Identification and Evaluation of Covid-19 Control Strategies in Kashan Schools Using SWOT and QSPM Matrix

authors:

avatar Mohammad Ghorbanalizadeh Jamal 1 , avatar Alireza Ziloui 2 , avatar Mohsen Hesami Arani 3 , avatar Moin Rezaei Ghamsari 2 , avatar Abolfazl Kazemzadeh Nooshabadi 2 , avatar Hadi Niknejad 4 , avatar Ameneh Marzban ORCID 5 , avatar Mohsen Dowlati ORCID 5 , *

Master Student of History and Philosophy of Education, Qom University, Qom, Iran
Department of Elementary Education, Farhangian Bahonar University, Isfahan, Iran
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How To Cite Ghorbanalizadeh Jamal M, Ziloui A, Hesami Arani M, Rezaei Ghamsari M, Kazemzadeh Nooshabadi A, et al. Identification and Evaluation of Covid-19 Control Strategies in Kashan Schools Using SWOT and QSPM Matrix. Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2022;14(4):e128375. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjhs-128375.

Abstract

Background:

Since the end of 2019, the emergence and spread of the Covid-19 pandemic has been raised as one of the challenges and problems of humanity in various dimensions, especially in the health sector. Due to the disease's high infectivity, controlling and breaking the chain of infection is especially important for vulnerable groups. Therefore, the present study was conducted to identify and evaluate Covid-19 control strategies in schools in Kashan.

Methods:

The present study is descriptive-analytical, using strategic management tools called strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) and a quantitative strategic planning model (QSPM) of the situation of schools during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2021.

Results:

The findings from the SWOT matrix show the existence of 10 opportunities, 11 weaknesses, ten threats, and 14 strengths in the studied schools. The score of 2.45 obtained from the total scores of the internal factor analysis matrix indicates that existing weaknesses prevail over the schools' strengths in the disease control management field. Also, the score of 2.515 obtained from the analysis matrix of external factors shows that this institution has more favorable opportunities to reduce external threats and internal weaknesses.

Conclusions:

Based on these findings, the final solution for implementing the methods of controlling the disease of COVID-19 in Kashan schools is a conservative strategy. Therefore, the implementation of the presented strategies, especially the implementation of related educational guidelines, is necessary to control Covid-19.

1. Background

In late 2019, there was evidence of the emergence of a respiratory disease created by a virus in China, which spread rapidly across all countries around the world and was finally introduced by the World Health Organization as a new pandemic called COVID-19 (1). Coronavirus is a new type of virus that cause symptoms of colds to severe respiratory diseases (pneumonia), That had not been seen in man before. After the epidemic and the involvement of all countries, they are working on planning to prevent and control the disease (2). Following the outbreak of the Coronavirus, to reduce and counter the outbreak of the disease, China and then other countries closed schools.

Considering the importance of schools in Iran as one of the most important gathering centers, which always requires health controls (3). in late February, after the spread of Corona, the Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Education have been closing universities and schools on a successive basis; after this holiday, the prevalence of the disease has declined, and schools and universities have begun their activities (4).

The Coronavirus required health controls in schools, which was affected by these preventive measures; the issue of courses management and learning processes around the world and in order to reduce rallies, the use of modern communication technologies was raised that changed the learning and implementation systems of distance education, online learning and electronic education in schools (5). The use of electronic devices, including computers, video, audio, virtual, and network, in the education process as e-learning (6). Benefits and constraints of e-learning include classroom independence at a specific time, comprehensiveness, learning, dynamism, up-to-date and educational needs at the desired time, and reduced cost and time (7). It also pointed to the high costs of launching and using computer equipment, the loss of cultural diversity and the absence of physical presence, and the use of tone language to give a fray (8). Therefore, educational experts and regulations repeatedly emphasized the re-implementation of in-person education. However, the World Health Organization and Disease Control and Prevention Centers (CDCs) and the Ministry of Health have prepared numerous health protocols to prevent and control COVID-19 for educational centers and students (9-12). However, various problems, such as the inadequate structure of some schools and the lack of personal protection equipment (PPE) (13, 14), It has caused severe increase in the number of infections patients and their negative consequences. So, the effective control and prevention management within these centers is necessary. For this reason, identifying and controlling the factors affecting the prevention of Corona in schools is essential to the use of efficient management theories. The most efficient methods of analyzing and evaluating organizations include the SWOT and QSPM matrix. SWOT initially; was used for overall systematic analysis in educational and managerial organizations (15). The QSPM matrix is also one of the common ways to evaluate strategic options and identify the relative attractiveness of the strategies used in decision-making (16). This requires managers to use more care and attention in weighting the criteria identified by SWOT and its analysis (17). This way, the best strategies are prioritized by quantifying sub-strategies (18).

