Logo
Jundishapur J Microbiol

Image Credit:Jundishapur J Microbiol

A Comprehensive Review on Staphylococcus aureus Complex, with Emphasis on S. argenteus, S. roterodami, S. schweitzeri, S. singaporensis, and their Role in Human Infections

Author(s):
Maryam SadehMaryam SadehMaryam Sadeh ORCID1, Mehdi Fatahi-BafghiMehdi Fatahi-Bafghi2,*
1Department of Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology:Vol. 18, issue 6; e159275
Published online:Jun 07, 2025
Article type:Review Article
Received:Jan 12, 2025
Accepted:May 15, 2025
How to Cite:Sadeh M, Fatahi-Bafghi M, A Comprehensive Review on Staphylococcus aureus Complex, with Emphasis on S. argenteus, S. roterodami, S. schweitzeri, S. singaporensis, and their Role in Human Infections.Jundishapur J Microbiol.2025;18(6):e159275.https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-159275.

Abstract

Context:

The Staphylococcaceae family consists of nine genera, with Staphylococcus being one of them. In 2015, the Staphylococcus aureus complex was introduced, incorporating five species: Staphylococcus aureus, S. roterodami, S. argenteus (formerly identified as S. aureus clonal complex 75 or CC75), S. schweitzeri, and S. singaporensis.

Evidence Acquisition:

This review comprehensively examines the S. aureus complex, particularly focusing on lesser-known and overlooked species.

Results:

This article highlights their important roles in human infections and food safety, which have been underexplored. This review explains updated taxonomic classifications and emphasizes these species’ distinct phenotypic and molecular characteristics.

Conclusions:

Additionally, we discuss their clinical manifestations, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance patterns for readers and clinicians.

1. Context

The Staphylococcaceae family received approval in 2009 (1, 2), encompassing nine genera (3). Ogston’s original description in 1883 introduced the genus Staphylococcus (4, 5). Later, Rosenbach further classified this genus into Staphylococcus albus and Staphylococcus aureus (4, 6). In 1886, Flügge distinguished Staphylococcus from Micrococcus (4, 7), emphasizing differences in DNA G+C content: 33 - 40 mol% for Staphylococcus species and approximately 70 mol% for Micrococcus species (4). The validation of the Staphylococcus genus was ultimately confirmed in 1980 (8, 9). Staphylococcus is a member of the Domain Bacteria, Kingdom Bacillati, Phylum Bacillota, Class Bacilli, Order Caryophanales, and Family Staphylococcaceae (10). This genus is the most prevalent member of this family (11). Up to the present time, the S. aureus complex comprises S. aureus, S. roterodami, S. argenteus (formerly identified as S. aureus clonal complex 75 or CC75) (12), S. schweitzeri, and S. singaporensis, playing an essential role in infections affecting both humans and animals. The cell wall structure and chemical composition of Staphylococcus species closely resemble those of other Gram-positive bacteria. Peptidoglycan, protein, and teichoic acid constitute the cell wall of this group of bacteria (13). In some species, the peptidoglycan type is Lys-Gly5–6, and teichoic acids consist of glycerol, ribitol, and N-acetylamino sugars (4). Additionally, the notable fatty acids in S. roterodami are anteiso-C15:0, anteiso-C17:0, and iso-C15:0 (14). The current article emphasizes that this review distinctly focuses on the lesser-known and overlooked members of the S. aureus complex, particularly S. argenteus, S. roterodami, S. schweitzeri, and S. singaporensis. Unlike previous review articles that predominantly focused on S. aureus, our article surveyed recent taxonomic updates, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance profiles specific to these species. Previous studies reported S. argenteus, S. aureus, S. roterodami, and S. singaporensis from human infections (15, 16). Additionally, we emphasize their important roles in clinical infections and food safety, which have not been addressed enough in the literature. By providing a comprehensive review of existing knowledge and emphasizing the clinical manifestation and epidemiological implications of these species, our review aims to fill important and vital gaps and inspire further research in this field.

2. Isolation from Human Clinical Specimens

Staphylococcus species, especially S. aureus, is a frequent source of various infections in hospitals and the community (17). These bacteria can be isolated from various clinical specimens such as a catheter (18) and skin (4, 19-21) [The swab technique is suitable for isolation (22), and the plate should be incubated at 34 - 35°C for 72 to 96 hours]. Additionally, it can be isolated from sepsis and blood culture (21, 23-25), body fluids (4, 24), joints [joint aspirate and/or intraoperative tissue samples are isolated and cultured on selective media] (24, 26), ocular sources (4, 27), sputum (21), ears (19, 21), and urine when there are 100,000 bacterial cells or more per mL in a midstream specimen. However, this criterion varies in different references. The urine specimen is homogenized, and the loop is vertically introduced into the bottle. The specimen is then seeded onto a blood agar (BA) medium and incubated for 18 to 24 hours at a temperature of 35°C (4, 28), as routinely performed in clinical laboratories. Some data are presented in Table 1. Typically, this genus is isolated on sheep BA in the primary culture within 18 - 24 hours (4). Various selective media isolate Staphylococcus from stool specimens and similar samples like nasal and skin specimens. These include Columbia CNA agar (containing blood, colistin, nalidixic acid) (29), lipase-salt-mannitol agar, mannitol salt agar (30, 31), phenylethyl alcohol agar (containing pancreatic digest of casein, papic digest of soybean meal, sodium chloride, agar, defibrinated sheep blood, phenylethyl alcohol, distilled water] (32), and Schleifer-Krämer (SK) agar [this medium has been used for selective isolation of Staphylococcus species and contains tryptone or peptone from casein, beef extract, yeast extract, glycerol, sodium pyruvate, glycine, KSCN, NaH2PO4 H2O, Na2HPO4 2H2O, LiCl, agar, and distilled H2O] (4) and, tellurite glycine agar (containing tryptone, yeast extract, mannitol, K2HP04, lithium chloride, glycine, agar, potassium tellurite) (33). The incubation period for these specimens is at least 48 - 72 hours (4) at 37°C. Additionally, S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri were cultured on tryptone soy agar (TSA) (enzymatic digestions of casein and soybean meal, sodium chloride, and agar) at 37°C (34, 35). Staphylococcus argenteus has been isolated from community-acquired or healthcare-associated settings (36). Schutte et al. reported that S. roterodami could grow on BA, Brucella BA, chocolate BA, MacConkey agar without salt, and Muller-Hinton agar (14).

Table 1.Some Phenotypic Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Complex
VariablesStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus argenteus (MSHR1132T)Staphylococcus schweitzeriStaphylococcus singaporensis (SS21T)Staphylococcus roterodami
Pigmentation+-1 a+2 b-
β-Hemolysis+++++
Arginine Dihydrolase+++++
Acetoin Production+
Alkaline Phosphatase+++++
Catalase+++++
Coagulase+++++
Nitrate Reduction+++
Ornithine Decarboxylase--
L-Pyrrolidonyl Arylamidase++++
Ureased c/---+-
Hydrolysis of Esculin-
Resistance to Novobiocin----
Resistance to Polymixin B++++
β-Galactosidase----
β-Glucosidase+--
β-Glucuronidase----
L-Arabinose-
D-Cellobiose-
Maltose+++++
D-Mannitol+++++
D-Mannose+++++
Raffinose-----
D-Trehalose+++++
Sucrose+++++
D-Turanose+
D-Xylose-----
D-Glucose+
D-Fructose+
D-Galactose++-+
Lactose---++
Growth in 6.5 % NaCl++++
Ref.(4, 35)(35)(35, 37)(38)(14)

Some Phenotypic Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Complex

3. Food Specimens

Two species of this complex have been isolated from food products, including S. aureus (4, 39) and S. argenteus (32, 36, 40-42). Staphylococcal food poisoning and gastroenteritis may result from the consumption of food contaminated with enterotoxins (43). For isolation of these bacteria from food materials, non-selective enrichment of S. aureus, tryptic soy broth (TSB), and TSB containing 20% NaCl, Egg Yolk Tellurite enrichment, Trypticase soy broth with 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate (4), Baird-Parker agar (basal medium is containing agar, beef extract, glycine, lithium chloride 6H2O, tryptone, yeast extract) (4, 36), salt egg yolk (SEY) agar (41), and SK agar (basal medium containing agar, beef extract, distilled H2O, glycine, glycerol, KSCN, LiCl, NaH2PO4 H2O, Na2HPO4 2H2O, tryptone or peptone from casein, sodium pyruvate, yeast extract) (4) have been recommended. The incubation period is set at 35 - 37°C for 24 - 48 hours.

