https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.11858

Yeast Colonization and Drug Susceptibility Pattern in the Pediatric Patients With Neutropenia

authors:

avatar Pedram Haddadi 1 , avatar Soheila Zareifar 2 , avatar Parisa Badiee 3 , * , avatar Abdolvahab Alborzi 3 , avatar Maral Mokhtari 2 , avatar Kamiar Zomorodian 4 , avatar Keyvan Pakshir 4 , avatar Hadis Jafarian 3

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
Hematology Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
Alborzi Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran
Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.7, issue 9; e11858
published online: September 1, 2014
article type: Research Article
received: May 1, 2013
revised: August 10, 2013
accepted: November 19, 2013

how to cite: Haddadi P, Zareifar S, Badiee P, Alborzi A, Mokhtari M, et al. Yeast Colonization and Drug Susceptibility Pattern in the Pediatric Patients With Neutropenia. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(9):e11858. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.11858.

Abstract

Background:

Pediatric patients with neutropenia are vulnerable to invasive Candida infections. Candida is the primary cause of fungal infections, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Candida albicans has been the most common etiologic agent of these infections, affecting 48% of patients

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to identify Candida spp. isolated from children with neutropenia and determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern of the isolated yeasts.

Patients and Methods:

In this study 188 children with neutropenia were recruited, fungal surveillance cultures were carried out on nose, oropharynx, stool, and urine samples. Identification of Candida strains was performed using germ tube and chlamydospore production tests on an API 20 C AUX system. Susceptibility testing on seven antifungal agents was performed using the agar-based E-test method.

Results:

A total of 229 yeasts were isolated. Among those, C. albicans was the most common species followed by C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. famata, C. dubliniensis, C. kefyr, and other Candida species. C.glabrata was the most resistant isolated yeasts, which was 70% resistant to fluconazole and 50% to itraconazole, 7.5% to amphotericin B and 14% to ketoconazole. All the tested species were mostly sensitive to caspofungin.

Conclusions:

Knowledge about the susceptibility patterns of colonized Candida spp. can be helpful for clinicians to manage pediatric patients with neutropenia. In this study, caspofungin was the most effective antifungal agent against the colonized Candida spp. followed by conventional amphotericin B.

1. Background

Opportunistic invasive Candida infection has considerably increased over the recent decades, with repercussions on morbidity and mortality and increases in related healthcare costs. Candida is the primary cause of fungal infections, particularly in immunosuppressed patients. Candida infection rates in hospital wards have increased from 3.2 cases per 1000 admissions during 1997 – 1999 to 5.5 per 1000 admissions during 2000 – 2002 and 6.9 per 1000 admissions during 2003 – 2005 (1). Candidaalbicans has been the most common etiologic agent of these infections, affecting 48% of patients (2), but recent studies have reported a relative shift toward non-albicans Candida spp. and a reduction in C. albicans infections. For example, C. parapsilosis was found to be the predominant species causing infections in pediatric ICU, suggesting nosocomial transmission (3).

In hospitalized patients, prior Candida colonization is considered as a major predisposing factor for the development of systemic candidiasis (4-6). The prophylactic antifungal agents have been used to prevent fungal colonization and invasive infections (7), and the efficacy of isolation measures in colonized patients has been assessed as an adjunct to routine infection control to avert Candida transmission to patients (8). Nonetheless, the risk is compounded with increasing resistance of Candida spp. to available antifungal agents (4), as previously stated in several studies (9, 10). New antifungal agents have produced, but the effectiveness of various azoles, especially for the treatment of systemic candidiasis in pediatric patients has not been fully evaluated. In neutropenic patients with infection, invasive sampling to diagnose the etiologic agent is quite impossible because of the decreased platelet and white blood cell counts; hence, empirical therapy is often used in this population. Therefore, information on the distribution and susceptibility patterns of predominant Candida spp. colonization could be helpful for clinicians to manage these patients.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to identify Candida spp. isolated from pediatric patients with neutropenia and to determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern of the isolated yeasts.

3. Patients and Methods

This prospective study was conducted between March 2011 and March 2012 to investigate the fungal colonization and drug susceptibility patterns of isolated fungi from patients treated in Amir Hospital, a large tertiary-care referral pediatric hematology/oncology center in Shiraz university of medical sciences, Southern Iran. This study comprised of 188 pediatric patients (87 girls and 101 boys) with a mean white cell count of 3886 cell/mL (range: 170 – 20300 cell/mL). Most of the patients had acute leukemia including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and underwent chemotherapy and/or hospitalizations. Many of patients had a history of antifungal prophylaxis administration.

