The three main antibiotics that are used as first-line eradication regimens against
H. pylori are clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxicillin (
16,
17). However,
H. pylori resistance to antimicrobials agents is the main cause of treatment failure (
18). The level of resistance varies between different geographical regions and unfortunately, which is increasing worldwide. This study showed that the rate of resistance to metronidazole is high (78.86%). In developed countries, metronidazole resistance ranges from 10 to 50% while in developing counties, higher rate of resistance are reported (
19). This is may be related to the greater consumption of this drug (
2). In the case of clarithromycin, the second most commonly used antibiotic in
H. pylori management, we found resistance rate as 17.07%. However, in Asian countries, a higher clarithromycin resistance rate has been reported in Japan (40.7%) while, the lowest value has been observed in Malaysia (2.1 %) (
18). In North America, clarithromycin resistance ranges from 2.5 - 12.2 % (
20).
In this research, the amoxicillin resistance was found in 27.64% of isolates. Until now, the resistance to amoxicillin in
H. pylori was reported to be very rare; but have now been reported in USA (
21), Italy (
22), Brazil (
23) and Iran (
2,
24). Multiple drug resistance is a major problem worldwide. In the present study, we remarkably observed double resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole and triple resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxicillin. Pretreatment
H. pylori antibiotic resistance has been reported to compromise the efficacy of management. For example, therapy regimens containing metronidazole and clarithromycin fail in as many as 38% and 55% of cases, respectively, when used to treat infection with an organism non-susceptible to one of these antimicrobial agents (
17).
There are new facts about the existence of various strains of
H. pylori with different levels of virulence (
1,
3,
8,
25-
27). The cagA gene is located at one end of a 40-kilobase DNA section called cag pathogenicity island (cag PAI) (
28,
29). The clinical relevance of the putative virulence- associated genes of
H. pylori and geographical region is still a subject of controversy (
28). The prevalence of cagA-positive
H. pylori strains varies from one geographic region to another (
29). In this research such as the study from Isfahan- Iran (
30), the prevalence of cagA-positive
H. pylori strains was 68.3% which is more similar to the findings reported from Western countries (
18,
27) and Brazil (
31) than those reported from East or Southeast Asia (
14,
28,
32). The presence of the cagA gene is thought to be associated with a further severe clinical outcome of the disease (
3,
27,
33-
35). The current study demonstrated the high prevalence of
H. pylori infection containing cag A in patients from Azerbaijan with peptic ulcer disease than non-ulcer dyspepsia (Pv 0.02). Reports from Turkey (
3) and Iraq (
36) have shown similar results to our findings. Due to the allelic variation in cagA the
H. pylori subtypes can circulate in different regions, the differences in cagA subtype might be a marker for different virulence among cagA positive
H. pylori strains (
32).
Furthermore, the severity of gastric inflammation and the pathology also affect the outcome of therapy (
8,
9). There is now increasing evidences that cagA-positive strains induce an enhanced inflammatory response, mucosal damage and significantly delays healing of ulcers (
1,
8). In this study, the rate of resistance to antibiotics in
H. pylori- cagA positive were higher than cagA negative ones, however no statistically significant difference was found (P value > 0.05). Similarly, some studies also failed to find any general association between virulence markers and antibiotic resistance (
18,
22,
37). This result is inconsistent with other studies that suggesting the statistically relation between drug resistance and cagA-positive strains (
27,
31,
38,
39). There is little information about the relation between the variability of the strain and any outcome on the drug resistance rates of
H. pylori. At the molecular level, there is no hypothetical basis for predicting an association between drug resistance and genotype; as such loci show to be neither physically nor functionally linked by genome organization (
40).
Our research had some limitations. The studied population was not large enough, and our results need to be confirmed by studies on great number of patients. This study only tested the hypothesis that the cagA gene is related to antibiotic resistance. We think additional genetic or environmental factors might influence the interaction of H. pylori and antibiotics. In conclusion, the prevalence of H. pylori resistance is high in this area. Our results indicated that the relationship between drug resistance and the availability of cagA gene was not statistically significant. So, different treatment regimens are not recommended for patients with H. pylori- cagA positive infection.