The Impact of Bacterial Co-infection on Hospitalized Children with Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections: A Retrospective Analytical Cross-sectional Study

authors:

avatar Qing Wan 1 , avatar Ya-wei Li 1 , avatar Ying Cheng 2 , avatar Hongbo Hu ORCID 1 , *

Department of Laboratory, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
Department of Pediatrics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China

How To Cite Wan Q, Li Y, Cheng Y, Hu H. The Impact of Bacterial Co-infection on Hospitalized Children with Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections: A Retrospective Analytical Cross-sectional Study. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2023;16(9):e139106. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-139106.

Abstract

Background:

Human rhinovirus (HRV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are common viral causes of pediatric respiratory tract infections. Bacterial co-infections frequently complicate HRV and hMPV illnesses in children, but the interactions between viral and bacterial pathogens and their impacts on disease severity are not well understood.

Objectives:

The present research aimed to analyze and compare the clinical features of HRV and hMPV mono-infections in hospitalized children and to assess the impact of bacterial co-infection on the disease severity of HRV and hMPV infections.

Methods:

The present retrospective analytical cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the clinical features between HRV and hMPV mono-infections and HRV and hMPV with bacterial co-infections in hospitalized children aged 14 years or younger.

Results:

Between January and December 2022, we investigated 1,978 children hospitalized with HRV infection, of which 1,529 had HRV mono-infection and 1,117 hospitalized with hMPV infection, among whom 910 had hMPV mono-infection. Compared to HRV, hMPV mono-infection exhibited more pronounced symptoms of fever, cough, and rales in most age groups, while HRV showed more wheezing. Except in patients ≥ 6 years old, hMPV was more associated with pneumonia and longer hospitalizations. In contrast to HRV mono-infections, children with bacterial co-infections had a higher proportion of coughs (P < 0.001), pneumonia (P < 0.001), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions (P < 0.001), and longer hospitalizations (P = 0.003). Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatments showed no significant differences between patients with hMPV mono-infection and co-infection.

Conclusions:

Among hospitalized children, hMPV mono-infection resulted in more severe respiratory illnesses compared to HRV mono-infection. Bacterial co-infections exacerbated disease severity in HRV infections.

1. Background

Human rhinovirus (HRV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are the leading causative agents of acute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) in humans throughout the world, regardless of age group (1-5). In China, the reported frequency of HRV infection in children was 4.79% - 27.4%, while the frequency of hMPV infection was about 1.5% - 7.9% (3-5). Both infections with HRV and hMPV can cause a variety of respiratory tract infections, ranging from mild upper respiratory tract disease, i.e., laryngitis, to tracheitis, bronchitis, and severe pneumonitis. While their clinical manifestations may overlap, there are likely differences in symptoms and severity between HRV and hMPV alone. It is not unusual for both bacterial and viral pathogens to be present during infections of the respiratory system that cause conditions like pneumonia, bronchitis, and the common cold (6, 7). HRV and hMPV are often found to co-infect with other respiratory pathogens (2, 4). However, the clinical characteristics and manifestations of these viral-bacterial co-infections are not well understood. In particular, the specific interactions between pathogens and their contribution to disease severity need to be further elucidated through research.

2. Objectives

The present study aimed to analyze and compare the clinical features of HRV and hMPV mono-infections in hospitalized children, evaluate the rates of bacterial co-detection in HRV and hMPV infections, assess the impact of bacterial co-infection on the disease severity of HRV and hMPV infections, and analyze differences in disease characteristics and outcomes between viral mono-infections and viral-bacterial co-infections among hospitalized pediatric patients.

3. Methods

3.1. Patient Selection

This study retrospectively enrolled hospitalized children aged 14 years or younger with ARIs from the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province in Wuhan between January and December 2022. ARIs were categorized as pneumonia, bronchitis, or upper respiratory infection based on clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, and chest X-ray results where available. Specifically, pneumonia was defined as the presence of fever, cough, tachypnea, breathing difficulties, and lung infiltrates on chest X-rays. Bronchitis was defined as cough, wheezing, rhonchi, and absence of infiltrates on chest X-rays.

Upper respiratory infections were defined as rhinorrhea, pharyngitis, and absence of auscultatory findings and infiltrates on chest X-rays when performed. Disease severity between the different infection groups was determined based on several predefined criteria, including the incidence of pneumonia, the utilization of mechanical ventilation, the rate of admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and the increased duration of hospitalization. We analyzed digital clinical data, including demographic, epidemiological, diagnostic, and laboratory information.

3.2. Respiratory Virus Detection

Nasopharyngeal secretions or alveolar lavage fluid collected within 24 hours after admissions were analyzed. A panel of respiratory viruses, including influenza A and B, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human parainfluenza virus, HRV, hPMV, human coronaviruses (NL63, OC43, 229E, and HKU1), human adenovirus, human bocavirus (HBoV), Mycoplasma pneumonia, and Chlamydia, were detected in these patients using commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) capillary electrophoresis kits (Ningbo Haiers Gene Technology Co., Ltd., China).

3.3. Microbial Culture and Identification

Bacterial co-infections were identified through evidence from sterile sites, such as bronchoalveolar lavage, or nonsterile sites, like sputum and nasopharyngeal swabs.

Twenty-four hours after admission, microbial culture and identification processes were carried out in accordance with the routine diagnostic standard operating procedures applied in the clinical laboratory of this hospital: Bronchoalveolar lavage or sputum was collected from patients suspected of ARI and then cultured. Blood, chocolate, and MacConkey plates were employed for the inoculation of the samples. The blood and chocolate plates were incubated for 72 hours or until observing a positive result in a carbon dioxide incubator at a concentration of 5 - 10%. The MacConkey plate was also put into an incubator at 35°C - 37°C for 24 to 48 hours. Afterward, Bruker matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was used to determine positive cultures at the species level (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany).

3.4. Exclusion Criteria

The exclusion criteria in the present research included (1) patients with chronic pulmonary diseases possibly influencing the chest X-ray results, aspiration pneumonia, or interstitial lung disease; (2) patients with compromised immune systems or those taking immunosuppressive medications; (3) patients with a suspected nosocomial or fungal infection; and (4) patients with insufficient clinical data.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons of the frequencies among groups were conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the mean values between groups. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Comparison of the Clinical Data Between Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Mono-infections

Between January and December 2022, we investigated 1,978 children hospitalized with HRV infection, of which 1,529 had HRV mono-infection and 1,117 were hospitalized with hMPV infection, among whom 910 had hMPV mono-infection. As demonstrated in Table 1, the male proportion of patients with HRV mono-infection was greater (61.4%, 939/1529) than that of patients with hMPV mono-infection (54.9%, 500/910) (P = 0.002). Compared to HRV, hMPV mono-infection exhibited more pronounced symptoms of fever, cough, and rales in most age groups, while HRV showed more wheezing. Except in patients ≥ 6 years old, hMPV was more associated with pneumonia and longer hospitalizations.

Table 1.

Comparison of the Clinical Characteristics Between Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Mono-infections

Clinical DataHRV (n = 299)hMPV (n = 119)PHRV (n = 492)hMPV (n = 254)PHRV (n = 580)hMPV (n = 501)PHRV (n = 158)hMPV (n = 36)P
Demography
Age (y)< 11 - 23 - 5≥ 6
Sex, male198 (66.2)87 (73.1)0.172320 (65.0)138 (54.3)0.004335 (57.8)255 (50.9)0.02486 (54.4)20 (55.6)0.903
Clinical presentation
Fever159 (53.2)84 (70.6)0.001339 (68.9)237 (93.3)< 0.001397 (68.4)471 (94.0)< 0.001108 (68.4)28 (77.8)0.265
Cough260 (87.0)117 (98.3)0.001392 (79.7)240 (94.5)< 0.001486 (83.8)479 (95.6)< 0.001121 (76.6)34 (94.4)0.029
Wheezing97 (32.4)64 (53.8)< 0.001172 (35.0)79 (31.1)0.291149 (25.7)82 (16.4)< 0.00125 (15.8)4 (11.1)0.648
Rales144 (48.2)102 (85.7)< 0.001209 (42.5)184 (72.4)< 0.001224 (38.6)340 (67.9)< 0.00148 (30.4)13 (36.1)0.504
Diagnosis
Pneumonia159 (53.2)88 (73.9)< 0.001243 (49.4)207 (81.5)< 0.001296 (51.0)399 (79.6)< 0.00179 (50.0)31 (86.1)< 0.001
Bronchitis61 (20.4)27 (22.7)0.60589 (18.1)36 (14.2)0.17593 (16.0)64 (12.8)0.12922 (13.9)2 (5.6)0.273
Upper respiratory infection82 (27.4)7 (5.9)< 0.001148 (30.1)17 (6.7)< 0.001179 (30.9)40 (8.0)< 0.00155 (34.8)4 (11.1)0.010
Bronchial asthma0 (0.0)0 (0.0)-3 (0.6)0 (0.0)0.55516 (2.8)4 (0.8)0.0319 (5.7)1 (2.8)0.766
Treatment
Oxygen support12 (4.0)8 (6.7)0.24228 (5.7)13 (5.1)0.74527 (4.7)8 (1.6)0.00510 (6.3)0 (0.0)0.213
Mechanical ventilation12 (4.0)6 (5.0)0.64014 (2.8)8 (3.1)0.81611 (1.9)0 (0.0)0.0012 (1.3)2 (5.6)0.325
PICU admission16 (5.4)12 (10.1)0.08116 (3.3)13 (5.1)0.21114 (2.4)2 (0.4)0.0132 (1.3)0 (0.0)1.000
Hospitalization length of stay (d)5.18 ± 2.6686.03 ± 3.3100.0074.83 ± 1.7805.54 ± 1.951< 0.0014.86 ± 1.8795.26 ± 1.541< 0.0015.00 ± 3.1095.08 ± 2.1430.879
Antibiotic use prior to hospitalization, n (%)133 (44.5)59 (49.6)0.345245 (49.8)176 (69.3)< 0.001340 (58.6)376 (75.0)< 0.001107 (67.7)25 (69.4)0.841