4. Animal Specimens

Previous studies have reported the isolation of these bacteria from animals such as bats (44), bovine mastitis (45), gorillas (46, 47), pigs (47, 48), chickens (48), and rabbits (20) (S. argenteus). These studies have also reported infections in bats (44, 49, 50), gorillas (50), and monkeys (50, 51) (S. schweitzeri). Olatimehin et al. employed nutrient broth and Mannitol salt agar to isolate the S. aureus complex from fecal samples of Eidolon helvum at 37°C for 48 hours (44). In another study by Schaumburg et al., the S. aureus complex was isolated from animals and humans by culturing on Columbia BA plate, Columbia CAP selective agar (containing aztreonam and colistin) plate and SAID [S. aureus ID] agar plate for 18 - 36 hours at 36°C (51). Indrawattana et al. used sheep blood and Mannitol salt agar to isolate S. argenteus (at 37°C for 24 - 48 hours) (20).

5. Phenotypic Identification

Colonies suspected to be Staphylococcus should undergo gram staining and be identified at both the genus and species levels. Schutte et al. reported that S. aureus and S. roterodami exhibit similar Gram staining characteristics under microscopic examination (14). The color of S. argenteus colonies is silver, as this bacterium lacks the carotenoid pigment staphyloxanthin (52-54). Various phenotypic tests can differentiate staphylococci from other gram-positive cocci with catalase production. These tests include susceptibility to erythromycin and lysostaphin (55), bacitracin (56), furazolidone (57), growth in 6.5% NaCl, coagulase, nitrate reduction, urease, colony morphology, OF (oxidation-fermentation) test, oxidase, hydrolysis of Esculin, acid production from various carbohydrates such as arabinose, cellobiose, maltose, mannitol, mannose, raffinose, trehalose, sucrose, turanose, xylose, glucose, fructose, galactose, lactose, and others (58, 59). Staphylococci are non-motile, non-spore-forming bacteria; some species are facultative anaerobes, and catalase and benzidine tests are positive in these species (4). Staphylococcus roterodami, S. argenteus, S. schweitzeri, and S. singaporensis test positive for coagulase enzymes, similar to S. aureus (14, 35, 38). They exhibit proximity to S. aureus when considering phenotypic and genotypic features (60). According to the phenotypic tests presented in Table 1, phenotypic identification alone is not entirely suitable for the S. aureus complex, and molecular methods are necessary for accurate identification at the species level. 16S rRNA gene sequence of S. simiae is similar to other members of the S. aureus complex (Figure 1), but some phenotypic test results such as coagulase, a-glucosidase, b-glucosidase, hydrolysis of DNA and esculin, and D-mannose were negative. However, acid production from D-maltose, D-mannitol, D-melezitose, D-trehalose, N-Acetylglucosamine, and resistance to polymyxin B were positive (61), indicating differences from these members. Conventional identification is inadequate for distinguishing four species in the S. aureus complex (38). To date, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has also been utilized for identifying the S. aureus complex (14, 20, 25, 35, 37, 44, 49, 62). Tong et al. compromised MALDI-TOF MS identity scores with two databases: A standard clinical database and an amended database with profile proteins from S. aureus, S. argenteus, and S. schweitzeri. In the standard/amended database, identity scores for S. aureus, S. argenteus, and S. schweitzeri were 2.295/2.295, 2.071/2.700, and 1.847/2.676, respectively (35). Indrawattana et al. used two methods, NRPS sequencing and MALDI TOF MS, to identify eight suspicious isolates of S. argenteus. The results of the two methods were reported to be similar (20). Another study by Chen et al. employed MALDI TOF MS for accurate differentiation between S. aureus and S. argenteus. They reported that this method correctly distinguished 100% of the 72 S. argenteus isolates from the 72 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus samples (25).

Phylogenetic tree of <i>Staphylococcus</i> species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, constructed using neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis and the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model the support of each branch was determined from 1000 bootstrap samples. Bar 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree of Staphylococcus species based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, constructed using neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis and the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model the support of each branch was determined from 1000 bootstrap samples. Bar 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

6. Molecular Identification

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that this genus belongs to the phylum Firmicutes (59). DNA-DNA hybridization (4), 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and their comparative oligonucleotide (63) reveal genetic differences between the two genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. Staphylococcus is closely related to genera such as enterococci, Lactobacilli, Listeria, micrococci, and streptococci (4, 59). The DNA G+C content is 30 - 39 mol% in the Staphylococcus genus (4). More than 30 species of the genus Staphylococcus, especially S. aureus, S. argenteus, S. schweitzeri, S. roterodami, and S. singaporensis have been completely sequenced (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/?term = Staphylococcus). Analysis of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that S. argenteus, S. roterodami, and S. schweitzeri have sequences that are closely related to S. aureus (14, 38). Additionally, these species exhibit differences in nuc gene nucleotides (37). Tong et al. reported the amplification of the nuc gene using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in S. argenteus, utilizing specific primers provided by Brakstad et al. (5'-GCGATTGATGGTGATACGGTI-3’ forward and 5'-AGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACTAAAGC-3’ reverse (64). They also reported the number of mismatches in the primer sites (35). Eshaghi et al. reported that 22 isolates of S. argenteus tested negative for nuc gene primers specific to S. aureus (37). Hansen et al. reported that the nuc length was 670 bp in all of the isolates of S. argenteus, whereas the nuc length was 687 bp in S. aureus. Additionally, they reported that the S. argenteusnuc gene homology was 83% with the S. aureusnuc gene (19). Another study by Zhang et al. reported that NRPS gene (nrps-F: 5'-TTGARWCGACATTACCAGT-3’/nrps-R: 5'-ATWRCRTACATYTCRTTATC-3’) could simultaneously recognize and differentiate S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri from S. aureus, producing PCR products of ~340 base pairs and ~160 base pairs, respectively (36). Designing primers specific to S. roterodami, S. argenteus, S. schweitzeri, and S. singaporensis will be necessary for accurate and rapid identification. There are various methods for bacterial whole-genome sequencing (WGS), including massively parallel sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and single-molecule sequencing (65, 66). There are various sequencing platforms, including Illumina, MiSeq, MiniSeq, NextSeq, NovaSeq, Ion Torrent, S5, Pyrosequencing, Pacific Biosciences, and Oxford Nanopore sequencing techniques (66-68). To date, WGS is a reliable tool for the taxonomic description of bacterial species, epidemiological studies, and clinical data (69, 70). Based on complete genome sequencing, we can generate a phylogenomic tree and assess the position of species on the evolutionary tree. Also, we can compare two or more species with DNA-DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity by blast (ANIb) based on the genomic sequences (71). The standard cut-off for ANIb is generally set at 95 - 96% (72, 73). Comparisons based on the whole-genome of S. argenteus (MSHR1132T) and S. schweitzeri (DSM 28300T) to S. aureus demonstrate significant phylogenetic differences, with an average nucleotide identity (ANI) value and DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) of 95% and 70% respectively (35). Average nucleotide identity by blast between S. argenteus MSHR1132 T and S. schweitzeri DSM 28300 T was 92.03%, below the species delineation cut-off. Suzuki et al. conducted a comparative genomic analysis and reported that S. simiae is the sister taxon of S. aureus (74). The ANIb and the percentage of aligned nucleotides [%] for the whole genome sequences of two members of the S. aureus complex are shown in Table 2. The last study reported that multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a powerful tool for identifying S. argenteus.

