The Gold-standard test to diagnose septic arthritis is SF culture. Many authors reported 80% positive SF cultures in the best methods (
1,
3). Li et al. showed that routine laboratory tests were useful to confirm a suspected diagnosis, to assess disease activity, and to measure the response and toxicity of the treatment (
3). Gram-staining of SF revealed bacteria in about 50% to 80% of the cases but was an insensitive technique and must be confirmed by culture. SF leukocyte count and concentration of protein and glucose lack specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis (
1). The sensitivity of PMN predominance for aseptic arthritis was 57% whereas the specificity was 10%. The positive predictive value for PMN predominance in aseptic disease was 81% but the negative predictive value was 31% (
1).
In the setting of an acute arthritis in the present study 11 (n = 77) proved septic arthritis caused by organisms except
S. aureus (for example,
S. pneumonia: five,
H. influenzae: two,
Klebsiella spp.: one,
N. meingitis: one,
P. aeruginosa: one,
C. albicans: one) were found and excluded.
S. aureus was the most common type of organisms isolated in SF (7/18) of septic arthritis in childhood. Wang et al. reported
S. aureus as the predominant causative microorganism in 43% (n = 58) of the septic arthritis (mean age = 3 years) which is very close to that of the current study (
2). The low rate of microorganism detection in the studied cases might be due to natural un-growth of microorganism in synovial fluid. Previous antibiotic treatment might explain the false negative cultures or low technical methods in some cases.
Bacterial arthritis diagnosed in the current study cases was far from previous studies in Iran reported in adult cases (45%); and 70% in the pediatric population (
13,
14). The older age of the cases (mean age: 11 ± 3.8 years) in the present study or undefined inclusion criteria for selection of cases could explain these differences (
14). Relatively low number of laboratory confirmed cases of bacterial arthritis observed in the present study, in cases with strong clinical suspicion of infection or cases with inflammatory arthritis, and signs and symptoms of bacterial arthritis in infants and older children are often nonspecific and it is not always possible to make a differential diagnosis between bacterial and aseptic arthritis (
1). Reactive arthritis is more frequent than bacterial arthritis in childhood (
1-
3). Some of the cases with negative culture, and negative Gram-stain samples are categorized as inflammatory non-septic or reactive arthritis (
3). Li et al. concluded that laboratory tests do not rule out septic arthritis with accuracy in 73 adult cases with septic arthritis (
3). Using the confirmatory diagnostic tests (PCR) was unavailable in the present study to rule out the false negative cultures (
4-
6). Here,
S. aureus was the most common cause of septic arthritis in the studied children which was very close to all previous Iranian studies and also those of Li et al. and Wang et al. in Taiwan(
1-
3,
13,
14).
In contrast to culture,
S. aureus toxins were detected in synovial fluid of 47% of the arthritis cases. Staphylococcal superantigens have been implicated in the pathogenesis of some inflammatory diseases (
7). No correlation was observed between isolation of
S. aureus from SF and determination of
S. aureus superantigens. Staphylococcal superantigens (TSST, enterotoxins A, B, and C) might have a prominent role in children arthritis.
S. aureus toxins might have a role in inducing the arthritis determined from the data obtained in the current investigation.
S. aureus is the most common cause of nosocomial and community acquired infection in children. The risk of emergence of methicillin-resistant strains causing community-acquired infections is widespread worldwide.
Skin and soft tissue infections as well as bone and joint involvement are frequent in children. Superantigens which are produced by Gram-positive and negative bacteria are microbial proteins that are able to stimulate T-cell population in a non-specific way. Superantigens had the potency to induce inflammation by extensive cytokine release after T-cell stimulation, T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and finally tissue damage. MHC class II molecules serve as superantigen receptors. Superantigens have a high affinity for binding to the alfa-chain of the MHC class II molecule, whereas the carboxy-terminal site is responsible for a strong binding to the T cell receptor (TCR). S. aureus secretes toxins leading to specific diseases: enterotoxins cause food-poisoning and exofoliatines causes generalized exfoliation and bullous impetigo.