Specimens were obtained from nose, oropharynx, stool, and urine of patients for fungal surveillance cultures. Samples were plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 24°C for 10 days. The purity of the isolate was evaluated by culturing the isolates on potato dextrose agar (OXOID LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) twice for 48 hours at 35°C. The identification of Candida strains was performed using germ tube, chlamydospore production tests, and by analyzing the carbohydrate assimilation reactions on the API 20 C AUX system (bioMeriéux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Two Candida spp., including C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used as controls.

Susceptibility testing against amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, and posaconazole was performed using an agar-based E-test method (bioMeriéux, Solna, Sweden). Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI ) 1640, supplemented with 1.5% agar and 2% glucose at pH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS), was used to then inoculated by dipping a sterile swab into an inoculum suspension adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity (106 cells/ mL) and streaking the agar in three directions. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each drug was determined after 24 and 48 hours of incubation at 35°C. The tested concentrations of each drug ranged from 0.002 to 32 µg/mL, with the exception of fluconazole, with concentrations of 0.016 to 256 µg/mL. For caspofungin, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, fluconazole, and ketoconazole, the MIC was based on significant inhibition of 80% of growth. For amphotericin B, the MIC was determined as the point of complete inhibition (100%). The resistance breakpoints for the antifungals were as follows: fluconazole ≥ 64, ketoconazole ≥ 4.0, itraconazole ≥ 1.0, voriconazole ≥ 8.0, amphotericin B > 1.0 and caspofungin > 2.0 µg/mL (11-16). The resistant breakpoint for posaconazole is not established as per CLSI document M27-A3 (12). The MIC50 and MIC90 (ie, the MIC at which 50% and 90% of isolates are inhibited) were also calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 16) and were analyzed using descriptive statistics and cross tabulation.

3.1. Ethical Considerations

The Ethics Committee of the Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, reviewed and approved the study. Written informed consents were obtained from the parents of all pediatric patients who participated in the study.

4. Results

In this study, 188 patients with neutropenia including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 122), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 18), Burkitt lymphoma (n = 18), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 13), megaloblastic anemia (n = 9), and aplastic anemia (n = 8) were entered . The mean age, white blood cell count and the number of chemotherapy treatment sessions of the patients were 6.6 years, 3886 cell/mL, and two times, respectively. These patients with clinical complains such as fever, bone pain, cough, pallor, headache, ecchymosis, epistaxis, vomiting, hematuria, and chest pain were admitted to the hospital. One hundred and two (54%) patients in at least one stage of previous admission received fluconazole or itraconazole for prophylaxis and nystatin as the mouth washing solution. But amphotericine B and voriconazole were received by 15 patients who were previously suspicious to have fungal infections. As all the patients in this study had the history of admission and neutropenia, the significant relationship between these factors and colonization in the patients cannot be determined.

During the study period, 88 of 188 children with neutropenia had colonized Candida spp. that is an overall colonization rate of 46.8%. Among the various hematologic disorders affecting the patients, the highest percentage of Candida colonization was found among those with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Colonization of the oral cavity was significantly more frequent in comparison to the other investigated body parts. Characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Candida Isolated from Different Specimens

Site of BodyEtiologic Agent (Isolates No.)
Oral C. albicans (53), C. dubliniensis (6), C. tropicalis (3), C. krusei (3), C. parabsilosis (3), Other (20)
StoolC. albicans (34), C. famata (5), C. tropicalis (5), C. krusei (6), Cryptococcus spp.(6), Other (21)
Nose C. albicans (14), C. dubliniensis (1), C. krusei (2), C. famata (3), C. glabrata (4)
UrineC. albicans (16), C. famata (4), C. glabrata (5), C. krusei (6), Cryptococcus spp.(3), Other (6)

Candida spp. were isolated from more than one body site of 26 (29.5%) patients, and in some cases, more than one species was isolated from each site. Overall, 229 yeasts were isolated. C.albicans was the most common species detected in 117 samples (51.2%), followed by C. krusei isolated from 18 patients (7.9%), C. glabrata from 14 (6.3%), C. tropicalis from 11 (4.7%), C. famata from 11 (4.7%), C. parapsilosis from 8 (3.5%), C. dubliniensis from 6 (2.4%), C. kefyr from 4 (1.8% ), Cryptococcus including C. terreus and C. laurentii from 16 (7%) patients and the other Candida species, including C. guilliermondii, C. rugosa, C. lusitaniae, C. lambica, as well as Rhodotorula spp. was isolated from 24 (10.5%) patients.

