The current study evaluated the prevalence of intestinal parasites in rural primary school students in West of Ahvaz and as indicated, the prevalence of parasitic infection in the study was 28.8%. The results of the current study were consistent with those of Rostami et al. with the prevalence of 28.8% (
13) and Daryani et al. with the prevalence of 27.7% (
14); but it was less compatible with the results obtained from other studies such as those of Kousha et al. in Tabriz, Iran, with 44% (
15). Less consistency was also observed in the studies on people from lower social classes and poor living accommodations. The current study showed that
G. lamblia with the prevalence of 19.9% had the highest prevalence among the isolated protozoans. This high prevalence could be due to over-crowdedness of the schools, lack of proper sewage disposal system, probable contamination of water with the protozoan cysts, resistance against chlorination, and lack of observance of food hygiene guidelines. Therefore, the obtained results were consistent with those of the majority of the studies that reported the high prevalence of
Giardia sp., Tappe et al. with a prevalence of 20.5% (
16), and Saidi and Sajadi et al. 20.5% (
17). Failure to observe worm infection can be due to not using human feces on farms, improvement of health and public hygiene levels in the region, the absence of appropriate interface hosts for most of the worms, and the use of anthelmintic for children in the health care centers in the rural areas.
In the current study, the prevalence of the parasite in the infected children was 32.2% in males and 23.8% in females; the difference between the 2 rates was statistically insignificant (P value = 1.0). Therefore, gender difference did not affect the prevalence of parasites. The findings of the study were inconsistent with those of Soheyli Azad et al. in Robat Karim, Iran, where the difference between the genders was significant (
18), but the results were consistent with those of the other studies, Saidi and Sajadi (
17) and Kousha et al. in Tabriz, which showed the difference between the genders was insignificant (
15).
The results obtained from the extent of the outbreak in different age groups showed a significant difference between the age groups (P value = 0.03). These results showed that all age groups were not equally exposed to parasitic infection. Infection among the age group of 9 years and below was more than those of the other age groups. This difference was probably due to more contact of these age groups with parasitic sources. The prevalence of parasite infection was higher among these age groups, because touching dirt, lack of personal hygiene observance, and dealing with the children in same age are more common among them; therefore, results of the current study were inconsistent with those of Saidi and Sajadi that did not find significant differences among the age groups regarding the prevalence of protozoan infection (
17). Furthermore, in the study conducted by Rostami et al. the maximum amount of infection was observed in the 1st years of primary school (
13); similar to the results of the current study that reported the maximum amount of infection in the age groups below 9 years.
In the current study, there was no significant relationship between the level of education in parents and the prevalence of infection in children (P value = 0.8). In a study conducted by Rostami et al. no significant difference was observed between the educational level of parents and the prevalence of parasites in children; the results were similar to those of the present study (
13). But in a study conducted by Ahmad-Rajabi et al. in Bam, Iran, no significant association was observed between the parents’ educational level and the prevalence of parasites in children (
19); same results in the current study may result from the parents’ educational level bellow guidance school.
Another finding of the current study was a significant relationship between the method of washing vegetables and fruits, and the prevalence of parasitic infections (P value = 0.0); that is the prevalence of parasitic infection in children who consumed vegetables and fruits washed with water and a few drops of dish washing liquid was lower than the ones who had taken vegetables and fruits merely washed with water; thus, the result was consistent with that of Atashnafas et al. in which a significant difference was observed between the method of washing vegetables and fruits, and the prevalence of parasitic infections (
20).
In the studied region drinking water is provided in 2 ways, tap water and barreled water refined by the shops specifically active in this field and distribute drinking water among the villagers. The parasite infection prevalence in children had a significant relationship with drinking water sources (P value = 0.002). Children who used the barreled drinking water were more infected compared with the ones who used tap water. Probably it was due to failure to assess the adherence to drinking-water guidelines in the water purification shops and pollution during distribution; however, no study was conducted in this regard.
4.1. Conclusions
Due to the high incidence of parasitic infections, especially Giardia sp. in the study subjects, health care centers are recommended to take training on the observation of drinking-water hygiene guidelines. In addition, to reduce the density of students in classes, renovate the school toilets, and prevent food supply around the schools by non-hygienic and authorized suppliers, proper regulations and programs should be performed. Periodic tests can be also helpful to decrease parasitic contaminations.