Various studies in recent years have shown that oral diseases, such as periodontal diseases, are the risk factors or indicators for some systemic diseases such as coronary disease, stroke, peripheral vascular diseases, metabolic syndromes, hypertension, obesity and hyperlipidemia (
29). Recently, it has been proposed that periodontal disease may be associated with breast cancer (
30). Oral microbiologic profile determination could be a suitable approach for management of the oral diseases. Classical tests based on traditional phenotypic methods are very time consuming and inconvenient and on the other hand sometimes diagnosis and isolation of these bacteria are not easily done. In contrast, PCR as a steadfast, precise and sensitive method can be reasonable and suitable advanced replacement for diagnosis and control of these bacteria (
7,
31).
In this study to achieve simple, rapid and accurate methods for detecting two of the most important bacteria in oral diseases, we designed and compared two diagnostic molecular assays. So a multiplex PCR assay and a quantitative SYBR green real time PCR for simultaneous detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans and T. forsythensis were designed and their analytical specificity and sensitivity was evaluated. One of the most important points in this approach is the primers design. After downloading sequences of the target genes from GeneBank of NCBI, they were aligned and then the consensus region was used for designing primers. It guarantees that the diagnostic primers anneal to all versions of the genes that are currently registered in GeneBank . It’s notable that in most of the studies, just one sequence has been used for primer design.
Multiplex PCR method is a suitable, precise and sensitive method due to reducing detection time with the basis of targeting different diagnostic genes of causative microorganisms . An additional important subject for designing multiplex primers is their Tm values which must be similar whereas the PCR products have different sizes. In this study compared with other similar studies, all the mentioned points were investigated. In a study by Leblebicioglu et al. in 2009, the PCR products were not differentiable and the band sizes were too short but the present study was designed in a way that the band sizes are at least 100 bp (
32).
In this study, the PCR products were cloned into pTZ57R/T plasmid after optimized amplification of the target genes, and also to practice in following steps of the study the confirmed plasmids were used as positive controls. In nearly all other studies, the genomic DNA has been used as the positive control, Leblebicioglu et.al studies, in 2009 are the examples in this regard (
32). It is obvious that cloning a gene into a plasmid vector in addition to inestimable access to the desired amount of amplified gene is possible to take advantage of having a stable positive control through cloning the gene into the plasmid.
The high sensitivity of the designed conventional PCR assay was determined via LOD determination. As a result, the LOD was 1200 copies for 16S rRNA gene and 5200 copies for hbpA gene. D'Ercole et al., in 2008 have compared the culture method and 16S rRNA gene multiplex PCR to detect the periodont pathogenic bacteria. The LOD of their multiplex PCR was 10
2 - 10
3 cells (
33). Flemmig et al. in 1995, by used the artificial contamination method to calculate the LOD of leukotoxin gene lktA to detect
A. actinomycetemcomitans finding 10
3 CFU/mL. In their study, enriching the samples on tryptic soy-serum-bacitracin-vancomycin agar prior to PCR improved the LOD to 10
2 CFU/mL (
34). Conrads and his colleagues in 1999 determined the LOD of 16S rRNA PCR to detect
T. forsythensis as 50 CFU/mL (
35). The variation in the LOD estimations is partially due to the use of different primers and/or performing PCR using various thermal cycling programs. Also the selected methods for the estimation can influence the final results. LOD is one of the most important items in target amplification tests and there are various methods for its determination.
According the above studies one of these methods is preparing serial dilution of bacteria, counting and determining the CFU. Despite the high accuracy of these techniques, being time consuming and necessity to use live bacteria are some of its disadvantages. The other method to determine LOD is to measure the genome concentration, prepare serial dilution, estimate genome copy number in each dilution, conducting PCR at different dilutions, and finally estimate the LOD. However, one of the important disadvantages of this method is its low precision. According to various studies, cloning of target gene in plasmid and then preparing serial dilutions from it and PCR is one of the best methods for LOD determination (
36) which was also used in the present study.
To improve the sensitivity or LOD of the conventional PCR assay and obtain a quantitative assay, we tried the same primers in SYBR green real time PCR approach. Fortunately, the hbpA- 16S rRNA SYBR green PCR assays at least tenfold increased the test sensitivity. Most of the oral pathogens are present in normal oral cavity with a low profile, but in periodontal diseases increase in their numbers can be happened. So a quantitative molecular method can play a critical role in evaluation of the health or disease of the oral cavity. Although quantitative anaerobic culture is a gold standard for number estimation of the oral pathogens, time consuming, laboring and relatively low level of sensitivity are some of its difficulties.
Various studies have shown a high concordance between results of anaerobic culture and real time PCR method in microbiological evaluation of periodontitis cases (
25,
37-
39). In our quantitative real time PCR experiments, the generated standard curves showed a linear range of 1.74 - 1.74 × 10
6 pg (520 - 520 × 10
6 copies) and 0.42 - 42×10
6 pg (120 – 120 × 10
5 copies) for pTZ57R/T-hbpA and pTZ57R/T-16S templates respectively. So to quantify unknown samples in the above ranges, the Ct value can be used on the standard curves of the respect target gene.to prove the claim, evaluation of the designed assays by using sample plaques of patients or artificially contaminated dental plaques is necessary.
The periodontopathogenic bacteria play an important role in the development and progress of the oral diseases. Thus, diagnosis of A. actinomycetemcomitans and T. forsythensis by using multiplex conventional and SYBR green real time PCR will supply necessary information about the oral bacterial profile and predicting disease in adult periodontitis. This study is the first report of developing and comparing conventional and real time multiplex PCR assay for the oral pathogens in Iran by designing primers and determining sensitivity and specificity, all the criteria necessary for a molecular diagnostic method are met. Domestication and design of the assays in Iran is an important step towards flourishing and development of medical diagnostic laboratories techniques for accurate and precise diagnosis of the oral pathogens.