4.2. Bacterial Co-pathogens Detected in Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections

Among the 1,978 children infected with HRV, 63 (3.2%) had bacterial co-infections. Of the 1,117 children infected with hMPV, 49 (4.4%) had bacterial co-infections. In hMPV co-infected cases, Streptococcus pneumoniae had the highest detection rate (n = 36, 73.5%), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (n = 11, 22.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2, 4.1%). The co-infection rate of hMPV and S. pneumoniae was significantly higher than that of HRV (P = 0.015). The bacterial pathogens detected in co-infections are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Bacterial Co-pathogens Detected in Human Rhinovirus and Human Metapneumovirus Infections a

With BacteriaHRV (n = 63)hMPV (n = 49)P
Total infection cases63 (3.2)49 (4.4)0.086
Streptococcus pneumoniae32 (50.8)36 (73.5)0.015
Klebsiella pneumoniae2 (3.2)0 (0.0)0.503
Staphylococuus aureus5 (7.9)0 (0.0)0.067
Haemophilus influenzae23 (36.5)11 (22.4)0.108
Pseudomonas aeruginosa1 (1.6)2 (4.1)0.825

4.3. Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients with Human Rhinovirus Mono-infection and Co-infection

We conducted statistical analysis on various clinical data of patients with HRV mono-infection and co-infection (Table 3). There was a statistical difference in the age distribution between HRV mono-infection and HRV co-infection with bacteria (P = 0.002). Children with bacterial co-infections had a higher proportion of coughs (P < 0.001), rales (P = 0.002), pneumonia (P < 0.001), PICU admissions (P < 0.001), and longer hospitalizations (P = 0.003).

Table 3.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between Patients with Human Rhinovirus Mono-infection and Co-infection

Clinical DataWith Bacteria (n = 63)Mono-infection (n = 1529)P
Demography
Sex, male41 (65.1)939 (61.4)0.558
Age (y)0.002
< 113 (20.6)299 (19.6)
1 - 29 (14.3)492 (32.2)
3 - 527 (42.9)580 (37.9)
≥ 614 (22.2)158 (10.3)
Clinical presentation
Fever, No. (%)37 (58.7)1003 (65.6)0.262
Cough, No. (%)63 (100.0)1259 (82.3)< 0.001
Wheezing22 (34.9)443 (29.0)0.309
Rales37 (58.7)625 (40.9)0.005
Diagnosis
Pneumonia48 (76.2)777 (50.8)< 0.001
Bronchitis10 (15.9)265 (17.3)0.764
Upper respiratory infection9 (14.3)464 (30.3)0.006
Bronchial asthma2 (3.2)28 (1.8)0.767
Treatment
Oxygen support4 (6.3)77 (5.0)0.863
Mechanical ventilation4 (6.3)39 (2.6)0.154
PICU admission8 (12.7)48 (3.1)< 0.001
Hospitalization length of stay (d)6.24 ± 3.4024.93 ± 2.1810.003
Antibiotic use prior to hospitalization35 (55.6)825 (54.0)0.803

4.4. Comparison of Clinical Data Between Patients with Human Metapneumovirus Mono-infection and Patients with Co-infection

As shown in Table 4, demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatments showed no significant difference between patients with hMPV mono-infection and those with co-infection.