2. Objectives

Now, due to the undesirable condition of the COVID-19 world in all countries of the world and the problems and challenges associated with environmental monitoring and health control of the illness in educational centers, The aim is to Identify and evaluate COVID-19 control strategies in Kashan schools using the SWOT and QSPM matrix.

3. Methods

The current study is a descriptive-analytical study using the internal and external environmental evaluation technique (SWOT and the QSPM) Model of Schools during the COVID-19 epidemic in 1399.

3.1. Identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats

The first step of this study was to evaluate the current situation, based on library studies and field studies, to identify all internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats. Books and health instructions were read to get better acquainted with school health, and then schools were visited. Environmental health workers conducted SWOT preliminary learning and its importance in health prevention for 25 school officials, and an expert team was formed. Then 25 school experts and administrators identified weaknesses, strengths, threats, and opportunities in 4 sessions.

In these meetings, the process of identifying and prioritizing factors affecting the spread of covid-19 was carried out by brainstorming and according to the school health checklists as well as the preventive knowledge and experiences of experts. These factors are recorded in Excel form.

The participants were 25 school administrators and health officials who had more than 15 years of experience, and their ages were between 50 - 38 years old. Environmental health experts who were proficient at school health inspections conducted the training.

3.2. SWOT Matrix Formulation Based on Registered Criteria

In the initial phase, the factors affecting the release of Corona in schools were categorized into four SWOT matrix groups, then evaluated internal and external factors (EFE) and prioritization of these issues based on their importance. In weight gaining and expressing the importance of each external strategic factor (threats and opportunities) and internal strategic factor (weaknesses and strengths) to factors of the highest importance, weight five and weight one were assigned to factors of the lowest importance. In order to normalize the weights specified in the previous stage, the coefficient of the validity of each internal or external factor was converted from a measure of one to five to zero and one because the sum of the coefficients must be one how the score is that the privilege of any strategic internal factor on a four-point scale (Very strong = four, strong = three, weak = two, and very weak = one) is determined by experts. The important point is the strengths of a score of 4 or 3 and the weaknesses of a score of 2 or 1. In this step, there is scoring on external strategic factors, except that scoring will be out of control due to the consistency power of the study. In other words, the factors that the study staff had a very good reaction with a score of 4, and the factors that were a very poor reaction were assigned a score of 1. According to the general guidelines, the degree assigned to the matrix of external factors is between 1 and 4 with an average of 2.5, with opportunities a score of 4 or 3 and threats 2 or 1. Finally, with the product of the rank of importance and the designated privilege, the rhythmic privileges of the internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) and external (threats and opportunities) were obtained. Finally, if the sum of the Matrix Points of the Organizational Factors was less than 2.5, It means the organization's weakness, and if was a more than 2.5, this shows that the strength of the organization in terms of internal factors. Similarly, in the matrix of external factors, a score of less than 2.5 indicates the overtaking of threats, and a score of more than 2.5 indicates opportunities.

3.3. Developing Control Strategies

After determining the score of the matrix of internal and external factors, the type of strategy to improve the status was determined (Table 1). Four strategies are interpreted as follows (2, 19, 20):

- SO strategy (offensive; with the privilege of internal and external factors more than 2.5) that all organizations are interested in being in this situation so that they can take the utmost external opportunities by taking advantage of internal strengths.

- ST strategy (competitive; domestic factors more than 2.5 and external factors less than 2.5); in this strategy, the organization uses its internal strengths to counter external threats.

- WO strategy (conservative; internal factors rating less than 2.5 and external factors rating more than 2.5) in which the organization uses external opportunities to offset internal weaknesses.