C. albicans, the most frequently isolated species, was sensitive to amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and caspofungin with the following sensitivities 97%, 88%, 94%, 72%, 92.4%, and 97%, respectively. C.glabrata was the most resistant isolated yeasts, with resistance rates of 70% to fluconazole, 50% to itraconazole, 7.5% to amphotericin B and 14% to ketoconazole. All the fungal species exhibited highest sensitivity to caspofungin. The detected 16 Cryptococcus isolates were divided into two subspecies; C. terreus and C. laurentii. The results of antifungal susceptibility tests by E-test in Candida isolates are shown in Table 2. The lowest MIC90 was observed against caspofungin.

Table 2.

Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida spp a

Antifungal AgentSpeciesIsolates No.MIC50 (µg/mL)MIC90 (µg/mL)RangeResistance No. (%)
AmphotericinC. albicans1170.50.750.047 - 1.54 (3%)
C. krusei180.2510.38 - 65 (1%)
C. glabrata140.250.750.25 - 61 (7.5%)
Cryptococcus spp.160.3810.016 - 22 (11%)
FluconazoleC. albicans1171.52560.094 - 25614 (12%)
C. krusei181612816 - 2568 (40%)
C. glabrata141612816 - 25610(70%)
Cryptococcus spp.162162 - 2566 (33%)
VoriconazoleC. albicans1170.12580.003 - 327 (6%)
C. krusei180.520.125 - 322 (10%)
C. glabrata141.520.75 - 323 (21%)
Cryptococcus spp.160.12530.016 - 30
ItraconazoleC. albicans1170.032320.016 - 3236 (28%)
C. krusei180.7540.19 - 326 (30%)
C. glabrata140.7514 - 327 (50%)
Cryptococcus spp.160.75320.023 - 328 (50%)
KetoconazoleC. albicans1170.125320.016 - 329 (7.6%)
C. krusei18341 - 322 (11%)
C. glabrata141.542 - 322 (14%)
Cryptococcus spp.161.5120.032 - 326 (33%)
Posaconazole C. albicans1170.04780.008 - 32b
C. krusei180.7520.008 - 32
C. glabrata143281 - 32
Cryptococcus spp.160.03210.032 - 32
CaspofunginC. albicans1170.0940.1250.032 - 84 (3%)
C. krusei180.1250.750.032 - 40 (0%)
C. glabrata140.0940.190.064 - 0.190
Cryptococcus spp.160.0941.50.032 - 41 (5%)

aSpecies present in small numbers are not mentioned in the table.

b As the breakpoint for posaconazole has not been established as per CLSI document M27-A312, the percent of resistant cases was not reported and only the MIC was reported.

5. Discussion

Patients with neutropenia and prior candidiasis are at high risk for developing systemic candidiasis (17). In this study, we investigated the major epidemiological characteristics of Candida colonization in children with neutropenia and their history of hospital admissions and chemotherapy. There is obvious that Candida colonization is a risk factor for developing invasive Candida infections (18) and candidemia in hospitalized patients. In one study, the reported rate of nosocomial candidemia increased more than 2-fold over the 9-year-study period (1), and in another, nosocomial candidemia was diagnosed in 6.9% of colonized neonates, compared with 0.76% of non-colonized neonates (19). The central nervous system, eyes, and other organs can also be infected by spreading of the infecting agent through the blood. In a previous study, the overall reported mortality rate associated with candidemia was 10.7% (20).

In the present study, 46.8% of pediatric patients were infected with Candida spp., 12.1% of neonates (19), 12.4% of infants (20), and 55.2% of adults with hematological malignancies were reported to have Candida colonization (6). The most commonly colonized sites in the present study were the oral cavity and rectum, which was in accordance to the findings of the other studies (6, 20). Among the Candida species isolated in the present report, 51.2% were identified as C. albicans. In other studies, C. albicans have been detected in 50% (21), 64.2% (20), 48.6% (22), 42% (19), and 55% (10) of cases. In blood cultures, C. albicans accounted for 37.2% (1) and 39.2% (23) of isolated Candida spp.. In this study the isolation rate of non-albicans Candida was 48.8%, whereas 35.8% (20) and 78.2% (24) have been previously reported in the literature. The mortality associated with C. albicans (37.5%) is reported to be significantly higher than with non-albicans species (17.7%) (1); therefore, it is important to identify the etiologic species of this infections. In our study, Cryptococcus spp. accounted for 7% of the isolates. Colonization with this yeast has been less extensively described. The increased use of antifungals in immunocompromised patients, mainly for prophylaxis, is considered as the strongest causative factor changing the distribution of these agents, which have subsequently affected the mortality and the choice of empirical treatments (25).

Resistance to antifungal agents is associated with high mortality rate in immunocompromised and at-risk hospitalized patients. These agents could be categorized into primary, acquired, and clinical resistant ones. Primary resistance to antifungal agents is known as intrinsic and occurs when the organism is naturally resistant to the antifungal agent, such as C. krusei, which is known to be universally resistant to fluconazole (26). Acquired resistance develops during treatment, and is often the result of genetic mutations (27). Clinical resistance, i.e., failure of anti-fungal therapy, depends on a variety of factors, such as the host immune system, pharmacokinetics of the antifungal agent, and the species involving in fungal infection. Intrinsic resistance to amphotericin B is rare and acquired resistance during therapy is even less common (28, 29). C.glabrata and C. krusei tend to have higher MICs than C. albicans, and a small proportion of them have been found to be resistant to amphotericin B with MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL (30). C.glabrata with amphotericin B MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL was reported in less than 1% of USA and in 4.4% of European isolates (31). Furthermore, difficulty in the treatment of infection with C. glabrata, which is often resistant to many azole antifungal agents, especially fluconazole, is also reported (32). Recent studies have revealed that the MICs of triazoles, voriconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, for C. glabrata were higher than those by most other Candida species (10, 21, 22).

Amphotericin B is recommended as the first-line therapy for invasive mycoses, and is commonly used in pediatric wards (24). The use of this drug is limited by the toxicity of the conventional formulation and the high amount of the lipid emulsions. In the present study, susceptibility testing revealed that all isolates of C. albicans were more sensitive to amphotericin B and caspofungin than to the other studied antifungal agents. However, resistance to amphotericin B was seen in 1% of C. krusei and 7.5% of C. glabrata isolates. In one study, amphotericin B resistance was found in nearly 20% of C. parapsilosis isolates (33).

Triazole alters the fungal cell membrane by inhibiting ergosterol synthesis through an interaction with 14-demethylase, which leads to alterations in cellular permeability and a loss of membrane fluidity and integrity (34). The currently available triazole antifungals include fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and posaconazole. Resistance to azoles was found in all Candida spp., with species-specific trends. Gene mutations related to ATP dependent pumps CDR genes in Candida spp. appears to confer resistance to multiple azoles and have been associated with fluconazole treatment, and cross-resistance with other azoles may also be possible (34, 35), which was well documented by molecular methods (36). According to previous studies, resistance to older azoles is commonly reported by C. krusei and C. glabrata (21, 22).

In the present study, fluconazole resistance was observed in 12%, 40%, and 70% of C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. glabrata isolates and resistance to itraconazole was found in nearly 28%, 30% and 50% of C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. glabrata strains, respectively, these amounts are consistent with the findings reported in previous studies (2, 21). Cross-resistance between the new and former azoles is a concern, such as fluconazole-voriconazole and itraconazole-posaconazole (37, 38). In the present study, voriconazole and fluconazole resistance was observed in 10% of C. krusei and 21% of C. glabrata isolates. Posaconazole is the newest orally administered triazole antifungal with an extended spectrum of activities. Due to cross activity between this antifungal agent and other azoles, the MICs for many Candida spp. were higher than 2 µg/mL in this study.

Our findings showed that the new antifungal agents are effective for the treatment of yeast infections. Echinocandins such as caspofungin are active against many fungal species and have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis. In our study, caspofungin was the most effective agent, with lower MIC50 and MIC90 values against all the Candida spp. studied. Several prophylactic antifungal agents are produced to reduce the Candida species colonization and associated morbidity and mortality in patients at risk of developing this infection. Knowledge about the susceptibility patterns of colonized Candida spp. can be helpful for the clinicians who chose the best therapeutic option to manage the high-risk patients. We found that caspofungin was the best antifungal agent against Candida colonization for pediatric patients with hematological disorders and neutropenia, followed by conventional amphotericin B.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Celebi S, Hacimustafaoglu M, Ozdemir O, Ozkaya G. Nosocomial candidaemia in children: results of a 9-year study. Mycoses. 2008;51(3):248-57. [PubMed ID: 18399906]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01464.x.

  • 2.

    Badiee P, Kordbacheh P, Alborzi A, Zakernia M, Haddadi P. Early detection of systemic candidiasis in the whole blood of patients with hematologic malignancies. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62(1):1-5. [PubMed ID: 19168950].

  • 3.

    San Miguel LG, Cobo J, Otheo E, Sanchez-Sousa A, Abraira V, Moreno S. Secular trends of candidemia in a large tertiary-care hospital from 1988 to 2000: emergence of Candida parapsilosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26(6):548-52. [PubMed ID: 16018430]. https://doi.org/10.1086/502582.

  • 4.

    Marodi L, Johnston RB, Jr. Invasive Candida species disease in infants and children: occurrence, risk factors, management, and innate host defense mechanisms. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(6):693-7. [PubMed ID: 18025938]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f1dde9.

  • 5.

    Saiman L, Ludington E, Dawson JD, Patterson JE, Rangel-Frausto S, Wiblin RT, et al. Risk factors for Candida species colonization of neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(12):1119-24. [PubMed ID: 11740316].

  • 6.

    Kaufman D, Boyle R, Hazen KC, Patrie JT, Robinson M, Donowitz LG. Fluconazole prophylaxis against fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(23):1660-6. [PubMed ID: 11759644]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010494.

  • 7.

    Pammi M, Eddama O, Weisman LE. Patient isolation measures for infants with candida colonization or infection for preventing or reducing transmission of candida in neonatal units. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD006068. [PubMed ID: 22071827]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006068.pub3.

  • 8.

    Zomorodian K, Rahimi MJ, Pakshir K, Motamedi M, Ghiasi MR, Rezashah H. Determination of antifungal susceptibility patterns among the clinical isolates of Candida species. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3(4):357-60. [PubMed ID: 22223999]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777X.91059.

  • 9.

    Shokohi T, Bandalizadeh Z, Hedayati MT, Mayahi S. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from oropharyngeal lesions of patients with cancer to some antifungal agents. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2011;4(2):S19-26.

  • 10.

    Badiee P, Alborzi A. Susceptibility of clinical Candida species isolates to antifungal agents by E-test, Southern Iran: A five year study. Iran J Microbiol. 2011;3(4):183-8. [PubMed ID: 22530086].

  • 11.

    Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida spp. to caspofungin: four years of global surveillance. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):760-3. [PubMed ID: 16517851]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.3.760-763.2006.

  • 12.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. USA; 2008.M27-A3. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast.

  • 13.

    Blignaut E, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA. Antifungal susceptibility of South African oral yeast isolates from HIV/AIDS patients and healthy individuals. Diagn Microbiol Infec Dis. 2002;44(2):169-74.

  • 14.

    Davey KG, Holmes AD, Johnson EM, Szekely A, Warnock DW. Comparative evaluation of FUNGITEST and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(4):926-30. [PubMed ID: 9542910].

  • 15.

    Swinne D, Watelle M, Van der Flaes M, Nolard N. In vitro activities of voriconazole (UK-109, 496), fluconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B against 132 non-albicans bloodstream yeast isolates (CANARI study). Mycoses. 2004;47(5-6):177-83. [PubMed ID: 15189180]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2004.00971.x.

  • 16.

    Sabatelli F, Patel R, Mann PA, Mendrick CA, Norris CC, Hare R, et al. In vitro activities of posaconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against a large collection of clinically important molds and yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(6):2009-15. [PubMed ID: 16723559]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00163-06.

  • 17.

    Maa SH, Lee HL, Huang YC, Wu JH, Tsou TS, MacDonald K, et al. Incidence density and relative risk of nosocomial infection in Taiwan's Only Children's Hospital, 1999-2003. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(8):767-70. [PubMed ID: 18690787]. https://doi.org/10.1086/589724.

  • 18.

    Badiee P, Alborzi A, Joukar M. Molecular assay to detect nosocomial fungal infections in intensive care units. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22(6):611-5. [PubMed ID: 22075290]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2011.08.025.

  • 19.

    Farmaki E, Evdoridou J, Pouliou T, Bibashi E, Panagopoulou P, Filioti J, et al. Fungal colonization in the neonatal intensive care unit: risk factors, drug susceptibility, and association with invasive fungal infections. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(2):127-35. [PubMed ID: 17304423]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970078.

  • 20.

    Lopes MM, Barros R, Peres I, Serelha M, Neto MT, Cabrita J, et al. Surveillance of nosocomial fungal infections in a Portuguese paediatric hospital: incidence and risk factors. J Med Mycol. 2006;16(4):212-9.

  • 21.

    Badiee P, Alborzi A, Davarpanah MA, Shakiba E. Distributions and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species from mucosal sites in HIV positive patients. Arch Iran Med. 2010;13(4):282-7. [PubMed ID: 20597560].

  • 22.

    Badiee P, Alborzi A, Shakiba E, Farshad S, Japoni A. Susceptibility of Candida species isolated from immunocompromised patients to antifungal agents. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(5):425-30. [PubMed ID: 21796956].

  • 23.

    Bakir M, Cerikcioglu N, Barton R, Yagci A. Epidemiology of candidemia in a Turkish tertiary care hospital. APMIS. 2006;114(9):601-10. [PubMed ID: 16948812]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2006.apm_359.x.

  • 24.

    Pasqualotto AC, Nedel WL, Machado TS, Severo LC. A 9-year study comparing risk factors and the outcome of paediatric and adults with nosocomial candidaemia. Mycopathologia. 2005;160(2):111-6. [PubMed ID: 16170605]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-005-3452-1.

  • 25.

    Filioti J, Spiroglou K, Panteliadis CP, Roilides E. Invasive candidiasis in pediatric intensive care patients: epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(7):1272-83. [PubMed ID: 17503015]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0672-5.

  • 26.

    Wingard JR, Merz WG, Rinaldi MG, Johnson TR, Karp JE, Saral R. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(18):1274-7. [PubMed ID: 1669837]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199110313251803.

  • 27.

    Masia Canuto M, Gutierrez Rodero F. Antifungal drug resistance to azoles and polyenes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(9):550-63. [PubMed ID: 12206971].

  • 28.

    Sanglard D, Odds FC. Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(2):73-85. [PubMed ID: 11901654].

  • 29.

    Dannaoui E, Lortholary O, Dromer F. In vitro evaluation of double and triple combinations of antifungal drugs against Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus terreus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(3):970-8. [PubMed ID: 14982791].

  • 30.

    Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, Filler SG, Pappas PG, Dismukes WE, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(4):662-78. [PubMed ID: 10770728]. https://doi.org/10.1086/313749.

  • 31.

    Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ. Geographic variation in the susceptibilities of invasive isolates of Candida glabrata to seven systemically active antifungal agents: a global assessment from the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program conducted in 2001 and 2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(7):3142-6. [PubMed ID: 15243073]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.7.3142-3146.2004.

  • 32.

    Fidel PL, Jr, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(1):80-96. [PubMed ID: 9880475].

  • 33.

    Zaoutis TE, Foraker E, McGowan KL, Mortensen J, Campos J, Walsh TJ, et al. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric patients: a survey of 4 children's hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;52(4):295-8. [PubMed ID: 15922535]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.03.002.

  • 34.

    Carrillo-Munoz AJ, Giusiano G, Ezkurra PA, Quindos G. Antifungal agents: mode of action in yeast cells. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2006;19(2):130-9. [PubMed ID: 16964330].

  • 35.

    Perea S, Lopez-Ribot JL, Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Santillan RA, Martinez M, et al. Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(10):2676-84. [PubMed ID: 11557454]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.10.2676-2684.2001.

  • 36.

    Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M, Fiori B, La Sorda M, Spanu T, Sanglard D, et al. Caspofungin activity against clinical isolates of azole cross-resistant Candida glabrata overexpressing efflux pump genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(2):458-61. [PubMed ID: 16757500]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl237.

  • 37.

    White TC, Holleman S, Dy F, Mirels LF, Stevens DA. Resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(6):1704-13. [PubMed ID: 12019079].

  • 38.

    Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Jones RN, Diekema DJ. In vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole compared with those of four approved systemic antifungal agents against 6,970 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(6):1723-7. [PubMed ID: 12019081].