Abstract
Background:
Persistent detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in individuals who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains an unexplained phenomenon warranting further study. Recent research suggests that this RNA could be the result of transcription from an integrated SARS-CoV-2 genome.Objectives:
This study aimed to investigate the presence of the DNA form of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples from COVID-19 patients with prolonged viral detection.Methods:
We examined the presence of the reverse-transcribed viral genome in samples from eighty COVID-19 patients, including 40 outpatients (group 1), 40 hospitalized patients (group 2), and 40 healthy individuals (group 3), using a TaqMan® based real-time RT-PCR assay.Results:
The mean ages of groups 1, 2, and 3 were 36.1 ± 11.0, 61.6 ± 18.4, and 39.0 ± 8.7, respectively. The molecular tests did not detect viral DNA forms, which may be produced during the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle, in the examined samples.Conclusions:
Although no evidence of integrated viral DNA was found in this study, further research is essential to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA presence in recovered COVID-19 patients.Keywords
1. Background
As of November 27, 2022, coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in over 645 million confirmed cases and more than 6.6 million deaths (1). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection can lead to a range of clinical outcomes, from asymptomatic carriers to patients with severe acute respiratory disease (ARD) (2-4). Typically, PCR tests turn negative within three weeks for patients recovering from COVID-19; however, there are reports of prolonged positive PCR tests in recovered individuals, persisting for months post-recovery despite non-infectivity (5). While re-infection cases have been documented, cohort studies indicate that some instances of PCR re-positivity months after recovery are not due to re-infection, as these individuals remained in quarantine (6). The phenomenon of prolonged or recurrent viral RNA shedding remains poorly understood due to the novel nature of the disease and warrants further study (6). Studies have detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples by analyzing sequence data from various studies (7).
Research shows that SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus (8, 9). Recent studies, however, suggest that SARS-CoV-2 DNA may be produced via reverse transcription from the viral RNA genome. This DNA could potentially integrate into the host genome, leading to the production of viral RNA through host-dependent transcription pathways (10). Two mechanisms are proposed: Some viruses, like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), can encode enzymes such as reverse transcriptase and integrase to synthesize complementary ssDNA and integrate it into the host genome. Another mechanism involves the viral genome recombining with the host genome through components of endogenous transposons like intracisternal A-particle (IAP) and long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) (11)
Integrating the viral genome into host chromosomal DNA can lead to various consequences, including gene disruption, premature cell death, and oncogene activation, and may contribute to species evolution through inherited genomic inclusions. While integration is a necessary stage for some viruses, such as retroviruses, it may occur incidentally in others (12). Establishing the capability of the SARS-CoV-2 genome to integrate into the host genome opens new avenues for future studies to understand the pathogenic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Such studies could explore the viral integration sites within the host genome, the stage of the viral life cycle at which integration occurs, and the cellular and viral factors involved in this process. They could also aim to develop biomarkers for the persistent presence of the viral genome in recovered COVID-19 cases and determine whether the virus can integrate in all individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2.
2. Objectives
This study aims to investigate the presence of the DNA form of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, and PBMC samples from individuals who have recovered from COVID-19 as well as from a healthy control group.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Population
From January 2022 to October 2022, this cross-sectional study enrolled eighty individuals diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, referred to clinics or hospitals affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) in Tehran, Iran. The study consisted of forty outpatient respondents with no specific complications (group 1) and another forty patients who were hospitalized due to significant clinical manifestations and remained molecularly positive for COVID-19 45 days post-onset of the illness (group 2). Additionally, forty healthy individuals served as controls (group 3). Notably, none of the COVID-19 patients or healthy control participants had co-infections with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or HIV.
3.2. Sample Collection and Processing
To assess the presence of the integrated SARS-CoV-2 genome in the participants’ specimens, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal samples were collected and stored in viral transport media (VTM). Additionally, 5 mL of peripheral blood was drawn from each participant and placed into sterile vacutainer tubes containing Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). PBMCs were then isolated from the blood samples using Ficoll-Hypaque (Lympholyte H, Cedarlane, Hornby, Canada) density gradient centrifugation. The resulting PBMC pellet was resuspended in 350 µL of RNALater solution (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) and stored at -80°C for subsequent analysis.
3.3. Genomic DNA Isolation
Total DNA was extracted from the oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal samples, and pellets of 4 - 5 × 106 PBMCs using the QIAamp® DNA Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's protocols. The quality and quantity of the isolated DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, MA).
3.4. Amplification of SARS-CoV-2 Genomic DNA Via Real-Time PCR
To determine the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in the samples, cDNA synthesis was omitted, and DNA sequences of the virus were directly tested. Real-time PCR was conducted using specific TaqMan probes and primers targeting the genomic DNA of SARS-CoV-2 in the isolated DNA. The PCR reactions were performed on a Rotor-Gene Q system (QIAGEN, Germany), targeting conserved regions of the N (Nucleocapsid) (13), E (Envelope), and RdRp (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) (14) genes, with RNase P serving as an internal control (13, 15) (Table 1). The reaction mixture for RT-PCR included 10 pmol of each primer and 5 pmol of each TaqMan probe for the N, E, RdRp, and RNase P genes, 12.5 μL Premix Ex TaqTM (Probe qPCR, TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), and 5 μL of total DNA as the template. The thermal profile included an initial step at 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds.
Primers and Probes for Detection of N, E, and RdRp Genes of COVID-19, and RNaseP as an Internal Control Using Real-Time PCR
| Assay Use and Polarity | Name | Sequences |
|---|---|---|
| RNase P | ||
| Forward primer | RP2-F | AGA TTT GGA CCT GCG AGC G |
| Reverse primer | RP2-R | GAG CGG CTG TCT CCA CAA GT |
| Probe | RP2-probe | ROX- TTC TGA CCT GAA GGC TCT GCG CG -BBQ |
| E | ||
| Forward primer | E-Sarbeco | ACA GGT ACG TTA ATA GTT AAT AGC GT |
| Reverse primer | E-Sarbeco | ATA TTG CAG CAG TAC GCA CAC A |
| Probe | E-Sarbeco | FAM- ACA CTA GCC ATC CTT ACT GCG CTT CG -BBQ |
| N | ||
| Forward primer | N-Pearson | CCA GAA TGG AGA ACG CAG T |
| Reverse primer | N-Pearson | TGA GAG CGG TGA ACC AAG A |
| Probe | N-Pearson | Cy5- GCG ATC AAA ACA ACG TCG GCC CC -BBQ |
| RdRp | ||
| Forward primer | RdRP-SARSr | GTG ARA TGG TCA TGT GTG GCG G |
| Reverse primer | RdRP-SARSr | CAR ATG TTA AAS ACA CTA TTA GCA TA |
| Probe | RdRP-SARSr | VIC- CAG GTG GAA CCT CAT CAG GAG ATG C -BBQ |
3.5. Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess data normality. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test or the chi-square test, as appropriate. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Results
As previously stated, 80 patients with COVID-19 were referred to hospitals associated with IUMS in Tehran, Iran. In addition, 40 healthy individuals (group 3) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Among the COVID-19 cases, forty were treated on an outpatient basis (group 1) and forty were hospitalized due to the severity of their symptoms (group 2). The mean age of the non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients (group 1) was 36.1 ± 11.0 years (range 22 - 63 years), 61.6 ± 18.4 years (range 13 - 92 years) for hospitalized COVID-19 patients (group 2), and 39.0 ± 8.7 years (range 25 - 51 years) for the healthy participants (group 3). In groups 1 and 2 of patients with COVID-19, and in the healthy controls, 17 (42.5%), 27 (67.5%), and 17 (42.5%) were males, respectively, as detailed in Table 2.
Demographic Parameters of Studied Participants
| Parameters | Male | Female | Total | P-Value a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (group 1) | ||||
| No. (%) | 17 (42.5) | 23 (57.5) | 40 (100.0) | - |
| Age; mean (range) | 37.4 ± 8.3 (29 - 53) | 35.2 ± 12.8 (22 - 63) | 36.1 ± 11.0 (22 - 63) | 0.055 |
| Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (group 2) | ||||
| No. (%) | 27 (67.5) | 13 (32.5) | 40 (100.0) | - |
| Age; mean (range) | 60.3 ± 19.2 (13 - 85) | 64.5 ± 17.3 (28 - 92) | 61.6 ± 18.4 (13 - 92) | 0.942 |
| Healthy controls (group 3) | ||||
| No. (%) | 17 (42.5) | 23 (57.5) | 40 (100.0) | - |
| Age; mean (range) | 34.4 ± 5.7 (25 - 40) | 42.4 ± 9.1 (25 - 51) | 39.0 ± 8.7 (25 - 51) | < 0.001 b |
The laboratory and clinical characteristics of the participants, as well as those of the healthy controls, are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The laboratory results for the three groups are summarized in Table 5. After conducting the real-time TaqMan® RT-PCR assay with an internal amplification control to detect the presence of the integrated SARS-CoV-2 genome in the host cell genome, no integration of the virus genome into the host genome was detected. It is important to note that three conserved regions of the virus genome were tested—genes N, E, and RdRp—and all tests returned negative results. Consequently, it can be concluded that the virus genome does not convert into DNA within the host cells, nor does it integrate into the host genome.