- WT strategy (defensive, with a privilege for internal and external factors less than 2.5) This is a risky strategy for the organization, and it should strive to limit internal weaknesses and be aware of external threats.

Finally, health workers have proposed useful methods to resolve problems and strengthen the opportunities and strengths of the organization.

Table 1.

SWOT Matrix

SWOTStrong Point (S)Weakness Points (W)
Opportunity (O)Area 1- Offensive strategies (SO)Area 3- Conservative strategies (WO)
Threats (T)Area 2- Competitive strategies (ST)Area 4- Defensive strategies (WT)

3.4. Prioritizing Strategies with QSPM

The quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) is used to determine the relative appeal of desirable alternative strategies by monitoring internal and external factors. Scientifically, QSPM expresses the relative attraction of various strategies using strengths and opportunities to eliminate weaknesses and prevent or reduce threats (2022).

The attractive table was formed by referring to the strategies provided by environmental health employees and school administrators. Thus, the rating of the attractiveness of each strategy was determined by the importance of each internal and external factor.

In other words, the rating of attractiveness is expressed as a numerical value designed to be the relative attractiveness of each strategy in a set of strategic options and demonstrates the importance of each factor and its range of 1 Up to 4 variables. The total attractiveness rating is obtained from the attractiveness score in the coefficient of the importance of each internal or external (EFE) (21, 22). Finally, the priority of strategies was calculated by the sum of the total value of the attractiveness of each strategy.

4. Results

The results of the SWOT matrix indicate 14 strengths, 11 weaknesses, ten opportunities, and ten threats in the schools under study (Tables 2 and 3). In total, 25 internal factors and 20 external factors were identified by the educational staff of schools with the guidance of environmental health experts. The most important strength of the classroom environment for the implementation of health protocols and the most important weakness of the delay in the implementation of health protocols. The lack of educational space was the vaccine of the system compared to the number of students, inadequate ventilation of classes and schools, and some households' lack of attention. The findings of this research determined that two factors of vaccination of school personnel and teachers and relative reduction of illness and design of assignments and performance tests with appropriate performance tests with the goals of education and culture, health issues among students are of the highest weight among the external opportunities of the system. However, the reduction of funding for disinfectants and disinfectants for some schools was recognized as the most effective threat to the organization.

Table 2.

Internal Factors Assessment Matrix (IFE)

RowStrengthsImportance CoefficientRank (3), (4)Rating = Weight × Rank
S1Existence of equipment necessary for the implementation of health protocols0.0630.18
S2School cadre health awareness0.0530.15
S3Intensifying the school environment intensification of the school environment regularly and frequently0.0530.15
S4Holding a series of family meetings focused on health issues in person and in person0.0430.12
S5The proper status of the classroom environment for the implementation of health protocols0.0540.2
S6The existence of a health expert in school0.0430.12
S7Corona's initial screening between school executives as well as students0.0330.09
S8Prohibition of entry into schools0.0430.12
S9Student health control in the field of emotional and emotional support0.0430.12
S10Sensitivity to personal hygiene by teachers and school staff0.0430.12
S11Preparation of the right time plan for classes (preventing overcrowding)0.0440.16
S12Illustration in different school spaces to maintain social distance0.0430.12
S13Use single-person benches for sitting in class students0.0430.12
S14Promotion of intellectual and creative games0.0330.09
RowWeaknessesImportance CoefficientRank (1), (2)Rating = Weight × Rank
W1Delay in the implementation of health protocols0.0520.1
W2Lack of educational space than the number of students0.0520.1
W3Cognitive Growth of Students in Elementary Schools0.0310.03
W4The misconception of some school cadres toward health issues0.0310.03
W5Inappropriate ventilation of classes and schools0.0520.1
W6Defects in disinfection of educational space by school servant0.0320.06
W7The lack of a dominant health instructor in some schools0.0320.06
W8The presence of a student's parents in the school courtyard (neglect of protocols)0.0310.03
W9Lack of attention to some households the vaccine0.0520.1
W10Lack of designing appropriate educational programs for students' physical education unit and lack of proper alternatives to it0.0210.02
W11Failure to pay attention to hidden education by teachers and coaches0.0310.03
Total12.45
Table 3.

