Pyogenic liver abscess is a common infectious disease of the liver, and early diagnosis is difficult. Severe sepsis, septic shock, and other serious life-threatening diseases could make the treatment time longer. In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of the disease became difficult due to the following reasons: the increase of diabetes, malignant tumor, biliary tract disease, and abdominal infectious diseases; the production of multiple drug-resistant and highly virulent pathogens; and the increased number of interventional operations in the digestive system. There are many ways for pathogens to invade the liver and lead to liver abscess. Biliary tract infection is the most common cause of liver abscess, followed by intestinal or pelvic diseases (
6,
7). Because of its route of transmission, pathogens mostly come from the digestive system and abdominal cavity. The main pathogenic bacteria of liver abscess in western countries are
E. coli,
K. pneumoniae,
Enterococcus, and
Streptococcus (
5). In Asia,
K. pneumoniae is the main pathogen. A study showed that
K. pneumoniae is the main infection in the east region in China (
4).
Pyogenic liver abscess caused by
F. nucleatum is extremely rare, and as far as we investigated, there is no relevant case report in China.
F. nucleatum is a common Gram-negative obligate anaerobe that mainly colonizes the human oral cavity and digestive tract. It can lead to brain abscess, appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, etc. (
8,
9). There are related cases reported that liver abscess caused by
F. nucleatum may be due to poor oral hygiene (
10) or oral diseases (
11,
12). Digestive system diseases such as sigmoid diverticulitis (
13) and abdominal scar (
14) may also be the cause of liver abscess caused by
F. nucleatum. In our case, the patient had a good oral hygiene and there were no digestive system diseases. So, there was no typical pathogenic cause.
Diagnosis of
F. nucleatum infection usually requires culture of the pathogen. However, due to the strict anaerobic environment required for culture and the high requirement for specimen collection, sometimes the pathogens could not be cultured. In a case report by Jayasimhan et al., they did not culture
F. nucleatum from pus, but found it through blood culture (
15). They considered that the delay in pus sampling and early anti-microbial treatment could affect the culture results. In this case, there was also no pathogen cultured from the pus, which made the further diagnosis and treatment of the disease difficult. Through NGS, the pathogen was finally identified as
F. nucleatum.
In NGS, also known as high-throughput sequencing, metagenomic NGS is commonly used in microbial detection. As there is currently no uniform standard in the clinic, it has not become the recommended test, but we can use its advantages to solve practical problems. In 2014, a laboratory in the United States successfully used the NGS to detect
Leptospira from a 14-year-old boy's cerebrospinal fluid, and timely anti-infective treatment saved his life. Five months later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed their diagnosis by serological method (
16). In this case, because the pathogen could not be cultured, NGS of pus was used to identify the pathogen, which provided an important basis for further targeted anti-infective treatment. We believe that the failure to culture the pathogen may be related to empirical medication during the initial stage of treatment. The use of antibiotics in early treatment inhibited the pathogenic bacteria. NGS results showed that the relative abundance of
F. nucleatum was not high, which confirmed our inference.
3.1. Conclusion
Our case report is valuable mainly for these reasons. Firstly, this is the first case of liver abscess caused by F. nucleatum in China. Secondly, in this case, we identified the pathogen and successfully cured the patient without culturing pathogenic bacteria. The idea of diagnosis and treatment can be used as a reference. Thirdly, this case reminds us that in order to improve the positive rate of anaerobic bacteria culture, we should pay attention to avoid contacting with air in the process of specimen collection when the pathogenic bacteria are suspected to be anaerobic bacteria. Finally, as a new microbial detection method, NGS can still be helpful in clinical practice, although it has not been widely used.