Table 4.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics Between Patients with Human Metapneumovirus Mono-infection and Patients with Co-infection

Clinical DataWith Bacteria (n = 49)Mono-infection (n = 910)P
Demography
Sex, male24 (49.0)500 (54.9)0.414
Age (y)
< 16 (12.2)119 (13.1)0.230
1 - 219 (38.8)254 (27.9)
3 - 521 (42.9)501 (55.1)
≥ 63 (6.1)36 (4.0)
Clinical presentation
Fever42 (85.7)820 (90.1)0.320
Cough48 (98.0)870 (95.6)0.666
Wheezing9 (18.4)229 (25.2)0.283
Rales38 (77.6)639 (70.2)0.273
Diagnosis
Pneumonia43 (87.8)725 (79.7)0.167
Bronchitis4 (8.2)129 (14.2)0.330
Upper respiratory infection3 (6.1)68 (7.5)0.943
Bronchial asthma1 (2.0)5 (0.5)0.719
Treatment
Oxygen support3 (6.1)29 (3.3)0.480
Mechanical ventilation2 (4.1)16 (1.8)0.531
PICU admission2 (4.1)27 (3.0)0.988
Hospitalization length of stay (d)5.96 ± 2.7845.43 ± 2.0090.196
Antibiotic use prior to hospitalization35 (55.6)825 (54.0)0.803

5. Discussion

Compared to HRV, in most age groups, hMPV infection exhibited more severe symptoms like fever, cough, and rales, while HRV manifested more wheezing. The increased pneumonia and hospitalization associated with hMPV suggest it is a generally more severe infection. Previous reports have compared the severity of hMPV infection to other respiratory viruses, such as HBoV and RSV, based on indicators including pneumonia incidence, mechanical ventilation use, PICU admission rates, and hospitalization duration. These studies have suggested that hMPV causes less severe illness than HBoV but more severe illness than RSV (8, 9).

The reasons for these differences are likely attributable to variations in viral properties and immune responses between hMPV, HBoV, and RSV. Specifically, one study characterized the relationship between neonatal rhinovirus infection and type 2 inflammation in a neonatal HRV model. In contrast, another study found that hMPV-infected children had increased T-helper type 1 (Th1) responses compared to controls (10, 11). Thus, differences in immune responses elicited by different respiratory viruses, as evidenced by these studies, may contribute to variations in clinical severity. Further research is needed to elucidate the viral and immunological factors underlying the spectrum of disease severity caused by common pediatric respiratory viruses.

Compared to previous literature, the bacterial co-infection rate in this study is lower than reports from other regions (8, 12), which can be due to several possible reasons:

- The present investigation was conducted in 2022. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Wuhan government still had relatively strict control measures during this period, with less population mobility, and local residents took more stringent personal protective measures. In fact, the co-infection rate in our study is only slightly lower than other studies from the same time period (13).

- Antibiotic use was prevalent among patients before hospitalization.

- There were differences in epidemiological characteristics across regions.

- Some patients with respiratory symptoms did not undergo bacterial pathogen testing.

While HRV also had a high co-infection rate with S.pneumoniae at 50.8%, hMPV demonstrated an even higher rate at 73.5%, indicating a particular affinity between hMPV and S. pneumoniae. Possible factors include hMPV more extensively damaging airways and impairing mucociliary clearance compared to HRV, allowing greater bacterial adhesion (14, 15). It is possible that hMPV also induces defects in specific immune pathways that favor S. pneumoniae infection (15). Streptococcus pneumoniae infection could potentially enhance hMPV replication to a greater degree as well (16). The differences in co-infection rates suggest variations in viral properties that specifically promote synergism with S. pneumoniae.