Table 2.Average Nucleotide Identity by Blast and (Aligned Nucleutides) [%] of Whole Genome Sequences of Four Members of Staphylococcus aureus Complex a
OrganismStaphylococcus argenteus MSHR1132 TStaphylococcus aureus 502AStaphylococcus roterodami Zoo-28Staphylococcus schweitzeri DSM 28300 T
S. argenteus MSHR1132 [T]-87.62 (84.55)93.47 (87.04)92.03(86.41)
S. aureus 502A87.41 (85.98)-87.85 (84.39)88.69 (86.05)
S. roterodami Zoo-2892.82 (87.55)87.81 (81.67)-92.74 (85.00)
S. schweitzeri NCTC13712 [T]91.82 (87.40)88.72 (86.13)92.83 (86.83)-

Average Nucleotide Identity by Blast and (Aligned Nucleutides) [%] of Whole Genome Sequences of Four Members of Staphylococcus aureus Complex a

7. Multilocus Sequence Typing

Multilocus sequence typing is a method that generally involves the amplification of seven housekeeping gene loci using PCR. In the following, PCR products are sequenced, and then these nucleotide sequences are compared to established allelic profiles. A variation in a single nucleotide at any loci showed a distinct allele, contributing to determining the sequence type (ST) (75). Zhang et al. reported three new STs, including ST3261, ST3262, and ST3267 (36). In the literature, for the taxonomy of the genus Staphylococcus, five housekeeping genes, namely gap, hsp60, rpoB, sodA, and tuf, have been used and are suitable for distinguishing S. argenteus from S. aureus (76). Wu et al. utilized the MLST method with several housekeeping genes such as arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqil to identify S. argenteus. In their study, eight different STs were identified in the 114 isolates, and they reported five new types, including ST5054, ST5055, ST5056, ST5057, and ST5058. ST2250 was the most common ST, and the prevalence of ST1223, ST2854, ST5057, ST5054, ST5056, ST5058, ST5055 were 14.0%, 2.6%, 2.6%,1.8%,1.8%,1.8%,0.9% respectively. They reported two clonal complexes, including CC2250 and CC1223 (42). Indrawattana et al. reported STs in the Staphylococcus complex, including ST4209, ST4210, ST4211, ST4212, and ST4213 (20). Hsu et al. performed MLST on 96 isolates of S. argenteus, and they reported four STs: ST1223 (10.4%), ST2198 (2.1%), ST2250 (75%), and ST2793 (12.5%). In their study, all ST2250 isolates harbored CRISPR loci, while other types did not carry CRISPR loci. They also employed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and Spa typing for genetic associations. Other genes, including Coa, DnaJ (hsp40), GroEL (hsp60), spacer sequencing, and accessory gene regulator (agr) group have been sequenced and analyzed (62). The phylogenetic tree of the Staphylococcus species was constructed using the molecular evolutionary genetics analysis program version 5 (MEGA5) (Figure 1).

8. Clinical Diseases, Virulence Factors, Antibiotic Resistance, and Epidemiology

Staphylococcus argenteus infections caused by S. argenteus are associated with various clinical manifestations, with a higher prevalence in skin and soft tissue infections. Compared to S. aureus, this bacterium is more sensitive to oxidative stress and susceptible to neutrophil killing due to the lack of pigment staphyloxanthin and fewer virulence factors (4, 77, 78). Human infections with S. argenteus are linked to a milder course of the disease (12, 79). Compared with S. aureus, S. argenteus infections cause less respiratory failure during hospitalization, with a non-significant similar trend for shock and no difference in mortality within 28 days. S. argenteus is also more susceptible to antimicrobial drugs (24). Although it can induce blood infection (24, 79, 80), bacteremia associated with S. argenteus poses a higher risk of mortality than methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) associated with bacteremia (81). Additionally, it may lead to nosocomial infections and invasive diseases (25, 79). Staphylococcus argenteus has been isolated from the blood culture of a woman with necrotizing fasciitis infection in Australia (52). This bacterium (22WJ8192) was isolated from a blood sample taken from the peripheral vein of a seven-month-old female infant in Eastern China (29). On the other hand, S. argenteus infection is more likely to lead to kidney disease and diabetes in adults than MSSA (79). It causes various infections such as mycotic aortic aneurysm (82), bone and prosthetic joint infection (83-85), purulent lymphadenitis (86), foreign-body infections (87), atopic dermatitis lesions (88), and keratoconjunctivitis (89). Although this group of bacteria may be pathogenic in food and milk, it may also trigger bovine mastitis (90). Small colony variants (SCVs) of S. argenteus strain pose challenges to therapeutic strategies, especially when amikacin is used or in chronic infections (91). Staphylococcus argenteus carries several toxin genes, such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (20, 41, 47, 77, 80, 92-94). However, some findings have indicated a lower prevalence of virulence genes than S. aureus (77, 93). Other findings suggest the absence of the pvl virulence gene in it (24, 95-98).

Recently, whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that the nucleotide sequence similarity in the pvl gene between S. argenteus and S. aureus is 75%, and this gene is more prevalent among S. argenteus isolates (94). Staphylococcus argenteus contains the esxB to induce pathogenesis of abscess; the ear gene is proposed for penicillin-binding protein and, ebh, esaB, seh, chp, lip, seg, esaC, esxB, sei, selu2, selm, and selo as adherence genes (19). Furthermore, other virulence factors such as atlE (autolysin), ebp (elastin binding protein), (37), icaA, icaB, icaC, and icaR, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, fib, and cna (intercellular adhesion) (37, 42, 84), sak (staphylokinase) (19, 21, 37, 47, 85, 99-101), scn (staphylococcal complement inhibitor) (19, 37, 47, 85, 101), spa (staphylococcal protein A) (37, 38), sspB (cysteine protease), hysA (hyaluronate lyase) (37), geh and lip (lipase) (19, 37), coa (staphylocoagulase) (37, 38, 99), nuc (thermonuclease) (37), cap5 and cap8 (capsular) (19, 37), hla (alpha hemolysin) (20, 37, 41, 77, 93, 94, 99), hld (delta hemolysin) (37), eta (exfoliative toxin type A) (37, 99) and hlgA, hlgB, and hlgC (gamma hemolysin) (37, 99), tst (toxic shock syndrome toxin) (19-21, 23, 37, 41, 47, 77, 92-94, 99, 101, 102), esaC, esxB, esxA, esaG, essA, essB, essC, adsA, and essA (type VII secretion system) (19, 47), mazE, Yef M [antitoxin component of type-II toxin-antitoxin (TA) system] (47), can (collagen binding protein), bap, and eno (biofilm production genes) (42), bbp (sialoprotein-binding protein gene) (62) have been reported in this group of bacteria. It forms silver colonies due to the lack of production of the carotenoid pigment staphyloxanthine, encoded by the operon crtOPQMN. Carotenoid pigment expression is associated with decreased bacterial virulence and density in the cardiac valve, spleen, and kidneys (53). The rate of antibiotic resistance appears to be lower in the members of the genus of S. aureus complex than in S. aureus (24). Staphylococcus argenteus strains seem to acquire more antibiotic resistance genes (Table 3) than other species (S. schweitzeri, S. singaporensis, and S. roterodami), especially in clinical isolates, and it is an issue of concern (103). While the isolates of penicillin-resistant (with or without blaZ) strains are common (20, 21, 23, 99-101), other antibacterial resistance are scarce, such as tetracycline (with or without tet genes), gentamycin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, ampicillin, and daptomycin (18, 41, 42, 99, 100, 104). Regarding the prevalence of methicillin resistance isolates (cefoxitin or oxacillin with or without mecA genes), findings vary across the globe (19, 37, 101, 103, 104). Nevertheless, the presence of SCCmec type IV is rarely indicated (19, 94, 101). In numerous epidemiological studies, S. argenteus is associated with various human and animal specimens. It has been reported from Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand (4 studies), Japan (6 studies), Myanmar, Taiwan, China (2 reports each), and Singapore (1 study). Relatively few studies have been reported from African and European countries, including Sweden (2 studies), Gabon, Nigeria, Denmark, France, Belgium (each country with one report), and England (2 studies), However, recent efforts have shown an increased focus on these regions (Table 4).