Clinical profiles of Studied Participants a
| Parameters | Group 11 | Group 22 | Group 33 | P-Value b, c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female ratio | 17/23 | 27/13 | 17/23 | 0.036 |
| Fever | 33 (82.5) | 34 (85.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Chills | 24 (60.0) | 25 (62.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Headache | 24 (60.0) | 27 (67.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Weakness | 7 (17.5) | 16 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.008 |
| Skeletal pain | 26 (65.0) | 29 (72.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Chest pain | 15 (37.5) | 19 (47.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Shortness of breath | 11 (27.5) | 17 (42.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0.002 |
| Dry cough | 24 (60.0) | 25 (62.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Sputum cough | 3 (7.5) | 6 (15.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.001 |
| Deceased smell | 6 (15.0) | 5 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Deceased taste | 9 (22.5) | 10 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Runny nose | 24 (60.0) | 6 (15.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Cape of nose | 25 (62.5) | 12 (30.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 0 (0.0) | 13 (32.5) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
| Bleeding stomach | 4 (10.0) | 2 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.025 |
| Gastrointestinal symptom | 22 (55.0) | 8 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | < 0.001 |
Clinical Profiles of Non-hospitalized and Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 a
| Parameters | Group 1 b | Group 2 c | P-Value d, e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female ratio | 17/23 | 27/13 | 0.021 |
| Positive result of PCR for SARS-CoV-2, day | 0.659 | ||
| ≤ 15 | 35 (87.5) | 32 (80.0) | |
| 16 - 30 | 3 (7.5) | 5 (12.5) | |
| 31 - 45 | 2 (5.0) | 3 (7.5) | |
| Fever | 33 (82.5) | 34 (85.0) | < 0.001 |
| Chills | 24 (60.0) | 25 (62.5) | 0.090 |
| Headache | 24 (60.0) | 27 (67.5) | 0.012 |
| Weakness | 7 (17.5) | 16 (40.0) | 0.390 |
| Skeletal pain | 26 (65.0) | 29 (72.5) | 0.022 |
| Chest pain | 15 (37.5) | 19 (47.5) | 0.039 |
| Shortness of breath | 11 (27.5) | 17 (42.5) | 0.500 |
| Dry cough | 24 (60.0) | 25 (62.5) | 0.036 |
| Sputum cough | 3 (7.5) | 6 (15.0) | 0.033 |
| Deceased smell | 6 (15.0) | 5 (12.5) | 0.057 |
| Deceased taste | 9 (22.5) | 10 (25.0) | 0.006 |
| Runny nose | 24 (60.0) | 6 (15.0) | < 0.001 |
| Nasal congestion | 25 (62.5) | 12 (30.0) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 0 (0.0) | 13 (32.5) | < 0.001 |
| Bleeding stomach | 4 (10.0) | 2 (5.0) | 0.259 |
| Gastrointestinal symptoms | 22 (55.0) | 8 (20.0) | < 0.001 |
The Laboratory Data of the Studied Participants (3 Groups) a
| Parameters | Group 1 b | Group 2 c | Group 3 d | P-Value e, f |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female ratio | 17/23 | 27/13 | 17/23 | 0.036 |
| WBC | 7.9 ± 1.0 (5.7 - 9.6) | 7.4 ± 5.3 (2.0 - 32.4) | 7.6 ± 1.4 (4.1 - 9.7) | 0.051 |
| RBC | 4.4 ± 0.4 (3.4 - 5.1) | 4.3 ± 1.1 (1.0 - 7.0) | 4.4 ± 0.4 (3.4 - 5.4) | 0.665 |
| Hb | 13.6 ± 1.2 (11.8 - 15.4) | 12.7 ± 3.6 (1.6 - 20.6) | 13.7 ± 1.4 (10.6 - 16.5) | 0.054 |
| Hct | 41.4 ± 3.8 (35 - 48) | 37.5 ± 9.4 (7.6 - 59.2) | 41.9 ± 4.4 (32 - 49) | 0.001 |
| Platelet | 240 ± 108 (105 - 437) | 184.1 ± 110.1 (20 - 571) | 242.8 ± 113.2 (115 - 465) | 0.004 |
| INR | 1.0 ± 0.1 (0.9 - 1.3) | 1.3 ± 0.7 (1.0 - 5.3) | 1.0 ± 0.1 (0.8 - 1.2) | 0.001 |
| PTT | 30.0 ± 3.2 (26 - 38) | 36.7 ± 14.4 (24 - 84) | 30.1 ± 4.0 (24 - 38) | 0.021 |
| FBS | 86.3 ± 9.3 (77 - 110) | 175.4 ± 121.6 (77 - 512) | 81.8 ± 8.3 (69 - 102) | < 0.001 |
| Urea | 20.5 ± 4.2 (14 - 31) | 25.2 ± 14.3 (7 - 77) | 19.8 ± 4.0 (14 - 29) | 0.186 |
| Cr | 0.93 ± 0.2 (0.5 - 1.2) | 2.3 ± 4.2 (0.6 - 20) | 0.96 ± 0.2 (0.5 - 1.2) | 0.009 |
| AST | 17.6 ± 9.4 (9 - 33) | 56.0 ± 32.0 (19 - 154) | 14.7 ± 5.0 (9 - 24) | < 0.001 |
| ALT | 19.5 ± 10.1 (10 - 39) | 47.0 ± 30.6 (10 - 145) | 16.4 ± 5.2 (10 - 27) | < 0.001 |
| LDH | 262 ± 90.0 (120 - 439) | 658.0 ± 332.0 (121 - 1479) | 222.7 ± 89.4 (109 - 430) | < 0.001 |
| CPK | 61.5 ± 36.3 (24 - 143) | 201.9 ± 503.4 (19 - 3200) | 58.2 ± 31.8 (22 - 140) | 1.000 |
| ALP | 92.4 ± 43.2 (41 - 178) | 301.2 ± 529.5 (45 - 3431) | 91.1 ± 34.3 (40 - 135) | < 0.001 |
| Na | 140 ± 2.8 (136 - 145) | 136 ± 4.6 (115 - 146) | 140 ± 2.7 (134 - 145) | < 0.001 |
| K | 4.0 ± 0.5 (3.3 - 5.0) | 4.1 ± 0.8 (2.0 - 5.7) | 4.0 ± 0.4 (3.3 - 5.4) | 0.126 |
| Ca | 10.0 ± 0.6 (9.0 - 11.2) | 8.7 ± 0.7 (6.5 - 10.2) | 9.9 ± 0.7 (8.9 - 11.0) | < 0.001 |
| Ph | 4.0 ± 0.6 (2.8 - 4.9) | 2.8 ± 0.9 (1.6 - 5.8) | 4.0 ± 0.4 (3.0 - 4.8) | < 0.001 |
| CRP | 7.2 ± 3.2 (2.0 - 12.0) | 26.0 ± 13.0 (4 - 48) | 1.7 ± 0.7 (1.0 - 3.0) | < 0.001 |
| Vitamin D | 23.4 ± 10.5 (11 - 44) | 25.5 ± 12.7 (6 - 47) | 33.3 ± 16.0 (11 - 65) | 0.006 |
5. Discussion
When COVID-19 escalated into a pandemic, several reports documented instances where individuals, including recovered and asymptomatic patients, continued to test positive for the virus weeks later, stirring considerable debate (16, 17). These reports raised the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 genome integration into human cellular DNA, akin to what is observed with retroviruses (18). Our study sought to detect the DNA form of SARS-CoV-2 as an indicator of viral integration in the PBMC, oropharyngeal, and nasopharyngeal samples of COVID-19 patients using a TaqMan® RT-PCR assay. Our results did not yield any positive detections in these samples. However, the absence of detected integration does not conclusively disprove our hypothesis about the potential integration of the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
Unlike retroviruses, where genome integration is a crucial part of the viral lifecycle (19), such integration is rare in other viruses. Yet, there are exceptions, such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and bornavirus, which may integrate into the host genome under certain conditions facilitated by host factors like IAP and LINEs, respectively (20-22). Long interspersed element-1, a non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon that constitutes about a fifth of the human genome, includes two open reading frames that encode an endonuclease/reverse transcriptase and a nucleic acid-binding protein (23).