The impact of co-infection on ARI severity remains controversial (17, 18). A previous study did not find significant clinical differences between HBoV infection and HBoV co-infection (17). However, another study reported increased PICU admission rates associated with RSV and bacterial co-infection (18). The discrepant findings indicate that the effects of co-infection may depend on the specific viruses and bacteria involved. Further research is needed to clarify which combinations of viruses and bacteria lead to more severe clinical manifestations. Carefully designed studies comparing clinical characteristics of sole viral infections, sole bacterial infections, and specific viral-bacterial co-infections are warranted. Such research will help elucidate the underlying mechanisms of disease exacerbation by viral-bacterial co-infections in pediatric ARIs.

In our study, children co-infected with HRV and bacteria had more severe illnesses compared to those with HRV infection alone. The co-infected group had significantly higher rates of cough, rales, pneumonia, PICU admissions, and longer hospitalizations. This is possibly due to bacterial infections increasing airway inflammation caused by HRV through the release of endotoxins and cytokines (19, 20). In contrast, though hMPV causes more severe illnesses in children than HRV, bacterial co-infections do not appear to worsen hMPV disease. One hypothesis is that the cytotoxic effects induced by hMPV infection on the respiratory epithelium may play a more important role in determining disease severity, outweighing additional damage due to bacterial co-pathogens (21), which differs from HRV-bacterial co-infections, where synergistic interactions between virus and bacteria further impair respiratory tract defense mechanisms (22).

Co-infections may worsen hMPV disease in high-risk subgroups, similar to those with underlying conditions. However, current evidence suggests that preventing bacterial co-infections may not improve outcomes for otherwise healthy children with hMPV. The viral pathogenesis itself appears most important, which highlights key differences between hMPV and HRV and shows that bacterial co-infections cannot always be assumed to worsen viral respiratory illnesses. More research is required on the complex interplay between specific viruses, bacteria, and the host immune response.

This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design meant that certain potential confounding variables, including household crowding, recent contact with sick siblings or other individuals with respiratory symptoms, and passive smoke exposure, were not systematically captured in the medical records, which may have influenced the findings. Second, a high proportion of children received antibiotics prior to hospitalization. Though antibiotic usage rates were comparable across most control groups, this pretreatment could have introduced bias into the statistical analyses. Third, missing respiratory pathogen data for a subset of patients due to lack of testing led to incomplete epidemiologic data. Finally, the data collected during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention stage may only reflect pathogen prevalence patterns specific to this time period.

5.1. Conclusions

In conclusion, hMPV infections in hospitalized children appear to be more severe than HRV infections. Bacterial co-infections with HRV, but not hMPV, aggravate disease.

References

  • 1.

    Zhao Y, Lu R, Shen J, Xie Z, Liu G, Tan W. Comparison of viral and epidemiological profiles of hospitalized children with severe acute respiratory infection in Beijing and Shanghai, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):729. [PubMed ID: 31429710]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6701130]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4385-5.

  • 2.

    Awad S, Khader Y, Mansi M, Yusef D, Alawadin S, Qudah W, et al. Viral surveillance of children with acute respiratory infection in two main hospitals in Northern Jordan, Irbid, during winter of 2016. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2020;15(1):1-10. [PubMed ID: 32300275]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7117070]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692972.

  • 3.

    Tang X, Dai G, Jiang X, Wang T, Sun H, Chen Z, et al. Clinical characteristics of pediatric respiratory tract infection and respiratory pathogen isolation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:759213. [PubMed ID: 35071128]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8767000]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.759213.

  • 4.

    Lei C, Yang L, Lou CT, Yang F, SiTou KI, Hu H, et al. Viral etiology and epidemiology of pediatric patients hospitalized for acute respiratory tract infections in Macao: a retrospective study from 2014 to 2017. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):306. [PubMed ID: 33771128]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7995389]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05996-x.

  • 5.

    Cong S, Wang C, Wei T, Xie Z, Huang Y, Tan J, et al. Human metapneumovirus in hospitalized children with acute respiratory tract infections in Beijing, China. Infect Genet Evol. 2022;106:105386. [PubMed ID: 36372116]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105386.

  • 6.

    Smith AP, Lane LC, Ramirez Zuniga I, Moquin DM, Vogel P, Smith AM. Increased virus dissemination leads to enhanced lung injury but not inflammation during influenza-associated secondary bacterial infection. FEMS Microbes. 2022;3:xtac022. [PubMed ID: 37332507]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10117793]. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtac022.

  • 7.

    Lane S, Hilliam Y, Bomberger JM. Microbial and Immune Regulation of the Gut-Lung Axis during Viral-Bacterial Coinfection. J Bacteriol. 2023;205(1). e0029522. [PubMed ID: 36409130]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9879096]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00295-22.

  • 8.

    Tang X, Dai G, Wang T, Sun H, Jiang W, Chen Z, et al. Comparison of the clinical features of human bocavirus and metapneumovirus lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children in Suzhou, China. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:1074484. [PubMed ID: 36704137]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9871608]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1074484.

  • 9.

    Nadiger M, Sendi P, Martinez PA, Totapally BR. Epidemiology and clinical features of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial viral infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2023;42(11):960-4. [PubMed ID: 37523504]. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004055.

  • 10.

    Ko YK, Zhang YL, Wee JH, Han DH, Kim HJ, Rhee CS. Human rhinovirus infection enhances the th2 environment in allergic and non-allergic patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;14(2):217-24. [PubMed ID: 32911880]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8111390]. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00444.

  • 11.

    Pancham K, Perez GF, Huseni S, Jain A, Kurdi B, Rodriguez-Martinez CE, et al. Premature infants have impaired airway antiviral IFNgamma responses to human metapneumovirus compared to respiratory syncytial virus. Pediatr Res. 2015;78(4):389-94. [PubMed ID: 26086642]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5529168]. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.113.

  • 12.

    Liu P, Xu M, He L, Su L, Wang A, Fu P, et al. Epidemiology of respiratory pathogens in children with lower respiratory tract infections in Shanghai, China, from 2013 to 2015. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2018;71(1):39-44. [PubMed ID: 29279451]. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2017.323.

  • 13.

    Jia R, Lu L, Li S, Liu P, Xu M, Cao L, et al. Human rhinoviruses prevailed among children in the setting of wearing face masks in Shanghai, 2020. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):253. [PubMed ID: 35287614]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8919361]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07225-5.

  • 14.

    Nicolas de Lamballerie C, Pizzorno A, Dubois J, Julien T, Padey B, Bouveret M, et al. Characterization of cellular transcriptomic signatures induced by different respiratory viruses in human reconstituted airway epithelia. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11493. [PubMed ID: 31391513]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6685967]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48013-7.

  • 15.

    Loevenich S, Montaldo NP, Wickenhagen A, Sherstova T, van Loon B, Boyartchuk V, et al. Human metapneumovirus driven IFN-beta production antagonizes macrophage transcriptional induction of IL1-beta in response to bacterial pathogens. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1173605. [PubMed ID: 37435074]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10330783]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1173605.

  • 16.

    Parker AM, Jackson N, Awasthi S, Kim H, Alwan T, Wyllie AL, et al. Association of upper respiratory streptococcus pneumoniae colonization with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(7):1209-17. [PubMed ID: 36401872]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac907.

  • 17.

    Wang W, Guan R, Liu Z, Zhang F, Sun R, Liu S, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of human bocavirus infection in children hospitalized for acute respiratory tract infection in Qingdao, China. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:935688. [PubMed ID: 36033842]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9399728]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.935688.

  • 18.

    Lin HC, Liu YC, Hsing TY, Chen LL, Liu YC, Yen TY, et al. RSV pneumonia with or without bacterial co-infection among healthy children. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022;121(3):687-93. [PubMed ID: 34446339]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.08.012.

  • 19.

    Schworer SA, Chason KD, Chen G, Chen J, Zhou H, Burbank AJ, et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist attenuates proinflammatory responses to rhinovirus in airway epithelium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(6):1577-1584 e4. [PubMed ID: 36708816]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10257744]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.015.

  • 20.

    Hanada S, Pirzadeh M, Carver KY, Deng JC. Respiratory viral infection-induced microbiome alterations and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2640. [PubMed ID: 30505304]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6250824]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02640.

  • 21.

    Andrade CA, Pacheco GA, Galvez NMS, Soto JA, Bueno SM, Kalergis AM. Innate immune components that regulate the pathogenesis and resolution of hRSV and hMPV infections. Viruses. 2020;12(6). [PubMed ID: 32545470]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7354512]. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12060637.

  • 22.

    Jamieson KC, Traves SL, Kooi C, Wiehler S, Dumonceaux CJ, Maciejewski BA, et al. Rhinovirus and bacteria synergistically induce IL-17c release from human airway epithelial cells to promote neutrophil recruitment. J Immunol. 2019;202(1):160-70. [PubMed ID: 30504421]. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1800547.