bouchard D, Cartier R. Influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term survival in systematic off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(4):1181-8. [PubMed ID: 18805157]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.063.
-
16.
Onishi T, Shimada K, Sunayama S, Ohmura H, Sumide T, Masaki Y, et al. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with metabolic syndrome after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiol. 2009;53(3):381-7. [PubMed ID: 19477380]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2009.01.004.
-
17.
Shephard RJ, Franklin B. Changes in the quality of life: a major goal of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21(4):189-200. [PubMed ID: 11508178].
-
18.
Banzer JA, Maguire TE, Kennedy CM, O'Malley CJ, Balady GJ. Results of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(1):81-4. [PubMed ID: 14697472].
-
19.
Milani RV, Lavie CJ. Behavioral differences and effects of cardiac rehabilitation in diabetic patients following cardiac events. Am J Med. 1996;100(5):517-23. [PubMed ID: 8644763].
-
20.
Schroter S, Lamping DL. Coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire (CROQ): development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty. Heart. 2004;90(12):1460-6. [PubMed ID: 15547029]. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.021899.
-
21.
SHAHALI SH, MJ S, GOHARPEY S, RAHIM F. Reliability Of The Persian Version Of Coronary Revascularization Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ) In Cardiac Patients Undergoing CABG And PTCA Procedures. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2008;2:919-24.
-
22.
Soja AM, Zwisler AD, Frederiksen M, Melchior T, Hommel E, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Use of intensified comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation to improve risk factor control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance--the randomized DANish StUdy of impaired glucose metabolism in the settings of cardiac rehabilitation (DANSUK) study. Am Heart J. 2007;153(4):621-8. [PubMed ID: 17383302]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.030.
-
23.
Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs in metabolic syndrome and diabetes. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2005;25(2):59-66. [PubMed ID: 15818190].
-
24.
Seki E, Watanabe Y, Sunayama S, Iwama Y, Shimada K, Kawakami K, et al. Effects of Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs on Health-Related Quality of Life in Elderly Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circul J. 2003;67(1):73-7. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.67.73.
-
25.
Yu CM, Lau CP, Chau J, McGhee S, Kong SL, Cheung BM, et al. A short course of cardiac rehabilitation program is highly cost effective in improving long-term quality of life in patients with recent myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):1915-22. [PubMed ID: 15605326].
-
26.
Araya-Ramirez F, Briggs KK, Bishop SR, Miller CE, Moncada-Jimenez J, Grandjean PW. Who is likely to benefit from phase II cardiac rehabilitation? J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30(2):93-100. [PubMed ID: 20216361]. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181d0c17f.
-
27.
Smith KM, Arthur HM, McKelvie RS, Kodis J. Differences in sustainability of exercise and health-related quality of life outcomes following home or hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004;11(4):313-9. [PubMed ID: 15292765].
-
28.
Belardinelli R, Georgiou D, Cianci G, Purcaro A. Randomized, controlled trial of long-term moderate exercise training in chronic heart failure: effects on functional capacity, quality of life, and clinical outcome. Circulation. 1999;99(9):1173-82. [PubMed ID: 10069785].
-
29.
Braith RW, Stewart KJ. Resistance exercise training: its role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2006;113(22):2642-50. [PubMed ID: 16754812]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584060.
-
30.
Belardinelli R, Paolini I, Cianci G, Piva R, Georgiou D, Purcaro A. Exercise training intervention after coronary angioplasty: the ETICA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(7):1891-900. [PubMed ID: 11401128].
-
31.
Briffa TG, Eckermann SD, Griffiths AD, Harris PJ, Heath MR, Freedman SB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation after an acute coronary event: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust. 2005;183(9):450-5. [PubMed ID: 16274344].
-
32.
Dalal HM, Evans PH, Campbell JL, Taylor RS, Watt A, Read KL, et al. Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms--Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). Int J Cardiol. 2007;119(2):202-11. [PubMed ID: 17196274]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.018.
-
33.
Strik JJ, Denollet J, Lousberg R, Honig A. Comparing symptoms of depression and anxiety as predictors of cardiac events and increased health care consumption after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(10):1801-7. [PubMed ID: 14642691].
-
34.
Komorovsky R, Desideri A, Rozbowsky P, Sabbadin D, Celegon L, Gregori D. Quality of life and behavioral compliance in cardiac rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(7):979-85. [PubMed ID: 17673241]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.06.008.
-
35.
Lie I, Arnesen H, Sandvik L, Hamilton G, Bunch EH. Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. The impact of a randomised controlled home-based intervention program. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(2):201-7. [PubMed ID: 19169899]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9438-y.