Table 3.Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Staphylococcus Species
BacteriumCommon Resistant AntibioticsCommon Susceptible AntibioticsResistance Genes
Staphylococcus argenteusPenicillin (with/without blaZ), tetracycline (with/without tet genes), gentamicin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, ampicillin, daptomycinMore susceptible than S. aureus; lower antibiotic resistance overallmecA (variable prevalence), SCCmec type IV (rare), blaZ, tet genes
S. schweitzeriNo reported resistanceSusceptible to all tested antibioticsNo known resistance genes
S. singaporensisOne isolate resistant to gentamicinSusceptible to penicillin, mupirocin, oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, fusidic acid, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, teicoplanin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, vancomycinNo known resistance genes
S. roterodamiResistant to polymyxin BSusceptible to cefoxitin, benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin, tetracycline, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, fusidic acid, mupirocin, rifampicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazoleNo known resistance genes

Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Staphylococcus Species

Table 4.Characteristics of the Studies Included in the Review of Staphylococcus aureus Complex
CountryYearType of StudySample TypeTotal Sample ValuesIdentification Method Bacteria SpeciesRef.
Sequence-based/ Conventional PCR MethodsBand-based MethodsMALDI-TOF
Thailand2016 Prospective cohort observational studySepsis (abscesses n = 163, blood n = 115, bone or arthocentesis n = 21, body fluids, biliary tract and cerbrospinal fluid n = 7, pus from implanted surgical hardware n = 3, pus from spaces such as sinuses and inner ear n = 2)31158 (19)MLSTPFGES. argenteus(24)
Japan2017 Case studyFecal specimens, food, table, workbench, and empty lunch boxes1010WGS, MLSTS. argenteus(40)
Japan2018 2 case studyFecal specimens, food samples, and swabs of cooking utensils5136MLSTPFGES. argenteus(40)
Gabon2016 Research articleFaucal specimens of wild-living apes (gorilla) 1-MLSTMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(46)
Japan2020 Retrospective observational cohort studyBlood culture212 (1)MLSTS. argenteus(23)
Thailand2015 CohortInvasive infection (Blood culture)24610 (4.1)MLSTS. argenteus(18)
Myanmar2017 Nasal swab (food handlers)5635 (4.5) (in 110 carrier)MLSTS. argenteus(105)
Taiwan2018 Retrospective studyBlood culture91597MLSTMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(25)
Thailand2019 Original articlePus (rabbits)67 (19 bacteria isolates)3MLSTMALDI‐TOF MS.S. argenteus(20)
Gabon2021 An in vitro studyMonkeys (n  =  38), bats (n  =  16), humans (n  =  3) and gorilla (n  =  1)15658MLST, WGS S. schweitzeri(50)
Nigeria2020 Fomites samples (currency note, computer keyboard)2392MLST, Wholegenome sequencingMALDI-TOF MSS. schweitzeri(106)
Nigeria2018 Original articleFecal samples from E. helvum250 samples (53 isolates)11 (14)MLST MALDI-TOF MSS. schweitzeri, S. argenteus(44)
Gabon2017Short communicationPharyngeal swabs (Bat)1332 (4)PCR, MLSTMALDI-TOF MSS. schweitzeri(49)
Côte d’Ivoire, Gabon, Congo2014Cross-sectional studyAnterior nares and the pharyngeal mucosa (human and monkey)Human (1288) and animal (698)24PCR, MLSTS. schweitzeri(51)
United Kingdom2021Molecular epidemiology case-studyNasal and throat swab RM recruits)10126 (4 recruits)WGS, MLSTS. argenteus(99)
Japan2019Clinical specimens: Sputum (6), pharyn× (2), nasal discharge (2), stool (4), skin and abscess (3), urine (2), vaginal discharge (2), ear discharge (1), blood ( 1), and subdural abscess (1)23 patients24PCR, MLSTMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(21)
Thailand2017Invasive infection68WGS, MLST, PCRS. argenteus(100)
Denmark2017Skin and soft tissue infection, wounds, the ear, the nose25WGS, MLS, PCRS. argenteus(19)
Sweden2019Throat swab, perineum, wound, abces, eczema16WGS PFGEMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(104)
Belgium2016Retrospectively studyClinical laboratories, nasal samples16503 (0.16)MLST and SCCmec typingS. argenteus(101)
China2016Short communication Food products, healthy humans, or hospital infections8396MLSTS. argenteus(36)
United Kingdom2021Original articleHuman, Pig, Gorilla132MLST, CRISPRCasFinder web-serverS. argenteus(47)
France2020Case studyProsthetic-joint infection1WGSS. argenteus(84)
Sweden2020Short Research CommunicationProsthetic-joint infection1WGSMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(87)
North American2021Original articleClinical samples (sterile sites, 11 from nonsterile sites, and 4 from surveillance screens)22WGS, 16S rRNA gene analysisMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(37)
Singapore2021Retrospective cohort studyClinical and screening samples4337WGS, MLSTS. argenteus, (38)
Singapore2021Retrospective cohort studyClinical and screening samples436WGS, MLSTS. singaporensis sp.(38)
Indonesia2021Foot wound116S phylogeny, MLSTMALDI-TOF MSS. roterodami sp.(14)
Gabon2016Cross-sectional studyHuman throat swabs, skin lesions1033 (2 from school children)MLSTS. schweitzeri(107)
China2020Retail foods (4300 samples)1581114MLSTS. argenteus(42)
United States2020Case reportHemodialysis catheter 1MALDITOF MSS. argenteus(18)
Taiwan2020Blood96MLSTPFGEMALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(26)
Myanmar2019Research articleNasal isolates of healthy food handlers (563), clinical isolates (wound swab, pus, and blood)144 + 1376MLSTS. argenteus(108)
Japan2020Case reportConjunctival scraping1Whole-genome sequence, MLSTMALDITOF MSS. argenteus(89)
Japan2021Clinical specimens823 (0.66)MALDI-TOF MSS. argenteus(103)

Characteristics of the Studies Included in the Review of Staphylococcus aureus Complex

Staphylococcus schweitzeri: S. schweitzeri is typically acquired as a strain that colonizes the nasopharynx of Afrotropical wildlife, particularly in primates and bats. However, it can also be found on fomites (50, 51, 106), and three S. schweitzeri isolates have been reported from human nasopharyngeal samples in Gabon (107). It has exhibited nearly the same virulence factor as those presented in other S. aureus complexes, such as exfoliative toxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst) enterotoxins (seb, sec), Panton-Valentine leukocidins (50, 51), autolysins, hemolysins (hla) (49, 50), adhesins, polysaccharide capsules, immune evasion factors, and fibronectin-binding proteins (FnBPA, FnBPB) (50, 51). It can exert a cytotoxic effect on the human cell line (77) and has demonstrated host cell invasion, activation of host cells with the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and intracellular cytotoxicity comparable to S. aureus. However, its extracellular cytotoxicity surpasses that of S. aureus. Moreover, it can produce more biofilm than S. aureus but is lower than Staphylococcus epidermidis. It is also capable of escaping from phagolysosomes (50). However, fecal specimens from straw-colored fruit bats (Eidolon helvum) (44) and fomites S. schweitzeri isolates revealed the absence of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes. Only one of the isolates contains icaC (intracellular adhesion gene) (106). Seems likely S. schweitzeri will emerge as a zoonotic strain within the genus Staphylococcus. As of now, no antibiotic resistance has been reported (107). In terms of epidemiology, S. schweitzeri appears to be associated with wildlife. It has been reported in several countries, including Gabon (2 reports), Nigeria (2 reports), Côte d’Ivoire, and Congo (1 report).

