Ensuring the prompt identification and treatment of MRSA infections is crucial for preventing the transmission of infection and minimizing the potential risk of patient mortality. In addition to being resistant to methicillin and beta-lactam drugs, MRSA strains exhibit resistance to several other antibiotics (
12,
15). In this study, 230
S. aureus isolates were detected and evaluated using phenotypic and genotypic methods to identify MRSA strains. The samples included 109 from wounds, 66 from blood, 22 from urine, 15 from lung samples, and 18 from other sources. Methicillin-resistant
S. aureus Istrains displayed varying levels of resistance to different antibiotics. Specifically, the resistance rates were as follows: Erythromycin 83.3%, tetracycline 56.4%, ciprofloxacin 42.3%, clindamycin 28.2%, cotrimoxazole 25.6%, rifampin 17.9%, and gentamicin 16.7%. However, all strains exhibited sensitivity to vancomycin and linezolid.
Similar results were reported in a study conducted in Brazil by Lima et al. on patients with underlying cystic fibrosis. Among 28 methicillin-resistant
S. aureus isolates, the resistance rates to antibiotics such as cotrimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, and tetracycline were 14.3%, 25%, 25%, 53.3%, 35.7%, and 21.4%, respectively. All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid (
16). In another study conducted by Boswihi et al. in Kuwait, out of 1327 MRSA isolates from clinical samples, the resistance rates to erythromycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline were 39.2%, 39.2%, 38.2%, and 32.1%, respectively, with all isolates being sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid antibiotics (
17). A study by Samadi et al. in Iran on 98 MRSA isolates showed resistance rates to rifampin (12%), gentamicin (24%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (24%), clindamycin (57%), and erythromycin (62%), with all isolates being sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid (
18).
In the present study, of the 230
S. aureus isolates, 78 were identified as MRSA, making the frequency of MRSA isolates 33.9%. The highest frequency was related to wound samples, which accounted for 47.4% of the MRSA isolates. Our findings align with those of Sadeghi and Mansouri in Kerman, Iran, where 56.8% of 162
S. aureus isolates were MRSA, with the majority coming from urine samples (
19). In a study by Wangai et al. in Africa, the prevalence of MRSA among
S. aureus isolates was 53.4%, with the highest frequency observed in pus samples (
20). Similarly, a study by Wang et al. in China found that 40.6% of 32
S. aureus isolates were MRSA (
21).
In our study, 23 (29.5%) of the 78 MRSA isolates tested positive for the
PVL gene. Of these, 8 were found in men and 15 in women. However, no significant association was observed between gender and the prevalence of the
PVL gene. The majority of
PVL-positive isolates were from wound samples, with 12 isolates (52.1%). A study conducted in Iran by Hessari et al. found that the
PVL gene was present in 20% of the samples. Additionally, in that study, no significant relationship was found between the presence of the
PVL gene and the sample type (
2). In a study conducted by Tajik et al. in 2020 among the Iranian population of Tehran, the prevalence of MRSA and
PVL-positive isolates was investigated. The presence of the
PVL gene was detected in 11.2% of the samples (
22). In our study, the majority of
PVL-positive samples were related to bronchial and wound samples, a finding that is consistent with a study conducted by Ahmad et al. in 2020 in Malaysia. Their study found that 20% of the isolates were
PVL-positive (
23). Furthermore, the frequency of the
PVL gene was higher in the HA-MRSA samples of this study. While
PVL genes were first reported in CA-MRSA strains (
24), an analysis of MRSA isolates in the Netherlands in 2003 revealed the presence of MRSA strains carrying
PVL genes, suggesting that these strains can be found both in the community and within the hospital environment. As noted earlier, MRSA strains are prevalent pathogens in hospitals and have also been detected in the community. Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains and HA-MRSA can be distinguished by identifying their
SCCmecA types (
25).
In the current study, among 78 MRSA isolates, 59 (75.6%) were classified as type IV, 9 (11.5%) as type III, 8 (10.3%) as type V, and 2 (2.6%) as type I. Type II was not identified in this study. Furthermore, 20 isolates (87%) contained
PVL genes, which were primarily associated with the CA-MRSA group. According to the classification, 85.9% of MRSA strains belonged to types IV and V, indicating an increase in the prevalence of CA-MRSA and a shift in its epidemiology in Yazd (Iran) hospitals, which requires special attention. Goudarzi et al. conducted a study in Iran on phenotypic and molecular characteristics of MRSA containing the
PVL gene. They found that 62 (88.6%) isolates were type IV, and 8 (11.4%) were type V, with no other types identified. Their study indicated an increase in CA-MRSA isolates in hospitals (
26). In another study by Peng et al. in China, 70.9% of isolates were type IV, 15.4% were type V, and 10.3% were type III (
27). In Saudi Arabia, Eed et al. found that 34.3% of isolates were type I, 20% were type III, 20% were type IV, 15.8% were type V, and 10% were type II (
7). Similarly, Alfouzan et al. in Kuwait reported that 39.5% of isolates were type IV, 34.4% were type III, and 25.8% were type V (
28).
Our study, in line with others, clearly indicates that the prevalence of CA-MRSA has surpassed that of HA-MRSA, resulting in a shift in its epidemiology. As a consequence, there is an urgent need for further investigation into CA-MRSA. This study has some limitations, including a limited sample size that may not fully represent the central region of Iran. Additionally, while the study focuses on antibiotic resistance and SCCmecA types, it does not explore other virulence factors or genetic characteristics.
5.1. Conclusions
The present study demonstrates that MRSA isolates from the hospital environment are resistant to all antibiotics except vancomycin and linezolid. Therefore, hospital personnel should take precautions to prevent the spread of such strains within the hospital. Proper treatment of patients and stringent control of unnecessary antibiotic use are strongly recommended. Based on our study and other research on SCCmec types, it is evident that the prevalence of the CA-MRSA group is rising in both Iranian and global hospitals, surpassing the prevalence of the HA-MRSA group. Additionally, the presence of the PVL pathogenic gene in the CA-MRSA group, coupled with its high antibiotic resistance, highlights the need for periodic detection of CA-MRSA isolates and monitoring of their antibiotic resistance in hospitals.