Carbapenem resistance in
P. aeruginosa strains poses a significant clinical challenge, as carbapenems have been widely considered the most potent and effective agents against MDR
P. aeruginosa strains. However, there has been a recent rise in the prevalence of carbapenem resistance among
P. aeruginosa strains globally, including in Turkey (
13,
16,
17). According to the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (
18), the lowest rate of carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa was observed in Oceania (5.1% - 7.1%), while the highest rates were found in the Middle East (27.9% - 19.5%). Resistance rates were 30.7% in South America, 28.0% in Europe, 24.4% in North America, 22.8% in Africa, and 18.1% in Asia (
19). A meta-analysis conducted in Turkey reported a pooled prevalence of 30.1% for resistance against meropenem and 28.0% for imipenem (
17). Among carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa clinical strains, MBLs are the most common type of carbapenemases. VIMs are the most widely distributed (Middle East, South America, Africa), followed by IMPs and NDMs (
20).
Kazmierczak et al. studied carbapenemases in
P. aeruginosa strains collected from 96 medical centers across 18 European countries. They found that 13.4% of the strains carried MBLs, with VIM being the most prevalent (
21). In Turkey,
P. aeruginosa strains exhibit various types of MBLs, including VIM-1, VIM-2, VIM-5, and IMP (
22-
25). The first isolation of NDM-1-producing
P. aeruginosa was reported in 2011 in Serbia, and subsequent cases of NDM-positive strains have been identified in Italy, France, Egypt, and Slovakia (
26-
30). In Turkey, a few
P. aeruginosa strains producing NDM-1 have been identified (
24,
31). However, in our study, no NDM-1-positive strains were detected, suggesting that the presence of NDM-1 may be limited to a localized area. In the current study, the detection rate of MBLs was 24.5%, with VIM being the most common type. These findings highlight the high prevalence of carbapenemase genes among the strains, emphasizing the importance of their detection as they can easily disseminate among bacterial strains. Ongoing surveillance is necessary to identify potential outbreaks.
Efflux pump overexpression, particularly MexXY, and MexAB-OprM, contributes to increased resistance to carbapenems in
P. aeruginosa strains (
6). The reported prevalence rates of efflux pump overexpression in carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains range from 37.5% to 80.9% (
13,
32,
33). In a Turkish study, efflux pump overexpression was found in 47.6% of carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains (
34). It is worth noting that meropenem is a substrate for efflux pumps (
35). In the presence of PaβN, approximately 35.9% of the strains under investigation exhibited a significant decrease in meropenem MICs, irrespective of the presence of any MBL genes. The efflux pump plays a crucial role in conferring carbapenem resistance in the strains examined. However, it is important to acknowledge that our study had limitations, including the lack of information regarding the expression of AmpC, other class C beta-lactamases, efflux pumps, and oprD gene mutations.
Treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains poses a challenge due to their increased antibiotic resistance. Consistent with previous studies, these strains exhibit elevated resistance to various antibiotic groups, including quinolones, cephalosporins, and penicillins (
16,
17). In our study, we assessed the
in vitro activity of C/A against carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains and observed that the MICs of C/A were 2 - 4 times lower than the MICs for CAZ alone. This aligns with other
in vitro studies that have demonstrated a smaller MIC for CZA compared to CAZ alone, indicating increased susceptibility of
P. aeruginosa to C/A (
36).
The susceptibility rates of carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains to C/T and C/A were 89.3% and 91.2%, respectively. In previous reports, carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains demonstrated susceptibility rates ranging from 51.8% to 92% for C/A and 65.4% to 94% for C/T (
7,
37-
40). Many studies have consistently shown higher susceptibility rates for C/T compared to C/A among carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains (
7,
37,
38,
41). However, in contrast to these previous studies, our findings indicate that C/A exhibited greater activity than C/T against carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains.
Our results align with those of Sader et al., who observed higher susceptibility rates for C/A (86.5%) compared to C/T (66.2%) among meropenem non-susceptible
P. aeruginosa strains (
40). This difference in susceptibility between C/A and C/T may be attributed to the ability of avibactam to suppress class A β-lactamases, class C β-lactamases, and class D β-lactamases, which is not seen with tazobactam (
42). Moreover, variations in the activity of C/A compared to C/T among
P. aeruginosa strains reflect the diverse resistance mechanisms expressed by these organisms, highlighting how these mechanisms can have different impacts on the efficacy of these two combinations.
Carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains were isolated from 2019 to 2021 across 17 centers in 12 countries as part of the ERACE-PA Global Surveillance Program. Among these strains, the most commonly identified carbapenemase genotype was VIM. The observed susceptibility rates of VIM-positive strains to C/T and C/A were 1% and 4%, respectively (
20). In the ATLAS global surveillance program, which collected 214 MBL-positive
P. aeruginosa strains from 2017 to 2019, 4.2% of the strains were found to be susceptible to C/A (
18). Lomovskaya et al. determined that the susceptibility rates of MBLs-producing
P. aeruginosa strains to C/T and C/A were 1.6% and 4.9%, respectively (
43). Within our collection, VIM is the predominant carbapenemase produced by carbapenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains.
The susceptibility rates to C/T and C/A among MBL-positive strains were 55.1% and 62.4%, respectively. Adam and Elhag previously reported the presence of MBL genes in carbapenem-sensitive Gram-negative strains, suggesting the potential presence of hidden MBL genes (
44). In our study, we identified MBL genes in strains that were reported as susceptible to C/T and C/A, indicating that these strains may serve as reservoirs for these resistance genes, posing a potential risk for silent dissemination in both community and hospital settings. The emergence of meropenem resistance in our clinical strains of
P. aeruginosa, where efflux pump activity was not detected, may be attributed to constitutive overproduction of the cephalosporinase AmpC or non-enzymatic mechanisms such as outer membrane impermeability. However, it is essential to note that our study did not analyze these resistance mechanisms in meropenem-resistant
P. aeruginosa strains, which is a limitation of our findings.
5.1. Conclusions
In this study, the main mechanism associated with carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains is the PAβN-sensitive efflux pump. Among the acquired carbapenemases in P. aeruginosa strains, VIM-type enzymes are the most commonly observed with a worldwide distribution. C/T and C/A have demonstrated their retained in vitro potency against clinical strains of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa collected from hospitalized patients in Turkey. These findings suggest that C/T and C/A may play a potentially important role in the management of P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by carbapenem-resistant strains. However, it is crucial to consider local susceptibility patterns and antibiotic susceptibility test results when deciding on the usage of C/T and C/A, as is the case with all antimicrobials.