9. <i>Staphylococcus singaporensis</i> and <i>Staphylococcus roterodami</i>

The clinical manifestations of S. singaporensis isolated from cholecystostomy were similar to those caused by S. aureus. It led to skin and soft tissue infections in 66.7% of cases. However, S. singaporensis appears to possess fewer toxin genes than S. aureus. This bacterial group contains staphylococcal protein A, coagulase, and crtM genes, but it lacks staphylococcal enterotoxins, tst-1, pvl, and mobile genetic elements such as phages, pathogenicity islands, and genomic islands (38). Staphylococcus roterodami has been isolated from a foot wound specimen in the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam. However, this bacterium’s pathogenicity and virulence factors have not been investigated (14). Overall, S. singaporensis isolates are susceptible to various antibiotics, including penicillin, mupirocin, oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, fusidic acid, ciprofloxacin, minocycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, teicoplanin, quinupristin – dalfopristin, and vancomycin while one isolate shows resistance to gentamicin (38). On the other hand, S. roterodami is susceptible to all antimicrobial drugs, including cefoxitin, benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, gentamycin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin, tetracycline, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, fusidic acid, mupirocin, rifampicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, except for polymyxin B (14). S. singaporensis and S. roterodami differ in their epidemiology; S. singaporensis has been reported from Singapore, while S. roterodami has been indicated from Indonesia. As of this writing, no further reports of these bacteria have been published, and no data on resistance genes, virulence factors, and the epidemiology of these bacteria are available.

10. Role of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Complex in Food Poisoning

Staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) is caused by staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), which are formed beforehand in food products. Various species of Staphylococci, including S. aureus and recently S. argenteus, carry SE genes found in mobile genetic elements (41, 109). Different studies have proposed twenty SE and SE-like genes, including five classical enterotoxins (sea-to-see genes) (110, 111). Various new SEs (SEG, SEH, SEI, SEM, SEN, and SEO) have recently been identified as triggers for SFP without producing SEs (112, 113). As mentioned, S. argenteus is also one of the leading causes of foodborne diseases globally, with various staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (sea, sec, sed, seb, seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, selu2, sec3, ear, selk, selq, selX, secY, sey, sea, sed) reported from food specimens (19-21, 23, 41), (37, 47, 77, 92-94), (99, 101, 102).