Staphylococcal toxins have the capacity to act as superantigens, bypassing normal antigen processing, provoking polyclonal activation of a large number of T cells, and the release of cytokines. It has been shown that superantigens stimulate B-cells to increase production of allergen-specific IgE. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome is caused by a group of superantigens that includes toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) and staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, and C (7, 8). Floret et al. discussed the clinical manifestations of streptococcal and staphylococcal toxinic diseases (
7). This polyclonal activation has been observed in some pediatric diseases of unknown origin, it has strong evidence in Kawasaki syndrome, probable effect in sudden death syndrome in infants and in acute exacerbations of atopic eczema and psoriasis. TSST-1 is a superantigen which can also be immunogenic. In patients with atopic dermatitis neutralizing anti-TSST-1-IgG antibodies anti-toxin-IgE antibodies are detectable. These toxins, released by some
S. aureus strains, are a cause of the toxic shock syndrome (TSS). The disease may develop during any staphylococcal infection like a super infection of a skin disease.
Recent studies determined the involvement of
S. aureus enterotoxins in lower airway diseases such as severe asthma and exacerbated chronic lung diseases, probable exposure to staphylococcal exotoxins in the blood and polyp tissue of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (
7-
10). Superantigens produced by
S. aureus are one of the most lethal toxins 7, therefore it is very important to have easier and quicker tests to determine the toxin production pattern of
S. aureus. Some conventional methods such as ELISA, immunodiffusion or agglutination test to detect
S. aureus toxins are available now. Indeed, the new sensitive and specific method (PCR) is introduced by some authors. Sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test has been reported from 82% to 100%. Recently, a multiplex-PCR test has been reported, which is able to detect the toxin-producing capacity of staphylococcal strains rapidly (
8-
12). Arad et al. and Kaempfer et al. studies defined the antagonist activity of this peptide, thus identifies a novel domain in superantigens that is critical for their toxic action (
9-
12).
Iwamoto et al. reported the effects of chemokines in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients (10). Schutyser et al. found that monocytes respond to Gram-positive bacterial infections by producing CCL18/PARC in the synovial cavity (
11). Here, a possible role for staphylococcal toxins (superantigens) was defined in arthritis cases without isolation of organisms from synovial fluid. Unlike conventional antigens, staphylococcal toxins can bypass antigen processing by binding to a specific groove outside the usual peptide-binding site of MHC II which are able to bridge MHC II with the (TCR) unleashing robust T cell activation. Whether or not staphylococcal toxins (superantigens) play a pathogenic role without direct invasion of the microorganism needs future larger studies on the
S. aureus superantigens. The current study agrees with Li et al. (
3) and Wang et al. (
2) that the confirmatory diagnostic test (PCR) would be helpful to decrease the false negative cultures with strong clinical suspicion of infection or other inflammatory conditions.
Due to failure in isolation of bacteria, the current study preferred to use complementary methods in children. These results would be valuable information as there is no similar study looking at the staphylococcal toxins in SF of children with arthritis. All data based on the assumption criteria in patients have been correctly categorized to the culture or Gram-stain. These data are critical as all further roles for staphylococcal toxins (superantigens) in children with arthritis (and negative SF culture). The main limitation of the study was the small study population, especially in younger age (< 2 years). This is further complicated by the relatively low number of laboratory confirmed cases of bacterial arthritis in the study. Confirmatory diagnostic test (PCR) to decrease the false negative cultures was not used.
5.1. Ethics Consideration
Ethical Committee in the Research Center of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences) reviewed and approved the waiver of authorization to use the Protected Health Information (PHI) for research purposes of the following study (Ethics code number: MT 207). The following requested PHI was necessary to conduct the study. Insertion of the patient information to be used or disclosed, or attach documentation of the information. The use or disclosure of PHI involves no more than minimal risk. Granting the waiver will not adversely affect privacy rights and welfare of the individuals whose records will be used. The project could not be practicably conducted without a waiver and use of PHI. The privacy risks are reasonable relative to the anticipated benefits of the research. An adequate plan to protect identifiers from improper use and disclosure is included in the research proposal. An adequate plan to destroy the identifiers at the earliest opportunity, or justification for retaining identifiers, is included in the research proposal. The project plan includes written assurances that PHI will not be re-used or disclosed for other purposes. Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation.