Patients with neutropenia and prior candidiasis are at high risk for developing systemic candidiasis (
17). In this study, we investigated the major epidemiological characteristics of
Candida colonization in children with neutropenia and their history of hospital admissions and chemotherapy. There is obvious that
Candida colonization is a risk factor for developing invasive
Candida infections (
18) and candidemia in hospitalized patients. In one study, the reported rate of nosocomial candidemia increased more than 2-fold over the 9-year-study period (
1), and in another, nosocomial candidemia was diagnosed in 6.9% of colonized neonates, compared with 0.76% of non-colonized neonates (
19). The central nervous system, eyes, and other organs can also be infected by spreading of the infecting agent through the blood. In a previous study, the overall reported mortality rate associated with candidemia was 10.7% (
20).
In the present study, 46.8% of pediatric patients were infected with
Candida spp., 12.1% of neonates (
19), 12.4% of infants (
20), and 55.2% of adults with hematological malignancies were reported to have Candida colonization (
6). The most commonly colonized sites in the present study were the oral cavity and rectum, which was in accordance to the findings of the other studies (
6,
20). Among the
Candida species isolated in the present report, 51.2% were identified as
C. albicans. In other studies,
C. albicans have been detected in 50% (
21), 64.2% (
20), 48.6% (
22), 42% (
19), and 55% (
10) of cases. In blood cultures,
C. albicans accounted for 37.2% (
1) and 39.2% (
23) of isolated
Candida spp.. In this study the isolation rate of non-albicans
Candida was 48.8%, whereas 35.8% (
20) and 78.2% (
24) have been previously reported in the literature. The mortality associated with
C. albicans (37.5%) is reported to be significantly higher than with non-albicans species (17.7%) (
1); therefore, it is important to identify the etiologic species of this infections. In our study,
Cryptococcus spp. accounted for 7% of the isolates. Colonization with this yeast has been less extensively described. The increased use of antifungals in immunocompromised patients, mainly for prophylaxis, is considered as the strongest causative factor changing the distribution of these agents, which have subsequently affected the mortality and the choice of empirical treatments (
25).
Resistance to antifungal agents is associated with high mortality rate in immunocompromised and at-risk hospitalized patients. These agents could be categorized into primary, acquired, and clinical resistant ones. Primary resistance to antifungal agents is known as intrinsic and occurs when the organism is naturally resistant to the antifungal agent, such as
C. krusei, which is known to be universally resistant to fluconazole (
26). Acquired resistance develops during treatment, and is often the result of genetic mutations (
27). Clinical resistance, i.e., failure of anti-fungal therapy, depends on a variety of factors, such as the host immune system, pharmacokinetics of the antifungal agent, and the species involving in fungal infection. Intrinsic resistance to amphotericin B is rare and acquired resistance during therapy is even less common (
28,
29).
C.glabrata and
C. krusei tend to have higher MICs than
C. albicans, and a small proportion of them have been found to be resistant to amphotericin B with MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL (
30).
C.glabrata with amphotericin B MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL was reported in less than 1% of USA and in 4.4% of European isolates (
31). Furthermore, difficulty in the treatment of infection with
C. glabrata, which is often resistant to many azole antifungal agents, especially fluconazole, is also reported (
32). Recent studies have revealed that the MICs of triazoles, voriconazole, itraconazole and fluconazole, for
C. glabrata were higher than those by most other
Candida species (
10,
21,
22).
Amphotericin B is recommended as the first-line therapy for invasive mycoses, and is commonly used in pediatric wards (
24). The use of this drug is limited by the toxicity of the conventional formulation and the high amount of the lipid emulsions. In the present study, susceptibility testing revealed that all isolates of
C. albicans were more sensitive to amphotericin B and caspofungin than to the other studied antifungal agents. However, resistance to amphotericin B was seen in 1% of
C. krusei and 7.5% of
C. glabrata isolates. In one study, amphotericin B resistance was found in nearly 20% of
C. parapsilosis isolates (
33).
Triazole alters the fungal cell membrane by inhibiting ergosterol synthesis through an interaction with 14-demethylase, which leads to alterations in cellular permeability and a loss of membrane fluidity and integrity (
34). The currently available triazole antifungals include fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and posaconazole. Resistance to azoles was found in all
Candida spp., with species-specific trends. Gene mutations related to ATP dependent pumps CDR genes in
Candida spp. appears to confer resistance to multiple azoles and have been associated with fluconazole treatment, and cross-resistance with other azoles may also be possible (
34,
35), which was well documented by molecular methods (
36). According to previous studies, resistance to older azoles is commonly reported by
C. krusei and
C. glabrata (
21,
22).
In the present study, fluconazole resistance was observed in 12%, 40%, and 70% of
C. albicans,
C. krusei, and
C. glabrata isolates and resistance to itraconazole was found in nearly 28%, 30% and 50% of
C. albicans,
C. krusei, and
C. glabrata strains, respectively, these amounts are consistent with the findings reported in previous studies (
2,
21). Cross-resistance between the new and former azoles is a concern, such as fluconazole-voriconazole and itraconazole-posaconazole (
37,
38). In the present study, voriconazole and fluconazole resistance was observed in 10% of
C. krusei and 21% of
C. glabrata isolates. Posaconazole is the newest orally administered triazole antifungal with an extended spectrum of activities. Due to cross activity between this antifungal agent and other azoles, the MICs for many
Candida spp. were higher than 2 µg/mL in this study.
Our findings showed that the new antifungal agents are effective for the treatment of yeast infections. Echinocandins such as caspofungin are active against many fungal species and have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis. In our study, caspofungin was the most effective agent, with lower MIC50 and MIC90 values against all the Candida spp. studied. Several prophylactic antifungal agents are produced to reduce the Candida species colonization and associated morbidity and mortality in patients at risk of developing this infection. Knowledge about the susceptibility patterns of colonized Candida spp. can be helpful for the clinicians who chose the best therapeutic option to manage the high-risk patients. We found that caspofungin was the best antifungal agent against Candida colonization for pediatric patients with hematological disorders and neutropenia, followed by conventional amphotericin B.