11. Conclusions

The present review focuses on the unique clinical, taxonomic, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of the S. aureus complex, specifically S. argenteus, S. schweitzeri, S. roterodami, and S. singaporensis. Although S. argenteus and S. aureus share similarities, S. argenteus has a lower virulence but a higher bacteremia-related mortality. S. schweitzeri is mainly linked to wildlife and has the potential to be transmitted to humans, while S. singaporensis and S. roterodami remain poorly understood. Significant knowledge gaps in global epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, and transmission patterns need further genomic and clinical research. Accurate diagnosis, infection control, and food safety monitoring are crucial to minimize these emerging pathogens’ risks.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Ludwig W, Schleife K, Whitman W. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evolut Microbiol. 2010;60(3):469-72. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0.
  • 2.
    Schleifer K, Bell JA. Family VIII. Staphylococcaceae fam. nov. Bergey's Manual Syst Bacteriol. 2009;3:392.
  • 3.
    List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature. Family Staphylococcaceae. 2025. Available from: https://lpsn.dsmz.de/family/Staphylococcaceae.
  • 4.
    Gotz T, Verfuss UK, Schnitzler HU. 'Eavesdropping' in wild rough-toothed dolphins (Steno bredanensis)? Biol Lett. 2006;2(1):5-7. [PubMed ID: 17148311]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1617177]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0407.
  • 5.
    Ogston A. Micrococcus poisoning. J Anat Physiol. 1882;17(Pt 1):24-58. [PubMed ID: 17231450]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1310127].
  • 6.
    Rosenbach FJ. Mikro-organismen bei den Wund-infections-krankheiten des menschen. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1884. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.22955.
  • 7.
    Flügge C. Die mikroorganismen. Leipzig, Germany: Verlag FCW Vogel; 1886.
  • 8.
    Prévot AR. Manuel de classification et de détermination des bactéries anaérobies. Paris, France: Masson; 1957.
  • 9.
    Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names (amended). Washington, USA: ASM Press; 1989.
  • 10.
    Euzéby JP. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. LPSN; 1997. Available from: https://lpsn.dsmz.de/.
  • 11.
    Madhaiyan M, Wirth JS, Saravanan VS. Phylogenomic analyses of the Staphylococcaceae family suggest the reclassification of five species within the genus Staphylococcus as heterotypic synonyms, the promotion of five subspecies to novel species, the taxonomic reassignment of five Staphylococcus species to Mammaliicoccus gen. nov., and the formal assignment of Nosocomiicoccus to the family Staphylococcaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70(11):5926-36. [PubMed ID: 33052802]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004498.
  • 12.
    Tong SY, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Thaden JT, Whitney AR, Yang SJ, Mishra NN, et al. Virulence of endemic nonpigmented northern Australian Staphylococcus aureus clone (clonal complex 75, S. argenteus) is not augmented by staphyloxanthin. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(3):520-7. [PubMed ID: 23599317]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3699000]. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit173.
  • 13.
    Schleifer KH. The cell envelope. Staphylococci and staphylococcal infections. 1983;2:385-428.
  • 14.
    Schutte AHJ, Strepis N, Zandijk WHA, Bexkens ML, Bode LGM, Klaassen CHW. Characterization of Staphylococcus roterodami sp. nov., a new species within the Staphylococcus aureus complex isolated from a human foot infection. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(9). [PubMed ID: 34582327]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004996.
  • 15.
    Akoua-Koffi C, Kacou N'Douba A, Djaman JA, Herrmann M, Schaumburg F, Niemann S. Staphylococcus schweitzeri-an emerging one health pathogen? Microorganisms. 2022;10(4). [PubMed ID: 35456820]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9026344]. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10040770.
  • 16.
    Becker K, Schaumburg F, Kearns A, Larsen AR, Lindsay JA, Skov RL, et al. Implications of identifying the recently defined members of the Staphylococcus aureus complex S. argenteus and S. schweitzeri: A position paper of members of the ESCMID study group for Staphylococci and Staphylococcal diseases (ESGS). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(9):1064-70. [PubMed ID: 30872103]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.028.
  • 17.
    Lindsay JA, Holden MT. Staphylococcus aureus: Superbug, super genome? Trends Microbiol. 2004;12(8):378-85. [PubMed ID: 15276614]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.004.
  • 18.
    Bayer AS, Tong SYC. Case commentary: Daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus argenteus-from Northern Australia to San Francisco. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64(10). [PubMed ID: 32718962]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7508616]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01502-20.
  • 19.
    Hansen TA, Bartels MD, Hogh SV, Dons LE, Pedersen M, Jensen TG, et al. Whole genome sequencing of danish Staphylococcus argenteus reveals a genetically diverse collection with clear separation from Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1512. [PubMed ID: 28848522]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5552656]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01512.
  • 20.
    Indrawattana N, Pumipuntu N, Suriyakhun N, Jangsangthong A, Kulpeanprasit S, Chantratita N, et al. Staphylococcus argenteus from rabbits in Thailand. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8(4). e00665. [PubMed ID: 29931813]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6460352]. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.665.
  • 21.
    Aung MS, Urushibara N, Kawaguchiya M, Sumi A, Takahashi S, Ike M, et al. Molecular epidemiological characterization of Staphylococcus argenteus clinical isolates in Japan: Identification of three clones (ST1223, ST2198, and ST2550) and a novel Staphylocoagulase genotype XV. Microorganisms. 2019;7(10). [PubMed ID: 31554314]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6843175]. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7100389.
  • 22.
    Kloos WE, Musselwhite MS. Distribution and persistence of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species and other aerobic bacteria on human skin. Appl Microbiol. 1975;30(3):381-5. [PubMed ID: 810086]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC187193]. https://doi.org/10.1128/am.30.3.381-395.1975.
  • 23.
    Kitagawa H, Ohge H, Hisatsune J, Masuda K, Aziz F, Hara T, et al. Low incidence of Staphylococcus argenteus bacteremia in Hiroshima, Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(1):140-3. [PubMed ID: 31377128]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2019.07.011.
  • 24.
    Chantratita N, Wikraiphat C, Tandhavanant S, Wongsuvan G, Ariyaprasert P, Suntornsut P, et al. Comparison of community-onset Staphylococcus argenteus and Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in Thailand: A prospective multicentre observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(5):458 e11-9. [PubMed ID: 26806258]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4898209]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.008.
  • 25.
    Chen SY, Lee H, Teng SH, Wang XM, Lee TF, Huang YC, et al. Accurate differentiation of novel Staphylococcus argenteus from Staphylococcus aureus using MALDI-TOF MS. Future Microbiol. 2018;13:997-1006. [PubMed ID: 29952240]. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2018-0015.
  • 26.
    Sendi P, Rohrbach M, Graber P, Frei R, Ochsner PE, Zimmerli W. Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants in prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43(8):961-7. [PubMed ID: 16983605]. https://doi.org/10.1086/507633.
  • 27.
    Faridi A, Kareshk AT, Fatahi-Bafghi M, Ziasistani M, Ghahraman MRK, Seyyed-Yousefi SZ, et al. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical samples of patients with external ocular infection. Iran J Microbiol. 2018;10(4):215-9. [PubMed ID: 30483372]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6243151].
  • 28.
    Ferreira AM, Bonesso MF, Mondelli AL, da Cunha Mde L. Identification of Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from patients with urinary tract infection using a simple set of biochemical tests correlating with 16S-23S interspace region molecular weight patterns. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;91(3):406-11. [PubMed ID: 23041266]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2012.09.024.
  • 29.
    Fang C, Zhou Z, Li J, Zhou M. Emergence of Staphylococcus argenteus in pediatrics: Molecular insights from a hospital in East China. Virulence. 2024;15(1):2396477. [PubMed ID: 39185671]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11364062]. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2024.2396477.
  • 30.
    Sadeh M, Khalili MB, Azartoos N, Rahmanian Kushkaki H, Sarhaddi Nasab S. [Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA among medical and medical laboratory students of Shahid Sadoughi of Medical Sciences]. Yazd, Iran. 20th International Congress of Microbiology of Iran; 2020. FA.
  • 31.
    Khalili MB, Moshref M, Sharifi M, Sadeh M, Sazmand A. [Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in personnel of operation room of Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran]. Payavard Salamat. 2013;6(5):392-402. FA.
  • 32.
    Rong D, Liu Z, Huang J, Zhang F, Wu Q, Dai J, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus argenteus isolated from rice and flour products in Guangdong, China. Int J Food Microbiol. 2023;406:110348. [PubMed ID: 37573713]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110348.
  • 33.
    Zebovitz E, Evans JB, Niven CJ. Tellurite-glycine agar: A selective plating medium for the quantitative detection of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Bacteriol. 1955;70(6):686-90. [PubMed ID: 13271314]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC386272]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.70.6.686-690.1955.
  • 34.
    Gillaspy AF, Iandolo JJ. Staphylococcus. In: Schmidt TM, editor. Encyclopedia of Microbiology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2009. p. 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012373944-5.00237-6.
  • 35.
    Tong SYC, Schaumburg F, Ellington MJ, Corander J, Pichon B, Leendertz F, et al. Novel staphylococcal species that form part of a Staphylococcus aureus-related complex: The non-pigmented Staphylococcus argenteus sp. nov. and the non-human primate-associated Staphylococcus schweitzeri sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015;65(Pt 1):15-22. [PubMed ID: 25269845]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4298100]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.062752-0.
  • 36.
    Zhang DF, Xu X, Song Q, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Song M, et al. Identification of Staphylococcus argenteus in Eastern China based on a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) gene. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:1113-21. [PubMed ID: 27561462]. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2016-0017.
  • 37.
    Eshaghi A, Bommersbach C, Zittermann S, Burnham CA, Patel R, Schuetz AN, et al. Phenotypic and genomic profiling of Staphylococcus argenteus in Canada and the United States and recommendations for clinical result reporting. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(6). [PubMed ID: 33731414]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8316026]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02470-20.
  • 38.
    Chew KL, Octavia S, Lai D, Lin RTP, Teo JWP. Staphylococcus singaporensis sp. nov., a new member of the Staphylococcus aureus complex, isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(10). [PubMed ID: 34698625]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005067.
  • 39.
    Chaalal W, Chaalal N, Bourafa N, Kihal M, Diene SM, Rolain JM. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food products in Western Algeria. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2018;15(6):353-60. [PubMed ID: 29638169]. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2339.
  • 40.
    Suzuki Y, Kubota H, Ono HK, Kobayashi M, Murauchi K, Kato R, et al. Food poisoning outbreak in Tokyo, Japan caused by Staphylococcus argenteus. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;262:31-7. [PubMed ID: 28961520]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.09.005.
  • 41.
    Wakabayashi Y, Umeda K, Yonogi S, Nakamura H, Yamamoto K, Kumeda Y, et al. Staphylococcal food poisoning caused by Staphylococcus argenteus harboring staphylococcal enterotoxin genes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;265:23-9. [PubMed ID: 29112896]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.10.022.
  • 42.
    Wu S, Huang J, Zhang F, Dai J, Pang R, Zhang J, et al. Staphylococcus argenteus isolated from retail foods in China: Incidence, antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation and toxin gene profile. Food Microbiol. 2020;91:103531. [PubMed ID: 32539963]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103531.
  • 43.
    Foster TJ. The Staphylococcus aureus "superbug". J Clin Invest. 2004;114(12):1693-6. [PubMed ID: 15599392]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC535074]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23825.
  • 44.
    Olatimehin A, Shittu AO, Onwugamba FC, Mellmann A, Becker K, Schaumburg F. Staphylococcus aureus complex in the straw-colored fruit bat (eidolon helvum) in Nigeria. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:162. [PubMed ID: 29487577]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5816944]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00162.
  • 45.
    Rossi BF, Bonsaglia ECR, Castilho IG, Dantas STA, Langoni H, Pantoja JCF, et al. First investigation of Staphylococcus argenteus in a Brazilian collections of S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16(1):252. [PubMed ID: 32690007]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7372812]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02472-7.
  • 46.
    Schuster D, Rickmeyer J, Gajdiss M, Thye T, Lorenzen S, Reif M, et al. Differentiation of Staphylococcus argenteus (formerly: Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 75) by mass spectrometry from S. aureus using the first strain isolated from a wild African great ape. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017;307(1):57-63. [PubMed ID: 27931949]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.11.003.
  • 47.
    Goswami C, Fox S, Holden M, Leanord A, Evans TJ. Genomic analysis of global Staphylococcus argenteus strains reveals distinct lineages with differing virulence and antibiotic resistance gene content. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:795173. [PubMed ID: 34925305]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8677677]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.795173.
  • 48.
    Peton V, Le Loir Y. Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:602-15. [PubMed ID: 23974078]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.011.
  • 49.
    Held J, Gmeiner M, Mordmuller B, Matsiegui PB, Schaer J, Eckerle I, et al. Bats are rare reservoirs of Staphylococcus aureus complex in Gabon. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;47:118-20. [PubMed ID: 27894991]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.022.
  • 50.
    Grossmann A, Frobose NJ, Mellmann A, Alabi AS, Schaumburg F, Niemann S. An in vitro study on Staphylococcus schweitzeri virulence. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1157. [PubMed ID: 33442048]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7806826]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-80961-x.
  • 51.
    Schaumburg F, Pauly M, Anoh E, Mossoun A, Wiersma L, Schubert G, et al. Staphylococcus aureus complex from animals and humans in three remote African regions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(4):345 e1-8. [PubMed ID: 25596779]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001.
  • 52.
    Holt DC, Holden MT, Tong SY, Castillo-Ramirez S, Clarke L, Quail MA, et al. A very early-branching Staphylococcus aureus lineage lacking the carotenoid pigment staphyloxanthin. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:881-95. [PubMed ID: 21813488]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3175761]. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr078.
  • 53.
    Xiong YQ, Yang SJ, Tong SY, Alvarez DN, Mishra NN. The role of Staphylococcal carotenogenesis in resistance to host defense peptides and in vivo virulence in experimental endocarditis model. Pathog Dis. 2015;73(7). [PubMed ID: 26242278]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4607738]. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftv056.
  • 54.
    Suzuki Y, Kubota H, Kakuda T, Takai S, Sadamasu K. Complete genome sequences of Staphylococcus argenteus Tokyo13064 and Tokyo13069, isolated from specimens obtained during a food poisoning outbreak in Tokyo, Japan. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2021;10(10). [PubMed ID: 33707339]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7953302]. https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.01447-20.
  • 55.
    Schleifer KH, Kloos WE. A simple test system for the separation of staphylococci from micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1975;1(3):337-8. [PubMed ID: 1100662]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC275080]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.1.3.337-338.1975.
  • 56.
    Falk D, Guering SJ. Differentiation of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp. with the taxo a bacitracin disk. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18(3):719-21. [PubMed ID: 6355156]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC270882]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.18.3.719-721.1983.
  • 57.
    Baker JS. Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19(6):875-9. [PubMed ID: 6381527]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC271202]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.19.6.875-879.1984.
  • 58.
    Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH. Staphylococcus and micrococcus. In: Hoos WE, Bannerman TL, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, USA: ASM Press; 1999.
  • 59.
    Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, et al. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology: Volume 3: The Firmicutes. 3. New York, USA: Springer; 2011.
  • 60.
    Křížová P. Invazivní meningokokové onemocnění. Pediatrie pro praxi. 2005;2(2):74-8.
  • 61.
    Pantucek R, Sedlacek I, Petras P, Koukalova D, Svec P, Stetina V, et al. Staphylococcus simiae sp. nov., isolated from South American squirrel monkeys. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55(Pt 5):1953-8. [PubMed ID: 16166694]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63590-0.
  • 62.
    Hsu JC, Wan TW, Lee H, Wang XM, Lin YT, Jung CJ, et al. Heterogeneity of molecular characteristics among Staphylococcus argenteus clinical isolates (ST2250, ST2793, ST1223, and ST2198) in Northern Taiwan. Microorganisms. 2020;8(8). [PubMed ID: 32751608]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7464136]. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081157.
  • 63.
    Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Fox GE, Seewaldt E, Stackebrandt E. A phylogenetic analysis of staphylococci, Peptococcus saccharolyticus and Micrococcus mucilaginosus. J Gen Microbiol. 1981;125(2):357-66. [PubMed ID: 6172548]. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-125-2-357.
  • 64.
    Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30(7):1654-60. [PubMed ID: 1629319]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC265359]. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.30.7.1654-1660.1992.
  • 65.
    Ronholm J, Nasheri N, Petronella N, Pagotto F. Navigating microbiological food safety in the era of whole-genome sequencing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(4):837-57. [PubMed ID: 27559074]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5010751]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00056-16.
  • 66.
    Fatahi-Bafghi M, Zandi H. Whole-genome sequencing in food-borne pathogenic bacteria. J Food Quality Hazards Control. 2021;8(3):94-5. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfqhc.8.3.7194.
  • 67.
    Besser J, Carleton HA, Gerner-Smidt P, Lindsey RL, Trees E. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their application to the study and control of bacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(4):335-41. [PubMed ID: 29074157]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5857210]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.013.
  • 68.
    Kwong JC, McCallum N, Sintchenko V, Howden BP. Whole genome sequencing in clinical and public health microbiology. Pathology. 2015;47(3):199-210. [PubMed ID: 25730631]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4389090]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000235.
  • 69.
    Land M, Hauser L, Jun SR, Nookaew I, Leuze MR, Ahn TH, et al. Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing. Funct Integr Genomics. 2015;15(2):141-61. [PubMed ID: 25722247]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4361730]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-015-0433-4.
  • 70.
    World Health Organization. Whole genome sequencing for foodborne disease surveillance: Landscape paper. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/789241513869.
  • 71.
    Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74(3). [PubMed ID: 38512750]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10963913]. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006300.
  • 72.
    Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110(10):1281-6. [PubMed ID: 28204908]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4.
  • 73.
    Majidzadeh M, Fatahi-Bafghi M. Current taxonomy of Rhodococcus species and their role in infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(11):2045-62. [PubMed ID: 30159693]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3364-x.
  • 74.
    Suzuki H, Lefebure T, Bitar PP, Stanhope MJ. Comparative genomic analysis of the genus Staphylococcus including Staphylococcus aureus and its newly described sister species Staphylococcus simiae. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:38. [PubMed ID: 22272658]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3317825]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-38.
  • 75.
    Uelze L, Grutzke J, Borowiak M, Hammerl JA, Juraschek K, Deneke C, et al. Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data. One Health Outlook. 2020;2:3. [PubMed ID: 33829127]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7993478]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-020-0010-1.
  • 76.
    Ng JW, Holt DC, Lilliebridge RA, Stephens AJ, Huygens F, Tong SY, et al. Phylogenetically distinct Staphylococcus aureus lineage prevalent among indigenous communities in northern Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2295-300. [PubMed ID: 19420161]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2708510]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00122-09.
  • 77.
    Johansson C, Rautelin H, Kaden R. Staphylococcus argenteus and Staphylococcus schweitzeri are cytotoxic to human cells in vitro due to high expression of alpha-hemolysin Hla. Virulence. 2019;10(1):502-10. [PubMed ID: 31131704]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6550535]. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2019.1620062.
  • 78.
    Okumura N, Kutsuna S, Tsukada A, Mezaki K, Nagashima M, Ohmagari N. Successful treatment of Staphylococcus argenteus sequence type 2198 uncomplicated bacteremia with a 2-week antibiotic course. IJID Reg. 2024;13:100443. [PubMed ID: 39386113]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11462222]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2024.100443.
  • 79.
    Thaipadungpanit J, Amornchai P, Nickerson EK, Wongsuvan G, Wuthiekanun V, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus argenteus infections in Thailand. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(3):1005-8. [PubMed ID: 25568440]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4390622]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03049-14.