External Factors Assessment Matrix (EFE)

RowOpportunitiesImportance CoefficientRank (3), (4)Rating = Weight × Rank
O1Vaccination of school personnel and teachers and relative reduction of illness0.0640.24
O2Automation of administrative and organizational processes, especially in the education0.0440.16
O3Increase inspection of health experts from school and school health conditions0.0730.21
O4Activate knowledge-based companies to replace virtual education according to school conditions during the Corona era0.0630.18
O5Special and special attention to the margins to increase their awareness of health behaviors by policymakers0.0530.15
O6Using a variety of capacities, such as mobilization and mobilization of mosques and universities in the education and prevention of Corona Disease in Schools0.5530.165
O7Easy access to the results of various research on health education to children during the Corona era0.0430.12
O8Designing homework and performance tests with the goals of education and culture of health issues among students0.5540.22
O9Increase media capacity for remote education in audiovisual0.0430.12
O10Holding meetings for managers on the issue of health through education0.0330.09
RowThreatsImportance CoefficientRank (1), (2)Rating = Weight × Rank
T1Failure to allocate funds for disinfectant and disinfectant for some schools0.0720.14
T2Failure to comply with some schools of general principles by the Department of Education0.0520.1
T3Existence of contradictory comments on the prevention of corona0.0420.08
T4Reducing students' mental health due to the lack of complete counseling beds0.0410.04
T5The existence of wrong patterns in the community for students in terms of behavior and unhealthy speech0.0520.1
T6The existence of various sanctions for the introduction of advanced health supplies and equipment needed for the school0.0620.12
T7Holding free training classes (entrance exams, language) regardless of protocols against school closures0.0520.1
T8Incomplete awareness and attitude of departments toward prevention0.0410.04
T9Failure to implement environmental health protocols by school services drivers0.0520.1
T10Parents' misconceptions about establishing in -person classes0.0410.04
Total12.515

The number of 2.45 of the total IFE matrix scores shows that the weaknesses of the existing weaknesses are the strengths of the school's understudy in the field of COVID-19. Of course, the proximity of this number to the numerical average of 2.5 determines a relatively low difference between strengths and weaknesses. Also, 2.515 from the EFE matrix determines that the organization has more opportunities to reduce internal weaknesses and external threats.

Based on the findings, the final strategy for implementing COVID-19 control measures in Kashan schools, A conservative strategy based on taking advantage of existing opportunities and reducing weaknesses to reduce the vulnerability caused by threats (Figure 1). Therefore, extracting conservative strategies (WO) is a priority in preparing strategies.

The strategic position of Kashan schools
The strategic position of Kashan schools

After determining the strategic status of the schools in the matrix of internal and external factors evaluation, the integration phase attempted to introduce effective strategies to improve the existing conditions by using Tables 1 and 2. The strategies selected based on SWOT analysis were weighed by environmental health employees using the QSPM matrix, and the attractiveness of these was determined (Table 4).

Table 4.

Prioritization of Selected Strategies

RowSelected StrategyAttractive ScorePriority
1System structuring and provision and upgrading of infrastructure equipment and facilities6.654
2Providing and upgrading health educational guidelines for teachers and students6.821
3Recruitment of a health instructor in schools6.712
4Developing and improving school and office cooperation6.623
5Tracking, deploying, and developing long-distance education systems5.975

5. Discussion

Given the importance of school health in the control of disease among students and the high vulnerability of this age group, the purpose of this research was to evaluate and investigate the COVID-19 control strategies in Kashan schools using the SWOT and QSPM matrix. So far, no study has been conducted on identifying and evaluating COVID-19 control strategies in schools. But studies have been conducted in other organizations during the Pandemic era of COVID-19. One of the studies by SWOT in the field of health and COVID-19 by Gholami in 1399, The formulation of urban crisis strategy and management focused on combating the Coronavirus with the emphasis on the role of professional health experts and HSE by SWOT matrix method studied: Shazand city (23). The title of formulating an effective strategy in the Coronavirus crisis management was emphasized by the role of NAJA in the Matrix (Case Study of Hamadan County) By calculating the final privileges for internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) and external (opportunities and threats) identified a favorable strategy for managing the COVID-19 virus crisis in Hamadan is a defensive strategy. In this regard, strategies such as developing a comprehensive crisis management program with the COVID-19 virus with the consultation of urban management specialists, and law enforcement, intensifying monitoring of hygiene protocols in people's gathering centers, appealing to the public transport fleet movement to reduce the number of passengers at stations and in transportation equipment, were provided in Hamadan (24). In a matrix of internal and external factors, weighing any of the SWOTs specified in the present study depends on the conditions of each region or country, so different answers can be achieved. According to the results in the matrix of internal and external factors, the total weight score column for external factors, including opportunities and threats, was 2.515, and for internal factors, including strengths and weaknesses, it was 2.45. Therefore, considering that both numbers are close to 2.5 acceptable values, it is necessary to plan to improve the control performance in similar encounters with Covid-19 in Kashan schools. Regarding the strengths and weaknesses, there is a relatively low difference between strengths and weaknesses, but the weaknesses are bolder than the strengths, and therefore the weaknesses should be reinforced and strengthened. The most important strengths of the classroom environment for implementing health protocols were: the necessary equipment for implementing health protocols and preparing the appropriate time for classes (prevention of congestion), and the most important weaknesses in the implementation of health protocols, lack of educational space over the number of students, inadequate ventilation of classes and schools, and the lack of attention by some households to the vaccine were identified. At the beginning of the spread of this disease, however, lack of knowledge about how the virus spreads and the confusion of managers in the methods of dealing with the Coronavirus caused some irregularities in the management of the illness, which is one of the threats to the system. As to analyzing external factors, it can be expressed that Kashan schools have more opportunities to reduce internal weaknesses and external threats, which should be properly taken to take advantage of opportunities. The most important identified opportunities for schools and teachers included vaccination and relative reduction of illness, an increased inspection of health experts from school and School health conditions, and design assignments and performance tests with educational and cultural goals of health issues among students, and the most important threats to the lack of funding for disinfectants and disinfectants for some schools and the existence of various sanctions for the introduction of advanced health equipment needed for the school.

5.1. Conclusions

According to the findings, the final strategy for implementing COVID-19 control regulation in Kashan schools is a conservative strategy based on reduced weaknesses and the use of existing opportunities to reduce the damage caused by threats. Accordingly, adopting strategies such as providing and upgrading health educational guidelines for teachers and students, system structure, providing and upgrading equipment and facilities, recruiting school health coaches, schools Developing and improving school and offices' outsourcing partnerships, and the pursuit, deployment, and development of telecommunications systems should be on the agenda. Given that this study used SWOT for the first time in the school of school health during the COVID-19 pandemic, the results cannot be compared with the results of other studies. According to these cases, it is suggested to design and implement the system for identifying weaknesses and threats of opportunities in line with health crises, while having a desirable monitoring structure to ensure the results.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. [PubMed ID: 31986264]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7159299]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.

  • 2.

    Olyaeemanesh A, Behzadifar M, Mousavinejhad N, Behzadifar M, Heydarvand S, Azari S, et al. Iran's Health System Transformation Plan: A SWOT analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018;32:39. [PubMed ID: 30159290]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6108248]. https://doi.org/10.14196/mjiri.32.39.

  • 3.

    Hesami Arani M, Bagheri S, Ghaneian MT. The Role of Environmental Education in Increasing the Awareness of Primary School Students and Reducing Environmental Risks. J Environ Health Sustain Dev. 2016;1(1):9-17.

  • 4.

    Salimi S, Fardin MA. [The Role of Corona Virus In Virtual Education, with an Emphasis on Opportunities and Challenges]. Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2020;8(2):49-60. Persian. https://doi.org/10.30473/etl.2020.53489.3249.

  • 5.

    Rahbari R, Saadatmand Z. [Performance comparison of education in Indonesia, China, Australia and Germany during the Covid-19 epidemic and school closures]. New advances in educational management. 2021;4(1):43-52. Persian.

  • 6.

    Kia A. [Take a look at virtual learning]. Social Science Month Book. 2010;24(12). Persian.

  • 7.