It is hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 RNA could be reverse transcribed and integrated into the host genome by the endogenous reverse transcriptase protein encoded by LINE-1. Due to this protein's high affinity for RNA, it may bind to viral RNAs and facilitate their retro-integration. Zhang et al. (6) proposed two mechanisms for the integration of SARS-CoV-2, noting that LINE-1 expression is significantly increased in SARS-CoV-2-infected or cytokine-exposed cells. Consequently, the retro-integration of viral RNAs may activate the host's immune system, potentially triggering severe immune responses and cytokine storms (6). In this study, we also investigated the integration of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in long-term hospitalized patients with symptoms and inflammatory conditions, and as mentioned, no positive samples were detected in this group.
Several publications have discussed the integration of the SARS-CoV-2 genome into infected cells under both in vitro conditions and in clinical samples. In these studies, the integrated viral genome was not detected. The negative results might be attributed to increased virus-induced cell death in culture mediums before sample collection and the relatively low and rare occurrence of this phenomenon, which should be investigated with larger sample sizes. In one study, the small sample size could have contributed to the lack of findings (10, 24). Furthermore, given the random nature of the integration process, the likelihood of integration occurring at the same genomic locus across different cases and/or tissues is low (11).
Smits et al. were unable to find any evidence of SARS-CoV-2 integration when investigating with long-read DNA sequencing, aligning with the results of this study (24). It should be noted that the negative results in both the current and previous studies might be influenced by the therapeutic drugs used to treat COVID-19 (6, 25). However, these negative results do not conclusively dismiss the hypothesis of viral genome integration, suggesting that further and more detailed studies are necessary to understand the mechanisms and effects of virus integration into the genomes of infected host cells.
In some viruses, such as human papillomavirus (HPV), only 14 of over 200 HPV types, known as high-risk HPV types, are capable of integrating into the host genome (26, 27). No studies have yet investigated the potential for integration among various SARS-CoV-2 variants. We collected all samples while the delta variant was dominant, yet no positive samples were detected in this study. The small sample size and focus on cases infected with the delta variant are limitations of this study. These factors may impact our findings, so our interpretations should be approached with caution.
5.1. Conclusions
The potential integration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA into host cells remains uncertain, as this study found no evidence of virus-related DNA sequences. Nonetheless, further research is required to explain the phenomenon of long-term PCR positivity in recovered COVID-19 patients.
References
-
1.
Worldometer. COVID-19 CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC. United States, America: Worldometer; 2022, [cited 2023]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
-
2.
Campos MC, Nery T, Starke AC, de Bem Alves AC, Speck AE, Aguiar SA. Post-viral fatigue in COVID-19: A review of symptom assessment methods, mental, cognitive, and physical impairment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;142:104902. [PubMed ID: 36202253]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9528075]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104902.
-
3.
Hamldar S, Kiani SJ, Khoshmirsafa M, Nahand JS, Mirzaei H, Khatami A, et al. Expression profiling of inflammation-related genes including IFI-16, NOTCH2, CXCL8, THBS1 in COVID-19 patients. Biologicals. 2022;80:27-34. [PubMed ID: 36153188]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9468312]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biologicals.2022.09.001.
-
4.
Abbasi-Kolli M, Sadri Nahand J, Kiani SJ, Khanaliha K, Khatami A, Taghizadieh M, et al. The expression patterns of MALAT-1, NEAT-1, THRIL, and miR-155-5p in the acute to the post-acute phase of COVID-19 disease. Braz J Infect Dis. 2022;26(3):102354. [PubMed ID: 35500644]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9035361]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102354.
-
5.
Chen YS, Lu S, Zhang B, Du T, Li WJ, Lei M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq and whole genome sequencing data reveals no evidence for SARS-CoV-2 integrating into host genome. Protein Cell. 2022;13(5):379-85. [PubMed ID: 34341964]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8327898]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-021-00861-8.
-
6.
Zhang L, Richards A, Khalil A, Wogram E, Ma H, Young RA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome. bioRxiv. 2020;Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516.
-
7.
Moustafa A, Khalel RS, Aziz RK. Traces of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in peripheral blood cells of patients with COVID-19. OMICS. 2021;25(8):475-83. [PubMed ID: 34280038]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8377512]. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2021.0068.
-
8.
Pashaei M, Rezaei N. Immunotherapy for SARS-CoV-2: potential opportunities. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(10):1111-6. [PubMed ID: 32762581]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7441764]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2020.1807933.
-
9.
Eslami N, Aghbash PS, Shamekh A, Entezari-Maleki T, Nahand JS, Sales AJ, et al. SARS-CoV-2: Receptor and co-receptor tropism probability. Curr Microbiol. 2022;79(5):133. [PubMed ID: 35292865]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8923825]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-02807-7.
-
10.
Kazachenka A, Kassiotis G. SARS-CoV-2-host chimeric RNA-sequencing reads do not necessarily arise from virus integration into the host DNA. Front Microbiol. 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434119.
-
11.
Grandi N, Tramontano E, Berkhout B. Integration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in infected human cells by retrotransposons: an unlikely hypothesis and old viral relationships. Retrovirol. 2021;18(1):34. [PubMed ID: 34715873]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8554740]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12977-021-00578-w.
-
12.
Lusic M, Siliciano RF. Nuclear landscape of HIV-1 infection and integration. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(2):69-82. [PubMed ID: 27941817]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.162.
-
13.
Grant PR, Turner MA, Shin GY, Nastouli E, Levett LJ. Extraction-free COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis by RT-PCR to increase capacity for national testing programmes during a pandemic. bioRxiv. 2020;Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.028316.
-
14.
Corman V, Bleicker T, Brünink S, Drosten C, Zambon M. Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR. Geneve, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020, [cited 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf.
-
15.
Wozniak A, Cerda A, Ibarra-Henriquez C, Sebastian V, Armijo G, Lamig L, et al. A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16608. [PubMed ID: 33024174]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7538882]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73616-w.
-
16.
Lan L, Xu D, Ye G, Xia C, Wang S, Li Y, et al. Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1502-3. [PubMed ID: 32105304]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7047852]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2783.
-
17.
Habibzadeh P, Sajadi MM, Emami A, Karimi MH, Yadollahie M, Kucheki M, et al. Rate of re-positive RT-PCR test among patients recovered from COVID-19. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020;30(3):30401. [PubMed ID: 32774117]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7394260]. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2020.030401.
-
18.
Doerfler W. Adenoviral vector DNA-and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines: Possible integration into the human genome-are adenoviral genes expressed in vector-based vaccines? Virus Res. 2021;302:198466. [PubMed ID: 34087261]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8168329]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198466.
-
19.
Graham SV. The human papillomavirus replication cycle, and its links to cancer progression: a comprehensive review. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(17):2201-21. [PubMed ID: 28798073]. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20160786.
-
20.
Bushman F, Lewinski M, Ciuffi A, Barr S, Leipzig J, Hannenhalli S, et al. Genome-wide analysis of retroviral DNA integration. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(11):848-58. [PubMed ID: 16175173]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1263.
-
21.
Khamina K, Lercher A, Caldera M, Schliehe C, Vilagos B, Sahin M, et al. Characterization of host proteins interacting with the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus L protein. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(12). e1006758. [PubMed ID: 29261807]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5738113]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006758.
-
22.
Horie M, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki Y, Tomonaga K. Comprehensive analysis of endogenous bornavirus-like elements in eukaryote genomes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013;368(1626):20120499. [PubMed ID: 23938751]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3758186]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0499.
-
23.
Beck CR, Collier P, Macfarlane C, Malig M, Kidd JM, Eichler EE, et al. LINE-1 retrotransposition activity in human genomes. Cell. 2010;141(7):1159-70. [PubMed ID: 20602998]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3013285]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.021.
-
24.
Smits N, Rasmussen J, Bodea GO, Amarilla AA, Gerdes P, Sanchez-Luque FJ, et al. No evidence of human genome integration of SARS-CoV-2 found by long-read DNA sequencing. Cell Rep. 2021;36(7):109530. [PubMed ID: 34380018]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8316065]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109530.
-
25.
Zhang L, Richards A, Barrasa MI, Hughes SH, Young RA, Jaenisch R. Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(21). [PubMed ID: 33958444]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8166107]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118.
-
26.
Liu CY, Li F, Zeng Y, Tang MZ, Huang Y, Li JT, et al. Infection and integration of high-risk human papillomavirus in HPV-associated cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2015;32(4):109. [PubMed ID: 25750043]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0560-8.
-
27.
Fatemipour M, Nahand JS, Fard Azar ME, Baghi HB, Taghizadieh M, Sorayyayi S, et al. Human papillomavirus and prostate cancer: The role of viral expressed proteins in the inhibition of anoikis and induction of metastasis. Microb Pathog. 2021;152:104576. [PubMed ID: 33086103]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104576.