  • 80.
    Dupieux C, Blonde R, Bouchiat C, Meugnier H, Bes M, Laurent S, et al. Community-acquired infections due to Staphylococcus argenteus lineage isolates harbouring the Panton-Valentine leucocidin, France, 2014. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(23). [PubMed ID: 26084314]. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es2015.20.23.21154.
  • 81.
    Chen SY, Lee H, Wang XM, Lee TF, Liao CH, Teng LJ, et al. High mortality impact of Staphylococcus argenteus on patients with community-onset staphylococcal bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52(6):747-53. [PubMed ID: 30149137]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.017.
  • 82.
    Mitsutake K, Watanabe N, Karaushi H, Tarumoto N, Koyama S, Ebihara Y, et al. Thoracic aortic mycotic aneurysm due to Staphylococcus argenteus: A case report. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(11):1213-5. [PubMed ID: 32839112]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2020.05.003.
  • 83.
    Rigaill J, Grattard F, Grange S, Forest F, Haddad E, Carricajo A, et al. Community-acquired Staphylococcus argenteus sequence type 2250 bone and joint infection, France, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(10):1958-61. [PubMed ID: 30226182]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6154148]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2410.180727.
  • 84.
    Diot A, Dyon-Tafani V, Bergot M, Tasse J, Martins-Simoes P, Josse J, et al. Investigation of a Staphylococcus argenteus strain involved in a chronic prosthetic-joint infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17). [PubMed ID: 32872360]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7503304]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176245.
  • 85.
    Soderquist B, Wildeman P, Stenmark B, Stegger M. Staphylococcus argenteus as an etiological agent of prosthetic hip joint infection: A case presentation. J Bone Jt Infect. 2020;5(4):172-5. [PubMed ID: 32670770]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7358968]. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.44848.
  • 86.
    Ohnishi T, Shinjoh M, Ohara H, Kawai T, Kamimaki I, Mizushima R, et al. Purulent lymphadenitis caused by Staphylococcus argenteus, representing the first Japanese case of Staphylococcus argenteus (multilocus sequence type 2250) infection in a 12-year-old boy. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(11):925-7. [PubMed ID: 29709375]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2018.03.018.
  • 87.
    Alhussein F, Furstenberg J, Gaupp R, Eisenbeis J, Last K, Becker SL, et al. Human infections caused by Staphylococcus argenteus in Germany: Genetic characterisation and clinical implications of novel species designation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(12):2461-5. [PubMed ID: 32572654]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7669802]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03950-4.
  • 88.
    Aziz F, Hisatsune J, Ono HK, Kajimura J, Yu L, Masuda K, et al. Genomic analysis and identification of a novel superantigen, SargEY, in Staphylococcus argenteus isolated from atopic dermatitis lesions. mSphere. 2024;9(7). e0050524. [PubMed ID: 38990001]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11288046]. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00505-24.
  • 89.
    Yamada K, Sasaki M, Imai W, Kato M, Maehara C, Yasui K, et al. Bacterial keratoconjunctivitis caused by Staphylococcus argenteus belonging to sequence type 1223 isolated in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(9):1002-4. [PubMed ID: 32471795]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2020.04.026.
  • 90.
    Pumipuntu N. Staphylococcus argenteus: An emerging subclinical bovine mastitis pathogen in Thailand. Vet World. 2019;12(12):1940-4. [PubMed ID: 32095044]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6989318]. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1940-1944.
  • 91.
    Jiang B, You B, Tan L, Yu S, Li H, Bai G, et al. Clinical Staphylococcus argenteus develops to small colony variants to promote persistent infection. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1347. [PubMed ID: 30013523]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6036243]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01347.
  • 92.
    Schaumburg F, Alabi AS, Kock R, Mellmann A, Kremsner PG, Boesch C, et al. Highly divergent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from African non-human primates. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012;4(1):141-6. [PubMed ID: 23757241]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00316.x.
  • 93.
    Kaden R, Engstrand L, Rautelin H, Johansson C. Which methods are appropriate for the detection of Staphylococcus argenteus and is it worthwhile to distinguish S. argenteus from S. aureus? Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:2335-44. [PubMed ID: 30538503]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6254542]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S179390.
  • 94.
    Zhang DF, Zhi XY, Zhang J, Paoli GC, Cui Y, Shi C, et al. Preliminary comparative genomics revealed pathogenic potential and international spread of Staphylococcus argenteus. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):808. [PubMed ID: 29058585]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5651615]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4149-9.
  • 95.
    McDonald M, Dougall A, Holt D, Huygens F, Oppedisano F, Giffard PM, et al. Use of a single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping system to demonstrate the unique epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote aboriginal communities. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3720-7. [PubMed ID: 17021102]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1594797]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00836-06.
  • 96.
    Jenney A, Holt D, Ritika R, Southwell P, Pravin S, Buadromo E, et al. The clinical and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Fiji. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:160. [PubMed ID: 24655406]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3998116]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-160.
  • 97.
    Monecke S, Stieber B, Roberts R, Akpaka PE, Slickers P, Ehricht R. Population structure of Staphylococcus aureus from Trinidad & Tobago. PLoS One. 2014;9(2). e89120. [PubMed ID: 24586536]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3929661]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089120.
  • 98.
    Tong SY, Lilliebridge RA, Bishop EJ, Cheng AC, Holt DC, McDonald MI, et al. Clinical correlates of panton-valentine leukocidin (PVL), PVL isoforms, and clonal complex in the Staphylococcus aureus population of Northern Australia. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(5):760-9. [PubMed ID: 20662623]. https://doi.org/10.1086/655396.
  • 99.
    Jauneikaite E, Pichon B, Mosavie M, Fallowfield JL, Davey T, Thorpe N, et al. Characterisation of Staphylococcus argenteus carried by healthy Royal Marines: A molecular epidemiology case-study. medRxiv. 2021;Preprint. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.03.21257959.
  • 100.
    Moradigaravand D, Jamrozy D, Mostowy R, Anderson A, Nickerson EK, Thaipadungpanit J, et al. Evolution of the Staphylococcus argenteus ST2250 clone in Northeastern Thailand Is linked with the acquisition of livestock-Associated Staphylococcal genes. mBio. 2017;8(4). [PubMed ID: 28679748]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5573676]. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00802-17.
  • 101.
    Argudin MA, Dodemont M, Vandendriessche S, Rottiers S, Tribes C, Roisin S, et al. Low occurrence of the new species Staphylococcus argenteus in a Staphylococcus aureus collection of human isolates from Belgium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(6):1017-22. [PubMed ID: 27044019]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2632-x.
  • 102.
    Ruimy R, Angebault C, Djossou F, Dupont C, Epelboin L, Jarraud S, et al. Are host genetics the predominant determinant of persistent nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in humans? J Infect Dis. 2010;202(6):924-34. [PubMed ID: 20677941]. https://doi.org/10.1086/655901.
  • 103.
    Aung MS, Urushibara N, Kawaguchiya M, Hirose M, Ike M, Ito M, et al. Distribution of virulence factors and resistance determinants in three genotypes of Staphylococcus argenteus clinical isolates in Japan. Pathogens. 2021;10(2). [PubMed ID: 33546443]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7913748]. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10020163.
  • 104.
    Giske CG, Dyrkell F, Arnellos D, Vestberg N, Hermansson Panna S, Froding I, et al. Transmission events and antimicrobial susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus argenteus in Stockholm. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(10):1289 e5-8. [PubMed ID: 31229597]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.003.
  • 105.
    Aung MS, San T, Aye MM, Mya S, Maw WW, Zan KN, et al. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus argenteus isolates harboring panton-valentine leukocidin, enterotoxins, and TSST-1 genes from food handlers in Myanmar. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9(8). [PubMed ID: 28777321]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5577575]. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9080241.
  • 106.
    Shittu AO, Mellmann A, Schaumburg F. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus complex from fomites in Nigeria. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;85:104504. [PubMed ID: 32805430]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104504.
  • 107.
    Okuda KV, Toepfner N, Alabi AS, Arnold B, Belard S, Falke U, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus from Lambarene, Gabon. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35(12):1963-73. [PubMed ID: 27553495]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2748-z.
  • 108.
    Aung MS, San T, San N, Oo WM, Ko PM, Thet KT, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus argenteus in Myanmar: Identification of novel genotypes/clusters in staphylocoagulase, protein A, alpha-haemolysin and other virulence factors. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(1):95-104. [PubMed ID: 30418108]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000869.
  • 109.
    Cavaiuolo M, Lefebvre D, Mutel I, Vingadassalon N, Merda D, Hennekinne JA, et al. First report of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus argenteus as a foodborne pathogen. Int J Food Microbiol. 2023;394:110182. [PubMed ID: 36965358]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110182.
  • 110.
    Ono HK, Sato'o Y, Narita K, Naito I, Hirose S, Hisatsune J, et al. Identification and Characterization of a novel Staphylococcal emetic toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(20):7034-40. [PubMed ID: 26231643]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4579459]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01873-15.
  • 111.
    Hennekinne JA, De Buyser ML, Dragacci S. Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: Characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(4):815-36. [PubMed ID: 22091892]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00311.x.
  • 112.
    Umeda K, Nakamura H, Yamamoto K, Nishina N, Yasufuku K, Hirai Y, et al. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of staphylococcal foodborne outbreak of Staphylococcus aureus harboring seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, and selu genes without production of classical enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;256:30-5. [PubMed ID: 28582663]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.05.023.
  • 113.
    Jorgensen HJ, Mathisen T, Lovseth A, Omoe K, Qvale KS, Loncarevic S. An outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning caused by enterotoxin H in mashed potato made with raw milk. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;252(2):267-72. [PubMed ID: 16213675]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.005.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles