H. pylori infection is a major cause of gastroduodenal diseases; however, there have been different reports about the prevalence rate of this infection between countries (
1,
10,
11). Several studies from Asia and Middle East including China, South Korea, Iran, and Kuwait have shown that the prevalence of
H. pylori has declined in these areas in the recent years (
10-
13). In the present study,
H. pylori positivity was 31% (
Table 1), which was surprisingly lower than other local reports (
2,
3,
11). In previous reports from Shiraz it was shown that more than 85% of Iranian adults carried IgG against
H. pylori (2). In addition, histological evidence of
H. pylori infection was recorded in 89.2% of biopsies in another report from north of Iran (
3). Recently, in a survey conducted by Farshad et al. (
11) in Iran, the prevalence of
H. pylori in a total of 522 patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation was 47.9%.
Interestingly, the results of this study showed a lower prevalence of
H. pylori in comparison with other reports from Asia and Middle East. Goh (
14) reported that the overall prevalence rate of
H. pylori in a Malaysian population with dyspepsia was 49.0%. In this study, two antral biopsies were performed for diagnosis of
H. pylori, using a rapid urease test. In Alazmi et al. (
12) research in Kuwait, an overall prevalence rate of 49.7% was reported in 362 patients with dyspepsia. In another report from India, Poddar and Yachha (
6) demonstrated that almost 80% of the population in India was infected with
H. pylori. Ahmed et al. (
20) also showed that the overall prevalence of
H. pylori in India was 80%. In this study, the diagnosis of
H. pylori was established by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the 16S rRNA gene of
H. pylori. As expected, similar to several other studies (
10-
13) our research showed that the prevalence of
H. pylori was declined.
According to the present study, the most common endoscopic abnormality in
H. pylori-positive patients was ulcerative lesion, comprising groups 3 and 4 (51.2%) (
Table 2).
H. pylori infection can be responsible for gastroduodenal ulcer. This association has been shown in previous studies (
14,
21). Goh (
14) reported that
H. pylori prevalence differed based on endoscopic findings. Similar results were reported in 1990 by Soll (
21). Regarding the sex, this study showed that
H. pylori positivity had predominance in females; however, no significant association between sex and infection rate was shown. A vast variety of results have been reported regarding the predominance of either males or females; but, it is generally concluded that there is no significant association between the infection rate of
H. pylori and sex (
1,
12,
20). There was a significant association between the
H. pylori infection prevalence and age in our study, which was similar to some other researches (
1,
12,
20). The findings of this cross-sectional study on dyspepsia showed a lower prevalence of
H. pylori infection compared to other studies. Abnormal nonulcerative and ulcerative changes constituted the dominant findings in
H. pylori-positive patients. It seems that this lower prevalence of
H. pylori may be due to an improvement in the socioeconomic status of the Iranian population.