    Farhadi R. [E-learning A new paradigm in the age of information]. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2005;21(1):49-66. Persian.

  • 8.

    Shahbeigi F, Nazari S. [Virtual education: Benefits and limitations]. J Med Educ Dev. 2012;6(1):47-54. Persian.

  • 9.

    Tenforde MW, Billig Rose E, Lindsell CJ, Shapiro NI, Files DC, Gibbs KW, et al. Characteristics of Adult Outpatients and Inpatients with COVID-19 - 11 Academic Medical Centers, United States, March-May 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(26):841-6. [PubMed ID: 32614810]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7332092]. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6926e3.

  • 10.

    Self WH, Tenforde MW, Stubblefield WB, Feldstein LR, Steingrub JS, Shapiro NI, et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Frontline Health Care Personnel in a Multistate Hospital Network - 13 Academic Medical Centers, April-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(35):1221-6. [PubMed ID: 32881855]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7470460]. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6935e2.

  • 11.

    Toquero CM. Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context. Pedagogical Res. 2020;5(4):em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947.

  • 12.

    Fox MD, Bailey DC, Seamon MD, Miranda ML. Response to a COVID-19 Outbreak on a University Campus - Indiana, August 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(4):118-22. [PubMed ID: 33507894]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7842813]. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7004a3.

  • 13.

    Heidari A, Miresmaeili A, Poormohammadi A, Bashirian S, Meschi M, Karkehabadi H, et al. Management of Dental School During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Application of Intervention Mapping. Front Public Health. 2021;9:685678. [PubMed ID: 34869137]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8634935]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.685678.

  • 14.

    Farsi Z, Sajadi SA, Afaghi E, Fournier A, Aliyari S, Ahmadi Y, et al. Explaining the experiences of nursing administrators, educators, and students about education process in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):151. [PubMed ID: 34416886]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8377325]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00666-4.

  • 15.

    Wang J, Wang Z. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of China's Prevention and Control Strategy for the COVID-19 Epidemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7). [PubMed ID: 32225019]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7178153]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072235.

  • 16.

    Fuertes G, Alfaro M, Vargas M, Gutierrez S, Ternero R, Sabattin J. Conceptual Framework for the Strategic Management: A Literature Review—Descriptive. J Eng. 2020;2020:6253013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6253013.

  • 17.

    Shojaie M, Hamidian M, Basiji A. Strategy Planning Using SWOT Analysis and QSPM Model A Case Study of Baridsoft Company (One of the top and leader companies of Iranian software industry). Int J Sci Manag Dev. 2014;2(7):252-7.

  • 18.

    Aramesh H, Beigi Firuzi AY, Sargolzaiee AR. [Special Economic Zone based on SWOT Analysis and Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)]. Public Manag Res. 2018;11(40):109-36. Persian. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2018.4296.

  • 19.

    Çınar F, Eren E, Mendeş H. Decentralization in Health Services and its Impacts: SWOT Analysis of Current Applications in Turkey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;99:711-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.542.

  • 20.

    Setyorini H, Santoso I. Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Menggunakan Matriks SWOT dan QSPM (Studi Kasus: Restoran WS Soekarno Hatta Malang). Ind J Teknol dan Manaj Agroindustri. 2017;5(1):46-53. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2016.005.01.6.

  • 21.

    Wati N, Siswoyo B, Wardana L. Development Strategy of Mangrove Conservation and Ecotourism BeejayBakau Resort. IOSR J Bus Manag. 2016;18(5):116-22.

  • 22.

    David ME, David FR, David FR. The quantitative strategic planning matrix: a new marketing tool. J Strateg Mark. 2017;25(4):342-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2016.1148763.

  • 23.

    Gholami S. Development of strategy and management of urban crisis with a focus on the fight against Coronavirus with emphasis on the role of occupational health experts and HSE by matrix method (SWOT studied: Shazand city). Sixth National Conference on Safety, Health and Environment (HSE). 2021; Tehran. 2021.

  • 24.

    Movagharpak A. [Development of an Effective Strategy in Corona Virus Crisis Management with Emphasis on the Role of NAJA Based on SWOT Matrix Method (Case Study of Hamadan)]. Police Cultural Studies. 2020;7(3):29-44. Persian.